Abstract
The light chains (KLCs) of the heterotetrameric microtubule motor kinesin-1, that bind to cargo adaptor proteins and regulate its activity, have a capacity to recognize short peptides via their tetratricopeptide repeat domains (KLCTPR). Here, using X-ray crystallography, we show how kinesin-1 recognizes a novel class of adaptor motifs that we call ‘Y-acidic’ (tyrosine flanked by acidic residues), in a KLC-isoform specific manner. Binding specificities of Y-acidic motifs (present in JIP1 and in TorsinA) to KLC1TPR are distinct from those utilized for the recognition of W-acidic motifs found in adaptors that are KLC-isoform non-selective. However, a partial overlap on their receptor binding sites implies that adaptors relying on Y-acidic and W-acidic motifs must act independently. We propose a model to explain why these two classes of motifs that bind to the concave surface of KLCTPR with similar low micromolar affinity can exhibit different capacities to promote kinesin-1 activity.
Introduction
Transport of cellular components along microtubules (MTs) is important in virtually all cell types and required for normal cellular activities. For neuronal function, MT-based transport is particularly critical due to the long distances that need to be travelled and strong links exist between intracellular transport and the pathogenesis of neurological diseases (Chevalier-Larsen and Holzbaur, 2006; Franker and Hoogenraad, 2013). The kinesin-1 motor, is responsible for the anterograde (plus-end directed) transport along MTs of a wide range of cargoes such as protein complexes, ribonuclear protein assemblies, vesicles, and organelles (Hirokawa et al., 2009). Defects in kinesin-1-mediated transport have been linked to various neurodegenerative diseases including Parkinson’s, Huntington’s, Alzheimer’s, and hereditary spastic paraplegia (Mandelkow and Mandelkow, 2002; Morfini et al., 2016; Morihara et al., 2014).
At the molecular level kinesin-1 is a tetramer consisting of two ATP-dependent motor-bearing heavy chains (KHCs) and two light chains (KLCs) that in mammalian cells are encoded by three (Kif5A-C) and four (KLC1–4) closely related genes, respectively, with distinct cell and tissue expression profiles. When not engaged in active transport, kinesin-1 is maintained in an autoinhibited state resulting from an intramolecular interaction in which the C-terminus of a single KHC tail binds at the N-terminal motor dimer interface preventing the structural transition required for ADP release (Kaan et al., 2011). Regulatory KLCs interact with KHCs using their N-terminal coiled-coil (CC) region that precedes an unstructured region followed by a cargo-anchoring tetratricopeptide repeat domain (TPR) and a disordered C-terminal region that varies considerably between isoforms (Figure 1A). The unstructured region N-terminal to KLCTPR (TPR domain of KLC) features a leucinephenylalanine-proline (LFP) triplet followed by Asn/Ser and flanked by negatively charged Asp/Glu residues that is highly conserved in all KLCs isoforms. We have shown that this ‘LFP-acidic’ region engages in cis with KLCTPR contributing to the maintenance of the autoinhibited state, and is likely important in cargo-driven activation (Yip et al., 2016).
The process of motor activation in response to cargo recognition occurs via molecular mechanisms that are incompletely understood. However, adaptor (or scaffolding) proteins that provide a molecular link between kinesin-1 and its cargoes play a clear role in coordinating motor’s activity and driving transport (Fu and Holzbaur, 2014). While vesicular cargoes interact with adaptors that can bind to multiple sites on both KHCs and KLCs, diversity of recognition is often mediated by the interaction of the KLCTPR domain with short disordered peptide sequences on the adaptors. One important class of such peptides features a tryptophan residue flanked by aspartic or glutamic acid residues (for example, EWD). Experimentally validated ‘W-acidic’ recognition motifs are found in a growing list of adaptors including the SifA-kinesin interacting protein (SKIP), a critical host determinant in Salmonella pathogenesis and a regulator of lysosomal positioning, the neuronal protein calsyntenin-1 (CSTN-1), dynein intermediate chain (DIC), nesprin-2, gadkin, and cayman ataxia protein (BNIP-H) (Aoyama et al., 2009; Araki et al., 2007; Dodding et al., 2011; Kawano et al., 2012; Konecna et al., 2006; Ligon et al., 2004; McGuire et al., 2006; Schmidt et al., 2009; Wilson and Holzbaur, 2015). Remarkably, W-acidic motifs have an intrinsic capacity to promote kinesin-1 activity (Dodding et al., 2011; Farias et al., 2015; Kawano et al., 2012; Pu et al., 2015). We have solved the X-ray structure of KLC2TPR in complex with the W-acidic peptide of SKIP (SKIPWD, sequence TNLEWDDSAI) thus deciphering the structural basis for the recognition of this important class of adaptor peptides by kinesin-1 (Pernigo et al., 2013).
