Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Predicting CD4 T-cell epitopes based on antigen cleavage, MHCII presentation, and TCR recognition

Dina Schneidman-Duhovny, Natalia Khuri, Guang Qiang Dong, Michael B. Winter, Eric Shifrut, Nir Friedman, Charles S. Craik, Kathleen P. Pratt, Pedro Paz, Fred Aswad, Andrej Sali
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/415661
Dina Schneidman-Duhovny
1Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sali@salilab.org dina@salilab.org pedro.paz@bayer.com fred.aswad@bayer.com
Natalia Khuri
1Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
4Graduate Group in Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guang Qiang Dong
1Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael B. Winter
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Shifrut
5Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nir Friedman
5Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles S. Craik
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
3California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen P. Pratt
6Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pedro Paz
7Bayer HealthCare, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sali@salilab.org dina@salilab.org pedro.paz@bayer.com fred.aswad@bayer.com
Fred Aswad
7Bayer HealthCare, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sali@salilab.org dina@salilab.org pedro.paz@bayer.com fred.aswad@bayer.com
Andrej Sali
1Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
3California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sali@salilab.org dina@salilab.org pedro.paz@bayer.com fred.aswad@bayer.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Accurate predictions of T-cell epitopes would be useful for designing vaccines, immunotherapies for cancer and autoimmune diseases, and improved protein therapies. The humoral immune response involves uptake of antigens by antigen presenting cells (APCs), APC processing and presentation of peptides on MHC class II (pMHCII), and T-cell receptor (TCR) recognition of pMHCII complexes. Most in silico methods predict only peptide-MHCII binding, resulting in significant over-prediction of CD4 T-cell epitopes. We present a method, ITCell, for prediction of T-cell epitopes within an input protein antigen sequence for given MHCII and TCR sequences. The method integrates information about three stages of the immune response pathway: antigen cleavage, MHCII presentation, and TCR recognition. First, antigen cleavage sites are predicted based on the cleavage profiles of cathepsins S, B, and H. Second, for each 12-mer peptide in the antigen sequence we predict whether it will bind to a given MHCII, based on the scores of modeled peptide-MHCII complexes. Third, we predict whether or not any of the top scoring peptide-MHCII complexes can bind to a given TCR, based on the scores of modeled ternary peptide-MHCII-TCR complexes and the distribution of predicted cleavage sites. Our benchmarks consist of epitope predictions generated by this algorithm, checked against 20 peptide-MHCII-TCR crystal structures, as well as epitope predictions for four peptide-MHCII-TCR complexes with known epitopes and TCR sequences but without crystal structures. ITCell successfully identified the correct epitopes as one of the 20 top scoring peptides for 22 of 24 benchmark cases. To validate the method using a clinically relevant application, we utilized five factor VIII-specific TCR sequences from hemophilia A subjects who developed an immune response to factor VIII replacement therapy. The known HLA-DR1-restricted factor VIII epitope was among the six top-scoring factor VIII peptides predicted by ITCall to bind HLA-DR1 and all five TCRs. Our integrative approach is more accurate than current single-stage epitope prediction algorithms applied to the same benchmarks. It is freely available as a web server (http://salilab.org/itcell).

Author summary Knowledge of T-cell epitopes is useful for designing vaccines, improving cancer immunotherapy, studying autoimmune diseases, and engineering protein replacement therapies. Unfortunately, experimental methods for identification of T-cell epitopes are slow, expensive, and not always applicable. Thus, a more accurate computational method for prediction of T-cell epitopes needs to be developed. While the T-cell response to extracellular antigens proceeds through multiple stages, current computational methods rely only on the prediction of peptide binding affinity to an MHCII receptor on antigen presenting cells, resulting in a relatively high number of false-positive predictions of T-cell epitopes within protein antigens. We developed an integrative approach to predict T-cell epitopes that computationally combines information from three stages of the humoral immune response pathway: antigen cleavage, MHCII presentation, and TCR recognition, resulting in an increased accuracy of epitope predictions. This method was applied to predict epitopes within blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) that were recognized by TCRs from hemophilia A subjects who developed an anti-FVIII antibody response. The correct epitope was predicted after modeling all possible 12-mer FVIII peptides bound in ternary complexes with the relevant MHCII (HLA-DR1) and each of five experimentally determined FVIII-specific TCR sequences.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 13, 2018.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predicting CD4 T-cell epitopes based on antigen cleavage, MHCII presentation, and TCR recognition
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Predicting CD4 T-cell epitopes based on antigen cleavage, MHCII presentation, and TCR recognition
Dina Schneidman-Duhovny, Natalia Khuri, Guang Qiang Dong, Michael B. Winter, Eric Shifrut, Nir Friedman, Charles S. Craik, Kathleen P. Pratt, Pedro Paz, Fred Aswad, Andrej Sali
bioRxiv 415661; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/415661
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Predicting CD4 T-cell epitopes based on antigen cleavage, MHCII presentation, and TCR recognition
Dina Schneidman-Duhovny, Natalia Khuri, Guang Qiang Dong, Michael B. Winter, Eric Shifrut, Nir Friedman, Charles S. Craik, Kathleen P. Pratt, Pedro Paz, Fred Aswad, Andrej Sali
bioRxiv 415661; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/415661

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4399)
  • Biochemistry (9637)
  • Bioengineering (7127)
  • Bioinformatics (24958)
  • Biophysics (12677)
  • Cancer Biology (10002)
  • Cell Biology (14406)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7992)
  • Ecology (12152)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16030)
  • Genetics (10957)
  • Genomics (14784)
  • Immunology (9911)
  • Microbiology (23750)
  • Molecular Biology (9516)
  • Neuroscience (51102)
  • Paleontology (370)
  • Pathology (1546)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2694)
  • Physiology (4038)
  • Plant Biology (8700)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1512)
  • Synthetic Biology (2406)
  • Systems Biology (6461)
  • Zoology (1350)