Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Irrelevant speech disrupts memory more when spoken by a familiar talker

Jens Kreitewolf, Malte Wöstmann, Sarah Tune, Michael Plöchl, Jonas Obleser
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/372508
Jens Kreitewolf
1Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jens.kreitewolf@uni-luebeck.de jonas.obleser@uni-luebeck.de
Malte Wöstmann
1Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Tune
1Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Plöchl
1Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Obleser
1Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jens.kreitewolf@uni-luebeck.de jonas.obleser@uni-luebeck.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

When listening, familiarity with an attended talker’s voice improves speech comprehension. Here, we instead investigated the effect of familiarity with a distracting talker. In an irrelevant-speech task, we assessed listeners’ working memory for the serial order of spoken digits when a task-irrelevant, distracting sentence was produced by either a familiar or an unfamiliar talker. We tested two groups of listeners using the same experimental procedure. The first group were undergraduate psychology students (N=66) who had attended an introductory statistics course. Critically, each student had been taught by one of two course instructors, whose voices served as familiar and unfamiliar task-irrelevant talkers. The students made more errors when the task-irrelevant sentence was produced by the familiar compared to the unfamiliar talker. There was evidence for the absence of this effect in a second group of listeners — that is, family members and friends (N=20) who had known either one of the two talkers for more than ten years. While familiarity with an attended talker benefits speech comprehension, our findings indicate that familiarity with an ignored talker deteriorates working memory for target speech. The absence of this effect for family members and friends suggests that the degree of talker familiarity modulates distraction by irrelevant speech.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 19, 2018.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Irrelevant speech disrupts memory more when spoken by a familiar talker
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Irrelevant speech disrupts memory more when spoken by a familiar talker
Jens Kreitewolf, Malte Wöstmann, Sarah Tune, Michael Plöchl, Jonas Obleser
bioRxiv 372508; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/372508
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Irrelevant speech disrupts memory more when spoken by a familiar talker
Jens Kreitewolf, Malte Wöstmann, Sarah Tune, Michael Plöchl, Jonas Obleser
bioRxiv 372508; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/372508

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3477)
  • Biochemistry (7316)
  • Bioengineering (5294)
  • Bioinformatics (20189)
  • Biophysics (9972)
  • Cancer Biology (7698)
  • Cell Biology (11243)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6416)
  • Ecology (9912)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13271)
  • Genetics (9347)
  • Genomics (12544)
  • Immunology (7667)
  • Microbiology (18928)
  • Molecular Biology (7415)
  • Neuroscience (40870)
  • Paleontology (298)
  • Pathology (1226)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2125)
  • Physiology (3138)
  • Plant Biology (6836)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1268)
  • Synthetic Biology (1891)
  • Systems Biology (5295)
  • Zoology (1083)