Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist

View ORCID ProfileHolly O. Witteman, View ORCID ProfileMichael Hendricks, Sharon Straus, Cara Tannenbaum
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/232868
Holly O. Witteman
1Associate Professor, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada, G1V 0A6
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Holly O. Witteman
Michael Hendricks
2Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, 1205 av du Docteur-Penfield, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, H3A 1B1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Hendricks
Sharon Straus
3Professor, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Canada, M3B 2T9
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cara Tannenbaum
4Scientific Director, Institute for Gender and Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research,Ottawa, Canada, H3A 1W4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Article usage

Article usage: January 2018 to February 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Jan 2018355501062
Feb 201814420402
Mar 201811100276
Apr 20184710170
May 20184990100
Jun 2018160078
Jul 2018396069
Aug 201810190136
Sep 201813650143
Oct 2018290072
Nov 20185920122
Dec 20183150127
Jan 20192270118
Feb 20193050181
Mar 20197905191
Apr 20193054691
May 20191812665
Jun 20191453074
Jul 20191652388
Aug 20191433632
Oct 20192653767
Nov 20192062655
Dec 20192104741
Jan 20201932257
Feb 20202634759
Mar 20201763259
May 20201731655
Jun 20201142935
Jul 20201073046
Aug 20201062337
Sep 20201551831
Oct 20201802148
Nov 20201433151
Dec 20201876454
Jan 20211791444
Feb 20211043931
Mar 20212025343
Apr 20211261525
May 20211281947
Jun 2021971324
Jul 2021105736
Aug 2021871643
Sep 20211001340
Oct 20211843149
Nov 2021981043
Dec 20211271429
Jan 20221692831
Feb 2022128832
Mar 2022128952
Apr 20221092548
May 20221062423
Jun 2022971025
Jul 2022791020
Aug 202260614
Sep 202289722
Oct 2022871022
Nov 202297727
Dec 202269322
Jan 2023651038
Feb 20231204
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 12, 2017.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist
Holly O. Witteman, Michael Hendricks, Sharon Straus, Cara Tannenbaum
bioRxiv 232868; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/232868
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist
Holly O. Witteman, Michael Hendricks, Sharon Straus, Cara Tannenbaum
bioRxiv 232868; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/232868

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Scientific Communication and Education
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4105)
  • Biochemistry (8808)
  • Bioengineering (6509)
  • Bioinformatics (23446)
  • Biophysics (11784)
  • Cancer Biology (9200)
  • Cell Biology (13314)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7430)
  • Ecology (11403)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15143)
  • Genetics (10430)
  • Genomics (14036)
  • Immunology (9167)
  • Microbiology (22142)
  • Molecular Biology (8802)
  • Neuroscience (47539)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1427)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2489)
  • Physiology (3729)
  • Plant Biology (8076)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2220)
  • Systems Biology (6036)
  • Zoology (1252)