Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Contribution of sensory encoding to measured bias

Miaomiao Jin, View ORCID ProfileLindsey L. Glickfeld
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/444430
Miaomiao Jin
Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lindsey L. Glickfeld
Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lindsey L. Glickfeld
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Perceptual decision-making is a complex process that involves sensory integration followed by application of a cognitive threshold. Signal detection theory (SDT) provides a mathematical framework for attributing the underlying neurobiological processes to these distinct phases of perceptual decision-making. In particular, SDT reveals the sensitivity (d’) of the neuronal response distributions and the bias (c) of the decision criterion, which are commonly thought to reflect sensory and cognitive processes, respectively. However, neuronal representations of bias have been observed in sensory areas, suggesting that some changes in bias are due to effects on sensory encoding. To directly test whether sensory encoding can influence bias, we optogenetically manipulated neuronal excitability in primary visual cortex (V1) during a detection task. Increasing excitability in V1 significantly decreased behavioral bias, while decreasing excitability had the opposite effect. To determine whether this change in bias is consistent with the effects on sensory encoding, we made extracellular recordings from V1 neurons in passively viewing mice. Indeed, we found that optogenetic manipulation of excitability shifted the neuronal bias in the same direction as the behavioral bias, despite using a fixed artificial decision criterion to predict hit and false alarm rates from the neuronal firing rates. To test the generality these effects, we also manipulated the quality of V1 encoding by changing stimulus contrast or inter-stimulus interval. These stimulus manipulations also resulted in consistent changes in bias measured both behaviorally and neuronally. Thus, changes in sensory encoding are sufficient to drive changes in bias measured using SDT.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 16, 2018.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contribution of sensory encoding to measured bias
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Contribution of sensory encoding to measured bias
Miaomiao Jin, Lindsey L. Glickfeld
bioRxiv 444430; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/444430
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Contribution of sensory encoding to measured bias
Miaomiao Jin, Lindsey L. Glickfeld
bioRxiv 444430; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/444430

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (6022)
  • Biochemistry (13696)
  • Bioengineering (10429)
  • Bioinformatics (33139)
  • Biophysics (17095)
  • Cancer Biology (14166)
  • Cell Biology (20097)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (10860)
  • Ecology (16007)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (20334)
  • Genetics (13392)
  • Genomics (18628)
  • Immunology (13740)
  • Microbiology (32149)
  • Molecular Biology (13380)
  • Neuroscience (70019)
  • Paleontology (526)
  • Pathology (2188)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3741)
  • Physiology (5860)
  • Plant Biology (12020)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1814)
  • Synthetic Biology (3365)
  • Systems Biology (8161)
  • Zoology (1841)