Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

High-throughput functional analysis of IncRNA core promoters elucidatesrules governing tissue-specificity

Kaia Mattioli, Pieter-Jan Volders, Chiara Gerhardinger, James C. Lee, Philipp G. Maass, Marta Melé, John L. Rinn
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/482232
Kaia Mattioli
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
2Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pieter-Jan Volders
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
3Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
4VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chiara Gerhardinger
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
5Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Lee
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
6Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp G. Maass
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
7Genetics and Genome Biology Program, Sickkids Research Institute, Toronto ON, M5G 0A4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Melé
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
5Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
8Life Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08034, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John L. Rinn
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
5Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
9Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
10Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, BioFrontiers Institute, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Transcription initiates at both coding and non-coding genomic elements, including mRNA and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) core promoters and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). However, each class has different expression profiles with lncRNAs and eRNAs being the most tissue-specific. How these complex differences in expression profiles and tissue-specificities are encoded in a single DNA sequence, however, remains unresolved. Here, we address this question using computational approaches and massively parallel reporter assays (MPRA) surveying hundreds of promoters and enhancers. We find that both divergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters have higher capacities to drive transcription than non-divergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters, respectively. Conversely, lincRNAs and eRNAs have lower capacities to drive transcription and are more tissue-specific than divergent genes. This higher tissue-specificity is strongly associated with having less complex TF motif profiles at the core promoter. We experimentally validated these findings by testing both engineered single-nucleotide deletions and human single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MPRA. In both cases, we observe that single nucleotides associated with many motifs are important drivers of promoter activity. Thus, we suggest that high TF motif density serves as a robust mechanism to increase promoter activity at the expense of tissue-specificity. Moreover, we find that 22% of common SNPs in core promoter regions have significant regulatory effects. Collectively, our findings show that high TF motif density provides redundancy and increases promoter activity at the expense of tissue specificity, suggesting that specificity of expression may be regulated by simplicity of motif usage.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 04, 2018.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High-throughput functional analysis of IncRNA core promoters elucidatesrules governing tissue-specificity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
High-throughput functional analysis of IncRNA core promoters elucidatesrules governing tissue-specificity
Kaia Mattioli, Pieter-Jan Volders, Chiara Gerhardinger, James C. Lee, Philipp G. Maass, Marta Melé, John L. Rinn
bioRxiv 482232; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/482232
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
High-throughput functional analysis of IncRNA core promoters elucidatesrules governing tissue-specificity
Kaia Mattioli, Pieter-Jan Volders, Chiara Gerhardinger, James C. Lee, Philipp G. Maass, Marta Melé, John L. Rinn
bioRxiv 482232; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/482232

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4076)
  • Biochemistry (8748)
  • Bioengineering (6466)
  • Bioinformatics (23310)
  • Biophysics (11710)
  • Cancer Biology (9131)
  • Cell Biology (13224)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7402)
  • Ecology (11357)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15074)
  • Genetics (10390)
  • Genomics (13997)
  • Immunology (9106)
  • Microbiology (22017)
  • Molecular Biology (8766)
  • Neuroscience (47303)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1418)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2480)
  • Physiology (3701)
  • Plant Biology (8041)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1427)
  • Synthetic Biology (2206)
  • Systems Biology (6009)
  • Zoology (1246)