Abstract
In mobile social groups, cohesion is thought to be driven by patterns of attraction at both the individual and group level. In long-lived species with high group stability and repeated interactions, such as baboons, individual-to-individual attractions have the potential to play a large role in group cohesion and overall movement patterns. In previous work, we used GPS mapping of a group of baboons in De Hoop, Western Cape, South Africa, to demonstrate the influence of such attractions on movement patterns. We also demonstrated the existence of emergent group-level structures, which arose as a consequence of individual social influence. Specifically, we found a core-periphery structure, in which a subset of influential animals exerted an influence on each other and those animals in the periphery, while those in the periphery were influenced by the core but did not exert any influence over others. Here, we use agent-based modelling of baboon groups to investigate whether this group-level structure has any functional consequences for foraging behaviour. By varying individual level attractions, we produced baboon groups that contained influence structures that varied from more to less centralized. Our results suggest that varying centrality affects both the ability of the group to detect resource structure in the environment, as well as the ability of the group to exploit these resources. Our models predict that foraging groups with more centralized social structures will show a reduction in detection and an increase in exploitation of resources in their environment, and will produce more extreme foraging outcomes. More generally, our results highlight the link between social and environmental structure on functional outcomes for mobile social groups of animals.