Despite the importance of W-acidic motifs, cargo adaptors exist that do not feature this type of recognition sequence. A prominent example is the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK)-interacting-interacting protein 1 (JIP1) that is involved in the anterograde transport of the amyloid precursor protein (APP), a key determinant in Alzheimer’s disease (Matsuda et al., 2001; Scheinfeld et al., 2002). The most C-terminal region of JIP1 (sequence YTCPTEDIYLE, JIP1C-term) has been shown to be necessary and sufficient for binding and, in contrast to W-acidic sequences, JIP1C-term has a strong preference for the KLC1 isoform, rather than KLC2 (Kawano et al., 2012; Verhey et al., 2001; Zhu et al., 2012). Interestingly, JIP1C-term binding to KLC1TPR is not sufficient to promote kinesin-1 activity (Kawano et al., 2012). Indeed, KHC binding by JIP1 as well as the cooperation of additional proteins, like FEZ1 or JIP3, is required for cargo transport (Blasius et al., 2007; Fu and Holzbaur, 2013, 2014; Hammond et al., 2008; Satake et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2017).
Using a structural approach we show here how kinesin-1 selects adaptors, like JIP1, that rely on an alternative ‘Y-acidic’ (tyrosine-acidic) motif for recognition. We also show how the solenoid-shaped KLCTPR domains utilize distinct, yet partly overlapping, portions of their concave surface to select between W-acidic and Y-acidic motifs in an isoform-specific manner following a general ‘induced-fit’ principle. Our work helps understanding the versatility and complexity of cargo recognition mediated by KLCTPRdomains that depends on their unanticipated remarkable plasticity. We propose a model to explain why W-acidic and Y-acidic motifs that bind to the concave groove of KLCTPR with similar low micromolar affinity exhibit different capacities to promote kinesin-1 activity.
Results
Y-acidic C-terminal motifs bind to KLC1TPR with low micromolar affinity
JIP1 is an important adaptor protein that can couple kinesin-1 to several cargoes thus enabling their transport along MTs (Figure 1B, left-hand side). While its JNK binding domain (JBD) is required for interaction with JNK, its PTB domain binds several proteins, including APP, apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2), p190RhoGEF, dual leucine zipper bearing kinase (DLK), and JIP3 (JSAP1). The JIP1C-term that binds to KLC1TPR is highly conserved and characterized by a low theoretical pI value of 4.57 due to the presence of multiple acidic amino acids (Figure 1C, top). The most C-terminal tyrosine (Y709 in human JIP1) is particularly important for the interaction and its replacement by an alanine has been shown to result in loss of KLC1 binding in immunoprecipitation experiments (Verhey et al., 2001). As Y709 is embedded within the acidic patch we refer to this region as the Y-acidic core (Figure 1C). To further validate this interaction we employed an in vitro fluorescence polarization (FP) assay. We first measured the affinity between TAMRA-labelled JIP1C-term and the highly homologous KLC1TPR and KLC2TPR domains. We find that TAMRA-JIP1C-term binds to KLC1TPR with a KD of 0.95 μM whilst its affinity for KLC2TPR is significantly lower (KD > 94 μM, Figure 1D). This is consistent with the previously reported specificity of JIP1C-term for KLC1TPR (Zhu et al., 2012).
Another protein that has also been shown to bind to KLC1 in co-IP experiments is TorsinA, a constitutively inactive AAA+ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) protein whose gene is linked to early-onset dystonia type 1 (DYT1) (Kamm et al., 2004) (Figure 1B, right-hand side). As gene deletions revealed that its last ∼80 amino acids are sufficient for the interaction, we inspected the primary structure for this region and noticed that its C-terminus shares similarities with JIP1C-term, particularly, with respect to the conservation of a Y-acidic core (Figure 1C, bottom). We thus hypothesised that this region might be responsible for KLC1 binding. Similarly to JIP1 we find that a TAMRA-labelled peptide encompassing the last twelve amino acids of mouse TorsinA (TAMRATorsinAC-term) binds with KD values of 1.7 μM and >24 μM to KLC1TPR and KLC2TPR, respectively (Figure 1E). Overall, Y-acidic motifs bind to KLC1TPR with low micromolar affinity and may provide a common mechanism for distinguishing between isoforms with preference for KLC1 over KLC2.
Strategy employed for the structural elucidation of KLC1TPR-specific Y-acidic peptide complexes
To elucidate how the well-established JIP1 cargo adaptor is recognized by KLC1TPR we pursued a crystallographic approach. We were previously successful in obtaining diffracting crystals of KLC2TPR in complex with the cognate SKIPWD W-acidic peptide by engineering a chimeric construct in which the peptide was fused N-terminal to KLC2TPR via a flexible (TGS)4 linker (Pernigo et al., 2013). Here, we used a similar approach. However, as JIP1 binds to KLC1TPR using its C-terminus we hypothesized that a free carboxyl group might be important for the interaction. We therefore fused JIP1C-term downstream of KLC1TPR via a flexible (TGS)10 linker. Crystals of the chimera grew readily in a variety of conditions. However, they exhibited very limited diffraction (worse than 15 Å resolution) or, more often, no diffraction at all. To improve crystal quality we decided to employ Nanobodies (Nbs) as crystallization chaperones (Pardon et al., 2014). Using the chimera as an antigen, a pool of 29 high-affinity Nbs was generated and a subset later employed in crystallization trials following purification of each individual Nb:chimera complex. Nb-mediated crystallization dramatically improved crystal quality and allowed us to collect X-ray data for the complex to 2.7 Å resolution using synchrotron radiation. We also sought to obtain structural information on TorsinA binding. To this end we replaced the JIP1C-term sequence with that of TorsinAC-term and produced crystals that diffracted X-rays at 2.3 Å resolution. A summary of data collection statistics is given in Table 1.
