Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Muscle stem cell intramuscular delivery within hyaluronan methylcellulose improves engraftment efficiency and dispersion

Sadegh Davoudi, Chih-Ying Chin, Michael C. Cooke, Roger Y. Tam, Molly S. Shoichet, Penney M. Gilbert
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/245258
Sadegh Davoudi
1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3G9
2Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3E1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chih-Ying Chin
1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3G9
2Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3E1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael C. Cooke
1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3G9
2Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3E1
3Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 3E5
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Y. Tam
1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3G9
2Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3E1
3Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 3E5
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Molly S. Shoichet
1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3G9
2Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3E1
3Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 3E5
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Penney M. Gilbert
1Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3G9
2Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S3E1
4Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S1A8
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Adult skeletal muscle tissue harbors the capacity for self-repair due to the presence of tissue resident muscle stem cells (MuSCs). Advances in the area of prospective MuSC isolation demonstrated the potential of cell transplantation therapy as a regenerative medicine strategy to restore strength and long-term regenerative capacity to aged, injured, or diseased skeletal muscle tissue. However, cell loss during ejection, limits to post-injection proliferation, and poor donor cell dispersion distal to the injection site are amongst hurdles to overcome to maximize MuSC transplant impact. Here, we assess a physical blend of hyaluronan and methylcellulose (HAMC) as a bioactive, shear thinning hydrogel cell delivery system to improve MuSC transplantation efficiency. Using in vivo transplantation studies, we found that the HAMC delivery system results in a >45% increase in the number of donor-derived fibers as compared to saline delivery. Furthermore, we observed a significant improvement in donor fiber dispersion when transplanted MuSCs were delivered in the HAMC hydrogel. Studies to assess primary myoblast and MuSC viability in HAMC culture revealed no differences compared to the media control even when the cells were first ejected through a syringe and needle or exposed to regenerating skeletal muscle extract to mimic the transplantation procedure. However, when we quantified absolute numbers, we found that more cells pass through the syringe and needle when delivered in HAMC. Culture in HAMC also increased the proportion of MuSCs in cell cycle, via a CD44-independent mechanism. An effect on myoblast proliferation was not observed, suggesting a hierarchical effect. Finally, a series of transplant studies indicated that HAMC delivery does not influence passive cell clearance or alter the host immune response, but instead may serve to support in vivo expansion by delaying differentiation following transplant. Therefore, we conclude that MuSC engraftment efficacy is improved by delivering the therapeutic cell population within HAMC.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 09, 2018.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Muscle stem cell intramuscular delivery within hyaluronan methylcellulose improves engraftment efficiency and dispersion
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Muscle stem cell intramuscular delivery within hyaluronan methylcellulose improves engraftment efficiency and dispersion
Sadegh Davoudi, Chih-Ying Chin, Michael C. Cooke, Roger Y. Tam, Molly S. Shoichet, Penney M. Gilbert
bioRxiv 245258; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/245258
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Muscle stem cell intramuscular delivery within hyaluronan methylcellulose improves engraftment efficiency and dispersion
Sadegh Davoudi, Chih-Ying Chin, Michael C. Cooke, Roger Y. Tam, Molly S. Shoichet, Penney M. Gilbert
bioRxiv 245258; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/245258

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioengineering
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2427)
  • Biochemistry (4784)
  • Bioengineering (3328)
  • Bioinformatics (14656)
  • Biophysics (6629)
  • Cancer Biology (5162)
  • Cell Biology (7417)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4355)
  • Ecology (6869)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9903)
  • Genetics (7338)
  • Genomics (9509)
  • Immunology (4545)
  • Microbiology (12657)
  • Molecular Biology (4936)
  • Neuroscience (28280)
  • Paleontology (199)
  • Pathology (804)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1388)
  • Physiology (2019)
  • Plant Biology (4487)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (976)
  • Synthetic Biology (1297)
  • Systems Biology (3909)
  • Zoology (725)