Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

How does the presence of neural probes affect extracellular potentials?

View ORCID ProfileAlessio Paolo Buccino, Miroslav Kuchta, Karoline Horgmo Jæger, Torbjørn Vefferstad Ness, Pierre Berthet, Kent-Andre Mardal, Gert Cauwenberghs, Aslak Tveito
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/318741
Alessio Paolo Buccino
1Center for Integrative Neuroplasticity (CINPLA), Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alessio Paolo Buccino
  • For correspondence: alessiob@ifi.uio.no
Miroslav Kuchta
3Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karoline Horgmo Jæger
4Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Torbjørn Vefferstad Ness
5Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre Berthet
1Center for Integrative Neuroplasticity (CINPLA), Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kent-Andre Mardal
3Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
4Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gert Cauwenberghs
2Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aslak Tveito
4Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective Mechanistic modeling of neurons is an essential component of computational neuroscience that enables scientists to simulate, explain, and explore neural activity. The conventional approach to simulation of extracellular neural recordings first computes transmembrane currents using the cable equation and then sums their contribution to model the extracellular potential. This two-step approach relies on the assumption that the extracellular space is an infinite and homogeneous conductive medium, while measurements are performed using neural probes. The main purpose of this paper is to assess to what extent the presence of the neural probes of varying shape and size impacts the extracellular field and how to correct for them.

Approach We apply a detailed modeling framework allowing explicit representation of the neuron and the probe to study the effect of the probes and thereby estimate the effect of ignoring it. We use meshes with simplified neurons and different types of probe and compare the extracellular action potentials with and without the probe in the extracellular space. We then compare various solutions to account for the probes’ presence and introduce an efficient probe correction method to include the probe effect in modeling of extracellular potentials.

Main results Our computations show that microwires hardly influence the extracellular electric field and their effect can therefore be ignored. In contrast, Multi-Electrode Arrays (MEAs) significantly affect the extracellular field by magnifying the recorded potential. While MEAs behave similarly to infinite insulated planes, we find that their effect strongly depends on the neuron-probe alignment and probe orientation.

Significance Ignoring the probe effect might be deleterious in some applications, such as neural localization and parameterization of neural models from extracellular recordings. Moreover, the presence of the probe can improve the interpretation of extracellular recordings, by providing a more accurate estimation of the extracellular potential generated by neuronal models.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 09, 2019.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How does the presence of neural probes affect extracellular potentials?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How does the presence of neural probes affect extracellular potentials?
Alessio Paolo Buccino, Miroslav Kuchta, Karoline Horgmo Jæger, Torbjørn Vefferstad Ness, Pierre Berthet, Kent-Andre Mardal, Gert Cauwenberghs, Aslak Tveito
bioRxiv 318741; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/318741
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How does the presence of neural probes affect extracellular potentials?
Alessio Paolo Buccino, Miroslav Kuchta, Karoline Horgmo Jæger, Torbjørn Vefferstad Ness, Pierre Berthet, Kent-Andre Mardal, Gert Cauwenberghs, Aslak Tveito
bioRxiv 318741; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/318741

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
  • Bioengineering
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2643)
  • Biochemistry (5245)
  • Bioengineering (3659)
  • Bioinformatics (15764)
  • Biophysics (7231)
  • Cancer Biology (5607)
  • Cell Biology (8073)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4755)
  • Ecology (7489)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10546)
  • Genetics (7711)
  • Genomics (10102)
  • Immunology (5172)
  • Microbiology (13865)
  • Molecular Biology (5370)
  • Neuroscience (30684)
  • Paleontology (214)
  • Pathology (874)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1522)
  • Physiology (2243)
  • Plant Biology (5001)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1039)
  • Synthetic Biology (1383)
  • Systems Biology (4139)
  • Zoology (810)