Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Impacts of Deep-Sea Mining on Microbial Ecosystem Services

View ORCID ProfileBeth N. Orcutt, James Bradley, William J. Brazelton, Emily R. Estes, Jacqueline M. Goordial, Julie A. Huber, Rose M. Jones, Nagissa Mahmoudi, Jeffrey J. Marlow, Sheryl Murdock, Maria Pachiadaki
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/463992
Beth N. Orcutt
1Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, 60 Bigelow Drive, East Boothbay, ME, 04544, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Beth N. Orcutt
James Bradley
2University of Southern California, Zumberge Hall of Science, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William J. Brazelton
3University of Utah, School of Biological Sciences, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily R. Estes
4University of Delaware, College of Earth, Ocean & Environment, 700 Pilottown Road, Lewes, DE, 19958, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline M. Goordial
1Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, 60 Bigelow Drive, East Boothbay, ME, 04544, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie A. Huber
5Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rose M. Jones
1Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, 60 Bigelow Drive, East Boothbay, ME, 04544, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nagissa Mahmoudi
6Harvard University, Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, 16 Divinity Ave, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
7McGill University, Department of Earth & Planetary Science, 3450 University Street, Montreal, QC, H3A 0E8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey J. Marlow
6Harvard University, Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, 16 Divinity Ave, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheryl Murdock
8University of Victoria, School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, CanadaCanada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Pachiadaki
1Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, 60 Bigelow Drive, East Boothbay, ME, 04544, USA
5Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Interest in extracting mineral resources from the seafloor through deep-sea mining has accelerated substantially in the past decade, driven by increasing consumer demand for various metals like copper, zinc, manganese, cobalt and rare earth elements. While there are many on-going discussions and studies evaluating potential environmental impacts of deep-sea mining activities, these focus primarily on impacts to animal biodiversity. The microscopic spectrum of life on the seafloor and the services that this microbial realm provides in the deep sea are rarely considered explicitly. In April 2018, a community of scientists met to define the microbial ecosystem services that should be considered when assessing potential impacts of deep-sea mining, and to provide recommendations for how to evaluate these services. Here we show that the potential impacts of mining on microbial ecosystem services in the deep sea vary substantially, from minimal expected impact to complete loss of services that cannot be remedied by protected area offsets. We conclude by recommending that certain types of ecosystems should be “off limits” until initial characterizations can be performed, and that baseline assessments of microbial diversity, biomass, and biogeochemical function need to be considered in environmental impact assessments of all potential instances of deep-sea mining.

1. INTRODUCTION

With increasing demand for rare and critical metals – such as cobalt, copper, manganese, tellurium, and zinc – there is increasing interest in mining these resources from the seafloor (Hein et al., 2013a; Wedding et al., 2015). The primary mineral resources in the deep sea that attract attention fall into four categories (Figures 1, 2): (1) massive sulfide deposits created at active high-temperature hydrothermal vent systems along mid-ocean ridges, back-arc spreading centers, and volcanic arcs; (2) similar deposits at inactive hydrothermal vent sites; (3) polymetallic “nodules” that form on the seafloor of the open ocean (often referred to as manganese nodules); and (4) other polymetallic crusts that can form in the deep sea at underwater mountains called seamounts (often referred to as cobalt crusts). Current areal estimates of these resources range from 38 million km2 for ferromanganese nodules, 3.2 million km2 for massive sulfides (combined active and inactive), and 1.7 million km2 for polymetallic crusts on seamounts (Petersen et al., 2016). Some of these resources occur within the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) of coastal nations, while others occur in international waters. In some EEZs continental shelf sediments, additional commercial interests include diamond and phosphorite deposits. Since these fall exclusively within national jurisdictions, they will not be a focus of this article, although mining activities for these deposits are currently occurring (Miller et al., 2018).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Locations of deep-sea mineral resources and current exploration contract zones. In all panels, areas of the seafloor within nations’ Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) highlighted in light grey boundaries along coastlines, whereas remaining seafloor within “the Area” not shaded. Panel A – Global seafloor distribution of hydrothermal vent (active and inactive) polymetallic sulfide deposits (red), ferromanganese nodules (purple), and cobalt crusts on seamounts (orange) overlain by current exploration contract zones (green) issued by the International Seabed Authority (ISA). Panel B – Highlight of exploration contracts and Areas of Particular Ecological Interest (APEI) in the eastern region of the Clarion Clipperton Zone and the East Pacific Rise vent locations on the western edge of Mexico, as shown by the blue bounding box in A. Panel C – Highlight of vent sites and contracted zones along part of the Southwest Indian Ridge and nodule exploration contracts in the Indian Ocean, as shown by the yellow bounding box in A. Underlying maps generated with data from the U.S. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA; coastlines), the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO) hosted by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (gridded bathymetry data), and the marineregions.org database (EEZ). Shape file information for nodules and cobalt crusts from (Hein et al., 2013a), for polymetallic sulfides InterRidge Vents Database version 3.3 hosted by the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (credit S. Beaulieu, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 2015, funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation #1202977), and for ISA exploration contract areas from the Deep Sea Mining Watch project version 1.2 hosted by the University of California Santa Barbara Benioff Ocean Initiative.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Types of deep-sea habitats with mineable resources. A – Ferromanganese nodules on the sediment of abyssal plains, image modified from Wikipedia courtesy Abramax. B – Active hydrothermal vent sulfide deposits from the Juan de Fuca Ridge, with chemosynthetic animals colonizing the sulfide surface around areas of fluid venting. Photo courtesy of AT15-34 cruise chief scientist Ray Lee, Western Washington University, U.S. National Science Foundation, HOV Alvin dive 4420, 2008, © Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. C – Inactive hydrothermal vent sulfide deposits from the Galapágos Rift. Image by ROV Hercules courtesy of NOAA Okeanos Explorer Program 2011 Galapágos Rift Expedition. D – Cobalt-rich crusts that form on seafloor basalts on seamounts, which can be areas of diffusive hydrothermal fluid flow and sites of deep-sea animal brooding. Photo courtesy of AT26-24 Chief Scientist Geoff Wheat, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks, U.S. National Science Foundation, HOV Alvin, 2014, © Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Panels E-H show examples of microscopic organisms living on these resources. E – Microbial filaments on a manganese nodule, modified from (Wang et al., 2009); scale bar 1 μm. F – Desulfurobacterium bacteria isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent at Axial volcano, courtesy of Julie A. Huber; scale bar 1 μm. G – Rod-shaped cells on inactive sulfides from the East Pacific Rise, modified from (Toner et al., 2013) and courtesy of Brandy Toner; scale bar 2 μm. H – Ferromanganese crust on seafloor basalt from the East Pacific Rise, modified from (Santelli et al., 2008) and courtesy of Cara Santelli; scale bar 10 μm. Cartoon schematic modified from (Schrenk et al., 2009) with permission.

For seabed mineral resources in international waters beyond national jurisdiction (referred to as “the Area”), access is only possible through the International Seabed Authority (the ISA) as established in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The ISS awards contracts of blocks of seafloor via sponsoring States to authorized contractors for resource exploration activity. This is done following regulations established under the Mining Code, which were established in 2000 and updated in 2013 for polymetallic nodules, in 2010 for polymetallic sulfides, and in 2012 for cobalt-rich crusts. More than 1.3 million km2 of international seabed is currently set aside in 29 exploration contracts for mineral exploration in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Figure 1); another 1 million km2 of seabed has been licensed or applied for in waters under national jurisdiction (Cuyvers et al., 2018). Currently, no country has an exploitation license to actively mine these resources in the Area, but the ISA is developing international regulations to govern future exploitation activities within the Area (International Seabed Authority, 2012; 2013). A few States have already begun allowing resource exploration and extraction testing in their national waters (Figure 1). Companies are developing and testing prototype mining equipment for this purpose. Proponents of deep-sea mining argue that resource extraction from the deep-sea is more environmentally friendly than mining on land for the same metals, but the environmental impacts of these efforts are currently poorly understood. The UNCLOS stipulates that deep-sea mining related activities on the international seabed within the Area must be carried out for the benefit of mankind (UNCLOS Articles 136, 137 and 140; (Cuyvers et al., 2018)). Thus, it is imperative to robustly and unbiasedly assess what the positive and negative impacts of deep-sea mining may be, to determine the nature and extent of benefits and consequences for mankind.

Mineral resources on the seabed are also centerpieces of deep-sea ecosystems, functioning as refugia and stepping stones for animal biodiversity. For example, polymetallic crusts in the deep-sea serve as hard substrate for the attachment of sessile animal communities such as sponges, or for egg-laying for mobile species like octopus which do not anchor in the soft sediment surrounding the deposits. As another example, unique animal communities have evolved to survive under the high temperature and extreme chemical conditions found at hydrothermal vents where massive sulfide deposits form from the interaction of these hot, mineral-rich fluids with surrounding cold seawater. Thus, these mineral deposits often host “hotspots” of animal life on the otherwise barren seafloor. There have been several recent studies and syntheses on the potential impacts of mining of these mineral resources on animal life (Boschen et al., 2013; Vanreusel et al., 2016; Jones et al., 2017; Suzuki et al., 2018).

In addition to the visible animal life associated with these resources, diverse microscopic life also flourishes in these systems. This nearly invisible microbial life is responsible for the majority of the chemical cycling that occurs in these habitats, providing essential ecosystem services for the deep-sea environments. Microbial life represents a vast and diverse genetic reservoir with mostly unexplored potential for medical and commercial applications. Despite the importance of the microscopic component of life to ecosystem services in the deep sea, this category has been largely overlooked in current planning related to assessing and evaluating possible environmental impacts related to deep-sea mining.

To address this gap in understanding and provide recommendations to policy makers about the possible impacts to deep-sea ecosystem services provided explicitly by microscopic life, a workshop of experts in deep-sea microbial ecology and geochemistry convened in April 2018 to discuss these topics, with support from the Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations, the Deep Carbon Observatory, and the Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences. The outcomes of this workshop are presented here. We provide an overview of the four mineral resource types along with descriptions of the microbial ecosystems that they support, the ecosystem services that these microbial communities provide, and an assessment of possible impacts to these services from mining activity. We also provide recommendations for baseline assessment and monitoring to evaluate the impact of mining activities on microbial ecosystem services.

2. EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEEP-SEA MINING ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FROM MICROORGANISMS

Seventy percent of the solid exterior of Earth lies under the ocean. While our perceptions of life on Earth are skewed by our daily encounter with photosynthesis-supported life on land, the deep-sea is a fundamentally different environment where sunlight does not penetrate. In deep-sea environments, energy for life comes in two forms. The first is through the respiration of organic matter delivered either in dissolved or particulate form (ranging from small particles up to large “food falls” like dead whales) from the sunlit surface world that is ultimately sourced from photosynthesis. The second source of energy is through generation of new organic matter (i.e., primary production) from a process known as chemosynthesis, where energy from inorganic chemical reactions is used to convert dissolved carbon dioxide into the organic molecules (sugars, fats, proteins, etc.) that are the building blocks of life. The ratio of these two energy sources can vary significantly in the deep sea, with habitats like hydrothermal vents offering a figurative buffet of chemical reactions that can fuel abundant chemosynthesis-driven microbial life. Similarly, in the low-temperature mineral deposits like ferromanganese nodules and cobalt crusts, chemosynthetic processes also occur (Orcutt et al., 2015), although the ratio of the two energy sources is poorly constrained. In these ecosystems, the chemosynthetic microbial life can form the base of the food web. Thus, disruption to the supply of chemical energy sources can have consequences for the amount and type of life that can be supported (Figure 3). The following sections describe how mining activities can upset the chemical energy supplies that fuel microbial life in these ecosystems, and how this can result in a disruption of the ecosystem services that microscopic life provides (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3.

A qualitative assessment of the ecosystem services from microorganisms in deep sea habitats with mineable resources. The size, outline, and shading of symbols reflects the value that microbes support in each system, how well microbial aspects of the ecosystem are understood, and the vulnerability of microbial aspects to mining impacts, respectively, per the legend.

2.1. ACTIVE VENTS AND ACTIVE VENT FIELDS

Hydrothermal vents are among the most dynamic environments on Earth, where hot, chemically reduced fluids come into contact with cold, oxidized seawater, leading to the precipitation of metal-rich deposits on and beneath the seafloor surrounding these vents (Figure 2). The high flux of metal-rich fluids mixing with cold, oxic seawater is a natural mechanism for accumulating iron, copper, zinc, and other economically viable elements within metal-sulfide rich mineral deposits, which makes these areas conducive to supporting chemosynthetic life as well as bring attractive targets for mining.

Any given vent ecosystem might only be the size of a football field, with a handful of 5-10 m diameter concentrated deposits within that footprint, or alternatively with the entire area consisting entirely of massive sulfide. Individual vent fields can be separated by 10s to 100s of kilometers, depending on the geological setting (Hannington et al., 2011). Inactive sulfide-rich mineral deposits often surround active vents where mineral deposition is occurring, in a formation processes that can take thousands of years (Jamieson et al., 2013). The combined global footprint of all active vent ecosystems is estimated to be up to 50 km2, which is <0.00001% of the planet’s surface (Van Dover et al., 2018). Because of the difficulty in separating active from inactive vent sites (see Supplemental Materials), the total amount of mineable resources resulting from high temperature hydrothermal activity is covered in the next section on inactive sulfides.

From their first discovery in the late 1970s (Corliss et al., 1979), hydrothermal vents have attracted widespread public attention because they support unique and abundant animals that thrive in these systems because of symbioses with chemosynthetic microorganisms (Dubilier et al., 2008; Sievert and Vetriani, 2012). Geological and geochemical heterogeneity of vent fields leads to localized differences in fluid and deposit chemistry (Fouquet et al., 2010; German et al., 2016), which translates to animal endemism and biodiverse animal populations (Van Dover, 2000; Van Dover et al., 2018). Changes to hydrothermal venting chemistry or intensity could have repercussions on the types of microbial life that can exist, and therefore on the animals that can be supported.

2.1.1. Possible impacts to biomass, primary production and microbial diversity at active vents

Microbes inhabit nearly every niche associated with active hydrothermal systems including the rocks and fluids in the subseafloor, sulfide chimney walls and surfaces, and in animal assemblages as internal and external symbionts (Fisher et al., 2007; Dubilier et al., 2008; Schrenk et al., 2009). Microbes growing on and within hydrothermal chimneys often produce thick biofilm mats easily visible to the naked eye, and even the extreme zones of high-temperature chimneys where temperatures up to 122°C host millions of microbial cells per gram of chimney material (Schrenk et al., 2003; Han et al., 2018). Nevertheless, the vast majority of microbial biomass in hydrothermal systems probably resides in the porous subseafloor underlying the chimneys. The amount of microbial biomass in the subseafloor of active hydrothermal vent systems is poorly constrained, though, due to difficulties in accessing this environment. Models of fluid circulation that assume a temperature limit of life of 122°C (Takai et al., 2008) as the main limitation to life yield a wide range of results depending on the depth of fluid circulation within the seafloor (Lowell et al., 2015), which can range from a few centimeters to the full thickness of the highly permeable basalt layer (~ 500 m). Therefore, mining activities risk removing the bulk of microbial biomass in areas where the habitable crustal area is thin. Without being able to directly observe and sample this microbial habitat, the diffuse fluids exiting cracks in the seafloor are considered to be windows into the subsurface of active vent systems (Deming and Baross, 1993; Huber and Holden, 2008). Diffuse fluids contain active microbial cells that are in one to two orders of magnitude greater abundance than that of the surrounding seawater (Karl et al., 1980; Huber et al., 2002; Meyer et al., 2013) with diverse metabolic capacities that affect global chemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen, iron, and sulfur (Mehta and Baross, 2006; Wankel et al., 2011; Holden et al., 2012; Bourbonnais et al., 2014; Fortunato et al., 2018).

The physiologically diverse microorganisms inhabiting active vent fields are considered to be fast growing and highly productive. The annual global production of biomass is estimated to reach 1.4 Tg carbon, significantly influencing deep-sea chemical cycling (McNichol et al., 2018). Thus, despite the small size of active vent fields, the rates of microbial primary productivity by microrganisms fueled by chemosynthesis in active vent systems can rival that of coastal and open ocean photosynthetic systems, making them productivity hotspots in an otherwise energy-starved deep sea (McNichol et al., 2018). As primary producers in the ecosystem, microbes support nearly all life at vents, from microbial consumers to the abundant and charismatic animals (Sievert and Vetriani, 2012). Animals can benefit from microbial primary productivity directly by harboring endosymbionts (e.g., tube worms, mussels, and clams) or indirectly by grazing microbial mats (e.g., Rimicaris shrimp)(Dubilier et al., 2008). Therefore, a major disruption of the chemical conditions that permit microbial chemosynthesis could have devastating consequences for all animals in that ecosystem.

Beyond their role in supporting primary productivity through chemosynthesis, many microbes in hydrothermal ecosystems play essential roles for animals by providing cues for larvae to settle (O’Brien et al., 2015). Microbial mats create barriers that slow the release of diffuse fluids and concentrate the energy-rich chemicals used in chemosynthesis. Growth of the microbial mat attracts microscopic and macroscopic grazers and traps more fluids, resulting in a rich ecosystem that supports dense and diverse assemblages of animals and microbes (Fisher et al., 2007). The concentration of energy and nutrients in complex, microbially-created habitats with strong spatial gradients fosters the evolution of highly diverse microbial communities, making hydrothermal vent systems hotspots of microbial diversity on the seafloor (Campbell et al., 2006; Schrenk et al., 2009; Olins et al., 2013; Meier et al., 2017).

In addition to the microscopic Bacteria and Archaea that are the base of the food web, hydrothermal systems also host abundant microscopic Eukarya, including protists and fungi (Edgcomb et al., 2002; López-Garcia et al., 2007), as well as viruses (Ortmann and Suttle, 2005; Williamson et al., 2008; Anderson et al., 2011; He et al., 2017). The diversity, distribution, and ecological roles of both groups are poorly constrained. Therefore, although hydrothermal systems are one of the better studied deep-sea environments (Figure 4), there is still much to learn about their microbial communities and their role in maintaining ecosystem functions.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4.

A schematic depicting the relative state of knowledge of deep-sea habitats with mineral resources versus the areal extent of the resources. White circles represent the relative area of the potentially exploitable resource (Petersen et al., 2016), and red circles signify the fraction of that area that is subject to current or pending exploration licenses (Hein et al., 2013a). Blue halos indicate the relative number of peer-reviewed publications with relevant key words. See Supplementary Materials Dataset 1 for more details.

In summary, microbial life at active hydrothermal vents are the dominant base of the food web at these sites, supporting abundant and diverse animal life at distinct “oases” on the seafloor. These microbial ecosystems comprise abundant standing stock of life that is diverse and highly productive, fueled by the abundant chemical energy supplies in these active vent systems. Mining activities near active vents could disrupt the nature of fluid flow, and therefore the availability of chemical energy to these ecosystems, potentially causing a cascade effect on the size, production, and diversity of these ecosystems (Figure 3) (Van Dover et al., 2018).

2.1.2. Potential loss of genetic resources from active vent ecosystems

In addition to being biological hot spots, hydrothermal vents are also targets for natural products discovery owing to the unique genetic resources that some of the microbes contain (Thornburg et al., 2010). According to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the term “genetic resources” is defined as genetic material (i.e., any material of plant, animal, microbial, or other origin containing functional units of heredity) of actual or potential value. They may be used in biotechnological development of pharmaceutical drugs, research-based enzymes, food processing enzymes, cosmetic products, and other potential applications. Natural products from marine animals and microbes are already being marketed as anti-cancer and anti-viral drugs as well as various “cosmeceuticals” – cosmetic products with medicinal properties (Martins et al., 2014). For example, a novel benzoquinone compound isolated from a thermophilic bacterium from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent had anti-tumor activity by triggering cell death of cancer cells (Xu et al., 2017), and recently a novel antibiotic was identified from a vent microorganism (Shi et al., 2017). DNA polymerases Vent® and Deep Vent®, both isolated from hyperthermophilic vent microorganisms, are marketed for research applications in molecular biology. Cosmeceuticals such as Abyssine® and RefirMAR® capitalize on excretions and internal proteins from hydrothermal vent bacteria and are marketed as reducing irritation in sensitive skin and reducing wrinkles. Numerous additional bioactive compounds from hydrothermal vent microorganisms are in research and development phases, and awareness of the potential of hydrothermal vents, other extreme environments, and the deep subseafloor in general, as sources of natural products is growing (Navarri et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018). The prevalence of symbiotic relationships among hydrothermal vent species may also be a source of untapped potential given that some bioactive compounds isolated from marine animals have now been attributed to their microbial symbionts (Piel, 2009; Penesyan et al., 2010).

Because each active vent site most likely contains endemic microbial species that are unique to the particular environmental conditions at that site (e.g. (Huber et al., 2010)), disruption of any vent site is likely to have some level of negative impacts on humanity’s ability to discover and utilize these genetic resources. The ability of these unique microbial ecosystems to reset after anthropogenic disturbance is poorly known, although there is evidence of recovery after natural disturbances such as volcanic eruptions (Opatkiewicz et al., 2009; Fortunato et al., 2018), so it is not clear if these impacts would be permanent, long-lasting, or ephemeral (Figure 3). Very few active vent systems have been studied in any detail, so a primary concern about mining of these systems is that their unique biodiversity and genetic resources could be lost before they are ever discovered.

2.1.3 Impacts on other microbial ecosystem services at active vents

In addition to the metals that are sourced from hydrothermal vents, other reducing substrates such as methane – a potent greenhouse gas – are highly enriched at active vent sites (Holden et al., 2012). Some specialized microbes use methane as their primary energy source and convert it into the less potent greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. Microbial consumption of methane and other chemicals has a measurable impact on the flux of these chemicals from hydrothermal systems into the ocean (Wankel et al., 2011; Wankel et al., 2012), but more exploration of these systems is required for accurate estimates of their global contribution to the carbon cycle. Irrespective of its global significance, disruption of the vigorous microbial activity in hydrothermal systems is likely to have unpredictable consequences for nearby deep-sea habitats, which may be exposed to chemicals such as methane, hydrogen, and hydrogen sulfide that were previously removed in the vents (Figure 3).

Active vent systems also have incalculable value as representations of habitats that were likely to be prevalent on the ancient Earth and perhaps even acted as the cradle for the evolution of microbial life (Baross and Hoffman, 1985; Martin et al., 2008). Similar environmental conditions that promote vigorous microbial activity in vents today could have also promoted the origin and early evolution of life on ancient Earth (e.g. (Baaske et al., 2007)). Furthermore, the isolation of deep-sea vents from the surface would have enabled them to act as refugia for early lifeforms when conditions at the surface of the planet were not hospitable (Nisbet and Sleep, 2001). Many of the enzymes and metabolic pathways used by vent microbes today appear to contain clues about the nature of the first biological molecules (Russell and Martin, 2004) and key evolutionary milestones (Nasir et al., 2015). Therefore, the microbial diversity of active vents is not only important for modern ecosystem functions but also as natural wonders and precious cultural and educational resources that connect us to our ancient origins on this planet (Figure 3).

Finally, it must be emphasized that the vast majority of microbial life at hydrothermal vents has not been explored (Figure 4), despite increasing improvements in access to the deep ocean and new analytical tools (Xie et al., 2011; Fortunato and Huber, 2016; Fortunato et al., 2018). Therefore, many of the ecosystem services that microbes provide in these ecosystems are not yet known to science. Thus, the cultural heritage and educational services that active hydrothermal vents provide, both known and unknown, could be lost from mining activities.

In summary, the ecosystem services described above (Figure 3) highlight the importance of active hydrothermal vents. As argued elsewhere (Niner et al., 2018; Van Dover et al., 2018), given the substantial challenges associated with the meaning and measurement of “no net loss” guidelines – e.g., distinguishing between different types of biodiversity, the central importance of function in addition to identity, and consideration of spatial and time scales involved – we argue that active systems should not be mined. This view is bolstered by recent recommendations (IUCN, 2016; OECD, 2016; Cuyvers et al., 2018), which note that perturbation coupled with biodiversity offsets is not an acceptable interpretation of the ISA’s remit to protect the marine environment for the common benefit of humanity, and other recent studies that try to model the efficacy of offsets for this type of resource (Dunn et al., 2018). Caution is particularly prudent when there is uncertainty around an ecosystem’s vulnerability and recoverability (Donohue and al., 2016), as with microbial communities at active hydrothermal vents. Given this stance, it is troubling that a large fraction of known active vents are within areas of the seabed that have already been contracted for exploration and possible exploitation (Figures 3, 4).

2.2. INACTIVE VENT FIELDS WITH MASSIVE SULFIDE DEPOSITS

Inactive vent fields are the remnants of prior active hydrothermal circulation (Figure 2). Current volumetric estimates and ore percentages of seafloor massive sulfide deposits approximate those of terrestrial ores, though the size of individual deposits is up to 20 Mt as opposed to opposed to 50-60 Mt for terrestrial equivalents (Hoagland et al., 2010; Hannington et al., 2011; Petersen et al., 2016). 90% of known deposits are less than 2 Mt, with only 10% above the current 2 Mt threshold of economic interest (Petersen et al., 2016). Moreover, mineral content, and therefore economic value, also varies greatly between and within deposits, with those of largest volume not necessarily being the most valuable (Petersen et al., 2016). Finally, these are rough estimates and they do not distinguish between active and inactive hydrothermal vent fields, which could differ greatly in the challenges they present to mining operations and in the potential impacts to biological communities.

