Abstract
Synaptic structure and activity are sensitive to environmental alterations. Modulation of synaptic morphology and function is often induced by signals from glia. However, the process by which glia mediate synaptic responses to environmental perturbations such as hypoxia remains unknown. Here, we report that, in the Drosophila trachealess (trh) mutant, smaller synaptic boutons form clusters named bunch boutons appear at larval neuromuscular junctions (NMJs), which is induced by the reduction of internal oxygen levels due to defective tracheal branches. Thus, the bunch bouton phenotype in the trh mutant is suppressed by hyperoxia, and recapitulated in wild-type larvae raised under hypoxia. We further show that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α/Similar (Sima) is critical in mediating hypoxia-induced bunch bouton formation. Sima upregulates the level of the Wnt/Wingless (Wg) signal in glia, leading to reorganized microtubule structures within presynaptic sites. Finally, hypoxia-induced bunch boutons maintain normal synaptic transmission at the NMJs, which is crucial for coordinated larval locomotion.
Author summary Oxygen is essential for animals to maintain their life such as growth, metabolism, responsiveness, and movement. It is therefore important to understand how animal cells trigger hypoxia response and adapt to hypoxia thereafter. Both mammalian vascular and insect tracheal branches are induced to enhance the oxygen delivery. However, the study of hypoxia response in the nervous system remains limited. In this study, we assess the morphology of Drosophila neuromuscular junctions (NMJs), a model system to study development and function of synapses, in two hypoxia conditions, one with raising wild-type larvae in hypoxia, and the other in the trachealess (trh) mutant in which the trachea is defective, causing insufficient oxygen supply. Interestingly, glia, normally wrapping the axons of NMJs, invade into synapse and trigger Wg signals to reconstitute the synaptic structure under hypoxia. This synaptic remodeling maintains the synaptic transmission of synapse, which associate the locomotor behavior of larvae.
Introduction
Animals need oxygen and food, not only to sustain life, but also for motility. In vertebrates, oxygen and nutrients are delivered through the vascular systems to organs and tissues throughout the body. To maintain proper nutrient and oxygen supply, and thus physiological functions, the vascular system is also highly coordinated with the nervous system during development. Indeed, the vascular and nervous systems resemble each other in terms of their anatomical structures and developmental processes [1, 2]. In the brain, nerves and vessels, form close associations and are in physical contact through the third player astrocytes to form neurovascular units (NVU) [3]. Such organization is essential for controlling oxygen and glucose delivery through the blood vessels by neuronal activity, and this regulatory process is mediated through the coupled astrocytes [4]. However, some invertebrates lack the complex vascular systems [5]. In nematodes, oxygen is supplied simply by ambient diffusion to inner cells [6]. Insects such as Drosophila have evolved a prototype of the tracheal system to deliver oxygen and a primitive vascular system, the dorsal vessel, to facilitate nutrient delivery [7]. However, the physical association of nerves, trachea, and glial processes has also been demonstrated at the NMJs of adult Drosophila flight muscles [8].
Animals respond to changing oxygen levels by altering their oxygen delivery system. Insufficient oxygen levels (hypoxia) activate a broad range of genes to re-establish body homeostasis. One crucial regulator of these hypoxia-responsive genes is the sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) [9]. HIF-1 consists of α and β subunits that form heterodimers [10]. Whereas HIF-1β is expressed constitutively, HIF-1α protein levels are modulated by oxygen levels [11]. Under normal oxygen conditions (normoxia), oxygen-dependent prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs) catalyze hydroxylation of a conserved prolyl residue in the central oxygen-dependent degradation (ODD) domain of HIF-1α [12-14]. Hydroxylation of HIF-1α promotes interaction with Von Hippel Lindau (VHL), which is the substrate recognition subunit of the cullin2-based E3 ubiquitin ligase, leading to HIF-1α ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [15]. Under hypoxia, prolyl hydroxylation does not occur, HIF-1α proteins are stabilized and are translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus where they form heterodimers with HIF-1β to activate transcription of target genes [16, 17]. One major class of target genes encoding the Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) is involved in inducing angiogenesis in mammals. In Drosophila, the FGF member encoded by Branchless (Bnl) induces tracheal branching [18]. When oxygen levels are reduced, oxygen-starved cells express Bnl as a chemo-attractant to guide the growth tracheal terminal branches toward them [19].