Overall structure of KLC1TPR in complex with Y-acidic peptides and conformational transition upon their recognition
KLC1TPR consists of six TPR repeats (TPR1 to TPR6), each contributed by a classical helix-turn-helix structural motif arranged in a right-handed super-helical conformation, with an additional non-TPR helix (αN) positioned between TPR5 and TPR6. The structures of the complexes reveal that the C-terminal peptides bind in an extended conformation straddling across the KLC1TPR concave surface with a direction opposite to that of superhelical coiling (Figure 2). The epitope recognized by the Nb used as crystallization chaperone is totally distinct from the peptide-binding region and maps on the outer surface with contributions from residues on TPR4(α8) and TPR5. The KLC1TPR domain is typically very well defined in both structures. However, most of the stretch connecting the single non-TPR αN helix to α11 of TPR6 (residues 437–459) could not be modeled due to flexibility. Also, electron density for helix (α1) of TPR1 is of significantly poorer quality compared to all other TPR helices indicating that this region is more disordered (Figure S1). Indeed, this helix appears to display an unusual degree of plasticity (Nguyen et al., 2017). For JIP1C-term, electron density is observed for the last eight residues of the 11-aa long peptide (Figure 2A,B) whilst for TorsinAC-term we could model all but the first residue of the 12-aa long peptide (Figure 2C,D). The engineered (TGS)10 linker connecting the TPR domain to the Y-acidic cargo adaptor peptides is not visible in electron density maps suggesting that this region is flexible and does not interfere with binding.
A comparison between the structures of KLC1TPR in the unbound (Zhu et al., 2012) and Y-acidic peptide-loaded states reveals dramatic conformational differences whereby peptide recognition induces an ‘open’-to-‘closed’ transition in its solenoid structure (Figure 2E, Movie M1). While the KLC1TPR domains are essentially identical in both Y-acidic peptide-bound structures (rmsd = 0.75 Å over 259 equivalent Cα atoms), a similar global superposition between the peptide-free (‘open’, PDB code 3NF1) and the TorsinAC-term-bound (‘closed’) structures gives a rmsd of ∼4.1 Å for 253 equivalent CCα atoms. An analysis using the DynDom algorithm (Poornam et al., 2009) indicates that peptide recognition elicits a conformational transition that is best described by a ∼30° rotation of an N-terminal domain with respect to a hinge region largely contributed by residues belonging to second-half and first-half of TPR3(α6) and TPR4(α8) (residues 323–329, 348–350, 353–358), respectively, while the C-terminal region (second-half of α8 to α12) is fixed. As a result, the TPR1(α1) helix axis undergoes a lateral displaced of over 16 Å. Each individual domain behaves essentially as a rigid-unit (rmsd N-terminal moving domains = 1.06 Å over 117 equivalent Cα atoms – rmsd C-terminal fixed domains = 0.88 Å over 131 equivalent Ca atoms). Overall, this highlights a significant degree of plasticity of the KLC1TPR domain that is used to accommodate the Y-acidic peptides by an ‘induced fit’ mechanism.
KLC1TPR-Y-acidic peptide interface
JIP1C-term and TorsinAC-term peptides are recognized by their KLC1TPR receptor using a common binding mode. An analysis performed with the Protein Interfaces, Surfaces and Assemblies (PISA) algorithm (Krissinel and Henrick, 2007) indicates that ∼75% of the surface atoms of the bound peptides form an extensive interface that is stabilized by residues contributed by the first helices of TPR2–6 (α3, α5, α7, α9, α11) whilst fewer residues on α4, α6, α8, α10 make secondary contacts (Figure 3A). Overall, the interface area is ∼710 Å2 and ∼887 Å2 for the KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term and KLC1TPR-TorsinAC-term complexes, respectively. The larger surface area for the latter complex reflects the longer TorsinA peptide bound to KLC1TPR. As JIP1 is one of the most important and extensively validated cargo adaptors we will discuss general principles for Y-acidic peptide binding using the KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term complex as a reference.
The structure shows that the recognition peptide binds in an extended conformation to the positively charged inner surface of the TPR solenoid structure (Figure 3B) with the conserved tyrosine within the Y-acidic core (Y709, referred to as position 0, p0) hosted by a ‘made-to-measure’ cavity (highlighted by a white dotted line in Figure 3B). The cavity stabilizing the side-chain of (p0)Y709, located between TPR3(α5/α6) and TPR4(α7), is lined by V305, K309, Y313, N344, L347, L348, N351 with the amide group of the latter residue participating in a H-bond with (p-2)D707(Oδ2) (Figure 3C). Two asparagine pairs (N386/N343 and N301/N344) also engage in hydrogen bonds the main chain atoms of (p-1)I708 and (p+1)L710, respectively, while the C-terminal glutamate at position (p+2) is locked in place by a salt bridge with R266 and K340. Virtually all key interactions observed in the KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term structure also stabilize the bound TorsinAC-term peptide (Figure S2). As TorsinAC-term features an additional p+3 position, this extra residue is hosted by a cavity (highlighted by a cyan dotted line in Figure 3B) lined partly by yet another asparagine pair (N259/N302) that together with the side-chains of R327 and K340 stabilize the doubly negatively charged C-terminal aspartate residue. While JIP1C-term and TorsinAC-term peptides display a virtually identical main-chain trace for their Y-acidic core, conformational variability is observed for their N-terminal portion that is not conserved (Figure S3). Overall, a combination of electrostatics, specific interactions often mediated by receptor asparagine residues, and the intrinsically malleable nature of the cargo adaptor peptides, plays a main role in the recognition process.
