New Results

Bidirectional alterations in antibiotics susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus - Pseudomonas aeruginosa dual-species biofilm

Elena Y. Trizna, Maria N. Yarullina, Diana R. Baidamshina, Farida S. Akhatova, Elvira V. Rozhina, Rawil F. Fakhrullin, Alsu M. Khabibrakhmanova, Almira R. Kurbangalieva, Mikhail I. Bogachev, Airat R. Kayumov
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/334516

ABSTRACT

While in biofilms bacteria are embedded into an extracellular matrix which forms inaccessible barrier for antimicrobials thereby drastically increasing the concentrations of antibiotics required for treatment. Here we show that the susceptibility of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa to antibiotics in mixed biofilms significantly differs from monoculture biofilms depending on both conditions and chosen antimicrobial agents. While S. aureus could completely avoid vancomycin, ampicillin and ceftriaxone by embedding into the biofilm of P. aeruginosa, the very same consortium was characterized by 10–fold increase in susceptibility to broad-spectrum antimicrobials like ciprofloxacin and aminoglycosides compared to monocultures. These data clearly indicate that efficient treatment of biofilm-associated mixed infections requires antimicrobials active against both pathogens, since the interbacterial antagonism would enhance the efficacy of treatment. Moreover, similar increase in antibiotics efficacy was observed when P. aeruginosa suspension was added to the mature S. aureus biofilm, compared to S. aureus monoculture, and vice versa. These findings open promising perspectives to increase the antimicrobial treatment efficacy of the wounds infected with nosocomial pathogens by the transplantation of the skin residential microflora.

Introduction

Bacterial fouling is an important factor that strongly affects acute and chronic wounds healing and prevents wound scratch closure 1. Besides the physical obstruction of the cells, pathogenic bacteria produce various virulence factors including toxins and proteases that also affect cytokine production by keratinocytes, induce apoptosis of the host cells and cause inflammation 2–6.

S. aureus and P. aeruginosa are one of the most widespread pathogens causing various nosocomial infections, including pneumonia on the cystic fibrosis background, healthcare associated pneumonia and chronic wounds 7–10. During infection, bacterial cells are embedded into a self-produced extracellular matrix of organic polymers this way forming either mono- or polymicrobial biofilms 11,12 which drastically reduce their susceptibility to both antimicrobials and the immune system of the host 13,14. Current data suggests that bacterial pathogenicity is promoted during polymicrobial infections and recovery is delayed in comparison with monoculture infections 15–17. Accordingly, interspecies interactions between S. aureus and P. aeruginosa within mixed biofilms attracted major attention in recent years including both in vitro 15 and in vivo studies 16.

P. aeruginosa is known as a common dominator in polymicrobial biofilm-associated infections due to multiple mechanisms allowing its rapid adaptation to the specific conditions of the host. In particular, P. aeruginosa produces multiple molecules to compete with other microorganisms for space and nutrients. The main anti-staphylococcal tools of P. aeruginosa are siderophores and 2-n-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline N-oxide (HQNO), the inhibitor of the electron transport chain of S. aureus. Their presence shifts S. aureus to a fermentative mode of growth, eventually leading to reduced S. aureus viability 18–22, forces increased S. aureus biofilm formation 23,24 and transition of S. aureus into small-colony variants (SCVs) 25. SCV is a well-characterized phenotype detected in various diseases, including cystic fibrosis and device-related infections 23–26. SCVs appear as small, smooth colonies on a culture plate and grow significantly slower compared to wild type colonies. Remarkably, switch to the SCV phenotype improves the survival of S. aureus under unfavorable conditions, as it exhibits increased vancomycin and aminoglycoside resistance as well as intracellular survival 25–29. Prolonged co-culture with P. aeruginosa leads to higher proportions of stable S. aureus SCVs that is further increased in the presence of aminoglycosides 25.

P. aeruginosa was shown to reduce S. aureus during co-culture in vitro in both planktonic and biofilm forms30–33 and has been observed as the dominant pathogen in S. aureus-P. aeruginosa mixed infections 16. Nevertheless, despite of the antagonistic relationship of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa 34,35, several studies reported their mutual association both in vitro 36,37 and in acute and chronic wounds embedded in a mixed biofilm 8,38–42, with S. aureus typically residing on the wound surface, whereas P. aeruginosa being rather observed in the deep layers 15,42–45. Interestingly, in mixed P. aeruginosa - S. aureus biofilms from cystic fibrosis patients S. aureus was shown to be dominating during childhood, with P. aeruginosa prevalence increasing with aging and worsening patient prognosis 46–48. During the biofilm formation P. aeruginosa produces three main exopolysaccharides, namely alginate, Pel, and Psl, which form an extracellular matrix in the biofilm exhibiting both structural and protective functions 49–52. Under prevalent Pel secretion, loose biofilm structures are formed 53 and thus S. aureus is able to penetrate into the biofilm 53. In has been recently suggested that rare observation of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa together in diagnostic cultures of sputum of cystic fibrosis patients could be attributed to the existence of S. aureus as SCVs that are more difficult to detect due to their small size and fastidious growth requirements 26,28.

Investigations on alternative treatment options against biofilm-associated infections are largely based upon using specialized agents (such as quaternary ammonium compounds, curcumin or chlorquinaldol) or enzymatic treatment that in combinations with antibiotics provide high local drug concentrations avoiding systemic adverse effects 54–60. While many approaches to targeting staphylococcal biofilms were reported 58,61–65, only few successive ways of targeting P. aeruginosa are known 60,66–68. Among various compounds exhibiting anti-biofilm activities, the derivatives of 2(5H)-furanone have been reported to inhibit biofilm formation by Staphylococci 69–73. While many of these approaches exhibited promising results against staphylococcal monocultures, their efficiency against polymicrobial biofilms remains questionable. A few investigations indicated that extracellular polymeric substances forming the biofilm matrix provide protection against antibiotics to all inhabitants of the biofilm, including the non-producers, although the biofilm as a whole is weakened 53,74, this way proposing that S. aureus could potentially survive in the presence of P. aeruginosa and even co-exist with it in a polymicrobial biofilm, benefiting from the antimicrobial barrier formed by the P. aeruginosa matrix components.

Here we demonstrate that S. aureus successfully survives in the P. aeruginosa biofilm matrix under conditions of staphylococcus-specific treatment. In contrast, the efficiency of antimicrobials active against both bacterial species like ciprofloxacin and aminoglycosides in mixed biofilms increased nearly 10-fold in comparison with corresponding monocultures. These data suggest bi-directional influences on the antibiotic susceptibility in mixed biofilms, the fact that should be taken in account when considering an optimized strategy of polymicrobial infections treatment.

Results

Modeling the S. aureus – P. aeruginosa mixed biofilm

Despite of known antagonistic interactions between S. aureus and P. aeruginosa 35, they are still the most common pathogens evoking wound infections and forming mixed biofilms on their surfaces 39,40,42. We have simulated in vitro different situations where either S. aureus suspension was added to the preformed 24-h old biofilm of P. aeruginosa or, vice versa, P. aeruginosa was added to the preformed 24-h old biofilm of S. aureus. As a control, both strains were inoculated simultaneously and grown for 48 h with the broth exchange after 24 h of cultivation. Both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were able to penetrate into the preformed biofilm of the other bacterium (Fig. 1). Irrespective of which bacterium initially preformed the biofilm and which one was added later, the ratio of their CFUs in the biofilm after 24 h cultivation remained around 1:10 with the prevalence of the first biofilm former (Fig. 1 A and B), and was 1:1 when both bacteria were inoculated simultaneously (Fig. 1 C).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. In vitro simulation of the S. aureus-P. aeruginosa mixed biofilm.

