New Results
Current models cannot account for V1’s specialisation for binocular natural image statistics
View ORCID ProfileSid Henriksen, Daniel A. Butts, Jenny C.A. Read, Bruce G. Cumming
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/497008
Sid Henriksen
1Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, UK
2Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA
Daniel A. Butts
3Department of Biology, University of Maryland College Park, USA
Jenny C.A. Read
1Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, UK
Bruce G. Cumming
2Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA
Article usage
Posted December 16, 2018.
Current models cannot account for V1’s specialisation for binocular natural image statistics
Sid Henriksen, Daniel A. Butts, Jenny C.A. Read, Bruce G. Cumming
bioRxiv 497008; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/497008
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (11571)
- Bioengineering (8622)
- Bioinformatics (28868)
- Biophysics (14803)
- Cancer Biology (11941)
- Cell Biology (17168)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9302)
- Ecology (14019)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (18128)
- Genetics (12145)
- Genomics (16616)
- Immunology (11707)
- Microbiology (27692)
- Molecular Biology (11387)
- Neuroscience (60096)
- Paleontology (447)
- Pathology (1847)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3184)
- Physiology (4878)
- Plant Biology (10278)
- Synthetic Biology (2849)
- Systems Biology (7289)
- Zoology (1619)