Cellular validation of the KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term interface and molecular determinants of KLC1 specificity
To validate the KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term interface and to rationalize the strong preference of this cargo adaptor for KLC1TPR over the highly homologous KLC2TPR observed in FP measurements we employed immunoprecipitation in HeLa cells in combination with structure-guided mutagenesis. Cells were co-transfected with wild-type and mutant constructs expressing hemagglutinin (HA)–KLC1TPRand FLAG-JIP1 (Figure 3D). For mutagenesis, key KLC1TPR interface residues R266, N343, N386, N469 were substituted with a serine to alter their salt bridge/H-bonding capabilities while V305 was replaced with a threonine to generate an isosteric change with altered polarity. Overall, we find that all amino acid substitutions tested substantially reduce the affinity between KLC1TPR and JIP1 with residual binding quantified ranging from ∼15&# to ∼35&# compared to wild-type (Figure 3E). In particular, a very strong effect is observed for the R266S replacement that prevents the formation of a salt bridge with the (p+2) acidic side-chain and a similar near-abrogation of binding is engendered by an increase in polarity (V305T) within the receptor cavity surface that interacts ‘face-on’ with the aromatic ring of (p0) tyrosine (Figure 4C). The N343S and N469S substitutions are particularly informative with respect to the specificity of Y-acidic peptides for the KLC1 isoform over KLC2. A sequence comparison between KLC1TPR and KLC2TPR highlights that the only two interface residues that differ between these isoform domains are KLC1 N343 and N469. These are naturally present as serine residues in KLC2 (Figure 3A). The structure shows that asparagines at these topological positions play a key role in maintaining the stability of the complex via H-bond interactions at positions p-5 and p-1 of the main chain cargo peptide. Our co-IP experiment shows that a substitution at either of these positions by a serine, thus imparting KLC2TPR-like properties, negatively affects the stability of the complex thus explaining isoform-specificity.
Y-acidic and W-acidic motifs bind at partly overlapping sites on KLCTPR and are differentially affected by the presence of the LFP-acidic intramolecular region
We have previously solved the X-ray structure of KLC2TPR in complex with the SKIPWD W-acidic peptide, thus providing a structural basis for the recognition of this widespread adaptor motif (Pernigo et al., 2013). A comparative analysis with the structures presented here reveals that Y-acidic and W-acidic motifs are recognized by partly overlapping binding sites that are shifted with respect to each other along the inner channel generated by the TPR right-handed super-helical arrangement (Figure 4A). The W-acidic motif binds toward the N-terminal end of the channel with its critical tryptophan residue sandwiched between TPR2 and TPR3 while the Y-acidic motif is positioned more C-terminally with its key tyrosine residue stabilized by the interface between TPR3 and TPR4 approximately at the same location occupied by the SKIPWD leucine at (p-2). Although W-acidic binding also occurs by an ‘induced fit’ mechanism, it elicits a more restrained closure of the receptor compared to Y-acidic binding, defined by smaller rotation (∼20.0°) with respect to an alternative, more N-terminal, hinge axis (Figure S4). Despite these differences W-acidic and Y-acidic binding sites partly overlap and in agreement with this we find that an unlabelled SKIPWD peptide is able to specifically compete TAMRA-JIP1C-term binding in a concentration dependent manner in our FP assay (Figure 4B). The functional implication of this is that a single KLC1TPR is not expected to simultaneously engage both types of cargo adaptors. The partial separation of Y-acidic and W-acidic binding sites on KLCTPR has also a possible important functional consequence. We have solved previously the 4 Å-resolution structure of KLC2extTPR, an extended TPR featuring the conserved LFP-acidic region N-terminal to the KLCTPR domain that contributes to kinesin-1 inhibition (Figure 1A) (Yip et al., 2016). In this structure the KLC2TPR domain is in its ‘open’ (ligand-free) conformation and we could model a stretch five poly-Ala residues between helices a1, a3, a5 that likely defines the general location of the intramolecular LFP-acidic region. The poly-Ala peptide partly overlaps with the SKIPWD binding site (Figure 4C) and consistent with this we found that a TAMRA-SKIPWD peptide binds in an FP assay with lower affinity to KLC2extTPR compared to KLC2TPR due to the inhibitory effect of the intramolecular LFP-acidic stretch (Yip et al., 2016). We have now also measured the affinity of TAMRA-SKIPWD for KLC1extTPR and KLC1TPR and, like for KLC2, the presence of the LFP-acidic region significantly inhibits binding, in this case, by more than one order of magnitude (KD from 0.64 ± 0.02 μM to 8.20 ± 0.37 μM, Figure 4D). In contrast, TAMRA-JIP1C-term binds with a similar affinity to either KLC1extTPR (KD= 2.21 ± 0.06 μM) or KLC1TPR (KD = 0.95 ± 0.09 μM) (Figure 4F) (Yip et al., 2016). A structural superposition between KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term and KLC2extTPR allows to rationalize the minimal impact that the LFP-acidic extension has on JIP1C-term binding. We observe that the KLC1TPR N-terminal domain rotation elicited by JIP1C-term binding is compatible with the presence of the poly-Ala peptide as no clashes are observed (Figure 4E). This is largely due to the more advanced position along the inner KLCTPR cavity of this adaptor peptide compared to SKIPWD. Thus, although with the obvious limitation imposed by a poly-Ala model that does not allow to reveal the full range of possible intermolecular interactions, we suggest that while an intramolecular interaction with the LFP-acidic region is not compatible with SKIPWD binding, this might be of little or no interference with JIP1C-term loading. This is in agreement with FP data (Figure 4F).