(A) P.aeruginosa suspension in a fresh broth was added to the preformed 24-h old biofilm of S. aureus or (B) S. aureus was added to the preformed 24-h old biofilm of P. aeruginosa and cultivation was continued for the next 24 h. (C) As a control, both strains were inoculated simultaneously and were grown for 48 h with the broth exchange after 24 h of cultivation. The biofilms were then assessed with either crystal-violet staining of wells bottom (upper lane) or differential CFUs counting.

Next to analyze the biofilm structure and cells distribution in the matrix, the S. aureus - P. aeruginosa mixed biofilm was grown in imaging cover slips, live/dead stained with SYTO9/PI and analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa formed 20-25 μm-thick biofilms when growing as monocultures (Fig. 2 A, B). While the mixed biofilm was of similar thickness, it appeared more rigid in comparison with monoculture ones and the fraction of non-viable cells was similar to monocultures (compare Fig. 2 A, B and C and Fig. S1 A) suggesting stability of S. aureus - P. aeruginosa consortium under the conditions used. By using differential staining of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (Fig. 2 D and Fig. S1 A) we have also analyzed the distributions of S. aureus (red-stained) and P. aeruginosa (blue-stained) over the biofilm layers and evaluated their relative fractions in each layer (Fig. 2E). Interestingly, in the mixed biofilm, S. aureus appeared as microcolonies embedded in the biofilm matrix (see white arrow in Fig. 2 C and 2 D) tended to distribute in the upper layers of the biofilm, while P. aeruginosa dominated in its lower layers (see Fig. 2 E).

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Mono- and polymicrobial biofilms formed by S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.

Cells were grown without any antimicrobial (A-F) or in presence of 2(5H)-furanone derivative (F105, G-L) specifically inhibiting the biofilm formation by S. aureus and exhibiting no effects on P. aeruginosa. The 48-h old biofilms were stained by Syto9/PI (A-C, G-I) or ViaGram Red+ (D, J) to differentiate S. aureus (stained in red) and P. aeruginosa (stained in blue) and assessed by CLSM. (E, K) The distribution of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in the biofilm layers expressed as their relative fractions. The repression of S. aureus ica-operon in mixed biofilm by F105 was monitored by detection of GFP in ica-GFP strain (F, L). The scale bars indicate 10 μm. S. aureus microcolonies in a mixed biofilm are shown by arrows.

In the last decades different approaches to inhibit the biofilm formation by various bacteria were developed 55,56,58, appearing nowadays more successful in prevention of S. aureus biofilm formation 61,62,64. Therefore we simulated the S. aureus - P. aeruginosa mixed biofilm formation under the conditions of biofilm-preventing treatment. For that, bacteria were cultivated in the presence of a derivative of 2(5H)-furanone denoted as F105, identified in recent study as an efficient inhibitor of biofilm formation by S. aureus 73,75, while exhibiting no significant effect against P. aeruginosa (Table S1). When S. aureus was grown for 48 h in the presence of 2.5 μg/ml of F105, no biofilm was formed and cells growth was retarded, while most of the cells remained viable in both surface-adherent (Fig. 2 G) and planktonic state (Fig. S2 A). As well, the repression of the biofilm formation was confirmed by evaluation of the ica-GFP expression in presence of F105. No GFP was observed in cells grown in presence of F105 in S.aureus pRB-ica-gfp (Fig. S3 C, D), while the constitutive expression of GFP in S.aureus pC-tuf-gfp76 was not affected under these conditions (Fig. S4 B, D) confirming the inhibition of the biofilm formation. As expected, no significant effect of F105 on P. aeruginosa viability could be observed (Fig. 2 H, Table S1). Moreover, the biofilm formation was slightly increased as determined by crystal violet staining (Fig. S5) and CLSM (compare Fig. 2 B and H).

When S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were grown together in the presence of F105, S. aureus microcolonies were also observed, similarly to the control (compare Fig. 2 C, D and I, J), suggesting that S. aureus cells are able to form clusters inside the biofilm of P. aeruginosa, despite of its antagonistic pressure (see white arrows on Fig. 2 I, J). No GFP in S. aureus pRB-ica-gfp was observed (Fig. 2 L), indicating that in presence of F105 in mixed biofilm the matrix is produced mainly by P. aeruginosa. Next, in marked contrast to the control, the S. aureus cells were observed predominantly in the middle layers of the biofilm (compare Fig. 2 E and K).

The microscopic data were also validated by direct CFU counting in the biofilm; by using mannitol salt agar plates and cetrimide agar plates the bacterial species were differentiated and their CFUs were counted separately (Fig. S2). In the presence of F105 the amount of adherent viable S. aureus cells decreased by six orders of magnitude in monoculture, suggesting complete inhibition of the biofilm formation, while no significant differences in CFUs of P. aeruginosa could be observed. In a mixed biofilm, the S. aureus to P. aeruginosa ratio remained unchanged in the control, while the fraction of viable S. aureus cells decreased slightly in the presence of F105, this way confirming CLSM data and supporting the hypothesis that S. aureus is apparently able to embed and hide thereby in the biofilm formed by P. aeruginosa when its own biofilm formation is repressed.

Atomic force microscopy

The atomic force microscopy of both monocultures and mixed biofilms of S. aureus - P. aeruginosa confirmed the CLSM data. Thus, in control wells the biofilms of monocultures of both strains formed a typical confluent multilayer biofilm (Fig. 3 A, B), in mixed biofilm S. aureus was prevalently distributed in the upper layers (Fig. 3 C). Interestingly, the adhesion force of the mixed biofilm was 3-fold lower compared to S. aureus monoculture biofilm and 2-fold lower compared to P. aeruginosa monoculture biofilm (Fig. 4), suggesting more irregular structure of the mixed biofilm 53. When growing with F105, only P. aeruginosa could be observed on the biofilm surface in the mixed culture, suggesting that S. aureus was hidden into the lower biofilm layers. Since the adhesion force of the mixed biofilm in the presence of F105 was similar to that one in the monoculture P. aeruginosa (Fig. 3 F and Fig. 4), we assumed that the biofilm matrix under these conditions was presumably formed by P. aeruginosa.

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Atomic force microscopy (Peak Force Tapping mode) of mono- and polymicrobial biofilms formed by S. aureus and P. aeruginosa.

Cells were grown without any antimicrobials (A-C) or in presence of F105 specifically inhibiting the biofilm formation by S. aureus cells (D-F) for 48 hours, then the plates were washed, fixed with glutardialdehyde and analyzed with AFM. (I) – Sensor height (topography); (II) – 3D reconstruction of height channel image; (III) –adhesion.

Figure 4.
Figure 4. The adhesion force of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa monoculture and mixed biofilms.

To repress the biofilm formation F105 was added up to 2.5 μg/ml. Asterisks denote statistical significant difference was confirmed by the Kruskal-Wallis statistical test at p < 0.05.

S. aureus and P. aeruginosa susceptibility to antibiotics in mixed biofilms

Our data suggest that S. aureus under anti-biofilm treatment conditions is able to form microcolonies in the biofilm of P. aeruginosa, thereby apparently changing their susceptibility to antimicrobials. To further verify this assumption, the effect of various conventional antibiotics on preformed mono- and polymicrobial biofilms was studied. The 48-h old monoculture and mixed biofilms were prepared in 24-well adhesive plates in either absence or presence of F105 to repress the biofilm formation by S. aureus itself. Then the biofilms were washed with sterile 0.9% NaCl and wells were loaded with fresh broth supplemented with antibiotics at wide range of final concentrations to fill the range of their 1-16 fold MBCs (see table S1 for MBC values). After 24h incubation the amount of CFUs of both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in both the culture liquid and the biofilm was determined by the drop plate assay and the distribution of cells in the mixed biofilm was assessed by CLSM.

