Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Occipitotemporal Representations Reflect Individual Differences in Conceptual Knowledge

View ORCID ProfileK. Braunlich, B. C. Love
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/264895
K. Braunlich
aDepartment of Psychology, University College London. 26 Bedford Way, London, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Braunlich
  • For correspondence: k.braunlich@ucl.ac.uk
B. C. Love
aDepartment of Psychology, University College London. 26 Bedford Way, London, UK.
bThe Alan Turing Institute. 96 Euston Rd., London, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Through selective attention, decision-makers can learn to ignore behaviorally-irrelevant stimulus dimensions. This can improve learning and can increase the perceptual discriminability of relevant stimulus information. Across cognitive models of categorization, this is typically accomplished through the inclusion of attentional parameters, which provide information about the importance of each stimulus dimension during decision-making. These parameters are often described geometrically, such that perceptual differences over relevant psychological dimensions are accentuated (or stretched), and differences over irrelevant dimensions are down-weighted (or compressed). An open question is whether these attention parameters are reflected in the brain. We examined two published fMRI datasets in which participants learned to categorize stimuli with features that differed in their relevancy. Attentional parameters were derived for each participants using formal categorization models fit to behavioral data. Using multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA), we found that when greater attentional weight was devoted to a particular visual feature (e.g., “color”), its value (e.g., “red”) was more easily decoded from occipitotemporal cortex. This effect was sufficiently sensitive to reflect individual differences in conceptual knowledge, indicating that occipitotemporal stimulus representations are embedded within a space similar to that formalized by classic categorization theory.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 14, 2018.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Occipitotemporal Representations Reflect Individual Differences in Conceptual Knowledge
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Occipitotemporal Representations Reflect Individual Differences in Conceptual Knowledge
K. Braunlich, B. C. Love
bioRxiv 264895; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/264895
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Occipitotemporal Representations Reflect Individual Differences in Conceptual Knowledge
K. Braunlich, B. C. Love
bioRxiv 264895; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/264895

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4229)
  • Biochemistry (9108)
  • Bioengineering (6752)
  • Bioinformatics (23944)
  • Biophysics (12098)
  • Cancer Biology (9497)
  • Cell Biology (13742)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7616)
  • Ecology (11662)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15479)
  • Genetics (10620)
  • Genomics (14297)
  • Immunology (9465)
  • Microbiology (22793)
  • Molecular Biology (9078)
  • Neuroscience (48890)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1479)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2565)
  • Physiology (3823)
  • Plant Biology (8309)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2290)
  • Systems Biology (6172)
  • Zoology (1297)