Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018

View ORCID ProfileDr Lewis E MacKenzie
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/298356
Dr Lewis E MacKenzie
Department of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, UK. DH1 3LE. Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dr Lewis E MacKenzie
  • For correspondence: Lewis.E.MacKenzie@Durham.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Since the mid-2000s, podcasts have emerged as a new and fundamentally decentralised global medium for science communication, with hundreds of podcasts freely disseminating scientific information worldwide. However, despite widespread interest in the benefits of podcasts for teaching, there have been no studies of how podcasts have been used to communicate science to the global public. Considering the popularity of science podcasts, this represents a large and fundamental gap into how science is being communicated to the public.

This study identified and analysed 952 freely available English language science podcasts. Podcasts were identified by exhaustive survey of the ‘iTunes’ ‘Natural Science’ podcast listings and categorical analysis was performed by textual and graphic data from both ‘iTunes’ and other podcast promotion websites between the 5th January and 5th February 2018. All data generated by this study is freely available as an associated supplementary dataset.

The total number of science podcasts was found to have grown linearly between 2004 and 2010, but between 2010 and 2018 the number of science podcast has grown exponentially. 38% of science podcasts were created by independent producers, but the majority (62%) were produced by various affiliated organisations. Most science podcasts (65%) were hosted by scientists and the majority of science podcasts (77%) were targeted to public audiences. ‘General Science’ was the most common topic for science podcasts, but a diverse range of topics was covered. Notably, chemistry appears to be under-represented compared to physics and biology podcasts. The USA and UK dominate English-language science podcasts, producing 57% and 17% of the science podcasts surveyed. Only 24% of podcasts had overt supplementary income. This suggests many science podcasts were being produced independently by scientists with no financial support. Science podcasts could be separated into ‘short lifespan’ (< 1 year) and ‘long lifespan’ podcasts (> 1 year). Podcasts affiliated with an organisation had a reduced ‘short lifespan’ and a greater ‘long lifespan’ when compared with independently produced podcasts.

This study provides a fundamentally new ‘snapshot’ of how science podcasts are being used to directly communicate science with global public audiences in 2018.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 15, 2018.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
Dr Lewis E MacKenzie
bioRxiv 298356; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/298356
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
Dr Lewis E MacKenzie
bioRxiv 298356; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/298356

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Scientific Communication and Education
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (5983)
  • Biochemistry (13560)
  • Bioengineering (10334)
  • Bioinformatics (32934)
  • Biophysics (16977)
  • Cancer Biology (14049)
  • Cell Biology (19919)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (10758)
  • Ecology (15904)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (20228)
  • Genetics (13326)
  • Genomics (18546)
  • Immunology (13639)
  • Microbiology (31867)
  • Molecular Biology (13283)
  • Neuroscience (69492)
  • Paleontology (518)
  • Pathology (2169)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3718)
  • Physiology (5818)
  • Plant Biology (11923)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1803)
  • Synthetic Biology (3341)
  • Systems Biology (8120)
  • Zoology (1835)