Inactive vent fields may be much more amenable to mining operations than active vents due to their size and absence of high-temperature acidic fluids. A complication, however, is that systems with no observable surficial venting may reveal underlying activity when disturbed by mining. Individual quiescent chimneys in a still-active vent fields are not a truly inactive hydrothermal system. Any indication of even minor venting of warm fluid could be indicative of high temperature fluids at depth, with any disruption of surface material from mining activities having operational and environmental consequences. Information is required regarding underlying hydrology and microbial colonization patterns before any predictions can be made regarding the potential unintended consequences of disturbing the microbial communities of inactive vent fields.

2.2.1. Possible impacts to microbial biomass, primary production and diversity at inactive vent fields

Inactive vent fields are not currently known to host many endemic animals, though this may be due to a lack of exploration (Figure 4). Inactive vent fields represent a broad transition zone between actively venting hydrothermal systems and non-hydrothermal seafloor environments and are therefore expected to share features of each (Levin et al., 2016a; Levin et al., 2016b). As in active vents, many animal taxa in inactive vent fields obtain their nutrition in association with chemoautotrophic microbial symbionts (Erickson et al., 2009). Many animals from the next generation recruit their symbionts from the environment independently of the previous generation, so disruptions to the composition of the ambient seawater microbial communities could affect the ability of these animals to persist in areas adjacent to mining activities even if their own habitat is not directly affected (Figure 3).

By contrast, inactive hydrothermal vent fields are home to microbial species that are distinct from those of active hydrothermal sites (Suzuki et al., 2004; Erickson et al., 2009; Sylvan et al., 2012; Toner et al., 2013). The overall microbial community composition of inactive vent fields can be similar to that of the surrounding seafloor (Kato et al., 2010), indicating that inactive fields may not host as many unique and endemic populations as active vents do (Figure 3). Any generalized descriptions of inactive vent fields are premature, however, considering that very few examples have been detected and studied (Figure 4) (Boschen et al., 2013; Vare et al., 2018). Furthermore, very few studies have attempted to characterize the microbial communities of inactive vent fields, their roles in local and global biogeochemical cycling, or as refugia and seed-banks for the more dynamic active vent fields. Inactive hydrothermal systems may lack vigorous hydrothermal venting, but they nevertheless contain complex subsurface habitats with unknown microbial ecosystems. Ecosystem services that these subsurface microbial communities could potentially provide include primary production, secondary production, element cycling, and unique genetic resources, although knowledge of these services is poorly constrained due to very limited sampling (Figures 3, 4).

2.2.2. Potential loss of habitat and creation of acidic conditions from mining massive sulfide deposits at inactive vent fields

A few categories of the potential impacts of mining on inactive sulfide-associated microbial communities are highlighted here. Our estimates mainly come from activities occurring within the national boundaries of Papua New Guinea, which is the most well-known mining project in a seafloor hydrothermal system, led by Nautilus Minerals Ltd. (Coffey Natural Systems, 2008). There have been recent reports of newer mining tests offshore Japan, but less information is publicly available from this site.

Mining seafloor massive sulfide deposits is a form of strip mining, where the top layer of sediment and crust is removed as overburden, and the exposed ore is removed in successive layers until the deposit is completely removed or “mined out”. By comparison to terrestrial mining sites, one can expect that exposure of massive sulfide deposits will start a cascade of abiotic and microbially catalyzed reactions, due to the exposure of the deposits to oxygenated seawater. Pyrite – an iron sulfide mineral – is the main constituent of massive sulfide deposits, and the overall oxidation reaction that occurs when this mineral is exposed to oxygen and water generates protons. Where the local environmental buffering capacity is unable to absorb these additional protons, a feedback system takes effect that causes a pH decrease. A change in pH causes changes in the type and speed of chemical reactions that occur (Bethke et al., 2011; Jin and Kirk, 2018), leading to changes in metal and oxygen dissolution properties in addition to changes in biology. This process and its effects are termed acid mine drainage or acid rock drainage in terrestrial systems (Schippers et al., 2010; Nordstrom, 2011), where many studies have been conducted on the pivotal roles that microbes play in contributing to these processes.

In terrestrial systems, exhausted strip mines create terraced open pits that can slowly fill with lakes or groundwater of altered chemistry, as any remaining metal-rich sulfides react with exposure to water and oxygen to create acidic conditions. In a marine sulfide system, such a pit will be permanently exposed to the oxic deep seawater long after extraction ceases, also allowing for the creation of acidic conditions. Although seawater has a higher pH buffering capacity than freshwater on land, a recent study on treatment of acid mine drainage from a terrestrial massive sulfide deposit (itself an ancient hydrothermal vent site) showed that a ratio of 1 part acid mine drainage to 90 parts seawater was required to neutralize the acid conditions (Sapsford et al., 2015). Biotic catalysis in the form of microbes may be a key factor in determining how exposed sulfide deposits will react to bottom seawater, but no studies have directly investigated the role of biological catalysis in marine environments affected by mining.

The consequences of the complete destruction and permanent loss of seafloor habitat caused by deep-sea mining are difficult to predict (Figure 3), since there is no precedent for such activities in the deep sea. One speculative scenario is that water in a deep mining pit on the seafloor may become sufficiently isolated from actively flowing seawater to stagnate and create a potentially permanent acidic, anoxic condition, but research is needed to investigate this possibility. Even minimal fluxes of material out of the pit could be sufficient to propagate acid mine drainage reactions to surrounding areas. Where there is local recharge of bottom seawater into ocean crust (Fisher and Wheat, 2010), which itself would likely be affected by changes in seafloor topography, the polluted water may also be entrained into the seafloor and transported from the point source farther than predicted. The degree to which acidic mining pits might influence surrounding ecosystems and the roles of microbial communities in these acid-generating reactions requires investigation.

2.2.3. Generation of tailings plumes from mining massive sulfide deposits at inactive vent fields

In addition to the loss of habitat directly caused by mining the seafloor, mining activities will produce a plume of waste material that will disperse and fall on the surrounding seafloor, which is expected to nearly double the total area of seafloor impacted by mining (Boschen et al., 2013; Fallon et al., 2017). The environmental impact of this plume of waste material will depend on several factors, but perhaps most importantly, on the proximity of the waste plume to active hydrothermal systems. If the active vents are close enough to the mining area, they could become buried in the mining plume. Determination of this critical distance should be studied prior to any mining activities (Dunn et al., 2018).

Furthermore, because inactive vent fields are poorly explored and their possible level of hydrothermal activity is difficult to ascertain without high resolution seafloor surveys, there is a high likelihood that undiscovered active vents could be associated with apparently inactive fields. If these vents are not discovered prior to mining activities, they could become buried in the plume of waste material before there is any opportunity to explore their ecosystem services and potential scientific value. In addition, burial of seafloor habitat, even if it is not hydrothermally active, could disrupt the ability of animal larvae to sense seafloor conditions and to respond to environmental cues of where to attach and colonize (Gollner et al., 2010; Gollner et al., 2015).

There is also the potential impact of plumes of mining tailings closer to the ocean surface. Current mining operation designs propose to transport mined seafloor material to a surface ship for processing, returning the waste fluids to the ocean. This tailings waste stream, consisting of rock/ore fragments of small size and initial treatment chemicals as well as elevated concentrations of dissolved metals from the mining process, will create plumes of debris in the water column (Nath et al., 2012; Boschen et al., 2013; Fallon et al., 2017). Tailings may extend affected areas up to 80% from the point-source of pollution, though this can be difficult to predict, particularly in the deep sea where baseline information is scarce (Boschen et al., 2013; Hughes et al., 2015; Fallon et al., 2017; Vare et al., 2018). Studies on the effects and magnitude of potential metal leachate concentrations indicate significant local effects, particularly in areas of low or stagnant flow, and have the potential to remain in solution despite extensive mixing (Sapsford et al., 2015; Fallon et al., 2017; Fallon et al., 2018). Any substantial chemical amendments will likely have dramatic consequences for community structure and function, as observed with hydraulic fracturing on land (Murali Mohan et al., 2013).

Legislation currently requires treatment of any mine tailings on land to minimize this historically problematic waste (Dold, 2014; Hughes et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2017; Vare et al., 2018). Tailings often still contain elevated concentrations of acid-generating sulfides and heavy metals, and thus represent a significant additional source of mine drainage. Current deep-sea mining proposals indicate disposal of rock over the side of the mining vessel at various depths (Schriever and Thiel, 2013), which may eventually form deposits of sulfide-containing rock on the seafloor. This is similar to Deep-Sea Tailings Disposal, a strategy already used by a small number of terrestrial mines (Jones and Ellis, 1995; Schriever and Thiel, 2013; Dold, 2014; Vare et al., 2018). Measurable impacts from these tailings dumps include elevated concentrations of various transition metals in sediment, blanketing of the seabed by compacted precipitates, and release of elevated concentrations of sulfur and transition metals into the water column (Kline and Stekoll, 2001; Shimmield et al., 2007; Ramirez-Llodra et al., 2015; Hauton et al., 2017).

A few studies have investigated the various effects of these tailings plumes on animals (Kline and Stekoll, 2001; Mestre et al., 2017). Mining waste is known to affect microbial biogeochemical cycling and the rates and success of community recovery in shallow coastal sites (Pedersen, 1984; Pedersen and Losher, 1988; Almeida et al., 2007). However, no studies have explored the impacts of tailings plumes on deep-sea microbial communities. Natural plumes emitted from hydrothermal systems are known to have profound implications for the composition and activity of deep-sea microbial communities (Anantharaman et al., 2013; Dick et al., 2013; Levin et al., 2016a), therefore the potential impacts of tailings plumes can also be expected to be significant.

One concern is that disruption of natural microbial communities and stimulation of heavy metal-metabolizing microbes, in particular, will have far-reaching consequences for element cycling in the deep sea (Figure 3). Some metals may enter solution due to microbial activity, thus spreading the effect to a larger area and making the metals more bioavailable and increasing their toxicity. Others may precipitate out of solution more readily, causing issues such as blanketing areas of the seafloor with amorphous metal-rich precipitates. There is currently no research on the relevant thresholds over which some level of mining activity might begin to impact marine element cycling on a regional level.

Lessons from terrestrial massive sulfide mining show that environmental change brought about by these activities persists long after mining activity has ceased, including cases where point-source remediation measures are in place (Bird, 2016). However, remediation strategies that might be applied to operationally challenging deep-sea environments are poorly developed, though some studies have made tentative recommendations (Ramirez-Llodra et al., 2015; Vare et al., 2018). An industry report proposes that active sites will regenerate themselves by generating new mineral cover from already-present geochemical reactions and biology re-seeded from nearby refugia (Coffey Natural Systems, 2008), though the report does not specify how long this might take and whether it will require active human management. Even if this prediction is reasonable for active vent fields, it is not applicable to inactive vent fields. We speculate that taking no remedial action will likely result in acid mine drainage conditions over many decades, but research is need to assess this. Remediation strategies are likely to involve either natural dilution of the mining pit with seawater or else capping and permanent isolation of the pit. Both strategies have potential consequences and require extensive investigation. Depending on the local buffering capacities, natural dilution of the pit may not be sufficient to completely neutralize the acid-generating chemical reactions, potentially resulting in spreading acid-mine drainage across a much broader area of the seafloor. Capping the pit would require development of new technology capable of permanently isolating a large deep-sea pit, and failure of the cap could have devastating consequences for nearby ecosystems, potentially resulting in run-away acid mine drainage reactions within the capped region.

2.3. FERROMANGANESE NODULES

Ferromanganese nodules form in sediment underlying organic-poor regions of the global ocean, often at water depths > 4,000 meters (Figures 1, 2). In addition to iron and manganese, nodules incorporate high concentrations of economically valuable metals such as nickel, cobalt, and copper (Hein et al., 2013a). Nodule size ranges from microscopic particles to several cm in diameter and occur dispersed across nodule fields. Nodule growth is extremely slow (mm to cm accumulation per million years; (Ku and Broecker, 1965; Bender et al., 1966; Boltenkov, 2012)), and surrounding pelagic sediments accumulate Mn at approximately similar rates as nodules (< 5 mg cm-3 per 1000 years; (Bender et al., 1970)). Nodules can acquire manganese from sediment pore waters or from the overlying water column. The growth mechanism is mediated by the redox state of overlying waters and, in some environments, growth can be supported by hydrothermal influence and may change throughout the growth history of the manganese nodule (Mewes et al., 2014; Wegorzewski and Kuhn, 2014). Whether nodule growth proceeds purely abiotically, or is influenced by microbial activity or seeding is not currently known, although microbial communities have been detected in nodules (Tully and Heidelberg, 2013; Lindh et al., 2017). Recent studies have also documented novel animal communities that are supported by nodule fields (Bluhm et al., 1995; Purser et al., 2016; Vanreusel et al., 2016; Peukert et al., 2018).