In addition to adaptations of the respiratory system, the nervous system also responds to hypoxia. Oxygen levels modulate the survival, proliferation, and differentiation of radial glial cells (RGCs) in the human cerebral cortex. Interestingly, physiological hypoxia (3% O2) induces neurogenesis and differentiation of RGCs into glutamatergic neurons [20]. Hypoxia induces neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells through activation of A2A receptor [21]. Brief exposure to anoxia and hypoglycemia caused axonal remodeling in hippocampal neurons, including presynaptic protrusion of filopodia and formation of multi-innervated spines [22]. Under hypoxia or upon depletion of PHD2, upregulation of the actin cross-linker Filamin A (FLNA) induces generation of more immature spines [23]. Astrocytes have been shown to play a crucial role in ischemic tolerance via the activation of P2X7 receptors, which trigger upregulation of HIF-1α [24].
Neuronal PAS (NPAS) proteins containing a DNA-binding Per-Arnt-Sim domain function in vascular and nervous system development. In mice, NPAS1 is responsible for cortical interneuron generation [25], whereas NPAS3 is required for adult neurogenesis [26]. NPAS1 and NPAS3 also play key roles in lung development [27, 28]. The homolog of NPAS1/3 in Drosophila, Trachealess (Trh), has been well studied for its involvement in formation of the respiratory tracheal system. Trh is a master regulator of tracheal cell fates, activating gene expression to induce tracheal development [29, 30]. However, the role of Trh in the development of other tissues, particularly the nervous system, is unknown. In this study, we found altered synaptic bouton morphology at the NMJs of trh1/trh2 mutants. By performing trh-RNAi knockdown and UAS-trh transgene rescue experiments, we show that trh is required in tracheal cells for normal bouton formation. Defective tracheal branching in the trh1/trh2 mutant mimics the effect of hypoxic conditions during larval development, and supplying higher than normal oxygen levels restored normal bouton morphology. We further show that glial cells respond to hypoxia by elevating Wnt/Wg expression to mediate synaptic bouton remodeling through HIF1-α/Sima in Drosophila. Finally, we reveal that this synaptic remodeling maintains normal synaptic transmission and it is required for normal locomotion in larvae.
Results
trh modulates synaptic bouton formation non-cell autonomously
To understand the possible role of Trh in synapse formation, we examined NMJ morphology in the trh mutants. Since both trh1 and trh2 loss-of-function alleles are homozygous lethal [31-33], we examined the trans-heterozygous trh1/trh2 mutant that survive to adult stages and compared it to wild-type (w1118) and heterozygous trh1/+ controls. Synaptic boutons of w1118 and trh1/+ NMJs were evenly spaced along the axonal terminals, displaying the typical “beads-on-a-string” pattern (Fig 1A, upper and middle panels, enlarged images at right). Strikingly, the trh1/trh2 mutant larvae exhibited aberrant NMJ morphology in that their synaptic boutons were small and formed clusters without discernable connections, particularly at the terminals (Fig 1A, bottom panel); a phenotype described as “bunch boutons” [34]. This bunch bouton phenotype in the trh1/trh2 mutant was detected at a high frequency; 18% of total boutons were bunched compared to 3% for trh1/+ and 0% for w1118 (Fig 1B). Of the 12 trh1/trh2 NMJs we examined, 11 possessed at least one bunch, with an average of 5 bunches per NMJ. Each bunch consisted of 3 to 10 small boutons (mean = 4.3). The trh1/+ larvae exhibited a much weaker phenotype; only 4 of 10 examined larvae had 1 or 2 bunches, with an average of 5 small boutons per bunch. We did not observe a bunch bouton phenotype in any of the nine w1118 NMJs we assayed (Fig 1B). Although the percentage of bunch boutons in the trh1/trh2 mutant was greatly increased, total bouton number was only slightly higher than that observed in controls, suggesting that bunch boutons form at the expense of normal ones (Fig 1B). We also assessed the percentage of satellite boutons that are also small ones stemmed from normal-size boutons, and are often observed in wild-type NMJs. We observed some satellite boutons in the w1118 control and the trh1/trh2 mutant, and found no significant differences between them (Fig S1A). Given the small size and clustering of synaptic boutons in the trh1/trh2 mutant, we examined whether these bunch boutons express synaptic proteins normally. We found that the synaptic vesicle protein Synapsin (Syn in Fig 1A) was normally distributed relative to control, but the active zone protein Bruchpilot (Brp) was expressed at higher levels in bunch boutons (Fig S1B). The postsynaptic glutamate receptor, as revealed by GluRIIA (Fig S1C) and GluRIII (Fig S1B) signal, as well as dPAK (Fig S1C) were also localized in bunch boutons, which were surrounded by the subsynaptic reticulum protein Dlg (Fig S1D). Thus, although the Brp signal intensity in the trh1/trh2 mutant was stronger than in the wild-type, the composition of synaptic proteins in bunch boutons was largely similar to that of normal-sized boutons.
