Article Information
History
- January 19, 2018.
Article Versions
- Version 1 (December 12, 2017 - 14:45).
- Version 2 (December 22, 2017 - 13:33).
- You are currently viewing Version 3 of this article (January 19, 2018 - 18:47).
- View Version 4, the most recent version of this article.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Author Information
- Holly O. Witteman, PhD1,
- Michael Hendricks, PhD2,
- Sharon Straus, MD FRCPC MSc HBSc3 and
- Cara Tannenbaum, MD MSc4
- 1Associate Professor, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada, G1V 0A6
- 2Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, 1205 av du Docteur-Penfield, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, H3A 1B1
- 3Professor, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Canada, M3B 2T9
- 4Scientific Director, Institute for Gender and Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Canada, H3A 1W4
- Corresponding author: Holly O. Witteman, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry 2881, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada, G1V 0A6, telephone: 418.656.2131 x3981, fax: 418.656.2465, email: holly.witteman{at}fmed.ulaval.ca
Posted January 19, 2018.
Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist
