Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Marine mammals and sea turtles listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act are recovering

Abel Valdivia, Shaye Wolf, Kieran Suckling
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/319921
Abel Valdivia
1Center for Biological Diversity, 1212 Broadway Suite 800, Oakland, CA 94612
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: avaldivia@biologicaldiversity.org
Shaye Wolf
1Center for Biological Diversity, 1212 Broadway Suite 800, Oakland, CA 94612
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kieran Suckling
2Center for Biological Diversity, P.O. Box 710, Tucson, AZ 85702
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) is the world’s strongest environmental law protecting imperiled plants and animals, and a growing number of marine species have been protected under this law as extinction risk in the oceans has increased. Marine mammals and sea turtles comprise 36% of the 161 ESA-listed marine species, yet analyses of recovery trends after listing are lacking. Here we gather the best available annual population estimates for all marine mammals (n=33) and sea turtles (n=29) listed under the ESA as species. Of these, we quantitatively analyze population trends, magnitude of population change, and recovery status for representative populations of 23 marine mammals and 9 sea turtles, which were listed for more than five years, occur in U.S. waters, and have data of sufficient quality and span of time for trend analyses. Using generalized linear and non-linear models, we found that 78% of marine mammals (n=18) and 78% of sea turtles (n=7) significantly increased after listing; 13% of marine mammals (n=3) and 22% of sea turtles (n=2) showed non-significant changes; while 9% of marine mammals (n=2), but no sea turtles declined after ESA protection. Overall, species with populations that increased in abundance were listed for 20 years or more (e.g., large whales, manatees, and sea turtles). Conservation measures triggered by ESA listing such as ending exploitation, tailored species management, and fishery regulations, among others, appear to have been largely successful in promoting species recovery, leading to the delisting of some species and to increases in most. These findings underscore the capacity of marine mammals and sea turtles to recover from substantial population declines when conservation actions under the ESA are implemented in a timely and effective manner.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 15, 2018.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Marine mammals and sea turtles listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act are recovering
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Marine mammals and sea turtles listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act are recovering
Abel Valdivia, Shaye Wolf, Kieran Suckling
bioRxiv 319921; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/319921
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Marine mammals and sea turtles listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act are recovering
Abel Valdivia, Shaye Wolf, Kieran Suckling
bioRxiv 319921; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/319921

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4655)
  • Biochemistry (10309)
  • Bioengineering (7629)
  • Bioinformatics (26208)
  • Biophysics (13454)
  • Cancer Biology (10631)
  • Cell Biology (15354)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8458)
  • Ecology (12761)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16777)
  • Genetics (11365)
  • Genomics (15411)
  • Immunology (10557)
  • Microbiology (25063)
  • Molecular Biology (10163)
  • Neuroscience (54132)
  • Paleontology (398)
  • Pathology (1656)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2878)
  • Physiology (4318)
  • Plant Biology (9206)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1582)
  • Synthetic Biology (2543)
  • Systems Biology (6757)
  • Zoology (1453)