As trh is expressed in both tracheal and nervous systems during embryonic stages [35], altered bouton morphology in the trh1/trh2 mutant could be due to a lack of trh in neurons, tracheal cells or other cells/tissues. Therefore, we performed trh-RNAi knockdown by using tissue-specific GAL4 drivers for trachea (btl-GAL4), neurons (elav-GAL4), glia (repo-GAL4), and muscles (MHC-GAL4). We observed a dramatic increase in bunch boutons upon tracheal trh knockdown using btl-GAL4 (Fig 1C and 1D). In contrast, trh-RNAi alone or using elav-GAL4, repo-GAL4 or MHC-GAL4 failed to replicate the bunch bouton phenotype (Fig 1D).
To further confirm the necessity of tracheal trh for normal bouton formation, we performed a rescue experiment of the trh1/trh2 phenotype. When we expressed a UAS-trh transgene in the trachea of the trh1/trh2 mutant upon using the tracheal btl-GAL4 driver, the bunch bouton phenotype was suppressed (Fig 1E and 1F). Controls bearing only the btl-GAL4 driver or the UAS-trh transgene still contained the comparably high numbers of bunch boutons observed in trh1/trh2 (Fig 1B) or upon tracheal trh-RNAi knockdown (Fig 1D). These results indicate that trh is required in the trachea for normal bouton formation.
Hypoxia induces bunch bouton formation
Apart from specifying the tracheal cell fate, Trh is also involved in the branching of tubular structures during post-embryonic stages [30]. Therefore, we examined the tracheal phenotypes in the trh1/trh2 larvae and observed an increase of the number of terminal branches in the dorsal branch of the third segment (Fig S2A and S2B). Furthermore, we identified morphological defects such as tracheal breaks and tangles, suggesting structural defects in the trh1/trh2 larvae (arrows in Fig S2A). Tracheal branching activity is enhanced under hypoxia [18]. Thus, the increased number of terminal branches in trh1/trh2 could be a compensatory mechanism for defective trachea formation.
To understand whether trh1/trh2 mutant cells are under hypoxia, we used the hypoxia biosensor GFP-ODD, in which the GFP is fused to the oxygen-dependent degradation (ODD) domain of Sima, under the control of the ubiquitin-69E (ubi) promoter [36]. We first confirmed that GFP-ODD signal was low under normoxia (21% O2) and enhanced under hypoxia (5% O2, Fig 2A) in wild-type late-stage embryos when tracheal tubules are already formed and functioning [36]. Indeed, enhanced GFP signal was ubiquitous under hypoxia in wild-type embryos, with some pronounced focal GFP signals (Fig 2A, upper row, and Fig S2C). The signal of mRFP-nls, also under the control of ubi promoter as an internal control, remained constant under hypoxia (Fig 2A, bottom row, and Fig S2D) [36]. Quantification of the GFP/RFP ratio revealed a significant difference between normoxia and hypoxia conditions (Fig 2B). We then examined whether oxygen supply is deficient in the trh1/trh2 mutant by measuring the GFP-ODD signals. We detected higher GFP-ODD signal under hypoxia in the mutant compared to w1118 control (Fig 2A and Fig S2C). The heterozygous trh1/+ presented similar GFP-ODD signal to w1118. Quantification of the GFP/RFP ratio also demonstrated a significant increase in GFP-ODD signal in trh1/trh2 (Fig 2B), supporting that the trh1/trh2 mutant senses reduced oxygen levels.
Thus, formation of bunch boutons in the trh1/trh2 mutant could be caused by hypoxia. To test this hypothesis, we reared wild-type larvae under hypoxia (5%) and assessed synaptic bouton morphology at the third instar stage. Consistently, we observed small clustered boutons, mirroring the bunch bouton phenotype, at NMJs (Fig 2C and 2D). Furthermore, when we subjected the trh1/trh2 mutant to a high oxygen level (50%), the bunch bouton phenotype was completely suppressed, with trh1/trh2 NMJs exhibiting normal bouton morphology (Fig 2C and 2D). These results suggest that hypoxia due to the defective tracheal system in the trh1/trh2 mutant induces the bunch bouton phenotype, and that this phenotype can be suppressed by extra oxygen supply.
Glial HIF-1α/Sima mediates bunch bouton formation
HIF-1α/Sima mediates the response to low oxygen supply [37, 38]. Protein levels of Sima are increased in wild-type Drosophila embryos subjected to hypoxia [39], leading to transcriptional activation of downstream target genes and the induction of tracheal branching [18]. We overexpressed Sima in tracheal cells, neurons, glia, or muscle cells by tissue-specific drivers to investigate which types of cells may play a role in modulating synaptic bouton formation. Overexpressing Sima in trachea caused embryonic lethality, preventing us from observing NMJ phenotypes. Larvae in which Sima was overexpressed in muscles, neurons, and glia could survive to the third instar stage and we detected a substantial number of bunch boutons upon glial Sima overexpression (Fig 3A and 3B). This result shows that the hypoxia-responding factor Sima is capable of inducing bunch bouton formation when overexpressed in glia.