JIP1C-term loading does not affect the affinity of JIP3LZ2for KLC1TPR
Various studies have shown that JIP1 and JIP3 act co-operatively in kinesin-1-mediated transport (Hammond et al., 2008; Satake et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2017). Like JIP1, JIP3 belongs to the JIP family of adaptor proteins that in mammals is composed of four members (Whitmarsh, 2006). The N-terminal region of JIP3/4 features several leucine zipper segments, the second of which (JIP3LZ2), has been found to mediate interaction with KLC1TPR (Bowman et al., 2000; Kelkar et al., 2005; Nguyen et al., 2005). To probe the effect of JIP1C-term loading on the interaction between KLC1TPR and JIP3LZ2 we employed isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) (Table 2). Binding of GST-JIP3LZ2 to His6-KLC1extTPR is an enthalpy-driven process with a dissociation constant KD of ∼3 μM (Figure 5A) and no significant changes in KD are observed when His6-KLC1extTPR is replaced by His6-KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term (Figure 5B). This indicates that binding of JIP3LZ2 to KLC1TPR is independent of JIP1C-term and of the conformational change it elicits. Also, it does not require the presence of the LFP-acidic region. ITC data suggest a stoichiometry for the complex that consistent with two TPR domains bound to a JIP3LZ2 coiled-coil dimer. We further confirmed this by native mass spectrometry (MS) (Figure 5C) (Hall et al., 2012; Hernandez and Robinson, 2007). Using an untagged SEC-purified KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term:JIP3LZ2 complex assembled using a slight molar excess (1.5) of KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term over the JIP3LZ2 dimer we find a mixture of KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term monomers and dimers both in isolation and bound to JIP3LZ2 indicating that up to two KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term molecules can bind to the coiled-coil. The intrinsic mobility of the TPR1(α1) (Figure S1) and its stabilization by other helices as often observed in various crystal structures (Nguyen et al., 2017) suggest that this KLC1TPR region might be involved in the interaction with JIP3LZ2 and possibly its dimerization.
Discussion
For many cargo types anchoring to the kinesin-1 motor is not direct but mediated by adaptor or scaffolding proteins that provide a molecular and mechanistic link for kinesin-driven intracellular transport (Fu and Holzbaur, 2014). An important region on the regulatory light chains that is often engaged by adaptors is their KLCTPR domain. TPR domains are found in a wide range of proteins and represent common platforms for protein-protein interactions (D’Andrea and Regan, 2003; Zeytuni and Zarivach, 2012). Like some other repeat-containing proteins, such as leucine-rich-repeats and WD40s, TPR domains have been traditionally considered fairly rigid docking platforms that respond with limited conformational alterations to ligand binding, thus lending support to the view that they are essentially pre-organized architectures onto which specific ligand-binding residues are ‘grafted’ (Cortajarena and Regan, 2006). Such a static view has been more recently mitigated by examples of TPR domains that undergo some conformational changes in response to protein-protein interactions. For example, a reduction of the solenoid super-helical pitch has been observed in the TPR domain of the Pex5p receptor in response to loading the peroxisomal targeting signal type 1 (PTS1) (Stanley et al., 2006). Also, in the magnetosome-associated protein, MamA the N-terminal portion of its TPR domain undergoes a radial movement of ∼3° upon binding of a putative ligand imitator (Zeytuni et al., 2011). Our crystallographic analysis of the recognition mechanism of Y-acidic motifs by KLC1TPR that extends our previous work on the recognition of W-acidic motifs (Pernigo et al., 2013), strongly challenges the view of TPR motifs as rigid scaffolds. Instead it portrays their strongly adaptive nature as binding of these motifs involves rotations of the N-terminal portion of the molecule of up to ∼30° with respect to alternative hinge axes. Overall, KLCTPR domains display the remarkable ability to employ inter-TPR repeats as separate ‘compartments’ to stabilize different peptide types in an isoform-specific manner. It is tempting to speculate that this Y-acidic recognition mechanism could be employed more broadly. Indeed, the C-terminal pentapeptide of Salmonella effector PipB2 that is required for kinesin-1 binding (Henry et al., 2006) also shares a sequence that matches the Y-acidic core of JIP1 and TorsinA (PipB2C-term, LFNEFYSENI).