First, the biofilm-eradicating activity was investigated for the antibiotics conventionally used for S. aureus treatment but typically inefficient against P. aeruginosa including vancomycin, tetracycline, ampicillin and ceftriaxone (Figs 5, S6, S7). In monoculture, vancomycin reduced the amount of viable S. aureus cells in the biofilm by 3 orders of magnitude only at 16×MBC (Fig. 5 A). In the culture liquid, 0.125×MBC (corresponds to 1×MIC, see Table S1) of vancomycin was sufficient to decrease of CFUs count by three orders of magnitude (Fig S6). Apparently, it could be attributed to the protection of detached cell clumps with EPS tailings (Fig. S8). Expectedly, in the presence of F105 (2.5 μg/ml) no biofilm could be formed and bacteria were found completely dead both in the biofilm and in culture liquid after 24-h exposition to the antibiotic at 1×MBC (Fig. 5 C, S6). Irrespective of either presence or absence of F105 P. aeruginosa remained resistant to the antibiotic (Fig. 5 B, D).

Figure 5.
Figure 5. The effect of vancomycin on viability of S. aureus and P.aeruginosa embedded into their mono- and polymicrobial biofilms.

Vancomycin was added to 48 hours-old biofilms grown in absence (A-B, E-F) or presence (C-D, H-J) of F105 to inhibit the biofilm formation by S. aureus. After 24 h incubation, the biofilms were washed twice with sterile 0.9% NaCl. The adherent cells were scratched, resuspended and CFUs were counted. Alternatively, biofilms were stained by Syto9/PI and biofilms were assessed by CLSM. The scale bars indicate 10 μm.

In a mixed culture, irrespective of the S. aureus biofilm formation repression by F105, viable S. aureus cells were identified within the biofilm and the efficiency of antibiotic reduced drastically (Figs. 5 A, C, compare reds and violets). Statistical significance of this discrepancy was confirmed by the Kruskal-Wallis statistical test at p < 0.05. Similar inefficiency of vancomycin against S. aureus in the culture liquid was observed in mixed cultures (Fig. S6).

For a deeper understanding of localization distribution and viability of bacteria in mixed biofilms under vancomycin treatment, the CLSM analysis has been performed. In the presence of F105 no biofilm of S. aureus could be observed resulting in significant decrease of viable cells fraction after vancomycin treatment, in contrast to the biofilm-embedded cells (compare Fig. 5 E and H). In the mixed biofilm the cell clusters (apparently S. aureus microcolonies) were observed in the biofilm matrix similarly to the control (compare Fig. 2 C, I and Fig 5 G, J), suggesting that staphylococci are able to escape the antimicrobials and survive by embedding into the polymicrobial biofilm. In marked contrast to the control where S. aureus was mostly located in the top layers of the biofilm, under vancomycin treatment most of S. aureus cells appeared in the lower and middle layers of the biofilm (compare Fig. 2 E and Fig. 6). These data suggest that vancomycin-resistant P. aeruginosa cells in the upper layers of the biofilm apparently prevented the penetration of the antibiotic into the matrix this way reducing the susceptibility of S. aureus to antibiotics considerably. Of note, S. aureus cells remained mainly viable in bottom layers apparently because of protection by P. aeruginosa cells (Fig. S9).

Figure 6.
Figure 6. The effect of vancomycin on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa distribution in mixed biofilms.

Cells were grown in absence (A, C) or in presence of F105 specifically inhibiting the biofilm formation by S.aureus cells (B, D). Vancomycin (256 μg/mL corresponding to 8×MBC for S. aureus) was added to 48 hours-old biofilms. After 24 h incubation, the biofilms were stained by ViaGram Red+ to differentiate S. aureus (stained in red) and P. aeruginosa (stained in blue) and assessed by CLSM. The scale bars indicate 10 μm. (C, D) The distribution of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in the biofilm layers are expressed as their relative fractions.

It has been suggested previously that 2-n-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline N-oxide (HQNO) and siderophores pyoverdine and pyochelin produced by P. aeruginosa force the shift of S. aureus to a fermentative mode of growth under anoxia and decrease thereby their susceptibility to vancomycin, the cell wall-targeting antibiotic29. To test whether this mechanism or hiding into the biofilm of P. aeruginosa primarily govern the decreased susceptibility of S. aureus to antimicrobials in the mixed biofilms, the effect of other conventional antibiotics effective only against S. aureus was investigated. Thus, ampicillin and ceftriaxone, antibiotics also targeting the cell wall synthesis although by another mechanism (by irreversible inhibition of the transpeptidase), as well as tetracycline, which inhibits the translation initiation by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, were used.

Similarly to vancomycin, treatment by ampicillin, tetracycline and ceftriaxone was almost inefficient against biofilm-embedded S. aureus, while under conditions of biofilm formation repression by F105, the 1-2×MBC of antimicrobials led to the complete death of cells in 24 h (Fig. S7). In culture liquids, 0.25-0.5×MBC of ampicillin and ceftriaxone provided the full death of S. aureus, 0.125×MBC of tetracycline decreased the amount of viable S. aureus cells by 3 orders of magnitude. F105 reduced by factor 4 the amount of antimicrobials sufficient to kill bacteria completely (Fig. S7 A, C). In the mixed culture, even despite of the S. aureus biofilm formation repression with F105, in both the culture liquid and biofilm S. aureus cells remained insensitive to any of antimicrobials tested (Fig. S7 A, C). CLSM analysis indicated considerable redistribution of S. aureus from upper to the bottom layers of the biofilm (Fig. S10), apparently leading to reduced antibiotic efficacy. Under double treatment by F105 and antimicrobials, the prevalence of P. aeruginosa in the biofilm was observed in agreement with the CFU count data (Figs S7 and S10).

These data suggest that under antimicrobial treatment conditions S. aureus changes its preferred topical localizations by hiding in the lower layers of mixed biofilm formed by another bacterium like P. aeruginosa insensitive to most antimicrobials probably thereby increasing its resistance to the treatment.

Next, we investigated the effect of broad-spectrum antimicrobials such as ciprofloxacin, amikacin and gentamycin which are active against both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (see Table S1). In contrast to the previous group of antimicrobials, high concentrations of ciprofloxacin efficiently eradicated both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus monocultures even in the biofilm-embedded form (Fig. 7 A, B). Interestingly, when the mixed biofilm was treated, nearly 10-fold lower concentration of antimicrobial was sufficient to obtain similar reduction of P. aeruginosa CFUs in the biofilm, although not for detached cells (Fig 7 B, Fig S11). Moreover, significant increase of susceptibility of both biofilm-embedded and detached S.aureus to ciprofloxacin was observed in mixed culture in contrast to monoculture (see Figs 7A, S11 A). Finally, in the mixed biofilm the complete death of both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus could be observed at 8×MBC of ciprofloxacin, in marked contrast to monocultures (Fig 7 A, B).

Figure 7.
Figure 7. The effect of ciprofloxacin on viability of S. aureus and P.aeruginosa embedded into their mono- and polymicrobial biofilms.

Ciprofloxacin was added to 48 hours-old biofilms grown in absence (A-B, E-F) or presence (C-D, H-J) of F105 to inhibit the biofilm formation by S. aureus. After 24 h incubation, the biofilms were washed twice with sterile 0.9% NaCl. The adherent cells were scratched, resuspended and CFUs were counted. Alternatively, biofilms were stained by Syto9/PI and biofilms were assessed by CLSM. The scale bars indicate 10 μm.

Similarly, 1-2×MBC of aminoglycosides (amikacin or gentamicin) led to the complete death of both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in mixed biofilm while reducing their CFUs in monocultures only by 2-3 orders of magnitude at 8×MBCs (Fig. 8). For detached S. aureus cells the effect was less pronounced (Fig. S12), while the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to both aminoglycosides in the culture liquid was slightly increased in contrast to ciprofloxacin (Fig. S11).

Figure 8.
Figure 8. The effect of amikacin and gentamycin on viability of S. aureus and P.aeruginosa in mono- and polymicrobial biofilms.

Antimicrobials were added to 48 hours-old biofilms grown in absence (A-B) or presence (C-D) of F105 to inhibit the biofilm formation by S. aureus. After 24 h incubation, the biofilms were washed twice with sterile 0.9% NaCl. The adherent cells were scratched, resuspended and CFUs were counted.