If glial Sima is the factor responsible for responding to hypoxia in the trh1/trh2 mutant, reducing the Sima level in glia would suppress bunch bouton formation. Accordingly, we expressed the sima-RNAi transgene, which could effectively deplete sima expression (Fig S3A), using repo-GAL4 in the trh1/trh2 mutant. As our prediction, the bunch bouton phenotype was almost completely suppressed upon glial sima knockdown (Fig 3C and 3D). In controls, trh1/trh2 mutants carrying only the UAS-sima-RNAi transgene or the repo-GAL4 driver still exhibited large numbers of bunch boutons (Fig 3C and 3D). We also tested whether low oxygen level-induced bunch bouton formation is mediated through Sima in glia. Bunch bouton phenotypes were detected in controls carrying either repo-GAL4 or UAS-sima-RNAi when raised in 5% O2 (Fig 3E). However, almost no bunch boutons were detected in larvae carrying both repo-GAL4 and UAS-sima-RNAi when raised in the same low-oxygen environment (Fig 3E and 3F). We also examined Sima protein levels in larvae, and found ubiquitous increases (including in Repo-positive glia) in the trh1/trh2 mutant or for the control under the 5% O2 condition (Fig S3B). Thus, glial Sima mediates the hypoxia response in the trh1/trh2 mutant and in the low O2 condition to modulate synaptic bouton formation.
Glial Wg remodels bouton morphology
Next, we explored possible signals transduced from glia to neurons in response to hypoxia. The glia-secreted Wingless (Wg) signaling molecule regulates synaptic growth at Drosophila NMJs [40, 41]. Therefore, we examined whether Wg can be induced under hypoxia in the trh1/trh2 mutant. Wg signal was enriched around the synaptic boutons of wild-type NMJs (Fig 4A), similar to previous reported staining patterns [40, 42]. Although the pattern of Wg signal at trh1/+ NMJs was similar to that of w1118, we detected much higher levels of Wg at trh1/trh2 NMJs (Fig 4A). Quantification of Wg immunofluorescence intensities normalized to co-stained HRP revealed a ∼3-fold increase relative to w1118 and trh1/+, respectively (Fig 4B). We then examined whether Sima is required for the enhanced Wg expression in the trh1/trh2 mutant. In a trh1/trh2 mutant carrying repo-GAL4, Wg levels were also increased 3.0-fold relative to the repo-GAL4 control (Fig 4C, 4D). When we reduced sima levels in the trh1/trh2 mutant by repo-GAL4-driven UAS-sima-RNAi, Wg signal was suppressed to a level equivalent to that in the repo-GAL4 control (Fig 4C and 4D). Interestingly, sima-RNAi knockdown in glia of the repo-GAL4 control had no effect on the Wg level (Fig 4C and 4D), suggesting that Sima is induced to upregulate Wg expression in the trh1/trh2 mutant but has no role in basal Wg expression in the wild-type. Taken together, we suggest that glial Sima is required for Wg upregulation at the NMJs of the trh1/trh2 mutant.
If glia-secreted Wg is responsible for bunch bouton induction in the trh1/trh2 mutant, then glia-specific knockdown of wg in that mutant should suppress bunch bouton formation. Indeed, the bunch bouton phenotype was almost undetectable in the trh1/trh2 mutant also bearing repo-GAL4 and the UAS-wg-RNAi transgene (Fig 4E and 4F). In control, bunch boutons were still prominent in the trh1/trh2 mutant bearing only UAS-wg-RNAi (Fig 4E and 4F). Inactivation of Wg signaling has been shown to induce unbundled filaments and a reduction of the more stabilized loops upon immunostaining for the microtubule-binding protein Futsch [41, 43]. To show that elevated Wg signaling remodels presynaptic bouton structure in the trh1/trh2 mutant, we examined Futsch-labeled microtubules within synaptic boutons and found significantly more Futsch-positive loops within the boutons (Fig S4A and S4B), supporting the elevation of presynaptic Wg signaling. Taken together, these results suggest that Wg plays a prominent role in the trh1/trh2 mutant to transduce the hypoxia signal from glia to remodel presynaptic bouton structure.