While JIP1 is one of the best-established and most studied adaptors, the role for TorsinA in the context of kinesin-1-based transport is less clear. TorsinA, the founding member of the Torsin family, is a constitutively inactive AAA+ protein of medical importance as a three-base pair (ΔGAG) deletion that removes one of a pair of glutamic acid residues (Glu-302/303) in proximity of its C-terminus is linked to DYT1, a neurological disorder that leads to uncontrollable muscular movements (Ozelius et al., 1997). In cells TorsinA is predominantly localized in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or nuclear envelope (NE) where its ATPase enzymatic activity requires the stimulation by one of two transmembrane cofactors, LAP1 (lamina associated polypeptide 1) or LULL1 (luminal domain like LAP1), via their luminal domains (Zhao et al., 2013). However, the exact biological function of TorsinA and other family members is at present uncertain although they clearly play a role in the integrity of the NE (Laudermilch and Schlieker, 2016). Interestingly, wild-type TorsinA expressed in brain CAD cells has been found co-localized with endogenous KLC1TPR at the distal end of processes, whereas mutant TorsinAΔGAG remained confined to the cell body thus opening the possibility that the wild-type protein undergoes anterograde transport along MTs possibly acting as a molecular chaperone regulating kinesin-1 activity and/or cargo binding (Kamm et al., 2004). This intriguing function would imply the existence of an endogenous TorsinA cytosolic pool that might be available to interact with kinesin-1. Indeed, the literature suggests that oxidative or heat-shock stresses can induce TorsinA translocation from the ER to the cytosol (Adam et al., 2017; Hewett et al., 2003). Our structural study shows that the C-terminus of TorsinA binds, like JIP1, preferentially to KLC1TPR with a similar low micromolar dissociation constant. In addition to the interaction with the Y-acidic core, KCL1TPR appears also perfectly poised to stabilize the additional negatively charged residue at position p+3 as well as the more divergent peptide region N-terminal of the Y-acidic core. These interactions define a rather robust molecular interface that, on the basis of structural considerations, warrants a deeper analysis of a possible functional role of TorsinA as a kinesin-1 adaptor/cargo. Interestingly, a comparison of the KLC1TPRTorsinAC-term structure with that of the recently solved complex between the TorsinAAAA+ domain and its LULL1 activator reveals that the TorsinAC-term region can undergo a dramatic structural transition. The TorsinAC-term segment that is part of the TorsinAAAA+ domain folds into a α-helix in the complex with LULL1 playing a role in its stabilization (Demircioglu et al., 2016). On the other hand, TorsinAC-term assumes a completely extended conformation when in complex with KLC1TPR (Figure 2C,D). This change in secondary structure is reminiscent of that undergone by the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the tubulin-like FtsZ upon binding to different regulatory proteins where the CTD folds into a a-helix when bound to the E. coli FtsZ-binding domain of ZipA and Thermotoga maritima FtsA (Mosyak et al., 2000; Szwedziak et al., 2012) while it takes an extended conformation when bound to SlmA from E. coli, Vibrio cholera, and Klebsiella pneumonia(Schumacher and Zeng, 2016). This plasticity has been suggested to be important for the versatile recognition of different regulators (Schumacher and Zeng, 2016). Similarly, it could be a mechanism utilized by TorsinA to select different partners, in this case, in alternative subcellular locations.
The role of cargo adaptors in kinesin-1 motor activation is a complex and an incompletely understood one. Remarkably, adaptors’ featuring W-acidic motifs appear to encode both motor recognition (via KLCTPR binding) and activation capacities. For example, an artificial transmembrane protein containing either of the two cytosolic W-acidic motifs of calsyntenin was shown to induce kinesin-1’s vesicular association and anterograde transport in a KLC-dependent manner (Kawano et al., 2012). Moreover, these motifs can also functionally substitute for homologous regions within the vaccinia virus KLC binding protein A36 and activate transport (Dodding et al., 2011) or when fused to LAMP1, promote lysosome transport (Pu et al., 2015). Differently, while the C-terminal Y-acidic region of JIP1 is sufficient to recruit KLC1 to vesicles, it is not able to activate transport (Kawano et al., 2012). Indeed, JIP1 requires interactions with the coiled-coil region of KHC and the KHC-tail binding protein FEZ1, or JIP3, a separate member of the JIP family, for full activity (Blasius et al., 2007; Fu and Holzbaur, 2014; Hammond et al., 2008; Satake et al., 2013). Recently, a clear cooperative role of JIP1 and JIP3 has been identified for the anterograde axonal transport of TrkB receptors (Sun et al., 2017), further supporting previous results that indicated that JIP1 and JIP3 are co-transported in neuronal cells (Hammond et al., 2008). The structural results presented here in conjunction with our previous studies allow us to formulate some hypotheses as to why Y-acidic and W-acidic motifs induce different functional responses. Our previous work has demonstrated that binding of W-acidic motifs displaces an intramolecular interaction between the KLCTPR and the LFP-acidic region (Yip et al., 2016). Moreover, binding of W-acidic motifs or disruption of the LFP-acidic intramolecular interaction triggers global changes in the KLC conformation, promotes kinesin-1 activity and results in an additional binding site on KHC-tail becoming accessible (Sanger et al., 2017; Yip et al., 2016). A key piece of data supporting this model is the observation that inclusion of the inhibitory LFP-containing sequence on KLC1/2TPR substantially reduces its affinity for W-acidic peptides. On the other hand, inclusion of the LFP-acidic sequence has very little effect on KLC1TPR affinity for the JIP1C-term Y-acidic peptide. This suggests that Y-acidic binding might co-exist with LFP-acidic binding and therefore cannot alone initiate this activation pathway. Two possibilities then present themselves – firstly, cooperative interactions with JIP3 serve to displace the LFP-acidic linker, driving the same activation pathway. Our ITC and mass spectrometry data suggest the possibility that could be driven by steric effects resulting from the JIP3LZ2-mediated dimerization of KLC1TPR within the kinesin-1 tetramer. Alternatively, the LFP-acidic linker remains bound and there is an as yet uncharacterized activation pathway triggered by JIP3 binding that is more reliant on the additional direct adaptor interactions with KHC. Structural insight into KLC1-JIP1-JIP3 complexes and the tetrameric kinesin-1 tail region will be required to address this question.
