Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Genetically modified pigs are protected from classical swine fever virus

Zicong Xie, Daxin Pang, Hongming Yuan, Huping Jiao, Chao Lu, Kankan Wang, Qiangbing Yang, Mengjing Li, Xue Chen, Tingting Yu, Xinrong Chen, Zhen Dai, Yani Peng, Xiaochun Tang, Zhanjun Li, Tiedong Wang, Huancheng Guo, Li Li, Changchun Tu, Liangxue Lai, View ORCID ProfileHongsheng Ouyang
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/361477
Zicong Xie
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daxin Pang
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongming Yuan
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huping Jiao
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chao Lu
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kankan Wang
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiangbing Yang
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mengjing Li
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xue Chen
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tingting Yu
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinrong Chen
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhen Dai
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yani Peng
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaochun Tang
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhanjun Li
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tiedong Wang
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huancheng Guo
2Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Institute of Military Veterinary, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Li
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Changchun Tu
2Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Institute of Military Veterinary, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liangxue Lai
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongsheng Ouyang
1Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, 130062, Changchun, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hongsheng Ouyang
  • For correspondence: ouyh@jlu.edu.cn
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Classical swine fever (CSF) caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV) is among the most detrimental diseases, and leads to significant economic losses in the swine industry. Despite efforts by many government authorities try to stamp out the disease from national pig populations, the disease remains widespread. Here, antiviral small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) were selected and then inserted at the porcine ROSA26 (pROSA26) locus via a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in strategy. Finally, anti-CSFV transgenic (TG) pigs were produced by somatic nuclear transfer (SCNT). Importantly, in vitro and in vivo viral challenge assays demonstrated that these TG pigs could effectively limit the growth of CSFV and reduced CSFV-associated clinical signs and mortality, and the disease resistance was stably transmitted to F1-generation. The use of these TG pigs can improve the well-being of livestock and substantially reduce virus-related economic losses. Additionally, this antiviral approach may provide a reference for future antiviral research.

Author summary Classical swine fever (CSF), caused by classical swine fever virus (CSFV), and is a highly contagious, often fatal porcine disease with significant economic losses. Due to its economic importance to the pig industry, the biology and pathogenesis of CSFV have been investigated extensively. Despite efforts by many government authorities to stamp out the disease from national pig populations, the disease remains widespread in some regions and seems to be waiting for the reintroduction and the next round of disease outbreaks. These highlight the necessity and urgency of developing more effective approaches to eradicate the challenging CSFV. In this study, we successfully produced anti-CSFV transgenic pigs and confirmed that these transgenic pigs could effectively limit the growth of CSFV in vivo and in vitro and that the disease resistance traits in the TG founders can be stably transmitted to their F1-generation offspring. This study suggests that these TG pigs can improve the well-being of livestock and contribute to offer potential benefits over commercial vaccination. The use of these TG pigs can improve the well-being of livestock and substantially reduce CSFV-related economic losses.

Footnotes

  • Address: 5333#, Xi’an Road, Changchun 130062, China; Tel.: (86) 431-87836175; Fax: (86) 431-86758018

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 03, 2018.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetically modified pigs are protected from classical swine fever virus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genetically modified pigs are protected from classical swine fever virus
Zicong Xie, Daxin Pang, Hongming Yuan, Huping Jiao, Chao Lu, Kankan Wang, Qiangbing Yang, Mengjing Li, Xue Chen, Tingting Yu, Xinrong Chen, Zhen Dai, Yani Peng, Xiaochun Tang, Zhanjun Li, Tiedong Wang, Huancheng Guo, Li Li, Changchun Tu, Liangxue Lai, Hongsheng Ouyang
bioRxiv 361477; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/361477
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Genetically modified pigs are protected from classical swine fever virus
Zicong Xie, Daxin Pang, Hongming Yuan, Huping Jiao, Chao Lu, Kankan Wang, Qiangbing Yang, Mengjing Li, Xue Chen, Tingting Yu, Xinrong Chen, Zhen Dai, Yani Peng, Xiaochun Tang, Zhanjun Li, Tiedong Wang, Huancheng Guo, Li Li, Changchun Tu, Liangxue Lai, Hongsheng Ouyang
bioRxiv 361477; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/361477

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4230)
  • Biochemistry (9123)
  • Bioengineering (6767)
  • Bioinformatics (23970)
  • Biophysics (12109)
  • Cancer Biology (9511)
  • Cell Biology (13753)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7623)
  • Ecology (11675)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15492)
  • Genetics (10632)
  • Genomics (14310)
  • Immunology (9473)
  • Microbiology (22824)
  • Molecular Biology (9087)
  • Neuroscience (48920)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1480)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3841)
  • Plant Biology (8322)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1468)
  • Synthetic Biology (2295)
  • Systems Biology (6180)
  • Zoology (1299)