In the presence of F105, just 0.5×MBC of any tested antimicrobial was already sufficient for the complete death of both S. aureus detached and biofilm-embedded cells (see Fig. 5 C and Fig. 7 C), similarly to vancomycin, tetracycline, ampicillin and ceftriaxone (see Fig. 5 and Fig. S7). The presence of F105 did not affect the susceptibility of monoculture P. aeruginosa biofilm to antibiotics. In contrast, in mixed cultures the inhibition of S. aureus by F105 restored the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa back to the monoculture level, suppressing the observed high efficiency of antimicrobials against this bacterium in the mixed biofilm (compare pallets B and D in Figs. 7, 8, S11, S12). Surprisingly, the efficiency of aminoglycosides against S. aureus in mixed culture did not depend on presence of F105 (pallets C in Figs. 7, 8, S11, S12).

The CLSM analysis of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa monoculture and mixed biofilms treated with ciprofloxacin confirmed the CFUs counting data. In particular, while 8×MBC did not affect either S. aureus or P. aeruginosa cells in monoculture biofilms (Fig. 7 E, F), in the mixed biofilm a huge fraction of non-viable cells was observed (Fig. 7 G). In marked contrast, repression of the S. aureus biofilm production by F105 led to a reversal with most P. aeruginosa cells green-stained while S. aureus identified as non-viable in mixed culture (Fig. 7 J).

The distribution of bacteria in the mixed biofilm layers under treatment with ciprofloxacin was also assessed (Fig. 9). In contrast to vancomycin treatment, here S. aureus dominated in the upper layers of the mixed biofilm (compare Fig 6 and 9 A and C) and remained alive, while P. aeruginosa were presumably dead (see Figs S9, S13, S14) suggesting no reversal protection of P. aeruginosa by S. aureus biofilm. On the other hand, double treatment by ciprofloxacin combined with F105 resulted in hiding of S. aureus in the bottom layers of the biofilm and increased resistance of P. aeruginosa. Treatment by amikacin and gentamycin led to considerably different distributions of bacteria over the biofilm layers with the prevalence of S. aureus in the bottom layers irrespective of its biofilm repression by F105 (Fig. S14, cells distribution patterns) but qualitatively similar bacterial survival patterns (see Fig. S12). Moreover, under single antibiotic treatment P. aeruginosa were presumably dead, while S. aureus remained viable (Fig. S14). In the presence of F105 P. aeruginosa remained alive and much less S. aureus cells could be observed in the biofilm, as almost all of them were identified as non-viable.

Figure 9.
Figure 9. The effect of ciprofloxacin on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa distribution in mixed biofilms.

Cells were grown normally (A, C) or in presence of F105 specifically inhibiting the biofilm formation by S. aureus cells (B, D). Ciprofloxacin (512 μg/mL corresponding to 8×MBC for both bacteria) was added to 48 hours-old biofilms. After 24 h incubation, the biofilms were stained by ViaGram Red+ to differentiate S. aureus (stained in red) and P. aeruginosa (stained in blue) and assessed by CLSM. The scale bars indicate 10 μm. (C, D) The distribution of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in the biofilm layers are expressed as their relative fractions.

Taken together these data suggest that complex interspecies interactions between S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in mixed biofilm significantly affect the efficacy of treatment by antimicrobials with different specificity.

Recent data indicate that S. aureus forms so-called Small Colony Variants (SCV) when growing with P. aeruginosa or when treated with aminoglycosides due to the defects in respiration 23–26,29. Cells with SCV-phenotype are much more robust against external stresses compared to regular S. aureus cells, and thus the observed drastic decrease of S. aureus susceptibility to antimicrobials in mixed biofilms could be potentially attributed to the SCV formation. To verify this hypothesis, next the CFUs were counted by plating the cells on LB broth with colistin, which specifically kills P. aeruginosa but does not affect S. aureus. While the SCVs constituted up to 90% of S. aureus population (Fig. S15), that fits with previous reports27, the effect of higher efficiency of broad-spectrum antibiotics against mixed biofilms could nevertheless be observed (Fig. S15).

This fact together with the observation that the repression of S. aureus by F105 abrogated the effect of higher efficiency of aminoglycosides against P. aeruginosa in mixed biofilms indicates that the increase of broad-spectrum antibiotics efficacy against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in mixed biofilms is less related or unrelated to SCV formation and rather governed by interspecies interaction between these bacteria. One of the main antagonistic tools of P. aeruginosa is the production of cyanide 77. To test whether it could be one of mechanisms increasing the efficiency of antimicrobials in mixed cultures, the experiments have been performed by using S.aureus 0349 pCXcydABsa 77 strain insensitive to cyanide. Despite of cyanide resistance, similar drastic reduction of S. aureus CFU in mixed biofilms could be observed when treated with ciprofloxacin and aminoglycosides also ruling out the cyanide synthesis by P. aeruginosa as the key contributing mechanism and indicating that other factors lead the observed effects (Fig. S16).

Intervention of P. aeruginosa into S. aureus biofilm and vice versa as a possible way to enhance antimicrobial susceptibility

Our results indicate that under appropriate conditions both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa due to their antagonistic interactions appear more susceptible to broad-spectrum antimicrobials in polymicrobial biofilms, compared to their monoculture counterparts. Based on these data, we have suggested that also the susceptibility of monoculture biofilms could be increased by deliberate intervention of P. aeruginosa into preformed S. aureus biofilm, and vice versa.

To verify the efficacy of this approach, P. aeruginosa suspension (106 CFU/mL) was added to the 24 h-old S. aureus biofilm and bacteria were incubated for the next 24 h. Then the biofilm was washed by sterile saline and fresh broth containing different antimicrobials was added into the wells. After 24 h the number of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus CFUs was counted by using differential media.

The introduction of P. aeruginosa into S. aureus biofilm did not change the efficacy of any antibiotic against P. aeruginosa itself (Fig. 10, lane II). In contrast, 1×MBC of ciprofloxacin led to the reduction of viable S. aureus in biofilm by 3 orders of magnitude, while in the monoculture 4-8×MBC was required to achieve the same effect (Fig. 10, lane I, compare reds and violets). Amikacin and gentamycin, being almost inefficient against S. aureus monoculture biofilm up to 8×MBC, were able to decrease the S. aureus CFUs in biofilm by 3 orders of magnitude already at 1-2×MBC after introduction of P. aeruginosa with the most pronounced effect observed for gentamycin.

Figure 10.
Figure 10. The susceptibility of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus after introduction of the antagonist into monoculture biofilms.

(I-II) P. aeruginosa suspension in a fresh broth was added to the preformed 24-h old biofilm of S. aureus or (III-IV) S. aureus was added to the preformed 24-h old biofilm of P. aeruginosa and cultivation was continued for the next 24 h. Then antimicrobials were added and after 24 h incubation CFUs in biofilms were counted. Asterisks show significant difference between CFUs number between monoculture and mixed biofilms.

In the reverse experiment, when S. aureus was added to the P. aeruginosa biofilm, a remarkable increase of ciprofloxacin efficacy against P. aeruginosa could be observed (Fig. 10, lane IV, compare blues and violets), while the susceptibility of S. aureus itself did not change significantly. The efficacy of aminoglycosides has increased only against S. aureus, while not against P. aeruginosa.

Discussion

Biofilm formation represents an important virulence factor of many bacteria, as the extracellular matrix drastically reduces their susceptibility to antimicrobials resulting in up to 1000-fold higher tolerance to antibiotics of biofilm-embedded cells compared to their planktonic forms 14,78,79. In contrast, polymicrobial communities are often characterized by concurrent interspecies interactions that likely overwhelm the potential benefits from biofilm protection. Here we show that in S. aureus – P. aeruginosa mixed biofilms, the most common pathogenic agents causing various nosocomial infections 7–9, bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics is drastically changed making them significantly more or less vulnerable to treatment than in monoculture biofilms depending on both conditions and chosen antimicrobial agents.

Despite of the antagonistic relationship between S. aureus and P. aeruginosa described in multiple studies 34,35,80, these bacteria can be found in close association in acute and chronic wounds being embedded into mixed biofilms 8,38–42. Our in vitro data show that the inoculation of S. aureus to the mature P. aeruginosa biofilm or vice versa leads to the formation of mixed biofilm, although with the prevalence of the first biofilm former (Fig. 1). The co-cultivation of both bacteria results in the formation of a more rigid biofilm, where S. aureus is located mainly in the upper layers, while P. aeruginosa can be found mostly in the lower layers of the biofilm (Fig. 2), in agreement with earlier data 15,42–45.

In several works the alteration of S. aureus susceptibility to various antimicrobials in presence of P. aeruginosa has been shown mainly in liquid cultures 21,81,82. Here, we investigated the effect of two groups of antimicrobials on bacterial viability in mixed biofilms. The first group contained vancomycin, tetracycline, ampicillin and ceftriaxone that are known to exhibit specific activity against S. aureus while leaving P. aeruginosa nearly unaffected. The second group included broad-spectrum antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and amikacin that exhibited comparable MBC values against both studied bacteria (see table S1). Additionally, we also simulated the biofilm-preventing treatment with earlier described compound F105, specifically affecting only S. aureus biofilm formation 73. In control experiments with S. aureus monoculture biofilms, none of the antimicrobials exhibited any bactericidal effect at their 8-16×MBCs, while 1×MBC was already sufficient for the complete eradication of both adherent and detached cells under biofilm repression conditions with F105 (compare Figs 5, 7, 8, S6, S7, S11, S12 reds on panels A and C). In addition, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and amikacin at 8×MBCs significantly reduced the number of CFUs of biofilm-embedded P. aeruginosa (Figs 5, 7, 8, S6, S7, S11, S12 blues on panels B and D).

In mixed biofilms, S. aureus became significantly less susceptible to antimicrobials active specifically against S. aureus such as vancomycin, tetracycline, ampicillin and ceftriaxone independently of presence of the biofilm repressing agent F105. It has been reported previously that HQNO produced by P. aeruginosa decrease the S. aureus susceptibility to vancomycin in mixed cultures in concentration-dependent manner and this effect was attributed to the fermentative mode of ETC action 29. In our experiments, not only vancomycin but the other S. aureus-specific antimicrobials like ampicillin, tetracycline and ceftriaxone became inefficient against S. aureus in dual-species biofilm (see Figs 5, S7) irrespective of staphylococcal biofilm repression with F105 (Fig. 5). CLSM analysis revealed that S. aureus was re-localized under treatment conditions to the middle and lower layers of the biofilm and remained viable apparently being embedded into the matrix of P. aeruginosa biofilm (see Figs 6, S9, S10). These data allowed suggesting that staphylococci are able to escape the antimicrobials by embedding into the biofilm matrix of P. aeruginosa and survive there, despite of antagonistic interactions between these bacteria. Notably, in mixed biofilms S. aureus formed cell clumps in the biofilm matrix (compare Fig. 2 C, D, I, J and Fig. 5 G, J), probably, to defend of P. aeruginosa antagonistic factors.

By contrast, when the S. aureus – P. aeruginosa mixed biofilms were treated with any of the broad-spectrum antimicrobials such as ciprofloxacin, gentamicin or amikacin, nearly 10–fold lower concentrations were sufficient to achieve the same reduction in the CFUs number of both bacteria in the biofilm, in comparison with monoculture treatment (Figs 7 and 8, compare violets with reds or blues on panels A and B). This effect was more pronounced for aminoglycosides, which at already 1–2×MBC led to the complete death of both biofilm-embedded and detached cells in dual-species biofilm, while in monocultures 8×MBC was required to reduce the number of CFUs by 3–5 orders of magnitude (Figs 8 and S12) despite of reported synergy of F105 with aminoglycosides 73. In the meanwhile, the observed reduction of the S. aureus CFUs number was not a consequence of their transition into small colony variants in response to aminoglycosides and cyanide production by P. aeruginosa (see Figs S15, S16). Apparently, this effect could be attributed to rhamnolipids synthesis with P. aeruginosa which increase S. aureus susceptibility to aminoglycosides 81.

In contrast to other works on antimicrobial susceptibility of S. aureus – P. aeruginosa dual species cultures, here we show that S. aureus also affects the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa biofilm-embedded cells to antimicrobials with the most pronounced effect for aminoglycosides. Moreover, tetracycline and ceftriaxone, while being inefficient against P. aeruginosa, at high concentrations significantly reduced the CFUs of this bacterium in the mixed biofilms (Fig. S7). This suggests that mechanisms of interbacterial interaction affecting bacterial susceptibility in biofilms differ from those in liquid cultures and are still to be understood.

Interestingly, under repression of the S. aureus biofilm formation by F105, the efficiency of ciprofloxacin and aminoglycosides against S. aureus did not change significantly, while the sensitivity of P. aeruginosa was restored to the level characteristic for its monoculture biofilm (Figs 7 and 8, compare violets with reds or blues on panels C and D). This effect could be attributed to either the significant reduction of S. aureus fraction in the biofilm (see Fig. 9, S13, S14) or the repression of the antagonistic factors production by S. aureus due to complex changes in its cell metabolism in the presence of F105 73,75. Nevertheless, the molecular basis of these complex interbacterial interactions that under certain conditions lead to a clear reversal in the antimicrobials susceptibility requires further investigations.

Taken together, our data clearly indicate that efficient treatment of biofilm-associated mixed infections requires antimicrobials which would be active against dominant pathogens. As we have shown for the S. aureus and P. aeruginosa mixed culture model, in this case the interbacterial antagonism under certain conditions assists antimicrobial treatment. In contrast, treatment by antibiotics with different efficacy against various consortia members leads to the survival of sensitive cells in the matrix formed by the resistant ones.

Finally, we have shown that S. aureus and P. aeruginosa are able to penetrate into each other’s mature biofilms (see Fig. 1 A and B) and by this intervention significantly affect the susceptibility of the mixed biofilm to antimicrobials (Fig. 10). When P. aeruginosa was introduced into S. aureus biofilm, all antimicrobials reduced the amount of CFUs of both bacteria in the biofilm by 3 orders of magnitude at 1–2×MBC with more pronounced effect observed for gentamicin. In the reverse experiment, the inoculation of S. aureus to the mature P. aeruginosa biofilm significantly increased the efficacy of ciprofloxacin against P. aeruginosa.

From a broader perspective, we believe that artificial intervention of antagonistic bacteria into already preformed monoculture biofilms could be used to enhance their antimicrobial treatment efficacy. We suggest that this approach has a strong potential of further development towards innovative treatment of biofilm-associated infections such as introduction of the skin residential saprophytic microflora to the biofilms formed by nosocomial pathogens to increase antimicrobial treatment efficacy. While in this work we demonstrated the synergy of interbacterial antagonism with antimicrobials using the well-studied S. aureus - P. aeruginosa model system, we believe that many other bacteria of normal body microflora are available to antagonize with nosocomial pathogens and thus can be used for the enhancement of microbial infections treatment by using microbial transplantation.

Materials and Methods

Derivate of 2(5H)-furanone designed as F105 (3-Chloro-5(S)-[(1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyloxy]-4-[4-methylphenylsulfonyl]-2(5H)-furanone) was described previously 83 and synthesized at the department of Organic Chemistry, A.M. Butlerov Chemical Institute, Kazan Federal University.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus (ATCC 29213) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853D-5) were used in this assay. The bacterial strains were stored in 10 % (V/V) glycerol stocks at −80 °C and freshly streaked on blood agar plates (BD Diagnostics) followed by their overnight growth at 35 °C before use. Fresh colony material was used to adjust an optical density to 0.5 McFarland (equivalent to 108 cells/mL) in 0.9 % NaCl solution that was used as a working suspension. For the biofilm assay the previously developed BM broth (glucose 5g, peptone 7g, MgSO4× 7H2O 2.0g and CaCl2× 2H2O 0.05g in 1.0 liter tap water) 57,71,84 where both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa formed rigid biofilms in 2 days was used. The mannitol salt agar (peptones 10g, meat extract 1g, NaCl 75g, D-mannitol 10g, agar-agar 12g in 1.0 liter tap water, Oxoid) and cetrimide agar (Sigma) were used to distinguish S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, respectively, in mixed cultures. Bacteria were grown under static conditions at 35°C for 24–72 hours as indicated.

Construction of ica-gfp reporter construction

The 500-bp promoter region of icaA gene was amplified from the chromosomal DNA of S. aureus USA300 85 by using primers icaA for and icaA rev (table S2), the gfp gene was amplified from the pCtuf-gfp plasmid 27 by using gfp for and gfp rev (table S2). The PCR products were cloned into the expression vector pRB473 86 digested by HindIII using an isothermal, single-reaction method for assembling multiple overlapping DNA molecules as described previously 87 by obtaining a plasmid pRB-ica-gfp. The resulting plasmid was transformed in S. aureus ATCC 29213 by electroporation as described previously 88.

Biofilm assays

Biofilm formation was assessed in 24-well polystirol plates (Eppendorf) by staining with crystal violet as described earlier in 89 with modifications. Bacteria with an initial density of 3×107 CFU/ml were seeded in 2 ml BM at 37°C and cultivated for 48 h under static conditions. Then the culture liquid was removed and the plates were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH=7.4 and dried for 20 min. Then, 1 ml of a 0.5% crystal violet solution (Sigma-Aldrich) in 96% ethanol was added per well followed by incubation for 20 min. The unbounded dye was washed off with PBS. The bound dye was eluted in 1 ml of 96% ethanol, and the absorbance at 570 nm was measured on a Tecan Infinite 200 Pro microplate reader (Switzerland). Cell-free wells subjected to all staining manipulations were used as control.

The biofilms were additionally analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) on Carl Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope. Both mono- and mixed cultures of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were grown on cell imaging cover slips (Eppendorf) under static conditions for 48 h in BM broth. Next one-half of the medium was replaced by the fresh one containing antimicrobials at final concentrations as indicated and cultivation was continued for the next 24h. The samples were then stained for 5 min with the SYTO 9 (ThermoFisher Scientific) at final concentration of 0.02 μg/ml (green fluorescence) and propidium iodide (Sigma) at final concentration of 3 μg/ml (red fluorescence) to differentiate between viable and non-viable bacteria. To differentiate between gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial species ViaGram Red+ (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used. The microscopic images were obtained with a 1-μm Z-stacks.

Evaluation of antibacterial activity

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobials was determined by the broth microdilution method in 96-well microtiter plates (Eppendorf) according to the recommendation of the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) rules for antimicrobial susceptibility testing 90. Briefly, the 108 cells/mL bacterial suspension was subsequently diluted 1:300 with BM broth supplemented with various concentrations of antimicrobials in microwell plates to obtain a 3×105 cells/mL suspension. The concentrations of antimicrobials ranged from 0.25 to 512 mg/L. Besides the usual double dilutions, additional concentrations were included in between. The cultures were next incubated at 35°C for 24 h. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobials for which no visible bacterial growth could be observed after 24 h incubation.

To determine the MBC of antimicrobials the CFU/mL were further evaluated in the culture liquid from those wells without visible growth. 10 μl of the culture liquid from the wells with no visible growth were inoculated into 3ml of LB broth followed by cultivation for 24h. The MBC was determined as the lowest concentration of compound for which no visible bacterial growth could be observed according to the EUCAST of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) 91.

Drop plate assay

To evaluate the viability of both detached and planktonic cells, a series of 10-fold dilutions of liquid culture from each well were prepared in 3 technical repeats and dropped by 5 μl onto LB agar plates. CFUs were counted from the two last drops typically containing 5-15 colonies and further averaged. To evaluate the viability of the biofilm-embedded cells, the wells were washed twice with 0.9% NaCl in order to remove the non-adherent cells. The biofilms were also suspended in 0.9% NaCl by scratching the well bottoms with subsequent treatment in an ultrasonic bath for 2 min to facilitate the disintegration of bacterial clumps 71. Viable cells were counted by the drop plate method as described above.

Statistical analysis

Experiments were carried out in six biological repeats with newly prepated cultures and medium in each of them. The fraction of non-viable cells in microscopic images was estimated as the relative fraction of the red cells among all cells in the combined images obtained by overlaying of the green and the red fluorescence microphotographs (10 images per each sample) by using BioFilmAnalyzer software 92.The statistical significance of the discrepancy between monoculture and mixed biofilms treatment efficacy was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis statistical test with significance threshold at p < 0.05.

Author contributions

ET, MY, DB, FA and ER performed the experiments. AKa and RF conducted the experiments. AKh and AKu synthesized F105. ET, MY, AKa and MB analyzed the results, prepared figures and graphs and wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No 20-04-00247 (AKa), by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia, assignment No 2019-0460 (MB). This study was partially performed in the framework of the Russian Government Program of Competitive Development of Kazan Federal University.

