Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Inference of CRISPR Edits from Sanger Trace Data

Tim Hsiau, David Conant, Nicholas Rossi, Travis Maures, Kelsey Waite, Joyce Yang, Sahil Joshi, Reed Kelso, Kevin Holden, Brittany L Enzmann, View ORCID ProfileRich Stoner
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/251082
Tim Hsiau
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Conant
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Nicholas Rossi
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Travis Maures
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelsey Waite
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joyce Yang
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sahil Joshi
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reed Kelso
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Holden
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brittany L Enzmann
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rich Stoner
Synthego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rich Stoner
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Efficient precision genome editing requires a quick, quantitative, and inexpensive assay of editing outcomes. Here we present ICE (Inference of CRISPR Edits), which enables robust analysis of CRISPR edits using Sanger data. ICE proposes potential outcomes for editing with guide RNAs (gRNAs) and then determines which are supported by the data via regression. Additionally, we develop a score called ICE-D (Discordance) that can provide information on large or unexpected edits. We empirically confirm through over 1,800 edits that the ICE algorithm is robust, reproducible, and can analyze CRISPR experiments within days after transfection. We also confirm that ICE strongly correlates with next-generation sequencing of amplicons (Amp-Seq). The ICE tool is free to use and offers several improvements over current analysis tools. For instance, ICE can analyze individual experiments as well as multiple experiments simultaneously (batch analysis). ICE can also detect a wider variety of outcomes, including multi-guide edits (multiple gRNAs per target) and edits resulting from homology-directed repair (HDR), such as knock-ins and base edits. ICE is a reliable analysis tool that can significantly expedite CRISPR editing workflows. It is available online at ice.synthego.com, and the source code is at github.com/synthego-open/ice

Footnotes

  • This version of the "Inference of CRISPR Edits from Sanger Trace Data" manuscript has been updated with data demonstrating that lasso regression with an L1 parameter of 0.8 decreases the number of false-positive indels detected by ICE. New data illustrating a strong correlation between Amp-seq and ICE results using a lasso regression are presented in Figure 6. Some terminology was changed, two authors were added, and the corresponding author was changed.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 10, 2019.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inference of CRISPR Edits from Sanger Trace Data
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inference of CRISPR Edits from Sanger Trace Data
Tim Hsiau, David Conant, Nicholas Rossi, Travis Maures, Kelsey Waite, Joyce Yang, Sahil Joshi, Reed Kelso, Kevin Holden, Brittany L Enzmann, Rich Stoner
bioRxiv 251082; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/251082
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Inference of CRISPR Edits from Sanger Trace Data
Tim Hsiau, David Conant, Nicholas Rossi, Travis Maures, Kelsey Waite, Joyce Yang, Sahil Joshi, Reed Kelso, Kevin Holden, Brittany L Enzmann, Rich Stoner
bioRxiv 251082; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/251082

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (6022)
  • Biochemistry (13697)
  • Bioengineering (10429)
  • Bioinformatics (33140)
  • Biophysics (17097)
  • Cancer Biology (14166)
  • Cell Biology (20097)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (10860)
  • Ecology (16008)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (20334)
  • Genetics (13392)
  • Genomics (18628)
  • Immunology (13740)
  • Microbiology (32149)
  • Molecular Biology (13380)
  • Neuroscience (70019)
  • Paleontology (526)
  • Pathology (2188)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3741)
  • Physiology (5860)
  • Plant Biology (12020)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1814)
  • Synthetic Biology (3365)
  • Systems Biology (8163)
  • Zoology (1841)