Since glial processes can invade synaptic boutons to match the growth of NMJs [44], we were intrigued to assess whether glia the trh1/trh2 mutant exhibits morphological change. In a live preparation of NMJs, we found that glial processes invaded the area of synaptic boutons in the trh1/trh2 mutant, whereas glial processes were comparatively restrained in the control (Fig S4C). Quantification of fluorescent signals of glial process overlaying the synaptic bouton area revealed significantly greater area of overlap in the trh1/trh2 mutant relative to control (Fig S4D). This increased extent of glial processes in the synaptic area may facilitate signal transduction from glia to synaptic boutons for structural reorganization.
Impaired crawling behavior in the trh mutant
Given the evident morphological changes at trh1/trh2 NMJs, we wondered if locomotion is affected in mutant larvae. We observed larvae crawling under free-movement conditions and found that wild-type control and trh1/+ heterozygous larvae presented smooth crawling paths with an average speed of ∼0.5 mm/s (Fig 5A and 5B), whereas the trh1/trh2 larva had shorter paths and a slower speed of 0.14 mm/s. The head turning frequency in trh1/trh2 was comparable to both controls, not contributing to the slow moving (Fig 5C). Larval crawling is a rhythmic behavior involving a series of periodic strides (S1 Movie) [45-48]. We noticed uncoordinated crawling in trh1/trh2 larvae, with their posterior body segments failing to follow the rhythmic movement (S2 Movie). We recorded larval forward crawling and constructed kymographs to represent the stride cycle. In wild-type larvae, normal and consistent periodic strides were apparent with regular head and tail displacements (Fig 5D, left panel). Similar to the wild-type, head movements of trh1/trh2 larvae were smooth and periodic, albeit slower. However, tail movements of trh1/trh2 larvae were abrupt (Fig 5D, right panel). Approximately 70% of the strides of trh1/trh2 larvae were uncoordinated (Fig 5E), which might contribute to the slower crawling of the trh1/trh2 mutant.
This uncoordinated stride cycle prompted us to examine the bouton morphology in anterior and posterior segments of trh1/trh2 larvae. Strikingly, we detected the bunch bouton phenotype in segments A2-A4 of individual trh1/trh2 mutant larvae, whereas bouton morphology in their respective posterior A5 and A6 segments was relatively normal (Fig 6A). In fact, we seldom observed the bunch bouton phenotype in posterior segments (Fig 6B). In wild-type larvae, all segments we examined had normal bouton morphology (Fig 6A and 6B). While bunch boutons appeared in A2-A4 segments, the total numbers of boutons were comparable in all segments between wild-type and trh1/trh2. We further examined whether Wg signal from glia has any effect on modifying bouton morphology in trh1/trh2 larvae. Glial wg-RNAi knockdown suppressed bunch bouton formation in the anterior A3 segment, but had no effect on the morphological phenotype of the posterior A6 segment (Fig 6E). Thus, induction of bunch boutons is specific to anterior A2-A4 segments.
Given the bunch bouton phenotype in trh1/trh2 larvae, we assessed basal synaptic transmission properties, firstly at muscle 6 of anterior A3 segments. Amplitude of evoked junctional potential (EJP), as well as the amplitude and frequency of miniature EJP (mEJP), were comparable among controls and trh1/trh2 larvae (Fig 7A-7E). The quantal content, calculated by dividing the EJP amplitude with that of mEJP, were also equivalent (Fig 7F). We then evaluated the synaptic transmission properties of muscle 6 for posterior A6 segments. Although the amplitude and frequency of mEJP and the EJP amplitude in trh1/trh2 larvae remained similar to controls, we did detect a significant reduction in the quantal content of mutant larvae (Fig 7F). Thus, the impaired synaptic activity of posterior segments of mutant larvae seems to be consistent with their defective stride cycle.
Discussion
Here, we demonstrate that Trh, a member of the NPAS protein family, non-cell autonomously regulates synaptic bouton formation at NMJs through a hypoxia response from glia. We observed small-sized and clustered boutons, so-called bunch boutons, at the NMJs of trh mutant larvae or larvae reared at low oxygen levels. The abnormal bouton morphology at trh NMJs could be suppressed by reducing levels of the hypoxia response factor Sima in glia. We further showed that Sima enhanced the Wg signal from glia to cause bunch bouton formation. Although normal synaptic transmission was detected at NMJs located in anterior segments of larvae bearing bunch boutons, reduced synaptic transmission was found in posterior segments lacking bunch boutons of the trh mutant, suggesting that glia-induced bunch bouton formation might be a homeostatic response to restore normal synaptic transmission. Imbalanced synaptic functioning of mutant NMJs might contribute to the uncoordinated stride cycles detected in the trh mutant, slowing larval crawl speed. Thus, we provide a model for studying the glial responses that modulate synaptic remodeling during hypoxia.
Glia play a critical role in response to hypoxia in the trh mutant
Animal cells adapt to hypoxia by triggering the expression of HIF-1α/Sima, the master transcriptional regulator of the hypoxia response [49]. We observed defective tracheal structure in the trh mutant (Fig S2A), which may result in hypoxic conditions inside the larval body. The increase in terminal branch number (Fig S2B) may be a response to oxygen supply deficiency [18]. Moreover, the increases in Sima protein levels and ODD-GFP reporter expression indicate reduced internal oxygen levels (Fig 2A, 2B and S3B). Finally, the bunch bouton phenotype in the trh mutant was recapitulated by rearing larvae under hypoxia, and it was suppressed by rearing larvae under hyperoxia. Taken together, these observations suggest that cells in the trh mutant sense low oxygen levels caused by the defective tracheal system and respond by elevating Sima protein levels. It is not clear how profound this effect is for other types of larval cells. Based on our ODD-GFP and Sima immunostaining patterns (Fig 2A, 2B and S3B), many types of cells are likely to be affected [50]. Our results also suggest that Trh has a late developmental role in tracheal morphogenesis, in addition to its well-characterized role in early tracheal cell fate specification [29, 30]. Unlike the mammalian homologs NPAS1 and NPAS3 that function in the nervous system, the Drosophila NPAS1/3 homolog Trh is more dedicated to tracheal development.
Glia induce synaptic remodeling
We suggest that glia is the major cell type mediating bunch bouton formation in the trh mutant under hypoxia. HIF-1α/Sima was ubiquitously, including glia, increased in both the trh1/trh2 mutant and the control grown under hypoxia (Fig S3B). Importantly, by manipulating Sima expression in glia we could regulate bunch bouton formation (Fig 3). Elevated Sima levels induce tracheal sprouting in tracheal cells, as well as protrusions in non-tracheal cells [18]. Interestingly, we also observed increased overlap of glial processes with synaptic area in the trh mutant, indicative of a glial response (Fig S4C, S4D). Several types of cells in Drosophila have been shown to respond to hypoxia [39, 51]. For instance, under hypoxia, elevated Sima levels induce the expression of Breathless (Btl, the FGF receptor) in tracheal cells that branch out seeking cells that express Branchless (Bnl)/FGF, with this latter process also being partially dependent on Sima [18, 19]. In an alternative pathway, atypical soluble guanylyl cyclases that are less sensitive to nitric oxide than conventional soluble guanylyl cyclases can mediate graded and immediate hypoxia responses mainly in neurons [52, 53]. Drosophila glia have not been reported to sense and respond to hypoxia, but mammalian astrocytes in the central nervous system have been shown to be involved in these processes. In a middle cerebral artery occlusion mouse model, astrocyte activation was shown to play a crucial role in ischemic tolerance, which is mediated through P2X7 receptor-activated HIF-1α upregulation [24]. Under physiological hypoxia, reduced mitochondrial respiration leads to the release of intracellular calcium and exocytosis of ATP-containing vesicles, thereby signaling the brainstem to modulate animal breathing [54]. Our results reveal a role for Drosophila larval glia in sensing hypoxia via the conventional HIF-1α/Sima pathway, warranting further detailed study.
We also demonstrated that under hypoxia, glia modulate the formation of synaptic boutons (Fig 3). These results clearly place the glia-modulated morphology of synaptic boutons in the context of hypoxia responses. Several studies have suggested that glia play important roles in regulating synaptic morphology at developmental stages or in response to neural insult. Perisynaptic Schwann cells surround nerve terminals and express neurotransmitter receptors, modulating synaptic efficacy upon nerve stimulation at mouse NMJs [55]. After nerve injury, Schwann cells participate in synaptic homeostasis and remodeling during NMJ re-innervation [56]. Chronic hypoxia causes hypomyelination, leading to synaptic reduction in the mouse cortex, which could be rescued by genetically-induced or drug-enhanced hypermyelination [57]. In Drosophila, expansion of glial structures to synaptic boutons matches synaptic growth [44]. Glial invasion of the synaptic region is also suggested to clear presynaptic debris of unstable boutons during activity-dependent synaptic growth [58]. Our study further establishes that in response to hypoxia, Wg is a glial signal that modulates synaptic bouton formation. Two sources of Wg, from presynaptic motor neurons and from glia, are involved in synapse growth and remodeling [40]. Our results suggest that Sima upregulates the level of Wg secreted from glia to modulate synapse formation in the trh mutant or in control larvae grown under hypoxia. In hypoxic macrophages, HIF-1α mediates the induction of Wnt1, which is a mammalian homolog of Wg [59-61]. Although it is unclear whether Wg is a direct target of the hypoxia signal Sima in Drosophila, we show that the level of Wg is controlled by glial Sima (Fig 4C, 4D) and that it mediates Sima-induced bunch bouton formation at trh NMJs (Fig 4E, 4F). As a secreted morphogen, Wg functions in both pre-synaptic and post-synaptic sites [41]. At presynaptic terminals, the canonical Wg pathway induces microtubule loop formation to regulate synaptogenesis [43]. We also detected an increase in microtubule loops in the trh mutant (Fig S4A, S4B), consistent with a role for Wg in mediating the hypoxia response by modulating synapse formation. Postsynaptic Wg signaling leads to subsynaptic reticulum differentiation [41], which was not apparent in the trh mutant (Fig S1D), suggesting that Wg might be a component of the complex hypoxia response that induces synapse remodeling. Brief exposure to hypoxia induces immature spines and impaired synaptic function in hippocampal neurons [23]. The morphological change to bunch boutons at trh NMJs (Fig 1A and 1B) was not accompanied by altered synaptic transmission (Fig 7A-F), which may reflect a compensatory effect during long-term hypoxia.
