Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Measuring the average power of neural oscillations

Liz Izhikevich, Richard Gao, Erik Peterson, Bradley Voytek
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/441626
Liz Izhikevich
1Department of Computer Science, Halıcıoğlu Data Science Institute, and Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
4Department of Computer Science, Stanford University (work done while at University of California, San Diego)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Gao
2Department of Cognitive Science, Halıcıoğlu Data Science Institute, and Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Peterson
2Department of Cognitive Science, Halıcıoğlu Data Science Institute, and Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bradley Voytek
2Department of Cognitive Science, Halıcıoğlu Data Science Institute, and Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
3Neurosciences Graduate Program, Halıcıoğlu Data Science Institute, and Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Neural oscillations are often quantified as average power relative to a cognitive, perceptual, and/or behavioral task. This is commonly done using Fourier-based techniques, such as Welch’s method for estimating the power spectral density, and/or by estimating narrowband oscillatory power across trials, conditions, and/or groups. The core assumption underlying these approaches is that the mean is an appropriate measure of central tendency. Despite the importance of this assumption, it has not been rigorously tested.

New method We introduce extensions of common approaches that are better suited for the physiological reality of how neural oscillations often manifest: as nonstationary, high-power bursts, rather than sustained rhythms. Log-transforming, or taking the median power, significantly reduces erroneously inflated power estimates.

Results Analyzing 101 participants’ worth of human electrophysiology, totaling 3,560 channels and over 40 hours data, we show that, in all cases examined, spectral power is not Gaussian distributed. This is true even when oscillations are prominent and sustained, such as visual cortical alpha. Power across time, at every frequency, is characterized by a substantial long tail, which implies that estimates of average power are skewed toward large, infrequent high-power oscillatory bursts.

Comparison with existing methods In a simulated event-related experiment we show how introducing just a few high-power oscillatory bursts, as seen in real data, can, perhaps erroneously, cause significant differences between conditions using traditional methods. These erroneous effects are substantially reduced with our new methods.

Conclusions These results call into question the validity of common statistical practices in neural oscillation research.

Highlights

  • Analyses of oscillatory power often assume power is normally distributed.

  • Analyzing >40 hours of human M/EEG and ECoG, we show that in all cases it is not.

  • This effect is demonstrated in simple simulation of an event-related task.

  • Overinflated power estimates are reduced via log-transformation or median power.

Acknowledgements

We thank Thomas Donoghue and Priyadarshini Sebastian for their assistance with data preparation and comments on a draft of this manuscript. Izhikevich is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE-1656518) and a Stanford Graduate Fellowship. Gao is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC PGS-D), UCSD Kavli Innovative Research Grant (IRG), and the Katzin Prize. Voytek is supported by a Sloan Research Fellowship (FG-2015-66057), the Whitehall Foundation (2017-12-73), and the National Science Foundation under grant BCS-1736028. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author contributions

All authors initiated and designed the study. Izhikevich built the database and analysis pipeline, and all authors analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 22, 2018.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measuring the average power of neural oscillations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Measuring the average power of neural oscillations
Liz Izhikevich, Richard Gao, Erik Peterson, Bradley Voytek
bioRxiv 441626; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/441626
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Measuring the average power of neural oscillations
Liz Izhikevich, Richard Gao, Erik Peterson, Bradley Voytek
bioRxiv 441626; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/441626

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (6022)
  • Biochemistry (13696)
  • Bioengineering (10426)
  • Bioinformatics (33136)
  • Biophysics (17093)
  • Cancer Biology (14165)
  • Cell Biology (20094)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (10860)
  • Ecology (16006)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (20334)
  • Genetics (13392)
  • Genomics (18626)
  • Immunology (13740)
  • Microbiology (32148)
  • Molecular Biology (13379)
  • Neuroscience (70017)
  • Paleontology (526)
  • Pathology (2188)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3740)
  • Physiology (5860)
  • Plant Biology (12020)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1813)
  • Synthetic Biology (3365)
  • Systems Biology (8161)
  • Zoology (1841)