Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Does deterministic coexistence theory matter in a finite world?

View ORCID ProfileSebastian J. Schreiber, View ORCID ProfileJonathan M. Levine, View ORCID ProfileOscar Godoy, View ORCID ProfileNathan J.B. Kraft, View ORCID ProfileSimon P. Hart
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/290882
Sebastian J. Schreiber
1Department of Evolution and Ecology and Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, 95616 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sebastian J. Schreiber
  • For correspondence: sschreiber@ucdavis.edu
Jonathan M. Levine
2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan M. Levine
Oscar Godoy
3Departamento de Biología, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, E-11510 Puerto Real, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Oscar Godoy
Nathan J.B. Kraft
4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nathan J.B. Kraft
Simon P. Hart
5School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Simon P. Hart
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Contemporary studies of species coexistence are underpinned by deterministic models that assume that competing species have continuous (i.e. non-integer) densities, live in infinitely large landscapes, and coexist over infinite time horizons. By contrast, in nature species are composed of discrete individuals subject to demographic stochasticity, and occur in habitats of finite size where extinctions occur in finite time. One consequence of these discrepancies is that metrics of species coexistence derived from deterministic theory may be unreliable predictors of the duration of species coexistence in nature. These coexistence metrics include invasion growth rates and niche and fitness differences, which are now commonly applied in theoretical and empirical studies of species coexistence. Here we test the efficacy of deterministic coexistence metrics on the duration of species coexistence in a finite world. We introduce new theoretical and computational methods to estimate coexistence times in stochastic counterparts of classic deterministic models of competition. Importantly, we parameterized this model using experimental field data for 90 pairwise combinations of 18 species of annual plants, allowing us to derive biologically-informed estimates of coexistence times for a natural system. Strikingly, we find that for species expected to deterministically coexist, habitat sizes containing only tens of individuals have predicted coexistence times of greater than 1, 000 years. We also find that invasion growth rates explain 60% of the variation in intrinsic coexistence times, reinforcing their general usefulness in studies of coexistence. However, only by integrating information on both invasion growth rates and species’ equilibrium population sizes could most (> 99%) of the variation in species coexistence times be explained. This integration is achieved with demographically uncoupled single species models solely determined by the invasion growth rates and equilibrium population sizes. Moreover, because of a complex relationship between niche overlap/fitness differences and equilibrium population sizes, increasing niche overlap and increasing fitness differences did not always result in decreasing coexistence times as deterministic theory would predict. Nevertheless, our results tend to support the informed use of deterministic theory for understanding the duration of species coexistence, while highlighting the need to incorporate information on species’ equilibrium population sizes in addition to invasion growth rates.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 10, 2022.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does deterministic coexistence theory matter in a finite world?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Does deterministic coexistence theory matter in a finite world?
Sebastian J. Schreiber, Jonathan M. Levine, Oscar Godoy, Nathan J.B. Kraft, Simon P. Hart
bioRxiv 290882; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/290882
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Does deterministic coexistence theory matter in a finite world?
Sebastian J. Schreiber, Jonathan M. Levine, Oscar Godoy, Nathan J.B. Kraft, Simon P. Hart
bioRxiv 290882; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/290882

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3697)
  • Biochemistry (7801)
  • Bioengineering (5686)
  • Bioinformatics (21316)
  • Biophysics (10592)
  • Cancer Biology (8193)
  • Cell Biology (11954)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6772)
  • Ecology (10411)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13890)
  • Genetics (9719)
  • Genomics (13083)
  • Immunology (8158)
  • Microbiology (20037)
  • Molecular Biology (7865)
  • Neuroscience (43116)
  • Paleontology (321)
  • Pathology (1279)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2264)
  • Physiology (3358)
  • Plant Biology (7242)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1314)
  • Synthetic Biology (2009)
  • Systems Biology (5545)
  • Zoology (1130)