The bunch bouton phenotype has also been described in spastin mutants [34, 62]. As an AAA ATPase, Spastin severs microtubules to facilitate transport to distal axon segments [63, 64]. Accordingly, the spastin mutant also exhibits a lack of microtubules at terminal boutons [62]. In contrast, the trh mutant presented an increase of microtubule loops (Fig S4A, S4B). Microtubule loops have been linked to synaptic bouton stabilization, and an excess of microtubule loops has been associated with increased synaptic bouton formation [65, 66]. The altered morphology of bunch boutons may be part of the structural changes necessary to maintain normal synaptic transmission under hypoxia. The trh and spastin mutants also exhibit differences in synaptic function, with loss of spastin function slightly enhancing spontaneous synaptic transmission release but reducing evoked synaptic transmission [62]. Thus, although the morphology of synaptic boutons at trh NMJs resembles that of spastin mutants, bunch boutons at trh NMJs retain synaptic functions, unlike the impaired synaptic transmission of spastin mutant boutons.
Difference of trh NMJs in anterior and posterior segments
The size of NMJs in muscles 6/7 decreases from the anterior to posterior segments, which could represent a coupling with muscle growth [67, 68], thereby maintaining similar electrophysiological efficacy at anterior and posterior NMJs (Fig 7A-F). Interestingly, our findings show that synaptic responses in the trh mutant differ, with bunch boutons only appearing in anterior segments (Fig 6A and 6B). Furthermore, synaptic transmission at trh NMJs remained normal in anterior A3 segments but was impaired in posterior A6 segments (Fig 7A-F). These observations are consistent with bunch bouton formation being part of a homeostatic response to restore synaptic activity. Why synapses were not remodeled in posterior segments remains unclear. Motor neurons in the ventral nerve cord project much longer axons to muscles in posterior segments compared to anterior ones. It has been shown that axonal transport to posterior segments is more vulnerable to inefficient transport conditions. For example, mutation of long-chain Acyl-CoA synthetase impairs the balance between anterograde and retrograde transport, causing distally-biased axonal aggregations and affecting the growth and functioning of synapses [69]. In addition, larval forward locomotion, propelled by peristatic contraction, is controlled by different circuits targeting anterior and posterior segments. The GABAergic SEZ-LN1 neurons specifically control posterior A6 and A7 segmental muscle contraction by inhibiting A27h premotor neurons, which promotes longitudinal muscle contraction during larval forward crawling [70]. It is possible that glia-derived Wg signals from cell bodies located in the ventral nerve cord of the trh mutant may not be efficiently transported to posterior segments during hypoxia. This polar difference in synaptic activity and bouton morphology may contribute to the uncoordinated peristatic movements of trh larvae.
Methods
Fly stocks
All flies were reared at 25 °C. w1118 was used as wild-type control and to backcross with trh1 or trh2. Fly strains are as follows: trh2, elav-GAL4, MHC-GAL4, repo-GAL4, ok371-GAL4, UAS-trh, UAS-sima, and UAS-sima-RNAi from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC); trh1 and UAS-wg-RNAi from Kyoto Stock Center, and UAS-trh-RNAi from Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC). Also used were btl-GAL4 [71], GFP-ODD [36], and the repo-cyto-GFP line was generated to drive cytoplasmic GFP expression under the control of the 4.3kb repo promoter, which recapitulates the full repo expression pattern. [72, 73]
Hypoxia or hyperoxia rearing conditions
Larvae in a food vial were transferred at 1 day after egg laying (AEL) to a ProOx (model 110, BioSpherix, Lacona, NY) oxygen-controlled chamber. Oxygen or nitrogen was infused into the chamber to a desired concentration (here, 5% or 50%), which was maintained until assay.
