Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Brain-Score: Which Artificial Neural Network for Object Recognition is most Brain-Like?

View ORCID ProfileMartin Schrimpf, View ORCID ProfileJonas Kubilius, Ha Hong, Najib J. Majaj, Rishi Rajalingham, Elias B. Issa, View ORCID ProfileKohitij Kar, View ORCID ProfilePouya Bashivan, Jonathan Prescott-Roy, Franziska Geiger, Kailyn Schmidt, Daniel L. K. Yamins, View ORCID ProfileJames J. DiCarlo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/407007
Martin Schrimpf
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
2Center for Brains, Minds and Machines, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin Schrimpf
  • For correspondence: mschrimpf@mit.edu qbilius@mit.edu dicarlo@mit.edu
Jonas Kubilius
3McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
4Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonas Kubilius
  • For correspondence: mschrimpf@mit.edu qbilius@mit.edu dicarlo@mit.edu
Ha Hong
5Bay Labs Inc., San Francisco, CA 94102
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Najib J. Majaj
6Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rishi Rajalingham
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elias B. Issa
7Department of Neuroscience, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kohitij Kar
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
3McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kohitij Kar
Pouya Bashivan
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
3McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pouya Bashivan
Jonathan Prescott-Roy
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franziska Geiger
3McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kailyn Schmidt
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel L. K. Yamins
8Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
9Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James J. DiCarlo
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
2Center for Brains, Minds and Machines, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
3McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James J. DiCarlo
  • For correspondence: mschrimpf@mit.edu qbilius@mit.edu dicarlo@mit.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The internal representations of early deep artificial neural networks (ANNs) were found to be remarkably similar to the internal neural representations measured experimentally in the primate brain. Here we ask, as deep ANNs have continued to evolve, are they becoming more or less brain-like? ANNs that are most functionally similar to the brain will contain mechanisms that are most like those used by the brain. We therefore developed Brain-Score – a composite of multiple neural and behavioral benchmarks that score any ANN on how similar it is to the brain’s mechanisms for core object recognition – and we deployed it to evaluate a wide range of state-of-the-art deep ANNs. Using this scoring system, we here report that: (1) DenseNet-169, CORnet-S and ResNet-101 are the most brain-like ANNs. (2) There remains considerable variability in neural and behavioral responses that is not predicted by any ANN, suggesting that no ANN model has yet captured all the relevant mechanisms. (3) Extending prior work, we found that gains in ANN ImageNet performance led to gains on Brain-Score. However, correlation weakened at ≥ 70% top-1 ImageNet performance, suggesting that additional guidance from neuroscience is needed to make further advances in capturing brain mechanisms. (4) We uncovered smaller (i.e. less complex) ANNs that are more brain-like than many of the best-performing ImageNet models, which suggests the opportunity to simplify ANNs to better understand the ventral stream. The scoring system used here is far from complete. However, we propose that evaluating and tracking model-benchmark correspondences through a Brain-Score that is regularly updated with new brain data is an exciting opportunity: experimental benchmarks can be used to guide machine network evolution, and machine networks are mechanistic hypotheses of the brain’s network and thus drive next experiments. To facilitate both of these, we release Brain-Score.org: a platform that hosts the neural and behavioral benchmarks, where ANNs for visual processing can be submitted to receive a Brain-Score and their rank relative to other models, and where new experimental data can be naturally incorporated.

Footnotes

  • New online submission system and open-source code.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 02, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Brain-Score: Which Artificial Neural Network for Object Recognition is most Brain-Like?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Brain-Score: Which Artificial Neural Network for Object Recognition is most Brain-Like?
Martin Schrimpf, Jonas Kubilius, Ha Hong, Najib J. Majaj, Rishi Rajalingham, Elias B. Issa, Kohitij Kar, Pouya Bashivan, Jonathan Prescott-Roy, Franziska Geiger, Kailyn Schmidt, Daniel L. K. Yamins, James J. DiCarlo
bioRxiv 407007; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/407007
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Brain-Score: Which Artificial Neural Network for Object Recognition is most Brain-Like?
Martin Schrimpf, Jonas Kubilius, Ha Hong, Najib J. Majaj, Rishi Rajalingham, Elias B. Issa, Kohitij Kar, Pouya Bashivan, Jonathan Prescott-Roy, Franziska Geiger, Kailyn Schmidt, Daniel L. K. Yamins, James J. DiCarlo
bioRxiv 407007; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/407007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4369)
  • Biochemistry (9543)
  • Bioengineering (7068)
  • Bioinformatics (24765)
  • Biophysics (12559)
  • Cancer Biology (9923)
  • Cell Biology (14296)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7929)
  • Ecology (12073)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15952)
  • Genetics (10901)
  • Genomics (14704)
  • Immunology (9841)
  • Microbiology (23580)
  • Molecular Biology (9453)
  • Neuroscience (50691)
  • Paleontology (369)
  • Pathology (1535)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2674)
  • Physiology (3996)
  • Plant Biology (8638)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1505)
  • Synthetic Biology (2388)
  • Systems Biology (6413)
  • Zoology (1344)