Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher preserving biodiversity assessment method

Vera Marie Alida Zizka, Florian Leese, Bianca Peinert, Matthias Felix Geiger
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/287276
Vera Marie Alida Zizka
1Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany
2Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU) Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2, 45141 Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: vera.zizka@uni-due.de
Florian Leese
1Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany
2Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU) Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2, 45141 Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bianca Peinert
1Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Faculty of Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany
2Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU) Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 2, 45141 Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Felix Geiger
3Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Metabarcoding is a powerful tool for biodiversity assessment and has become increasingly popular in recent years. Although its reliability and applicability have been proven in numerous scientific studies, metabarcoding still suffers from some drawbacks. One is the usually mandatory destruction of specimens before DNA extraction, which is problematic because it does not allow a later taxonomic evaluation of the results. Additionally, metabarcoding often implements a time-consuming step, where specimens need to be separated from substrate or sorted in different size classes. A non-destructive protocol, excluding any sorting step, where the extraction of DNA is conducted from a samples fixative (ethanol) could serve as an alternative. We test an innovative protocol, where the sample preserving ethanol is filtered and DNA extracted from the filter for subsequent DNA metabarcoding. We first tested the general functionality of this approach on 15 mock communities comprising one individual of eight different macroinvertebrate taxa each and tried to increase DNA yield through different treatments (ultrasonic irradiation, shaking, freezing). Application of the method was successful for most of the samples and taxa, but showed weaknesses in detecting mollusc taxa. In a second step, the community composition detected in DNA from ethanol was compared to conventional bulk sample metabarcoding of complex environmental samples. We found that especially taxa with pronounced exoskeleton or shells (Coleoptera, Isopoda) and small taxa (Trombidiformes) were underrepresented in ethanol samples regarding taxa diversity and read numbers. However, read numbers of Diptera (mainly chironomids) and Haplotaxida were higher in ethanol derived DNA samples, which might indicate the detection of stomach content, which would be an additional advantage of this approach. Concerning EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) taxa which are decisive for the determination of ecological statuses, both methods had 46 OTUs in common with 4 unique to the ethanol samples and 10 to the bulk samples. Results indicate that fixative-based metabarcoding is a non-destructive, time-saving alternative for biodiversity assessments focussing on taxa used for ecological status determination. For a comprehensive picture on total biodiversity, the method might however not be sufficient and conventional bulk sample metabarcoding should be applied.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 23, 2018.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher preserving biodiversity assessment method
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher preserving biodiversity assessment method
Vera Marie Alida Zizka, Florian Leese, Bianca Peinert, Matthias Felix Geiger
bioRxiv 287276; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/287276
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher preserving biodiversity assessment method
Vera Marie Alida Zizka, Florian Leese, Bianca Peinert, Matthias Felix Geiger
bioRxiv 287276; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/287276

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Molecular Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3499)
  • Biochemistry (7342)
  • Bioengineering (5319)
  • Bioinformatics (20250)
  • Biophysics (10003)
  • Cancer Biology (7735)
  • Cell Biology (11292)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6431)
  • Ecology (9945)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13313)
  • Genetics (9358)
  • Genomics (12577)
  • Immunology (7696)
  • Microbiology (19002)
  • Molecular Biology (7433)
  • Neuroscience (40984)
  • Paleontology (300)
  • Pathology (1228)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2133)
  • Physiology (3155)
  • Plant Biology (6857)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1272)
  • Synthetic Biology (1895)
  • Systems Biology (5310)
  • Zoology (1087)