Several studies have correlated water depth with nodule coverage to extrapolate and predict nodule occurrences over a wider area (Park et al., 1997; Jung et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2012; Peukert et al., 2018). Invariably, the occurrence of nodules coincides with areas of low sedimentation; for example, the sedimentation rate in the Clarion Clipperton Zone is estimated to be 0.3-15 mm per 1000 yrs (Jeong et al., 1994). These low sedimentation rates, which are typical of ocean gyres, are due to extremely low productivity of the overlying ocean, which exports low amounts of particles and organic matter to the deeper ocean. Thus, mining of nodules would disrupt deep-sea sediment environments that have evolved over millennia and would likely take just as long to recover to pre-disturbance conditions.

Manganese nodules harbor active microbial communities with cell densities three orders of magnitude higher than in surrounding sediment (Shiraishi et al., 2016). However, the specific organism(s) responsible for manganese oxidation and precipitation in those environments remain unidentified, despite some recent studies suggesting different chemical processes and structures occurring in the interiors versus exteriors of nodules, and nodule microbial communities that are distinct from the surrounding sediment (Tully and Heidelberg, 2013; Blöthe et al., 2015; Shulse et al., 2017). The interplay between sediment geochemistry and nodule microbial community structure remains poorly understood. It is therefore difficult to predict what the microbial and biogeochemical response and recovery would be to disturbance caused by deep sea mining (Figure 3).

2.3.1. Limited impacts to organic carbon sequestration from mining ferromanganese nodules

Marine sediments are a major sink of organic matter over geological timescales and an important part of the global carbon and oxygen cycles (Berner, 2003). Sinking particles settling on the ocean floor are buried, effectively protecting and preserving their organic matter contents, and impeding it from microbial “remineralization” to carbon dioxide. The burial of organic carbon in the deep ocean is an important component of the global carbon cycle, thus regulating atmospheric CO2 and global climate through the sequestration of carbon, and allowing the build-up of oxygen in the atmosphere (Arndt et al., 2013; Hülse et al., 2017). Deep-sea mining of ferromanganese nodules will cause the re-suspension of sediments (Thiel and Schriever, 1990), potentially altering the ecosystem service of carbon sequestration that occurs in this habitat.

We estimate (see Supplemental Materials for calculations), however, that proposed mining of these nodule-bearing sediments and resulting re-suspension of particles and organic matter will have a trivial impact on the ecosystem service of carbon sequestration for two reasons (Figure 3). First, these sediments contain extremely low quantities of organic matter (<0.5% percent (Khripounoff et al., 2006). This is typical for deep-sea sediment (Seiter et al., 2004), since the particles delivering organic carbon to the ocean floor must sink over long distances to reach the ocean floor, during which the majority of organic matter is remineralized by microbes in the water column (Marsay et al., 2015; Cavan et al., 2017). Thus, only a relatively small mass of carbon might be re-suspended, compared to the much higher carbon loads in nearshore sediment environments. Second, the organic matter contained in these deep-sea sediments is likely to be highly processed and thus not particularly bioavailable to microbial remineralization, so most of the organic carbon would be redeposited on the seafloor and sequestered. Furthermore, as stimulation of organic carbon remineralization in the overlying water column is likely to be low, there would be inconsequential changes in dissolved oxygen concentration in bottom seawater (<0.5%).

2.3.2. Other microbial ecosystem service impacts from mining ferromanganese nodules

Although the carbon sequestration ecosystem service of nodule fields would not be impacted, other microbial ecosystem services in nodule fields are expected to be impacted by mining activity (Figure 3). For example, as part of the European JPI Oceans Mining Impact project (Paul et al., 2018), the DISturbance and reCOLonization (DISCOL) area was recently revisited to study the long-term impact of nodule mining. The DISCOL experiment was carried out in 1989 in the Peru Basin in which the deep seafloor was plowed in an area of ~ 11 km2 to mimic nodule mining (Thiel et al., 2001). Clear geochemical differences, including metal distributions, in the upper 20 cm of disturbed and undisturbed sediments could be observed even 26 years after plowing (Paul et al., 2018). Based on their observations, the authors noted that nodule mining will likely have long-lasting impacts on the geochemistry of the underlying sediment (Paul et al., 2018). Specifically, solid-phase manganese concentrations were lower in disturbed areas compared to reference areas. This finding suggests that the capacity for metal sequestration via scavenging onto nodules will be substantially limited during the recovery period. The absence of nodules in the disturbed area increases metal flux out of sediment, although it is argued that these flux rates do not reach rates that are potentially toxic to animals (Paul et al., 2018).

Nodule regrowth may also be limited by both the geochemical and microbiological changes following mining-related disturbances. For example, thermodynamic and kinetic constraints limit the oxidation of reduced manganese to oxidized manganese by oxygen (Luther, 2010). Microbes can catalyze this reaction via direct and indirect pathways; thus, the formation of most manganese oxide minerals in the environment is microbially mediated (Hansel and Learman, 2015). A broad diversity of organisms are capable of manganese oxidation, from bacteria to fungi (Hansel, 2017), although microbial manganese oxidation does not provide an energetic benefit to the organism and the physiological purpose is unclear.

Mining activities will cause a decrease in the ecosystem service of this habitat through the destruction of paleoscientific records, a valuable education aspect of this environment. Marine sediment cores are an immensely valuable resource for reconstructing climate conditions over Earth’s history (Figure 3). Plant and animal fossils found in sediments are frequently used to reconstruct and understand the past chemistry and temperature of the ocean. For example, the calcium carbonate shells of microorganisms such as foraminifera or coccoliths can be analyzed using oxygen isotopes to determine the temperature and chemistry of ancient seawater and how cold the ocean was at the time the shell formed (Spero et al., 1997; Ornella Amore et al., 2004; Maeda et al., 2017). Moreover, diatom microfossils can be used to understand upwelling currents and reconstruct past wind and weather patterns (Abrantes, 1991; Schrader and Sorknes, 1991; Zúñiga et al., 2017). In addition, dust layers found in sediment cores can be analyzed to determine its origin to understand the direction and strength of winds and how dry the climate may have been at that particular time (Rea, 1994; Middleton et al., 2018). Nodules themselves record paleoclimate and seawater conditions. For example, rare earth element ratios in nodules serve as a proxy for bottom water redox state and changes in deep currents over time (Glasby et al., 1987; Kasten et al., 1998), and some rare earth element isotopes in ferromanganese nodules also reveal patterns in ocean circulation throughout time (Albarède et al., 1997; Frank et al., 1999; van de Flierdt et al., 2004). Marine sediment and nodules thus serve as a valuable resource for reconstructing past climate conditions as well as understanding and predicting future climate change. Sediment in nodule-rich regions is particularly valuable due to a low sedimentation rate that allows for piston coring techniques to readily access extremely old sediment. Widespread sediment disturbances from nodule mining would result in the loss of this record and educational ecosystem service (Figure 3).

Overall, mining activities in nodule fields will have varied impacts on microbial ecosystem services (Figure 3). Some services, such as carbon sequestration potential, will be minimally impacted. Other services, such as research and educational value from paleoscientific records contained with sediment layers, would be severely perturbed and not recoverable. Decades-long studies have identified that microbial processes with the sediments underlying nodules remain impacted for quite some time (Paul et al., 2018), but the corresponding impact this has to biogeochemical cycling and ecological functioning is not constrained and requires further investigation, despite this resource type having been the most studied for these kinds of impacts (Figure 4).

2.4. COBALT CRUSTS ON BASALTIC SEAMOUNTS

Cobalt-rich crusts (also called polymetallic crusts) occur on sediment-free rock surfaces in all oceans of the world (Figures 1, 2), raging in thickness from <1 mm to ~260 mm. They are most common in the Pacific Ocean where there are estimated to be over 50,000 seamounts and knolls and many more seamounts likely exist in uncharted waters (Wessel et al., 2010; Levin et al., 2016c). In addition to cobalt, other rare and trace metals of high economic value – including copper, nickel, platinum and tellurium (used in the solar cell industry) – are adsorbed to the crust from seawater. In the central Pacific, ~7,500 million dry tons of crusts are estimated, containing 4 times more cobalt, 9 times more tellurium, and a third of the manganese that makes up the entire land based reserve of these metals (Hein et al., 2013b). Polymetallic crusts are formed slowly (1-5 mm per million years), and biomineralization by microorganisms plays a role in initiation of crust accretion, serving as a biological nuclei (Wang and Müller, 2009). Microorganisms may also play a role promoting the enrichment of cobalt in the crust through sorption/immobilization processes (Krishnan et al., 2006; Sujith et al., 2017).

2.4.1. Possible impacts to biomass, primary production and microbial diversity in cobalt crusts

The alteration rinds that form on seafloor exposed basalts at seamounts and outcrops (i.e. cobalt-rich crusts) provide a habitat suitable for sessile animals like corals and sponges that require a hard substrate to attach to (Etnoyer et al., 2010; Shank, 2010), as well as for brooding animals like octopus (Hartwell et al., 2018). However, the role microorganisms play in faunal colonization and presence in these regions remains unknown, as does the relative role of microbial chemosynthesis and heterotrophy in this ecosystem. Some studies suggest persistent patterns in microbial community composition on highly altered seafloor-exposed basalts that have ferromanganese crusts (Lee et al., 2015). Surveys of indigenous microorganisms from sediments associated with cobalt-rich crusts (Liao et al., 2011; Huo et al., 2015) and manganese rich crust (Nitahara et al., 2011) have detected the potential for microbial chemosynthetic primary production supported by ammonia oxidation. Similarly, the amount of primary production supported by microbial communities on altered seafloor basalts could be significant for carbon cycling in the deep sea (Orcutt 2015).

Removal of alteration crusts from seamounts and outcrops through mining/dredging is expected to physically alter the seafloor substantially. The overall slope of the seamount may be flattened, and the amount of soft sediment increased though disturbance and release of waste during the mining process (Levin, 2013). This mining activity would dramatically impact sessile animal communities, although recovery rates from these disturbances are unknown. Mining activity would expose fresh surfaces of underlying basalt rocks, which would eventually be altered through seawater exposure, although this process would be very slow (1-5 mm per million years). Due to the slow growth of both the alteration crust as well as the fauna that live on them, the recovery time for physically disturbed crusts on seamounts caused by mining is predicted to be long (Schlacher et al., 2014). For example, recovery and recolonization of seamounts by animals was found to not have occurred after 10 years of closing bottom-trawling activities in coastal New Zealand and Australia (Williams et al., 2010). Dredging activities for recovering the crusted rocks underneath, and not just animals, is expected to have even slower recovery rates.

Moreover, mining/dredging activities that change the physical structure of the seamount/outcrop would potentially impact fluid circulation pathways through basaltic crust, especially on ridge flanks. This outcrop-to-outcrop fluid circulation away from the ridge axis ventilates the majority of heat from the oceans (Fisher et al., 2003; Fisher and Wheat, 2010) and is an important component of global geochemical cycles (Wheat et al., 2017; Wheat et al., submitted). For example, a recent study indicated that at least 5% of the global ocean dissolved organic pool is removed via microbial oxidation within the subsurface ocean crust during ridge flank fluid circulation (Shah Walter et al., 2018). Mining activities could change the permeability, porosity and locations of fluid discharge, which would impact fluid circulation and could have consequences on the nature of microbial communities resident in these environments that are influenced by fluid conditions (Figure 3) (Zinke et al., 2018). However, very little is known about fluid circulation far away from ridge axes where many seamounts occur, so it is difficult to know how widespread this disruption could be.

2.4.2. Other possible impacts to microbial ecosystem services in cobalt crusts

Microorganisms in cobalt crusts can likely use metals as an energy source and carry adaptations to tolerate the high heavy metal concentrations that occur in polymetallic crusts, potentially playing a role in metal cycling in oceans. Crustal microorganisms have demonstrated the ability to immobilize cobalt from seawater, release trace metals like nickel, and may also be capable of scavenging other metals (Krishnan et al., 2006; Antony et al., 2011). These traits are of interest for biotechnological applications, or applications that involve metal/microbe interactions such as bioremediation of polluted sites, bioleaching, and metal recovery (Figure 3). However, the financial considerations for dredging cobalt crusts from the seafloor limit the viability of this natural product discovery track.

3. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BASELINE AND MONITORING DATA TO EVALUATE IMPACTS TO MICROBIAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Recommendations for baseline measurements and monitoring of mining impacts have been published elsewhere (Gjerde et al., 2016; Henocque, 2017; Boetius and Haeckel, 2018; Cuyvers et al., 2018; Durden et al., 2018; Jones et al., 2018). These recommendations include measurements of animal biodiversity and deep-sea ecosystem structure and function. We propose that including microorganisms in these biodiversity and ecosystem measurements is critical for effective monitoring of mining impacts. In high energy environments like hydrothermal vents, where many microorganisms have short generation times, measurements of microbial diversity are likely to be highly sensitive and quickly responsive to environmental impacts. Alternatively, impacts in lower energy environments like deep-sea sediments hosting ferromanganese nodules may be harder to discern. Furthermore, the responses of microbial communities to mining impacts will be more complex than a simple "good" or "bad", as microbial species will respond in many different ways. Changes in microbial community composition are likely to convey a wealth of information about changes to the environment, if we are able to detect and decipher these signals. With enough research, monitoring of microbial communities could become sufficiently sensitive and specific to enable adjustments of ongoing mining activities before impacts to animal communities reach a dangerous threshold.

Predicting and assessing the environmental impacts of mining in the deep sea is fundamentally more challenging than on land because so little of the deep sea has been explored in any detail. In many areas under consideration for mining, we lack any knowledge of how the resident microbial communities contribute to primary production and element cycling in their habitats and how these local activities relate to regional- and global-scale chemical cycles. Therefore, any assessment or monitoring of mining impacts should consider the potential unexpected consequences associated with undiscovered microbial organisms and activities stimulated, directly or indirectly, by mining activities.

One pragmatic approach to the monitoring of mining impacts is the creation of protected areas and reserves, as recommended by others. Protected areas, such as Preservation Reference Zones where no impacts occur within mining sites (International Seabed Authority, 2018), and reserves would be particularly useful as reference points for the monitoring of microbial communities, since there is no way to assess the status of a microbial community a priori without reference points. Samples for detailed microbial community analysis through DNA sequencing approaches should be collected from both protected and impacted sites, to evaluate change. It is worth noting, though, that the technology for measuring microbial diversity is advancing so quickly that baseline measurements collected prior to mining activities are likely to be rendered obsolete shortly thereafter, therefore appropriate samples should be archived for re-analysis with new techniques as they become available. We also recommend the use of in situ and lab-based activity-oriented experiments to evaluate changes in metabolic activities that could alter element and nutrient distributions due to anticipated disruptions.

In conclusion, while some ecosystem services provided by microbial life in deep-sea habitats may be minimally impacted by mining activities, others are expected to be severely impacted (Figure 3). Active vent environments are expected to suffer the most extreme impacts from mining activity, which will be hard to avoid even with protected offsets (Dunn et al., 2018). There are several critical knowledge gaps that remain, and these are not evenly distributed across habitat type (Figure 4). For example, the long-term impacts of mining inactive sulfide deposits are poorly known, but could be dramatic in comparison to open-pit mines on land. When considering that the total estimated copper and zinc potential of these deposits are only slightly larger than the annual production on land (Hannington et al., 2011), it is important to weigh the consequences of these activities in environmental impact assessments. Moreover, it is unclear how extensively the seabed and overlying water column can be disturbed before tipping points are reached and some ecosystem services become negatively and/or critically impacted on local and regional scales. We highly recommend that baseline assessments of microbial diversity, biomass, and rates of hemical processes be included in environmental impact assessment planning, as they are currently lacking in policy recommendations (International Seabed Authority, 2012).

FUNDING STATEMENT

The Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations (C-DEBI, funded by the US National Science Foundation award OIA-0939564) and the Deep Carbon Observatory at the Carnegie Institution of Washington (funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, CIW subaward 10693-03) are gratefully acknowledged for their funding support for the workshop and development and publication of this manuscript.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS STATEMENT