Immunostaining
The NMJ phenotypes were analyzed as previously described [74]. For live tissue preparation, non-fixed larvae were dissected as previously described, before directly incubating larval fillets with anti-horseradish peroxidase (HRP, 1:10) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 10 minutes. Primary antibodies used were against Synapsin (3C11, mouse, 1:100; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, DSHB), HRP-Cy5 (rabbit, 1:100; Jackson ImmunoResearch), Dlg (mouse, 1:100, DSHB), GluRIIA (mouse, 1:100, DSHB), dPAK (rabbit, 1:1000)[75], GluRIII (rabbit, 1:1000)[76], Brp (nc82, mouse, 1:100, DHSB), Sima (guinea pig, 1:1000)[77], Repo (mouse, 1:1000, DSHB), Wg (4D4, mouse, 1:10, DSHB), and Futsch (22C10, mouse, 1:100, DSHB). Secondary antibodies used were anti-rabbit or -mouse 488, Cy3, or Cy5 (1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch).
Image acquisition and processing
Unless specified otherwise, NMJs in muscle 6/7 of A3 segments of wandering third-instar larvae were analyzed. Confocal images were acquired via LSM510 confocal microscopy (Carl Zeiss) using 40x water, 40x water immersion, or 100x oil objectives. All presented images are projections of confocal z-stacks. Numbers of bunch boutons, total boutons, and microtubule loops were counted manually. The immunofluorescence intensities of Wg and HRP, as well as the areas of GFP and HRP signal, were analyzed in ImageJ. Each dot in the bar graph represents the data from a single NMJ of a larva, and 8-10 NMJs from 2-5 independent experiments were pooled for quantification. Embryos were acquired by means of LSM510 confocal microscopy (Carl Zeiss) using a 20x objective, and were analyzed as previously described [36]. Each dot in the bar graph represents data from a single embryo in which fluorescence was measured in at least 35 cells.
Electrophysiological recordings
Basal transmission properties were analyzed at NMJs of muscle 6/7 in specified segments of wandering third-instar larvae as previously described [78], with some modifications. The larval body wall was dissected in cold calcium-free HL3 solution and recorded in HL3 solution containing 0.4 mM CaCl2 at room temperature.
Crawling behavior
Mid third instar larvae (feeding stage) were placed on black agar plates (2% agar with black food coloring in 25 × 20 cm2 dishes) at room temperature for filming. Video recording by a Sony Xperia Z1 camera started after 1 min habituation and lasted for 5 min, and it was analyzed using Ctrax software [79]. The (x, y) positions were used to calculate the crawling distance between two successive frames, and crawling speed was derived by dividing total distance travelled by time. The change in angle of larvae between two frames was divided by time to represent rotational speed. Our forward crawling assay was a modification of a previous study [48]. Larvae were transferred into a tunnel (∼1 mm width) made in 2% black agar. Specimens were video-recorded for 3-10 mins using a Leica S8 APO microscope. Kymographs were constructed using the MultipleKymograph plug-in for ImageJ (NIH). Only forward crawling was counted, and 7-10 steps for each of ten larvae were analyzed for each genotype.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Pei-Yi Chen, Yi-Wei Tsai, Cheng-Ting Chien.
Formal analysis: Pei-Yi Chen.
Funding Acquisition: Cheng-Ting Chien
Investigation: Pei-Yi Chen.
Methodology: Pei-Yi Chen, Cheng-Ting Chien.
Project administration: Cheng-Ting Chien.
Resources: Pei-Yi Chen, Yi-Wei Tsai, Angela Giangrande, Cheng-Ting Chien.
Supervision: Cheng-Ting Chien.
Validation: Pei-Yi Chen.
Visualization: Pei-Yi Chen.
Writing – original draft: Pei-Yi Chen.
Writing – Review & Editing: Pei-Yi Chen, Yi-Wei Tsai, Angela Giangrande, Cheng-Ting Chien.
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Luschnig (Universität Münster), Y. Henry Sun (Academia Sinica), T Leung (National University of Singapore), A. DiAntonio (Washington University), BDSC, Kyoto Stock Center, VDRC, and DSHB for providing reagents; NPAS Electrophysiology Core, Taiwan Fly Core, and Hsiu-Hwa Kao for technical support; as well as Y.-J., Cheng, H. Li, V. Nithianandam and all members of C.-T. Chien’s laboratory for discussion and comments.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- 32.
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- 42.↵
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.↵
- 46.
- 47.
- 48.↵
- 49.↵
- 50.↵
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.↵
- 60.
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.↵
- 64.↵
- 65.↵
- 66.↵
- 67.↵
- 68.↵
- 69.↵
- 70.↵
- 71.↵
- 72.↵
- 73.↵
- 74.↵
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