Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Most regulatory interactions are not in linkage disequilibrium

View ORCID ProfileSean Whalen, Katherine S. Pollard
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/272245
Sean Whalen
1Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sean Whalen
Katherine S. Pollard
1Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute for Human Genetics, Quantitative Biology Institute, and Institute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
3Chan-Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) and genomic proximity are commonly used to map non-coding variants to genes, despite increasing examples of causal variants outside the LD block of the gene they regulate. We compared chromatin contacts in 22 cell types to LD across billions of pairs of loci in the human genome and found no concordance, even at genomic distances below 25 kilobases where both tend to be high. Gene expression and ontology data suggest that chromatin contacts identify regulatory variants more reliably than do LD and genomic proximity. We conclude that the genomic architectures of genetic and physical interactions are independent, with important implications for gene regulatory evolution and precision medicine.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 26, 2018.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Most regulatory interactions are not in linkage disequilibrium
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Most regulatory interactions are not in linkage disequilibrium
Sean Whalen, Katherine S. Pollard
bioRxiv 272245; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/272245
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Most regulatory interactions are not in linkage disequilibrium
Sean Whalen, Katherine S. Pollard
bioRxiv 272245; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/272245

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3701)
  • Biochemistry (7820)
  • Bioengineering (5695)
  • Bioinformatics (21343)
  • Biophysics (10603)
  • Cancer Biology (8206)
  • Cell Biology (11974)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6786)
  • Ecology (10425)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13908)
  • Genetics (9731)
  • Genomics (13109)
  • Immunology (8171)
  • Microbiology (20064)
  • Molecular Biology (7875)
  • Neuroscience (43171)
  • Paleontology (321)
  • Pathology (1282)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2267)
  • Physiology (3363)
  • Plant Biology (7254)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1316)
  • Synthetic Biology (2012)
  • Systems Biology (5550)
  • Zoology (1133)