References

  1. ↵
    Kirker, K. R. & James, G. A. In vitro studies evaluating the effects of biofilms on wound-healing cells: a review. Apmis 125, 344–352, doi:10.1111/apm.12678 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Kirker, K. R. et al. Loss of viability and induction of apoptosis in human keratinocytes exposed to Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vitro. Wound Repair and Regeneration 17, 690–699, doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00523.x (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. Marano, R. J. et al. Secreted biofilm factors adversely affect cellular wound healing responses in vitro. Scientific Reports 5, doi:10.1038/srep13296 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. Secor, P. R. et al. Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm and Planktonic cultures differentially impact gene expression, mapk phosphorylation, and cytokine production in human keratinocytes. Bmc Microbiology 11, doi:10.1186/1471-2180-11-143 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. den Reijer, P. M. et al. Detection of Alpha-Toxin and Other Virulence Factors in Biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus on Polystyrene and a Human Epidermal Model. Plos One 11, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145722 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    Kirker, K. R., James, G. A., Fleckman, P., Olerud, J. E. & Stewart, P. S. Differential effects of planktonic and biofilm MRSA on human fibroblasts. Wound Repair and Regeneration 20, 253–261, doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00769.x (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Harrison, F. Microbial ecology of the cystic fibrosis lung. Microbiology-Sgm 153, 917–923, doi:10.1099/mic.0.2006/004077-0 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Fazli, M. et al. Nonrandom Distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in Chronic Wounds. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 47, 4084–4089,doi:10.1128/jcm.01395-09 (2009).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Tipton C. D., Mathew M. E., Wolcott R. A., Wolcott R. D., Kingston T., & Phillips C. D. Temporal dynamics of relative abundances and bacterial succession in chronic wound communities. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 25, 673–679, doi: 10.1111/wrr.12555 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    Foundation, C. F. Vol. 2011 annual data report (2012).
  11. ↵
    Lewis, K. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 45, 999–1007, doi:10.1128/aac.45.4.999-1007.2001 (2001).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Atshan, S. S. et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of extracellular proteins expressed by various clonal types of Staphylococcus aureus and during planktonic growth and biofilm development. Frontiers in Microbiology 6, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00524 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Cosgrove, S. E., Kaye, K. S., Eliopoulous, G. M. & Carmeli, Y. Health and economic outcomes of the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacter species. Archives of Internal Medicine 162, 185–190, doi:10.1001/archinte.162.2.185 (2002).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Sanchez-Vizuete, P., Orgaz, B., Aymerich, S., Le Coq, D. & Briandet, R. Pathogens protection against the action of disinfectants in multispecies biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 6, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00705 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    Dalton, T. et al. An In Vivo Polymicrobial Biofilm Wound Infection Model to Study Interspecies Interactions. Plos One 6, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027317 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Seth, A. K. et al. Quantitative Comparison and Analysis of Species-Specific Wound Biofilm Virulence Using an In Vivo, Rabbit-Ear Model. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 215, 388–399, doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.028 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Pastar, I. et al. Interactions of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Polymicrobial Wound Infection. Plos One 8, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056846 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Mashburn, L. M., Jett, A. M., Akins, D. R. & Whiteley, M. Staphylococcus aureus serves as an iron source for Pseudomonas aeruginosa during in vivo coculture. Journal of Bacteriology 187, 554–566, doi:10.1128/jb.187.2.554-566.2005 (2005).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. Ruger, M., Ackermann, M. & Reichl, U. Species-specific viability analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia and Staphylococcus aureus in mixed culture by flow cytometry. Bmc Microbiology 14, doi:10.1186/1471-2180-14-56 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. Nguyen, A. T., Jones, J. W., Ruge, M. A., Kane, M. A. & Oglesby-Sherrouse, A. G. Iron Depletion Enhances Production of Antimicrobials by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Bacteriology 197, 2265–2275, doi:10.1128/jb.00072-15 (2015).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Filkins, L. M. et al. Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Drives S-aureus towards Fermentative Metabolism and Reduced Viability in a Cystic Fibrosis Model. Journal of Bacteriology 197, 2252–2264, doi:10.1128/jb.00059-15 (2015).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Tognon, M., Kohler, T., Luscher, A. & van Delden, C. Transcriptional profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus during in vitro co-culture. Bmc Genomics 20, doi:10.1186/s12864-018-5398-y (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    Mitchell, G. et al. Staphylococcus aureus sigma B-dependent emergence of small-colony variants and biofilm production following exposure to Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline-N-oxide. Bmc Microbiology 10, doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-33 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Fugere, A. et al. Interspecific Small Molecule Interactions between Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus from Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Plos One 9, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086705 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Hoffman, L. R. et al. Selection for Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants due to growth in the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 19890–19895, doi:10.1073/pnas.0606756104 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Proctor, R. A. et al. Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nature Reviews Microbiology 4, 295–305, doi:10.1038/nrmicro1384 (2006).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Biswas, L., Biswas, R., Schlag, M., Bertram, R. & Gotz, F. Small-Colony Variant Selection as a Survival Strategy for Staphylococcus aureus in the Presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75, 6910–6912, doi:10.1128/aem.01211-09 (2009).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Atalla H., Gyles C., & Mallard B. Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants (SCVs) and their role in disease. Animal health research reviews 12, 33–45 (2011).
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Orazi, G. & O’Toole, G. A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alters Staphylococcus aureus Sensitivity to Vancomycin in a Biofilm Model of Cystic Fibrosis Infection. Mbio 8, doi:10.1128/mBio.00873-17 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    Lightbown J. W., & Jackson F. L. Inhibition of cytochrome systems of heart muscle and certain bacteria by the antagonists of dihydrostreptomycin: 2-alkyl-4-hydroxyquinoline N-oxides. Biochemical Journal 63, 130–137 (1956).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  31. Palmer, K. L., Mashburn, L. M., Singh, P. K. & Whiteley, M. Cystic fibrosis sputum supports growth and cues key aspects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa physiology. Journal of Bacteriology 187, 5267–5277, doi:10.1128/jb.187.15.5267-5277.2005 (2005).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. Baldan, R. et al. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis Airways Influences Virulence of Staphylococcus aureus In Vitro and Murine Models of Co-Infection. Plos One 9, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089614 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    DeLeon, S. et al. Synergistic Interactions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Wound Model. Infection and Immunity 82, 4718–4728, doi:10.1128/iai.02198-14 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Rendueles, O. & Ghigo, J. M. Multi-species biofilms: how to avoid unfriendly neighbors. Fems Microbiology Reviews 36, 972–989, doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00328.x (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Hotterbeekx, A. et al. The endotracheal tube microbiome associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus epidermidis. Scientific Reports 6, doi:10.1038/srep36507 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Cendra, M. D., Blanco-Cabra, N., Pedraz, L. & Torrents, E. Optimal environmental and culture conditions allow the in vitro coexistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in stable biofilms. Scientific Reports 9, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52726-0 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    Wijesinghe, G. et al. Influence of Laboratory Culture Media on in vitro Growth, Adhesion, and Biofilm Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Medical Principles and Practice 28, 28–35, doi:10.1159/000494757 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    Co, E. M., Keen, E. F. & Aldous, W. K. Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Combat Support Hospital in Iraq. Military Medicine 176, 89–93 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Keen, E. F. et al. Incidence and bacteriology of burn infections at a military burn center. Burns 36, 461–468, doi:10.1016/j.burns.2009.10.012 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Gomez, R. et al. Causes of Mortality by Autopsy Findings of Combat Casualties and Civilian Patients Admitted to a Burn Unit. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 208, 348–354, doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.11.012 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. Martin, J. M., Zenilman, J. M. & Lazarus, G. S. Molecular Microbiology: New Dimensions for Cutaneous Biology and Wound Healing. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 130, 38–48, doi:10.1038/jid.2009.221 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Gjødsbøl, K., Christensen, J. J., Karlsmark, T., Jørgensen, B., Klein, B. M., & Krogfelt, K. A. Multiple bacterial species reside in chronic wounds: a longitudinal study. International wound journal 3, 225–231 (2006).
    OpenUrl
  43. Kirketerp-Moller, K. et al. Distribution, organization, and ecology of bacteria in chronic wounds. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 46, 2717–2722, doi:10.1128/jcm.00501-08 (2008).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. Duan, K. M., Dammel, C., Stein, J., Rabin, H. & Surette, M. G. Modulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa gene expression by host microflora through interspecies communication. Molecular Microbiology 50, 1477–1491, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03803.x (2003).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Korgaonkar, A., Trivedi, U., Rumbaugh, K. P. & Whiteley, M. Community surveillance enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence during polymicrobial infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 1059–1064, doi:10.1073/pnas.1214550110 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Sagel, S. D. et al. Impact of Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus Infection on Inflammation and Clinical Status in Young Children with Cystic Fibrosis. Journal of Pediatrics 154, 183–188, doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.08.001 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. Hauser, A. R., Jain, M., Bar-Meir, M. & McColley, S. A. Clinical Significance of Microbial Infection and Adaptation in Cystic Fibrosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 24, 29–70, doi:10.1128/cmr.00036-10 (2011).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Foundation, C. F. Vol. 2013 patient registry annual data report (2014).