Materials and methods
Cloning
Codon-optimized DNA sequences encoding the TPR domain of mouse KLC1 (residues 205–496, Uniprot Q5UE59, KLC1TPR) fused either to the C-terminal eleven amino acids of human JIP1 (residues 701–711, Uniprot Q9UQF2, JIP1C-term) or the C-terminal twelve amino acids of mouse TorsinA (residues 322–333, Uniprot Q9ER39, TorsinAC-term) linked via a (Thr-Gly-Ser)5 or 10 flexible connector were purchased from Genscript and subcloned between the NdeI/XhoI sites of a pET28 vector (Novagen). This strategy allows for the expression of chimeric proteins that will be identified as KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term and KLC1TPRTorsinAC-term, respectively, bearing a thrombin-cleavable N-terminal hexa-histidine tag. Nanobodies were generated by the VIB Nanobody Service Facility of Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) following the immunization of a llama with purified KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term according to published protocols. Out of a panel of 36 antigen-specific Nanobodies supplied in a pMECS vector, we sub-cloned a subset representing the most divergent amino acidic sequences between the PstI/BstEII sites of a pHEN6c vector. This allowed the expression of C-terminally His6-tagged Nanobodies in the periplasmic space of E.coli.
Protein expression and purification
Chimeric proteins were expressed in the E.coli BL21(DE3) strain. Briefly, single colonies were picked and grown at 37 °C overnight. Small-scale overnight bacterial cultures grown at 28 °C was used to inoculate 8×0.5L cultures that were incubated at 37 °C until they reached an OD600 of 0.4–0.6. The temperature was then lowered to 18 °C and protein synthesis was induced by the addition of 500 μM isopropyl b-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 16 hours. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 g for 15 minutes at 4 °C and resuspended in 50mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer at pH 7.5, 500mM NaCl, 5mM β-mercaptoethanol supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and 5U/mL of Benzonase endonuclease (Merck). Cell lysis was accomplished by sonication. Insoluble material was sedimented by centrifugation at 16500g for 1 hour at 4 °C and the supernatant microfiltered using a 0.22 μm pore size filter prior to loading on a HisTrap column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer for immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). Proteins were eluted with an imidazole gradient and fractions containing the target protein collected and dialysed overnight at 4 °C against imidazole-free lysis buffer. The purification tag was cleaved by incubating the dialysed sample for approximately 5 h in the presence of thrombin protease covalently bound to agarose beads (Thrombin CleanCleave Kit, Sigma). Beads were removed by filtration over a gravitational column and the eluate further microfiltered using 0.22 μm pore size filter prior to loading it on a HisTrap column (GE Healthcare) preequilibrated with lysis buffer. Untagged material present in the flow-through fraction was collected, concentrated, and further purified by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) on a 16/60 HiLoad Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 5mM β-mercaptoethanol.
Nanobodies were expressed in E.coli WK6 cells. Protein expression in TB medium was induced by addition of 1 mM IPTG at an OD600 of 0.9–1.0, and cells were grown overnight at 28°C. The periplasm fraction was harvested by osmotic shock, and Nanobodies were purified by IMAC and SEC using a HiLoad Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare). The Nb:KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term and Nb:KLC1TPR-torsinAC-term complexes used for crystallization were obtained by mixing the individual components with a 1:1 molar ratio and allowing incubation on ice for 30 min. The complexes were further purified by SEC on a 16/60 HiLoad Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare).
Crystallization
All crystallization experiments were performed using the vapor diffusion setup at 18 °C and a 1:1 protein:precipitant ratio in 400-nl sitting drops dispensed with the aid of Mosquito crystallization robot (TTP LabTech). Crystals of the Nb:KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term complex grew from a protein solution concentrated at ∼10 mg/ml in the presence of a non-buffered reservoir solution containing 0.04 M potassium phosphate monobasic, 16% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000 and 20% glycerol. For Nb:KLC1TPR-torsinAC-term, the complex was also concentrated at ∼10 mg/ml and crystals were obtained in the presence of 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 10% propan-2-ol, 20% PEG 4000. For cryoprotection, the latter crystals were briefly transferred to a reservoir solution in which the propan-2-ol concentration was increased to 30%.