RMJ constructed the maps in Figure 1, JJM developed the dataset for Figure 5, JAH contributed to Figure 2, and BNO created the remaining figures. BNO wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the other participants in the April 2018 workshop at Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences for their contributions to the ideas summarized in this manuscript: David Emerson, Kristina Gjerde, Susan Lang, Jennifer Le, James J. McManus, Ramunas Stepanaukas, Jason Sylvan, Margaret K. Tivey, and Geoff Wheat. We also thank Verena Tunnicliff and Cindy Lee Van Dover for providing advice on this topic, Kim Juniper for providing input on the manuscript, James Hein for providing the shape file information used in Figure 1, and Brandy Toner and Cara Santelli for providing photomicrographs used in Figure 2. This is C-DEBI publication number XXX.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Abrantes, F. (1991). Increased upwelling off Portugal during the last glaciation: Diatom evidence. Marine Micropaleontology 17(3-4), 285-310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Albarède, F., Goldstein, S.L., and Dautel, D. (1997). The neodymium isotopic composition of manganese nodules from the Southern and Indian oceans, the global oceanic neodymium budget, and their bearing on deep ocean circulation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 61(6), 1277-1291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Almeida, A., Cunha, Â., Fernandes, S., Sobral, P., and Alcântara, F. (2007). Copper effects on bacterial activity of estuarine silty sediments. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science 73, 743. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    Anantharaman, K., Breier, J.A., Sheik, C.S., and Dick, G.J. (2013). Evidence for hydrogen oxidation and metabolic plasticity in widespread deep-sea sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A. 110, 330-335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215340110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Anderson, R.E., Brazelton, W.J., and Baross, J.A. (2011). Is the genetic landscape of the deep subsurface biosphere affected by viruses? Frontiers in Microbiology 2, 219.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Antony, R., Sujith, P., Fernandes, S.O., Verma, P., Khedekar, V., and Bharathi, P.L. (2011). Cobalt immobilization by manganese oxidizing bacteria from the Indian Ridge System. Current microbiology 62(3), 840-849.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Arndt, S., Jørgensen, B.B., LaRowe, D.E., Middelburg, J.L., Pancost, R.D., and Regnier, P. (2013). Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: A review and synthesis. Earth-Science Reviews 123, 53-86. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev2013.02.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  8. ↵
    Baaske, P., Weinert, F.M., Duhr, S., Lemke, K.H., Russell, M.J., and Braun, D. (2007). Extreme accumulation of nucleotides in simulated hydrothermal pore systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(22), 9346-9351.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Baross, J.A., and Hoffman, S.E. (1985). Submarine hydrothermal vents and associated gradient environments as sites for the origin and evolution of life. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 15(4), 327-345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Bender, M.L., Ku, T.-L., and Broecker, W.S. (1966). Manganese nodules: their evolution. Science 151(3708), 325-328.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Bender, M.L., Ku, T.-L., and Broecker, W.S. (1970). Accumulation rates of manganese in pelagic sediments and nodules. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 8(2), 143-148.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  12. ↵
    Berner, R.A. (2003). The long-term carbon cycle, fossil fuels and atmospheric composition. Nature 426, 323-326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Bethke, C.M., Sanford, R.A., Kirk, M.F., Jin, Q., and Flynn, T.M. (2011). The thermodynamic ladder in geomicrobiology. Am. J. Sci. 311, 183-210.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Bird, G. (2016). The influence of the scale of mining activity and mine site remediation on the contamination legacy of historical metal mining activity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23, 23456–23466. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7400-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    Blöthe, M., Wegorzewski, A., Müller, C., Simon, F., Kuhn, T., and Schippers, A. (2015). Manganese-cycling microbial communities inside deep-sea manganese nodules. Environmental science & technology 49(13), 7692–7700.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Bluhm, H., Schriever, G., and Thiel, H. (1995). Megabenthic recolonization in an experimentall disturbed abyssal manganese area. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology 13, 393-416. doi: 10.1080/10641199509388295.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    Boetius, A., and Haeckel, M. (2018). Mind the seafloor. Science 359(6371), 34-36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Boltenkov, B. (2012). Mechanisms of formation of deep-sea ferromanganese nodules: mathematical modeling and experimental results. Geochemistry International 50(2), 125-132.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    Boschen, R.E., Rowden, A.A., Clark, M.R., and Gardner, J.P.A. (2013). Mining of deep-sea seafloor massive sulfides: A review of the deposits, their benthic communities, impacts from mining, regulatory frameworks and management strategies. Ocean Coastal Management 84, 54-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.07.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    Bourbonnais, A., Juniper, S.K., Butterfield, D.A., Anderson, R.E., and Lehmann, M.F. (2014). Diversity and abundance of Bacteria and nirS-encoding denitrifiers associated with the Juan de Fuca Ridge hydrothermal system. Annals of Microbiology 64(4), 1691-1705. doi: 10.1007/s13213-014-0813-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    Campbell, B.J., Summers Engel, A., Porter, M.L., and Takai, K. (2006). The versatile ε- proteobacteria: key players in sulphidic habitats. Nature Reviews Microbiology 4, 458-468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Cavan, E.L., Trimmer, M., Shelley, F., and Sanders, R. (2017). Remineralization of particulate organic carbon in an ocean oxygen minimum zone. Nature Communications 8, 14847. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14847.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    Coffey Natural Systems (2008). “Environmental Impact Statement: Nautilus Minerals Miugini Limited, Solwara 1”.).
  24. ↵
    Corliss, J., Dymond, J., Gordon, L.I., Edmond, J., von Herzen, R., Ballard, R., et al. (1979). Submarine thermal springs on the Galapagos Rift. Science 203, 1073-1083.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Cuyvers, L., Berry, W., Gjerde, K., Thiele, T., and Wilhelm, C. (2018). “Deep seabed mining: a rising environmental challenge”. (Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and Gallifrey Foundation).
  26. ↵
    Deming, J.W., and Baross, J.A. (1993). Deep-sea smokers: Windows to a subsurface biosphere? Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 57(14), 3219-3230.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Dick, G.J., Anantharaman, K., Baker, B.J., Li, M., Reed, D.C., and Sheik, C.S. (2013). The microbiology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent plumes: Ecological and biogeographic linkages to seafloor and water column habitats. Frontiers in Microbiology 4, 124. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Dold, B. (2014). Submarine Tailings Disposal (STD) - A review. Minerals 4, 642-666. doi: 10.3390/min4030642.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    Donohue, I., and al., e. (2016). Navigating the complexity of ecological stability. Ecology Letters 19(9), 1172-1185.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    Dubilier, N., Bergin, C., and Lott, C. (2008). Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: the art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6(10), 725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Dunn, D.C., Van Dover, C.L., Etter, R.J., Smith, C.R., Levin, L.A., Morato, T., et al. (2018). A strategy for the conservation of biodiversity on mid-ocean ridges from deep-sea mining. Science Advances 4, eaar4313. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar4313.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Durden, J.M., Lallier, L.E., Murphy, K., Jaeckel, A., Gjerde, K., and Jones, D.O.B. (2018). Environmental Impact Assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’. Marine Policy 87, 194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Edgcomb, V.P., Kysela, D.T., Teske, A., de Vera Gomez, A., and Sogin, M.L. (2002). Benthic eukaryotic diversity in the Guaymas Basin hydrothermal vent environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A. 99, 7658-7662.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Erickson, K.L., Macko, S.A., and Van Dover, C.L. (2009). Evidence for chemoautotrophically based food web at inactive hydrothermal vents (Manus Basin). Deep Sea Research II 56, 1577-1585. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.05.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    Etnoyer, P.J., Wood, J., and Shirley, T.C. (2010). How Large is the Seamount Biome. Oceanography 23(1), 206-209.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    Fallon, E.K., Niehorster, E., Brooker, R.A., and Scott, T.B. (2018). Experimental leaching of massive sulphide from TAG active hydrothermal mound and implications for seafloor mining. Marine Pollution Bulletin 126, 501-515. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.079.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    Fallon, E.K., Petersen, S., Brooker, R.A., and Scott, T.B. (2017). Oxidative dissolution of hydrothermal mixed-sulphide ore: An assessment of current knowledge in relation to seafloor massive sulphide mining. Ore Geology Reviews 86, 309-337. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.02.028.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    Fisher, A.T., Davis, E.E., Hutnak, M., Spless, V., Zühlsdorff, L., Cherkaoul, A., et al. (2003). Hydrothermal recharge and discharge across 50 km guided by seamounts on a young ridge flank. Nature 421, 618-621.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Fisher, A.T., and Wheat, C.G. (2010). Seamounts as conduits for massive fluid, heat, and solute fluxes on ridge flanks. Oceanography 23, 74-87.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    Fisher, C.R., Takai, K., and le Bris, N. (2007). Hydrothermal vent ecosystems. Oceanography 20(1), 14-23.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    Fortunato, C.S., and Huber, J.A. (2016). Coupled RNA-SIP and metatranscriptomics of active chemolithoautotrophic communities at a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. The ISME journal 10(8), 1925.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    Fortunato, C.S., Larson, B., Butterfield, D.A., and Huber, J.A. (2018). Spatially distinct, temporally stable microbial populations mediate biogeochemical cycling at and below the seafloor in hydrothermal vent fluids. Environmental microbiology 20(2), 769-784.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    Fouquet, Y., Cambon, P., Etoubleau, J., Charlou, J.L., Ondreas, H., Barriga, F., et al. (2010). “Geodiversity of hydrothermal proceses along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and ultramafic-hosted mineralization: A new type of oceanic Cu-Zn-Co-Au volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit,” in Diversity of hydrothermal system on slow spreading ocean ridges.), 321–367.
  44. ↵
    Frank, M., O’nions, R., Hein, J., and Banakar, V. (1999). 60 Myr records of major elements and Pb–Nd isotopes from hydrogenous ferromanganese crusts: reconstruction of seawater paleochemistry. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 63(11-12), 1689–1708.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    German, C.R., Petersen, S., and Hannington, M.D. (2016). Hydrothermal exploration of mid-ocean ridges: Where might the largest sulfide deposits be forming? Chemical Geology 420, 114-126.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  46. ↵
    Gjerde, K.M., Weaver, P., Billet, D.S.M., Paterson, G., Colaco, A., Dale, A.W., et al. (2016). “Implications of MIDAS results for policy makers: Recommendation for future regulations”.).
  47. ↵
    Glasby, G., Gwozdz, R., Kunzendorf, H., Friedrich, G., and Thijssen, T. (1987). The distribution of rare earth and minor elements in manganese nodules and sediments from the equatorial and SW Pacific. Lithos 20(2), 97-113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    Gollner, S., Govenar, B., Arbizu, P.M., Mills, S., le Bris, N., Weinbauer, M., et al. (2015). Differnces in recovery between deep-sea hydrothermal vent and vent-proximate communities after a volcanic eruption. Deep-Sea Res. Part I - Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 106, 167-182.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Gollner, S., Reimer, B., Arbizu, R.P., le Bris, N., and Bright, M. (2010). Diversity of meiofauna from the 9°50’N East Pacific Rise across a gradient of hydrothermal fluid emissions. PLoS ONE 8, e12321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012321.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    Han, Y., Gonnella, G., Adam, N., Schippers, A., Burkhardt, L., Kurtz, S., et al. (2018). Hydrothermal chimneys host habitat-specific microbial communities: analogues for studying the possible impact of mining seafloor massive sulfide deposits. Scientific Reports 8, 10386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28613-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    Hannington, M.D., Jamieson, J., Monecke, T., Petersen, S., and Beaulieu, S. (2011). The abundance of seafloor massive sulfide deposits. Geology 39, 1155-1158. doi: 10.1130/G32468.1.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Hansel, C., and Learman, D. (2015). The geomicrobiology of manganese. Erlich’s Geomicrobiology, 347-420.
  53. ↵
    Hansel, C.M. (2017). “Manganese in marine microbiology,” in Advances in microbial physiology. Elsevier), 37–83.
  54. ↵
    Hartwell, A.M., Voight, J.R., and Wheat, C.G. (2018). Clusters of deep-sea egg-brooding octopods associated with warm fluid discharge: An ill-fated fragment of a larger, discrete population? Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 135, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2018.03.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    Hauton, C., Brown, A., Thatje, S., Mestre, N.C., Bebianno, M.J., Martins, I., et al. (2017). Identifying toxic impacts of metals potentially released during deep-sea mining - A synthesis of the challenges to quantifying risk. Frontiers in Marine Science 4, 368. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00368.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    He, T., Li, H., and Zhang, X. (2017). Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Viruses Compensate for Microbial Metabolism in Virus-Host Interactions. mBio 8(4). doi: 10.1128/mBio.00893-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Hein, J.R., Mizell, K., Koschinsky, A., and Conrad, T.A. (2013a). Deep-ocean mineral deposits as a source of critical metals for high- and green-technology applications: Comparison with land-based resources. Ore Geology Reviews 51, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.12.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    Hein, J.R., Mizell, K., Koschinsky, A., and Conrad, T.A. (2013b). Deep-ocean mineral deposits as a source of critical metals for high-and green-technology applications: Comparison with land-based resources. Ore Geology Reviews 51, 1-14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    Henocque, Y. (2017). “The Crafting of Seabed Mining Ecosystem-Based Management,” in Deep-Sea Mining. Springer), 507–526.
  60. ↵
    Hoagland, P., Beaulieu, S., Tivey, M.A., Eggert, R.G., German, C.R., Glowka, L., et al. (2010). Deep-sea mining of seafllor massive sulfides. Marine Policy 34, 728-732. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.12.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    Holden, J.F., Breier, J.A., Rogers, K.L., Schulte, M.D., and Toner, B.M. (2012). Biogeochemical processes at hydrothermal vents: microbes and minerals, bioenergetics, and carbon fluxes. Oceanography 25(1), 196-208.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    Huber, J.A., Butterfield, D.A., and Baross, J.A. (2002). Temporal changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68(4), 1585-1594. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.4.1585-1594.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Huber, J.A., Cantin, H.V., Huse, S.M., Mark Welch, D.B., Sogin, M.L., and Butterfield, D.A. (2010). Isolated communities of Epsilonproteobacteria in hydrothermal vent fluids of the Mariana Arc seamounts. FEMS microbiology ecology 73(3), 538-549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    1. R.P. Lowell,
    2. J.S. Seewald,
    3. A. Metaxas &
    4. M.R. Perfit
    Huber, J.A., and Holden, J.F. (2008). “Modeling the impact of diffuse vent microorganisms along mid-ocean ridges and flanks,” in Magma to Microbe: Modeling Hydrothermal Processes at Oceanic Spreading Ridges, eds. R.P. Lowell, J.S. Seewald, A. Metaxas & M.R. Perfit. (Washington, D.C.: American Geophysical Union Press), 215-231.
