Abstract
Spike-and-wave discharges (SpW) are seen in absence-type epilepsies. They are heterogeneous in terms of their clinical burden and their electrographic signature, which is used to classify different types of absence seizures; typical absence, in which SpW frequency is 3-4Hz and atypical absence, which shows a slower 1-2Hz frequency. Treatment of SpW varies dependent upon the syndrome, but both Valproic Acid (VPA) and Ethosuximide (ESM) are shown to be effective in controlling typical absence seizures. Other anti-epileptic’s (AED’s), Levetiracetam (LEV) and Rufinamide (RUF), have shown promise in treating absence epilepsies and their associated syndromes. Here we examine the efficacy of these AED’s on an in vitro model of SpW.
Both LEV and RUF show an effective reduction in both the number of SpW events and the spike component amplitude; VPA shows no effect, whilst ESM enhances the spike amplitude. Phenytoin exacerbates the SpW activity, increasing both the number of SpW, amplitude of the SpW and the number of spikes within each event. These data suggest that both LEV and RUF could be effective in the treatment of absence-type epilepsies. They also suggest this model could be an effective tool to test other AED’s aimed at treating atypical absence syndromes.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.