X-ray data collection, processing and structure solution
Datasets at the 2.7-Å and 2.3-Å resolution were measured at the P14 beam line of Petra III (Hamburg, Germany) and at the I04 beam line of Diamond Light Source (Didcot, United Kingdom) for Nb:KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term and Nb:KLC1TPR-TorsinAC-term, respectively. Although the growth conditions are different both complexes crystallize in the monoclinic space group C2 and display similar cell dimensions (Table 1). Data were processed using the xia2 pipeline (Kabsch, 2010; Waterman et al., 2016; Winter et al., 2013) and the structures were solved by the molecular replacement (MR) technique using the software package Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007). Model building and crystallographic refinement was performed using COOT (Emsley and Cowtan, 2004) and BUSTER (Bricogne et al., 2017), respectively. A summary of data collection and refinement statistics are shown in Table 1. Structural images were prepared with PyMol (Schrödinger).
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)
Samples for ITC measurements were extensively dialyzed in buffer composed of 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. ITC experiments were conducted on a MicroCal ITC (MicroCal Inc.) instrument at a temperature of 20 °C. GSTJIP3LZ2 (550 μM) was loaded in the syringe and used as titrant while either His6-KLC1extTPR or His6-KLC1TPR-JIP1C-term were loaded in the cell and employed as analytes at the final concentration of 25 μM. Data were corrected for heats of dilution of the protein solution. Binding constants and other thermodynamic parameters were calculated by fitting the integrated titration data assuming a single set of binding sites using the Origin software package (OriginLab).
Fluorescence polarization (FP)
N-terminal TAMRA-conjugated peptides and non-conjugated peptides used for FP and competition measurements were supplied by Bio-Synthesis. Sequences were as follows: JIP1C-term, YTCPTEDIYLE; TorsinAC-term TVFTKLDYYLDD; SKIPWD, STNLEWDDSAI. Measurements were performed on a BMG Labtech PolarStar Omega plate reader at 20 °C by incubating 300 nM TAMRA-labeled peptides with the indicated protein at increasing concentrations in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Estimation of the equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) for the different peptides was performed assuming a one-site specific-binding model. For competition experiments, a mixture of TAMRA-JIP1C-term and KLC1TPR at 300 nM and 2 μM, respectively, was incubated with increasing concentrations of unlabeled SKIPWD peptide in buffer supplemented by 5% (v/v) DMSO. The concentration-dependent decrease in FP signal was fitted to a sigmoidal equation to derive IC50 using the Prism package (GraphPad Software). KI estimation was performed using the online tool (http://sw16.im.med.umich.edu/software/calc_ki/onlinetool) based on (Nikolovska-Coleska et al., 2004). All data points are the mean of three replicates.
Native Mass Spectrometry
The protein complex (25 μL) was buffer exchanged into 150 mM ammonium acetate, pH 7.5 using Micro Bio-Spin 6 columns (Bio-Rad, CA). The buffer exchanged sample was infused into the mass spectrometer, a Synapt G2Si qTOF (Waters, MA), using a 20:80 Au:Pd coated borosilicate capillary into a nanoflow electrospray source. The instrument was calibrated using a caesium iodide mixture. The mass spectrometer was run in positive mode with a capillary voltage of 1.2–2.0 kV, a sampling cone of 40–80 V and a source temperature of 45 °C. Mass spectra were processed using MassLynx V4.1 (Waters, MA).
Immunoprecipitation
HeLa cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, L-glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin, and cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 environment. For immunoprecipitation experiments, 1×106 cells were seeded on 10 cm dishes and transfected the next day with vectors expressing FLAG-JIP1 and HA-KLC1TPR. KLC1TPR variants R266S, V305T, N343S, N386S and N469S were produced by site-directed mutagenesis using the Quickchange kit and tested alongside wild-type HA-KLC1TPR. After 24 hours, transfected cells were lysed in 1 mL of lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % Nonidet P-40, 0.1 % Triton X-100 containing a protease inhibitor mixture (Roche)) for 10 min before centrifugation at 13000×g for 10 minutes at 4 °C. Supernatants were added to 40 μl of anti-FLAG M2 agarose (A2220, Sigma) and incubated at 4 °C for 2 hours on a rotator. After binding, beads were washed four times in lysis buffer, resuspended in 100 μL of buffer and 25 μL of SDS-loading buffer before boiling. 20 μL of samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot using antibodies against FLAG and HA.
Figure legends
Additional Information
Competing interests
All authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Funding
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Author contributions
SP, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article; MC, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article; YYY, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article; CT, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article; GG, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article; KH, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article; AP, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article; MPD, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article; RAS, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.
Additional Files
Major datasets
The following datasets were generated
Acknowledgments
The X-ray crystallography work was conducted at beamline I04 of Diamond Light Source (Didcot, UK) and at beamline P14 of Petra III/DESY (Hamburg, Germany). We are grateful to the staff scientists working at these beamlines for their excellent technical support.