Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Auditory evoked potentials to changes in speech sound duration in anesthetized mice

View ORCID ProfileA. Lipponen, J.L.O. Kurkela, Kyläheiko I., Hölttä S., View ORCID ProfileT. Ruusuvirta, View ORCID ProfileP. Astikainen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/329433
A. Lipponen
1Department of Psychology, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyväskylä, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Lipponen
  • For correspondence: Arto.Lipponen@jyu.fi
J.L.O. Kurkela
1Department of Psychology, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyväskylä, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyläheiko I.
1Department of Psychology, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyväskylä, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hölttä S.
1Department of Psychology, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyväskylä, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Ruusuvirta
2Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku, Rauma, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Ruusuvirta
P. Astikainen
1Department of Psychology, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyväskylä, Finland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Astikainen
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Electrophysiological response termed mismatch negativity (MMN) indexes auditory change detection in humans. An analogous response, called the mismatch response (MMR), is also elicited in animals. Mismatch response has been widely utilized in investigations of change detection in human speech sounds in rats and guinea pigs, but not in mice. Since e.g. transgenic mouse models provide important advantages for further studies, we studied processing of speech sounds in anesthetized mice. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded from the dura above the auditory cortex to changes in duration of a human speech sound /a/. In oddball stimulus condition, the MMR was elicited at 53-259 ms latency in response to the changes. The MMR was found to the large (from 200 ms to 110 ms) but not to smaller (from 200 ms to 120-180 ms) changes in duration. The results suggest that mice can represent human speech sounds in order to detect changes in their duration. The findings can be utilized in future investigations applying mouse models for speech perception.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 24, 2018.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Auditory evoked potentials to changes in speech sound duration in anesthetized mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Auditory evoked potentials to changes in speech sound duration in anesthetized mice
A. Lipponen, J.L.O. Kurkela, Kyläheiko I., Hölttä S., T. Ruusuvirta, P. Astikainen
bioRxiv 329433; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/329433
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Auditory evoked potentials to changes in speech sound duration in anesthetized mice
A. Lipponen, J.L.O. Kurkela, Kyläheiko I., Hölttä S., T. Ruusuvirta, P. Astikainen
bioRxiv 329433; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/329433

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3592)
  • Biochemistry (7562)
  • Bioengineering (5508)
  • Bioinformatics (20762)
  • Biophysics (10309)
  • Cancer Biology (7967)
  • Cell Biology (11627)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6602)
  • Ecology (10190)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13594)
  • Genetics (9532)
  • Genomics (12834)
  • Immunology (7917)
  • Microbiology (19525)
  • Molecular Biology (7651)
  • Neuroscience (42027)
  • Paleontology (307)
  • Pathology (1254)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2196)
  • Physiology (3263)
  • Plant Biology (7029)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1294)
  • Synthetic Biology (1949)
  • Systems Biology (5422)
  • Zoology (1114)