  65. ↵
    Hughes, D.J., Shimmield, T.M., Black, K.D., and Howe, J.A. (2015). Ecological impacts of large-scale disposal of mining waste in the deep sea. Scientific Reports 5, 9985. doi: 10.1038/srep09985.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    Hülse, D., Arndt, S., Wilson, J.D., Munhoven, G., and Ridgwell, A. (2017). Understanding the causes and consequences of past marine carbon cycling variabulity through models. Earth-Science Reviews 171, 349-382. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. ↵
    Huo, Y., Cheng, H., Post, A.F., Wang, C., Jiang, X., Pan, J., et al. (2015). Ecological functions of uncultured microorganisms in the cobalt-rich ferromanganese crust of a seamount in the central Pacific are elucidated by fosmid sequencing. Acta Oceanologica Sinica 34(4), 92-113.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    International Seabed Authority (2012). “Environmental management needs for exploration and exploitation of deep sea minerals: report of a workshop held by the International Seabed Authority in collaboration with the Government of Fiji and the SOPAC Division of the Secretariat of the Pacific Community in Nadi, Fiji, from 29 November to 2 December, 2011”. (Kingston, Jamaica: International Seabed Authority).
  69. International Seabed Authority (Year). “Towards the development of a regulatory framework for polymetallic nodule exploitation in the Area. Technical Study: No. 11”: International Seabed Authority, Kingston, Jamaica), 90.
  70. ↵
    International Seabed Authority (2018). “Design of IRZs and PRZs in Deep-Sea Mining Contract Areas. Briefing Paper 02/2018”. (Kingston, Jamaica: International Seabed Authority).
  71. ↵
    IUCN (2016). “Policy on Biodiversuty Offsets”.).
  72. ↵
    Jamieson, J.W., Hannington, M.D., Clague, D.A., Kelley, D.S., Delaney, J.R., Holden, J.F., et al. (2013). Sulfide geochronology along the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 14, 2084-2099.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  73. ↵
    Jeong, K., Kang, J., and Chough, S. (1994). Sedimentary processes and manganese nodule formation in the Korea Deep Ocean Study (KODOS) area, western part of Clarion-Clipperton fracture zones, northeast equatorial Pacific. Marine Geology 122(1-2), 125–150.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  74. ↵
    Jin, Q., and Kirk, M.F. (2018). pH as a primary control in environmental microbiology: 1. Thermodynamic perspectibe. Frontiers in Environmental Science 6, 21. doi: 10.3389/FENVS.2018.00021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. ↵
    Jones, D.O.B., Amon, D.J., and Chapman, A.S.A. (2018). Mining deep-ocean mineral deposits: What are the ecological risks? Elements 14, 325-330. doi: 10.2138/gselements.14.5.325.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    Jones, D.O.B., Kaiser, S., Sweetman, A.K., Smith, C.R., Menot, L., Vink, A., et al. (2017). Biological responses to distrurbance from simulated deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining. PLoS ONE 12(2), e0171750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171750.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. ↵
    Jones, S.G., and Ellis, D.V. (1995). Deep water std at the Misima gold and silver mine, Papua, New Guinea. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology 13, 183-200. doi: 10.1080/10641199509388283.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  78. ↵
    Jung, H.-S., Ko, Y.-T., Chi, S.-B., and Moon, J.-W. (2001). Characteristics of seafloor morphology and ferromanganese module occurrance in the Korea Deep-sea Envirionmental Study (KODES) Area, NE Equatorial Pacific. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology 19, 167-180. doi: 10.1080/10641190109353811.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  79. ↵
    Karl, D.M., Wirsen, C.O., and Jannasch, H.W. (1980). Deep-Sea Primary Production at the Galapagos Hydrothermal Vents. Science 207(4437), 1345-1347.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    Kasten, S., Glasby, G., Schulz, H., Friedrich, G., and Andreev, S. (1998). Rare earth elements in manganese nodules from the South Atlantic Ocean as indicators of oceanic bottom water flow. Marine Geology 146(1), 33-52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  81. ↵
    Kato, S., Takano, Y., Kakegawa, T., Oba, H., Inoue, K., and Kobayashi, C. (2010). Biogeography and biodiversity in sulfide structures of active and inactive vents at deep-sea hydrothermal fields of the southern Mariana Trough. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76, 2968-2979. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00478-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    Khripounoff, A., Caprais, J.-C., Crassous, P., and Etoubleau, J. (2006). Geochemical and biological recovery of the disturbed seafloor in polymetallic nodule fields of theClipperton-Clarion Fracture Zone (CCFZ) at 5,000 m depth. Limnology and Oceanography 51(5), 2033-2041. doi: 10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  83. ↵
    Kim, J., Hyeong, K., Lee, H.-B., and Ko, Y.-T. (2012). Relationship between polymetallic nodule genesis and sediment distribution in the KODOS (Koren Deep Ocean Study) Area, Northeastern Pacific. Ocean Science Journal 47, 197–207. doi: 10.1007/s12601-012-0020-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  84. ↵
    Kline, E.R., and Stekoll, M.S. (2001). Colonization of mine tailings by marine invertebrates. Marine Environmental Research 51, 301-325. doi: 10.1016/S0141-1136(00)00105-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    Krishnan, K., Fernandes, C.E., Fernandes, S.O., and Bharathi, P.L. (2006). Tolerance and immobilization of cobalt by some bacteria from ferromanganese crusts of the Afanasiy Nikitin Seamounts. Geomicrobiology Journal 23(1), 31-36.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  86. ↵
    Ku, T.-L., and Broecker, W.S. (1965). Rates of sedimentation in the Arctic Ocean. Progress in oceanography 4, 95-104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  87. ↵
    Lee, M.D., Walworth, N.G., Sylvan, J.B., Edwards, K.J., and Orcutt, B.N. (2015). Microbial communities on seafloor basalts at Dorado Outcrop reflect level of alteration and highlight global lithic clades. Frontiers in Microbiology 6, 1470. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01470.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  88. ↵
    Levin, L.A., Baco, A.R., Bowden, D.A., Colaco, A., Cordes, E.E., and Cunha, M.R. (2016a). Hydrothermal vents and methane seeps: Rethinking the sphere of influence. Frontiers in Marine Science 3, 72. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00072.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  89. ↵
    Levin, L.A., Mengerink, K., Gjerde, K., Rowden, A.A., Van Dover, C.L., and Clark, M.R. (2016b). Defining “serious harm” to the marine environment in the context of deep seabed mining. Marine Policy 74, 245-259. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.032.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  90. ↵
    Levin, L.A., Mengerink, K., Gjerde, K.M., Rowden, A.A., Van Dover, C.L., Clark, M.R., et al. (2016c). Defining “serious harm” to the marine environment in the context of deep-seabed mining. Marine Policy 74, 245-259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.032.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  91. ↵
    Liao, L., Xu, X.-W., Jiang, X.-W., Wang, C.-S., Zhang, D.-S., Ni, J.-Y., et al. (2011). Microbial diversity in deep-sea sediment from the cobalt-rich crust deposit region in the Pacific Ocean. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 78(3), 565–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01186.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    Lindh, M.V., Maillot, B.M., Shulse, C.N., Gooday, A.J., Amon, D.J., Smith, C.R., et al. (2017). From the Surface to the Deep-Sea: Bacterial Distributions across Polymetallic Nodule Fields in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone of the Pacific Ocean. Frontiers in Microbiology 8(1696). doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01696.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  93. ↵
    López-Garcia, P., Vereshchaka, A., and Moreira, D. (2007). Eukaryotic diversity associated with carbonates and fluid-seawater interface in Lost City Hydrothermal Field. Environmental Microbiology 9, 546-554.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  94. ↵
    Lowell, R.P., Houghton, J.L., Farough, A., Craft, K.L., Larson, B.I., and Meile, C. (2015). Mathematical modeling of diffuse flow in seafloor hydrothermal systems: The potential extent of the subsurface biopshere at mid-ocean ridges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 425, 145-153.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  95. ↵
    Luther, G.W. (2010). The role of one-and two-electron transfer reactions in forming thermodynamically unstable intermediates as barriers in multi-electron redox reactions. Aquatic Geochemistry 16(3), 395-420.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  96. ↵
    Ma, W., Schott, D., and Lodewijks, G. (2017). A new procedure for deep sea mining tailings disposal. Minerals 7, 47. doi: 10.3390/min7040047.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  97. ↵
    Maeda, A., Fujita, K., Horikawa, K., Suzuki, A., Yoshimura, T., Tamenori, Y., et al. (2017). Evaluation of oxygen isotope and Mg/Ca ratios in high-magnesium calcite from benthic foraminifera as a proxy for water temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 122, 185-199. doi: 10.1002/2016jg003587.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  98. ↵
    Marsay, C.M., Sanders, R.J., Henson, S.A., Pabortsava, K., Achterberg, E.P., and Lampitt, R.S. (2015). Attenuation of sinking particulate organic carbon flux through the mesopelagic ocean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A. 112(4), 1089-1094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415311112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  99. ↵
    Martin, W., Baross, J., Kelley, D., and Russell, M.J. (2008). Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6(11), 805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  100. ↵
    Martins, A., Vieria, H., Gaspar, H., and Santos, S. (2014). Marketed marine natural products in the pharmaceutical and cosmoceutical industries: Tips for success. Marine Drugs 12, 1066-1101.
    OpenUrl
  101. ↵
    McNichol, J., Stryhanyuk, H., Sylva, S.P., Thomas, F., Musat, N., Seewald, J.S., et al. (2018). Primary productivity below the seafloor at deep-sea hot springs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201804351.
  102. ↵
    Mehta, M.P., and Baross, J.A. (2006). Nitrogen fixation at 92 C by a hydrothermal vent archaeon. Science 314(5806), 1783-1786.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  103. ↵
    Meier, D.V., Pjevac, P., Bach, W., Hourdez, S., Girguis, P.R., Vidoudez, C., et al. (2017). Niche partitioning of diverse sulfur-oxidizing bacteria at hydrothermal vents. The ISME Journal 11(7), 1545.
    OpenUrl
  104. ↵
    Mestre, N.C., Rocha, T.L., Canals, M., Cardoso, C., Danovaro, R., Dell’Anno, A., et al. (2017). Environmental hazard assessment of a marine mine tailings deposit site and potential implication for deep-sea mining. Environmental Pollution 228, 169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.027.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  105. ↵
    Mewes, K., Mogollón, J.M., Picard, A., Rühlemann, C., Kuhn, T., Nöthen, K., et al. (2014). Impact of depositional and biogeochemical processes on small scale variations in nodule abundance in the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone. Deep-Sea Research I 91, 125-141.
    OpenUrl
  106. ↵
    Meyer, J.L., Akerman, N.H., Proskurowski, G., and Huber, J.A. (2013). Microbiological characterization of post-eruption “snowblower” vents at Axial Seamount, Juan de Fuca Ridge. Frontiers in Microbiology 4, article 153. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00153.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  107. ↵
    Middleton, J.L., Mukhopadhyay, S., Langmuir, C.H., McManus, J.F., and Huybers, P.J. (2018). Millennial-scale variations in dustiness recorded in Mid-Atlantic sediments from 0 to 70 ka. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 482, 12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.034.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  108. ↵
    Miller, K.A., Thompson, K.F., Johnston, P., and Santillo, D. (2018). An overview of seabed mining including the current state of development, environmental impacts, and knowledge gaps. Frontiers in Marine Science 4, 418. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00418.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  109. ↵
    Murali Mohan, A., Hartsock, A., Bibby, K.J., Hammack, R.W., Vidic, R.D., and Gregory, K.B. (2013). Microbial community changes in hydraulic fracturing fluids and produced water from shale gas extraction. Environmental science & technology 47(22), 13141-13150.
    OpenUrl
  110. ↵
    Nasir, A., Kim, K.M., and Caetano-Anollés, G. (2015). Lokiarchaeota: eukaryote-like mising links from microbial dark matter? TRENDS in Microbiology 23(8), 448-450.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  111. ↵
    Nath, B.N., Khadge, N.H., Nabar, S., Raghukumar, C., Ingole, B.S., Valsangkar, A.B., et al. (2012). Monitoring the sedimentary carbon in an artificially disturbed deep-sea sedimentary environment. Environmental Monitoring Assessment 184, 2829-2844. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2154-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  112. ↵
    Navarri, M., Jégou, C., Meslet-Cladière, L., Brillet, B., Barbier, G., Bergaud, G., et al. (2016). Deep subseafloor fungi as an untapped reservoir of amphipathic antimicrobial compounds. Marine Drugs 14, 50. doi: 10.3390/md14030050.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  113. ↵
    Niner, H.J., Ardron, J.A., Escobar, E.G., Gianni, M., Jaeckel, A.L., Jones, D.O.B., et al. (2018). Deep-sea mining with no net loss of biodiversity - An impossible aim. Frontiers in Marine Science 5, 53. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00053.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  114. ↵
    Nisbet, E., and Sleep, N.H. (2001). The habitat and nature of early life. Nature 409(6823), 1083–1091.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  115. ↵
    Nitahara, S., Kato, S., Urabe, T., Usui, A., and Yamagishi, A. (2011). Molecular characterization of the microbial community in hydrogenetic ferromanganese crusts of the Takuyo-Daigo Seamount, northwest Pacific. FEMS Microbiology Letters 321(2), 121-129. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02323.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  116. ↵
    Nordstrom, D.K. (2011). Mine waters: Acidic to circumneutral. Elements 7, 393-398. doi: 10.2113/gselements.7.6.393.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  117. ↵
    O’Brien, C.E., Giovannelli, D., Govenar, B., Luther, G.W., Lutz, R.A., Shank, T.M., et al. (2015). Microbial biofilms associated with fluid chemistry and megafaunal colonization at post-eruptive deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 121, 31-40.
    OpenUrl
  118. ↵
    OECD (2016). “Biodiversity Offsets Effective Design and Implementation”.).
  119. ↵
    Olins, H., Rogers, D., Frank, K., Vidoudez, C., and Girguis, P. (2013). Assessing the influence of physical, geochemical and biological factors on anaerobic microbial primary productivity within hydrothermal vent chimneys. Geobiology 11(3), 279-293.
    OpenUrl
  120. ↵
    Opatkiewicz, A.D., Butterfield, D.A., and Baross, J.A. (2009). Individual hydrothermal vents at Axial Seamount harbor distinct subseafloor microbial communities. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 70(3), 413-424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  121. ↵
    Orcutt, B.N., Sylvan, J.B., Rogers, D.R., Delaney, J., Lee, R.W., and Girguis, P.R. (2015). Carbon fixation by basalt-hosted microbial communities. Frontiers in Microbiology 6, 904. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00904.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  122. ↵
    Ornella Amore, F., Caffau, M., Massa, B., and Morabito, S. (2004). Late Pleistocene–Holocene paleoclimate and related paleoenvironmental changes as recorded by calcareous nannofossils and planktonic foraminifera assemblages in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea (Cape Palinuro, Italy). Marine Micropaleontology 52(1-4), 255-276. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2004.05.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  123. ↵
    Ortmann, A.C., and Suttle, C.A. (2005). High abundances of viruses in a deep-sea hydrothermal vent system indicates viral mediated microbial mortality. Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers 52(8), 1515-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2005.04.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  124. ↵
    Park, S.H., Kim, D.H., Kim, C.W., Park, C.Y., and Kang, J.K. (1997). “Estimation of coverage and size distribution on manganese nodules based on image processing techniques”, in: Second ISOPE Ocean Mining Symposium, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.).
  125. ↵