  49. ↵
    Leid J. G., Willson C. J., Shirtliff M. E., Hassett D. J., Parsek M. R., & Jeffers A. K. The Exopolysaccharide Alginate Protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Bacteria from IFN-γ-Mediated Macrophage Killing. The Journal of Immunology 175, 7512–7518 (2005).
    OpenUrl
  50. Ryder, C., Byrd, M. & Wozniak, D. J. Role of polysaccharides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Current Opinion in Microbiology 10, 644–648, doi:10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.010 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. Colvin, K. M. et al. The Pel Polysaccharide Can Serve a Structural and Protective Role in the Biofilm Matrix of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Plos Pathogens 7, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001264 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Colvin, K. M. et al. The Pel and Psl polysaccharides provide Pseudomonas aeruginosa structural redundancy within the biofilm matrix. Environmental Microbiology 14, 1913–1928, doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02657.x (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    Chew, S. C. et al. Dynamic Remodeling of Microbial Biofilms by Functionally Distinct Exopolysaccharides. Mbio 5, doi:10.1128/mBio.01536-14 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Kali A., Devaraj Bhuvaneshwar P., Charles M. V., & Seetha K. S. Antibacterial synergy of curcumin with antibiotics against biofilm producing clinical bacterial isolates. Journal of basic and clinical pharmacy 7, 93–96 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    Percival, S. L. et al. Antiseptics for treating infected wounds: Efficacy on biofilms and effect of pH. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 42, 293–309, doi:10.3109/1040841x.2014.940495 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Bortolin, M., Bidossi, A., De Vecchi, E., Avveniente, M. & Drago, L. In vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Chlorquinaldol against Microorganisms Responsible for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: Comparative Evaluation with Gentamicin and Fusidic Acid. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01039 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Baidamshina, D. R. et al. Targeting microbial biofilms using Ficin, a nonspecific plant protease. Scientific Reports 7, doi:10.1038/srep46068 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Blackledge, M. S., Worthington, R. J. & Melander, C. Biologically inspired strategies for combating bacterial biofilms. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 13, 699–706, doi:10.1016/j.coph.2013.07.004 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. Kaplan, J. B. Biofilm Dispersal: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Potential Therapeutic Uses. Journal of Dental Research 89, 205–218, doi:10.1177/0022034509359403 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    Bayer, A. S. et al. Effects of alginase on the natural-history and antibiotic-therapy of experimental endocarditis caused by mucoid Pseudomonas-aeruginosa. Infection and Immunity 60, 3979–3985 (1992).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    Park, J. H., Lee, J. H., Cho, M. H., Herzberg, M. & Lee, J. Acceleration of protease effect on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm dispersal. Fems Microbiology Letters 335, 31–38, doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02635.x (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    Izano, E. A., Amarante, M. A., Kher, W. B. & Kaplan, J. B. Differential roles of poly-N-acetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide and extracellular DNA in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74, 470–476, doi:10.1128/aem.02073-07 (2008).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. Donelli, G. et al. Synergistic activity of dispersin B and cefamandole nafate in inhibition of staphylococcal biofilm growth on polyurethanes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 51, 2733–2740, doi:10.1128/aac.01249-06 (2007).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Darouiche, R. O., Mansouri, M. D., Gawande, P. V. & Madhyastha, S. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy of triclosan and DispersinB (R) combination. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 64, 88–93, doi:10.1093/jac/dkp158 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    Selan, L., Berlutti, F., Passariello, C., Comodiballanti, M. R. & Thaller, M. C. Proteolytic-enzymes - a new treatment strategy for prosthetic infections. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 37, 2618–2621 (1993).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    Alkawash, M. A., Soothill, J. S. & Schiller, N. L. Alginate lyase enhances antibiotic killing of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. Apmis 114, 131–138, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2006.apm_356.x (2006).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. Alipour, M., Suntres, Z. E. & Omri, A. Importance of DNase and alginate lyase for enhancing free and liposome encapsulated aminoglycoside activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 64, 317–325, doi:10.1093/jac/dkp165 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    Nijland, R., Hall, M. J. & Burgess, J. G. Dispersal of Biofilms by Secreted, Matrix Degrading, Bacterial DNase. Plos One 5, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015668 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Heck, R., Stuetz, A. Antimycotic-6-phenyl-2-hexen-4-ynamines. (1988).
  70. Lonn-Stensrud, J., Landin, M. A., Benneche, T., Petersen, F. C. & Scheie, A. A. Furanones, potential agents for preventing Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm infections? Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 63, 309–316, doi:10.1093/jac/dkn501 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    Kayumov, A. R. et al. New Derivatives of Pyridoxine Exhibit High Antibacterial Activity against Biofilm-Embedded Staphylococcus Cells. Biomed Research International, doi:10.1155/2015/890968 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. Trizna, E., Latypova, L., Kurbangalieva, A., Bogachev, M. I. & Kayumov, A. 2(5H)-Furanone Derivatives as Inhibitors of Staphylococcal Biofilms. Bionanoscience 6, 423–426, doi:10.1007/s12668-016-0258-1 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    Sharafutdinov, I. S. et al. Antimicrobial Effects of Sulfonyl Derivative of 2(5&ITH&IT)-Furanone against Planktonic and Biofilm Associated Methicillin-Resistant and - Susceptible&IT Staphylococcus aureus&IT. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02246 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    Billings, N. et al. The Extracellular Matrix Component Psl Provides Fast-Acting Antibiotic Defense in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Plos Pathogens 9, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003526 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    Sharafutdinov, I. S. et al. Unraveling the Molecular Mechanism of Selective Antimicrobial Activity of 2(5H)-Furanone Derivative against Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, doi:10.3390/ijms20030694 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    Cramton, S. E., Gerke, C. & Gotz, F. In vitro methods to study staphylococcal biofilm formation. Microbial Growth in Biofilms, Pt a: Developmental and Molecular Biological Aspects 336, 239–255, doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(01)36593-x (2001).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. ↵
    Voggu, L. et al. Microevolution of cytochrome bd oxidase in staphylococci and its implication in resistance to respiratory toxins released by Pseudomonas. Journal of Bacteriology 188, 8079–8086, doi:10.1128/jb.00858-06 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    Cosgrove, S. E., Kaye, K. S., Eliopoulous, G. M. & Carmeli, Y. Health and economic outcomes of the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacter species. Archives of internal medicine 162, 185–190 (2002).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  79. ↵
    Naicker, P. R., Karayem, K., Hoek, K. G. P., Harvey, J. & Wasserman, E. Biofilm formation in invasive Staphylococcus aureus isolates is associated with the clonal lineage. Microbial Pathogenesis 90, 41–49, doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2015.10.023 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    Michelsen, C. F. et al. Evolution of metabolic divergence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during long-term infection facilitates a proto-cooperative interspecies interaction. Isme Journal 10, 1323–1336, doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.220 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  81. ↵
    Radlinski, L. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoproducts determine antibiotic efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus. Plos Biology 15, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003981 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  82. ↵
    Willner, D. et al. Metagenomic Analysis of Respiratory Tract DNA Viral Communities in Cystic Fibrosis and Non-Cystic Fibrosis Individuals. Plos One 4, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007370 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    Sharafutdinov, I. et al. The antimicrobial activity of 2 (5H)-furanone derivative on Staphylococcus aureus. Febs Journal 283, 200–201 (2016).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  84. ↵
    Kayumov, A. R. et al. Inhibition of biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis by new halogenated furanones. Journal of Antibiotics 68, 297–301, doi:10.1038/ja.2014.143 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    Diep, B. A. et al. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 367, 731–739, doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68231-7 (2006).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  86. ↵
    Bruckner, R. A series of shuttle vectors for Bacillus-subtilis and Escherichia-coli. Gene 122, 187–192, doi:10.1016/0378-1119(92)90048-t (1992).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  87. ↵
    Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nature Methods 6, 343–U341, doi:10.1038/nmeth.1318 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. ↵
    Augustin, J. & Gotz, F. Transformation of Staphylococcus-epidermidis and other Staphylococcal species with plasmid DNA by electroporation. Fems Microbiology Letters 66, 203–207 (1990).
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  89. ↵
    Merritt J. H., Kadouri D. E., & O’Toole G. A. Growing and analyzing static biofilms. Current protocols in microbiology Chapter 1 (2005).
  90. ↵
    Leclercq, R. et al. EUCAST expert rules in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 19, 141–160, doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03703.x (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    Terminology relating to methods for the determination of susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 6, 503–508, doi:10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00149.x (2000).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  92. ↵
    Bogachev, M. I. et al. Fast and simple tool for the quantification of biofilm-embedded cells sub-populations from fluorescent microscopic images. Plos One 13, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193267 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Posted March 07, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email
Bidirectional alterations in antibiotics susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus - Pseudomonas aeruginosa dual-species biofilm
Elena Y. Trizna, Maria N. Yarullina, Diana R. Baidamshina, Farida S. Akhatova, Elvira V. Rozhina, Rawil F. Fakhrullin, Alsu M. Khabibrakhmanova, Almira R. Kurbangalieva, Mikhail I. Bogachev, Airat R. Kayumov
bioRxiv 334516; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/334516
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area