Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Neural computations combine low- and high-order motion cues similarly, in dragonfly and monkey

Eyal I. Nitzany, Gil Menda, Paul S. Shamble, James R. Golden, Qin Hu, Ron R. Hoy, Jonathan D. Victor
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/240101
Eyal I. Nitzany
1Division of Systems Neurology and Neuroscience, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York NY, 10065, USA
2Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gil Menda
3Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul S. Shamble
3Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James R. Golden
4Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qin Hu
5Microsoft, Redmond, WA 98052, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ron R. Hoy
3Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
Jonathan D. Victor
1Division of Systems Neurology and Neuroscience, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York NY, 10065, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Visual motion analysis is fundamental to survival across the animal kingdom. In insects, our understanding of the underlying computations has centered on the Hassenstein-Reichardt motion detector, which computes two-point cross-correlation via multiplication; in mammalian cortex, it is postulated that a similar signal is computed by comparing matched squaring operations. Both of these operations are difficult to implement biophysically in a precise fashion; moreover, they fail to detect the more complex multipoint local motion cues present in the visual environment. Here, via single-unit recordings in two visual specialists, dragonfly "(Odonata)" and macaque, and via model simulations, we show that neuronal computations are not simply approximations to idealized behaviors forced by biological constraints, but rather, are signatures of a common computational strategy to capture multiple local motion cues. The similarity of motion computations at the neuronal level in the brains of two extremely dissimilar animals, with evolutionary divergence of over 700 Myr1, suggests convergence on a common computational scheme for detecting visual motion.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 28, 2017.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neural computations combine low- and high-order motion cues similarly, in dragonfly and monkey
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Neural computations combine low- and high-order motion cues similarly, in dragonfly and monkey
Eyal I. Nitzany, Gil Menda, Paul S. Shamble, James R. Golden, Qin Hu, Ron R. Hoy, Jonathan D. Victor
bioRxiv 240101; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/240101
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Neural computations combine low- and high-order motion cues similarly, in dragonfly and monkey
Eyal I. Nitzany, Gil Menda, Paul S. Shamble, James R. Golden, Qin Hu, Ron R. Hoy, Jonathan D. Victor
bioRxiv 240101; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/240101

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (6022)
  • Biochemistry (13697)
  • Bioengineering (10429)
  • Bioinformatics (33141)
  • Biophysics (17097)
  • Cancer Biology (14169)
  • Cell Biology (20098)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (10866)
  • Ecology (16008)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (20334)
  • Genetics (13392)
  • Genomics (18629)
  • Immunology (13741)
  • Microbiology (32149)
  • Molecular Biology (13380)
  • Neuroscience (70040)
  • Paleontology (526)
  • Pathology (2188)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3741)
  • Physiology (5860)
  • Plant Biology (12020)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1814)
  • Synthetic Biology (3365)
  • Systems Biology (8163)
  • Zoology (1841)