    Paul, S.A.L., Gaye, B., Haeckel, M., Kasten, S., and Koschinsky, A. (2018). Biogeochemical Regeneration of a Nodule Mining Disturbance Site: Trace Metals, DOC and Amino Acids in Deep-Sea Sediments and Pore Waters. Frontiers in Marine Science 5(117). doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00117.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  126. ↵
    Pedersen, T.F. (1984). Interstitial water metabolite chemistry in a marine mine tailings deposit, Rupert Inlet, B. C. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 21, 1-9. doi: 10.1139/e84-001.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  127. ↵
    Pedersen, T.F., and Losher, A.J. (1988). “Diagenetic processes in aquatic mine tailings deposits in British Columbia,” in Chemistry and Biology of Solid Waste. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 238-258.
  128. ↵
    Penesyan, A., Kjelleberg, S., and Egan, S. (2010). Development of novel drugs from marine surface associated microorganisms. Marine Drugs 8, 438-459. doi: 10.3390/md8030438.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  129. ↵
    Petersen, S., Krätschell, A., Augustin, N., Jamieson, J., Hein, J.R., and Hannington, M.D. (2016). News from the seabed - Geological characteristics and resource potential of deep-sea mineral resources. Marine Policy 70, 175-187. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  130. ↵
    Peukert, A., Schoening, T., Alevizos, E., Köser, K., Kwasnitschka, T., and Greinert, J. (2018). Understanding Mn-nodule distribution and evaluation of related deep-sea mining impacts using AUV-based hydroacoustic and optical data. Biogeosciences 15, 2525-2549. doi: 10.5194/bg-15-2525-2018.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  131. ↵
    Piel, J. (2009). Metabolites from symbiotic bacteria. Natural Products Reports 26, 338-362. doi: 10.1039/b703499g.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  132. ↵
    Purser, A., Marcon, Y., Hoving, H.J.T., Vecchione, M., Piatkowski, U., Eason, D., et al. (2016). Association of deep-sea incirrate octopods with mangense crusts and nodule fields in the Pacific Ocean. Current Biology 26(24), 1268-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.052.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  133. ↵
    Ramirez-Llodra, E., Trannum, H.C., Evenset, A., Levin, L.A., Andersson, M., Finner, T.E., et al. (2015). Submarine and deep-sea mine tailing placement: A review of current practives, environmental issues, natural analogs and knowledge gaps in Norway and internationally. Marine Pollution Bulletin 97, 13-35. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.05.062.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  134. ↵
    Rea, D.K. (1994). The paleoclimatic record provided by eolian deposition in the deep sea: The geologic history of wind. Reviews of Geophysics 32(2), 159-195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  135. ↵
    Russell, M.J., and Martin, W. (2004). The rocky roots of the acetyl-CoA pathway. Trends in biochemical sciences 29(7), 358-363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  136. ↵
    Santelli, C.M., Orcutt, B.N., Banning, E., Bach, W., Moyer, C.L., Sogin, M.L., et al. (2008). Abundance and diversity of microbial life in ocean crust. Nature 453, 653-656. doi: 10.1038/nature06899.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
  137. ↵
    Sapsford, D., De Leeuw, L., Phillips, J., and Brabham, P. (2015). “The feasiblity of treatment of acid mine drainage with seawater”, in: 10th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage IWMA Annual Conference. (Santiago, Chile).
  138. ↵
    Schippers, A., Breuker, A., Blazejak, A., Bosecker, K., Kock, D., and Wright, T.L. (2010). The biogeochemistry and microbiology of sulfidic mine waste and bioleaching dumps and heaps, and novel Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria. Hydrometallurgy 104, 342-350. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.01.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  139. ↵
    Schlacher, T.A., Baco, A.R., Rowden, A.A., O’Hara, T.D., Clark, M.R., Kelley, C., et al. (2014). Seamount benthos in a cobalt-rich crust region of the central P acific: conservation challenges for future seabed mining. Diversity and distributions 20(5), 491-502.
    OpenUrl
  140. ↵
    Schrader, H., and Sorknes, R. (1991). Peruvian coastal upwelling: Late Quaternary productivity changes revealed by diatoms. Marine Geology 97(3-4), 233-249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  141. ↵
    Schrenk, M.O., Huber, J.A., and Edwards, K.J. (2009). Microbial provinces in the subseafloor. Annual Reviews of Marine Sciences 2, 85-110.
    OpenUrl
  142. ↵
    Schrenk, M.O., Kelley, D.S., Delaney, J.R., and Baross, J.A. (2003). Incidence and diversity of microorganisms within the walls of an active deep-sea sulfide chimney. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69(6), 3580-3592.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  143. Schriever, G., and Thiel, H. (Year). “Tailings and their disposal in deep-sea mining”, in: ISOPE Ocean Minerals Symposium).
  144. ↵
    Seiter, K., Hensen, C., Schröter, J., and Zabel, M. (2004). Organic carbon content in surface sediments—defining regional provinces. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 51(12), 2001-2026.
    OpenUrl
  145. ↵
    Shah Walter, S.R., Jaekel, U., Osterholz, H., Fisher, A.T., Huber, J.A., Pearson, A., et al. (2018). Microbial decomposition of marine dissolved organic matter in cool oceanic crust. Nature Geoscience 11(5), 334-339. doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0109-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  146. ↵
    Shank, T.M. (2010). Seamounts: Deep-ocean Laboratories of Faunal Connectivity, Evolution, and Endemism. Oceanography 23(1), 108-122. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2010.65.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  147. ↵
    Shi, Y., Pan, C., Auckloo, B.N., Chen, X., Chen, C.-T.A., Wang, K., et al. (2017). Stress-driven discovery of a cryptic antibiotic produced by Streptomyces sp. WU20 from Kueishantao hydrothermal vent with an integrated metabolomics strategy. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 101(4), 1395-1408.
    OpenUrl
  148. ↵
    Shimmield, T.M., Black, K.D., Howe, J.A., Hughes, D.J., and Sherwin, T. (2007). “Independent evaluation of deep-sea mine tailings placement (DSTP) in PNG”.).
  149. ↵
    Shiraishi, F., Mitsunobu, S., Suzuki, K., Hoshino, T., Morono, Y., and Inagaki, F. (2016). Dense microbial community on a ferromanganese nodule from the ultra-oligotrophic South Pacific Gyre: implications for biogeochemical cycles. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 447, 10-20.
    OpenUrl
  150. ↵
    Shulse, C.N., Maillot, B., Smith, C.R., and Church, M.J. (2017). Polymetallic nodules, sediments, and deep waters in the equatorial North Pacific exhibit highly diverse and distinct bacterial, archaeal, and microeukaryotic communities. MicrobiologyOpen 6(2), e00428.
    OpenUrl
  151. ↵
    Sievert, S.M., and Vetriani, C. (2012). Chemoautotrophy at deep-sea vents: past, present, adn future. Oceanography 25(1), 218-233.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  152. ↵
    Spero, H.J., Bijma, J., Lea, D.W., and Bemis, B.E. (1997). Effect of seawater carbonate concentration on foraminiferal carbon and oxygen isotopes. Nature 390(6659), 497.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  153. ↵
    Sujith, P., Ramanan, D., Gonsalves, M.J.B., and LokaBharathi, P. (2017). Microbial activity promotes the enrichment of cobalt over nickel on hydrogenetic ferromanganese crusts. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 35(8), 1158-1167.
    OpenUrl
  154. ↵
    Suzuki, K., Yoshida, K., Watanabe, H., and Yamamoto, H. (2018). Mapping the resilience of chemosynthetic communities in hdyrothermal vent fields. Nature 8, 9364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27596-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  155. ↵
    Suzuki, Y., Inagaki, F., Takai, K., Nealson, K.H., and Horikoshi, K. (2004). Microbial diversity in inactive chimney structures from deep-sea hydrothermal systems. Microbial Ecology 47, 186-196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  156. ↵
    Sylvan, J.B., Toner, B.M., and Edwards, K. (2012). Life and death of deep-sea vents: Bacterial diversity and ecosystem succession on inactive hydrothermal sulfides. mBio 3(1), doi: 10.1128/mBio.00279-00211.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  157. ↵
    Takai, K., Nakamura, K., Toki, T., Tsunogai, U., Miyazaki, M., Miyazaki, J., et al. (2008). Cell proliferation at 122 degrees C and isotopically heavy CH4 production by a hyperthermophilic methanogen under high-pressure cultivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(31), 10949-10954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712334105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  158. ↵
    Thiel, H., and Schriever, G. (1990). Deep-sea mining, environmental impact and the DISCOL project. Ambio. Stockholm 19(5), 245-250.
    OpenUrl
  159. ↵
    Thiel, H., Schriever, G., Ahnert, A., Bluhm, H., Borowski, C., and Vopel, K. (2001). The large-scale environmental impact experiment DISCOL—reflection and foresight. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 48(17-18), 3869-3882.
    OpenUrl
  160. ↵
    Thornburg, C.C., Zabriskie, T.M., and McPhail, K.L. (2010). Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vents: Potential Hot Spots for Natural Products Discovery? Journal of Natural Products 73(3), 489-499. doi: 10.1021/np900662k.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  161. ↵
    Toner, B.M., Lesnewski, R.A., Marlow, J.J., Briscoe, L.J., Santelli, C.M., Bach, W., et al. (2013). Mineralogy drives bacterial biogeography at hydrothermally-inactive seafloor sulfude deposits. Geomicrobiology Journal 30(4), 313-326.
    OpenUrl
  162. ↵
    Tully, B.J., and Heidelberg, J.F. (2013). Microbial communities associated with ferromanganese nodules and the surrounding sediments. Frontiers in Microbiology 4, 161. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00161.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  163. ↵
    van de Flierdt, T., Frank, M., Halliday, A.N., Hein, J.R., Hattendorf, B., Günther, D., et al. (2004). Deep and bottom water export from the Southern Ocean to the Pacific over the past 38 million years. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology 19(1).
  164. ↵
    Van Dover, C.L. (2000). The ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  165. ↵
    Van Dover, C.L., Arnaud-Haond, S., Gianni, M., Helmreich, S., Huber, J.A., Jaeckel, A.L., et al. (2018). Scientific rationale and international obligations for protection of active hydrothermal vent ecosystems from deep-sea mining. Marine Policy 90, 20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.020.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  166. ↵
    Vanreusel, A., Hilario, A., Ribeiro, A., Menot, L., and Arbizu, P.M. (2016). Threatened by mining, polymetallic nodules are required to preserve abyssal epifauna. Scientific Reports 6, 26808. doi: 10.1038/srep26808.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  167. ↵
    Vare, L.L., Baker, M.C., Howe, J.A., Levin, L.A., Neira, C., Ramirez-Llodra, E., et al. (2018). Scientiic considerations for the assessment and management of mine tailings disposal in the deep sea. Frontiers in Marine Science 5, 17. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00017.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  168. ↵
    Wang, X., and Müller, W.E.G. (2009). Marine biominerals: perspectives and challenges for polymetallic nodules and crusts. Trends in Biotechnology 27(6), 375–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.03.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  169. ↵
    Wang, X., Schröder, H.C., Wiens, M., Schloßmacher, U., and Müller, W.E.G. (2009). Manganese/polymetallic nodules: Micro-structural characterization of exolithobiontic- and endolithobiontic microbial biofilms by scanning electron microscopy. Micron 40, 350-358. doi: 10.1026/j.micron.2008.10.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  170. ↵
    Wankel, S.D., Adams, M.M., Johnston, D.T., Hansel, C.M., Joye, S.B., and Girguis, P.R. (2012). Anaerobic methane oxidation in metalliferous hydrothermal sediments: influence on carbon flux and decoupling from sulfate reduction. Environmental Microbiology 14(10), 2726-2740. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02825.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  171. ↵
    Wankel, S.D., Germanovitch, L.N., Lilley, M.D., Gence, G., DiPerna, C.J., Bradley, A.S., et al. (2011). Influence of subsurface biosphere on geochemical fluxes from diffuse hydrothermal vents. Nature Geoscience 4, 461-468.
    OpenUrl
  172. ↵
    Wedding, L.M., Reiter, S.M., Smith, C.R., Gjerde, K.M., Kittinger, J.N., Friedlander, A.M., et al. (2015). Managing mining of the deep seabed. Science 349(6244), 144-145. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6647.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  173. ↵
    Wegorzewski, A.V., and Kuhn, T. (2014). The influence of suboxic diagenesis on the formation of manganese nodules in the Clarion Clipperton nodule belt of the Pacific Ocean. Marine Geology 357, 123-138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  174. ↵
    Wessel, P., Sandwell, D.T., and Kim, S.-S. (2010). The global seamount census. Oceanography 23(1), 24-33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  175. ↵
    Wheat, C.G., Fisher, A.T., McManus, J., Hulme, S.M., and Orcutt, B.N. (2017). Cool seafloor hydrothermal springs reveal global geochemical fluxes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 476, 179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.049.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  176. Wheat, C.G., Hartwell, A.M., McManus, J., Fisher, A.T., Orcutt, B.N., Schlicht, L.E.M., et al. (submitted). Geologic constraints and geochemical consequences of fluid discharge from Dorado Outcrop, A Cool Ridge Flank Hydrothermal System. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems.
  177. ↵
    Williams, A., Schlacher, T.A., Rowden, A.A., Althaus, F., Clark, M.R., Bowden, D.A., et al. (2010). Seamount megabenthic assemblages fail to recover from trawling impacts. Marine Ecology 31, 183-199.
    OpenUrl
  178. ↵
    Williamson, S.J., Cary, S.C., Williamson, K.E., Helton, R.R., Bench, S.R., Winget, D., et al. (2008). Lysogenic virus-host interactions predominate at deep-sea diffuse-flow hydrothermal vents. The ISME Journal 2(11), 1112-1121.
    OpenUrl
  179. ↵
    Xie, W., Wang, F., Guo, L., Chen, Z., Sievert, S.M., Meng, J., et al. (2011). Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities inhabiting deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimneys with contrasting chemistries. The ISME journal 5(3), 414.
    OpenUrl
  180. ↵
    Xu, C., Sun, X., Jin, M., and Zhang, X. (2017). A Novel Benzoquinone Compound Isolated from Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Triggers Apoptosis of Tumor Cells. Marine drugs 15(7), 200.
    OpenUrl
  181. ↵
    Zhang, X., Li, S.-J., Li, J.-J., Liang, Z.-Z., and Chao, C.-Q. (2018). Novel natural products from extremophilic fungi. Marine Drugs 16, 194. doi: 10.3390/md16060194.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  182. ↵
    Zinke, L.A., Kiel Reese, B., McManus, J., Wheat, C.G., Orcutt, B.N., and Amend, J.P. (2018). Sediment microbial communities influenced by cool hydrothermal fluid migration. Frontiers in Microbiology 9, 1249. doi: 10/3389/fmicb.2018.01249.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  183. ↵
    Zúñiga, D., Santos, C., Froján, M., Salgueiro, E., Rufino, M.M., De la Granda, F., et al. (2017). Diatoms as a paleoproductivity proxy in the NW Iberian coastal upwelling system (NE Atlantic). Biogeosciences 14(5), 1165-1179. doi: 10.5194/bg-14-1165-2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 06, 2018.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impacts of Deep-Sea Mining on Microbial Ecosystem Services
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Impacts of Deep-Sea Mining on Microbial Ecosystem Services
Beth N. Orcutt, James Bradley, William J. Brazelton, Emily R. Estes, Jacqueline M. Goordial, Julie A. Huber, Rose M. Jones, Nagissa Mahmoudi, Jeffrey J. Marlow, Sheryl Murdock, Maria Pachiadaki
bioRxiv 463992; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/463992
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Impacts of Deep-Sea Mining on Microbial Ecosystem Services
Beth N. Orcutt, James Bradley, William J. Brazelton, Emily R. Estes, Jacqueline M. Goordial, Julie A. Huber, Rose M. Jones, Nagissa Mahmoudi, Jeffrey J. Marlow, Sheryl Murdock, Maria Pachiadaki
bioRxiv 463992; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/463992

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Microbiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4383)
  • Biochemistry (9599)
  • Bioengineering (7092)
  • Bioinformatics (24864)
  • Biophysics (12615)
  • Cancer Biology (9957)
  • Cell Biology (14354)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7949)
  • Ecology (12107)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15989)
  • Genetics (10925)
  • Genomics (14743)
  • Immunology (9869)
  • Microbiology (23676)
  • Molecular Biology (9485)
  • Neuroscience (50872)
  • Paleontology (369)
  • Pathology (1539)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2683)
  • Physiology (4015)
  • Plant Biology (8657)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1509)
  • Synthetic Biology (2397)
  • Systems Biology (6436)
  • Zoology (1346)