Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Myc instructs and maintains pancreatic adenocarcinoma phenotype

Nicole M. Sodir, Roderik M. Kortlever, Valentin J.A. Barthet, Luca Pellegrinet, Tania Campos, Steven Kupczak, Lamorna Brown Swigart, Laura Soucek, Mark J. Arends, Trevor D. Littlewood, Gerard I. Evan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/556399
Nicole M. Sodir
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roderik M. Kortlever
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valentin J.A. Barthet
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
2Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luca Pellegrinet
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tania Campos
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Kupczak
3Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lamorna Brown Swigart
4Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Soucek
5Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona 08035, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark J. Arends
6Division of Pathology, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trevor D. Littlewood
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerard I. Evan
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gie20@cam.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by its dismal prognosis and its signature fibroinflammatory phenotype. We show that activation of Myc in PanIN epithelial cells is alone sufficient to instruct and maintain immediate transition of indolent PanINs to PDACs phenotypically identical to the spontaneous human disease. Myc does this by inducing a distinct, tissue-specific ensemble of instructive signals that, together, coordinate changes in multiple, stromal and inflammatory cell types to generate the signature PDAC stroma. We also demonstrate that the Myc PDAC switch is completely reversible and that Myc deactivation immediately triggers meticulous disassembly of both PDAC tumor and stroma. Hence, both the formation and deconstruction of the complex PDAC phenotype may be mediated by a single, reversible molecular switch.

SIGNIFICANCE Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis and lacks effective therapies. We show that Myc is a single molecular switch that directly and immediately instructs transition from indolent KRasG12D-induced PanIN to the characteristic complex, multi-cell-type fibroinflammatory and immune-cold PDAC phenotype through the release of a distinct, tissuespecific set of instructive signals. The same combination of KRasG12D and Myc drives a very different phenotype in lung, indicating that the principal phenotypes of adenocarcinomas are dictated by tissue of origin not specific oncogenes. We also show that the Myc switch is immediately and completely reversible: blocking Myc function triggers meticulous disassembly of the entire PDAC tumor-stromal edifice demonstrating that phenotypic complexity is not a barrier to effective treatment of cancers.

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal cancer with a 5-year survival of less than 5% 1. Its dismal prognosis is in great part due to its typically late presentation and its profound resistance to all forms of conventional chemo and radiotherapy. Studies of resected tumors suggest that malignant ductal adenocarcinoma evolves from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms (PanIN), indolent precursors that are histologically classified into four stages (PanIN1A, 1B, 2 and 3) based on increasing degrees of nuclear and architectural atypia 2-4. Frank PDAC is characterized by its striking fibroinflammatory stroma, absent from normal pancreas, whose attendant dense desmoplasia typically constitutes some 90% of tumor bulk 8,9. This fibroinflammatory stroma is a product of complex interplay between tumor cells and adjacent mesenchymal, endothelial, inflammatory and immune cells and is thought to contribute to PDAC therapeutic recalcitrance by impeding vascular perfusion and oxygenation 10,11.

At the molecular level, PDAC is associated with a core of recurring, presumably causal, oncogenic mutations, of which activating mutations in KRas appear to be founder drivers and are present in over 90% of both PanINs and PDAC. Other frequently recurring signature mutations inactivate CDKN2A (90–95%), TP53 (50–84%) or SMAD4/DPC4 (49–55%) and recent, more granular, analyses reveal a plethora of additional sporadic PDAC mutations encompassing great functional diversity 5-7. As the most commonly recurring oncogenic mutation, many of the canonical features of PDAC are attributed to precocious KRas signaling. KRas is a multifunctional communication node with diverse, pleiotropic outputs that encompass downstream intracellular effectors (e.g. MAPK, PI3K, p38, JAK/STAT, Hippo and NF-κB) and a host of extracellular signals and their receptors (e.g. Wnt, Notch, Shh, CXCL1, 2 and 5, CXCL8 (IL-8), IL-6, GM-CSF and IL-17RA). These influence diverse aspects of PDAC pathology, including tumor initiation, maintenance, drug sensitivity, metabolism, macropinocytosis, metastasis, desmoplasia, inflammation and immunity 12,13. Oncogenic KRas has been successfully used as the initiating driver in various pancreas cancer mouse models 14-22. All concur that, without cooperating oncogenic mutations, KRas oncogenic potential is very poor, stalling at indolent PanIN with little desmoplasia, inflammation or lymphocytic suppression 14,23. Aside from its role in pancreatic tumor initiation (Collins, 2014 #433), oncogenic KRas also plays an obligate role in maintenance of established PDAC 14,16,23,24 and hence appears to provide a necessary platform upon which subsequent cooperating lesions exert their oncogenic impacts.

The archetypical cooperating oncogenic partner of KRas is Myc 25, a pleiotropic transcription factor whose putative role is to coordinate expression of thousands of genes whose products have enormously diverse functions involved in virtually every aspect of cell and tissue behavior, that together mediate somatic cell proliferation. In proliferating normal cells, Myc serves as a functionally non-redundant and essential transcriptional node that is tightly controlled by mitogen availability 26. By contrast, some degree of aberrant Myc regulation is implicated in the majority, maybe all, cancers. Such aberrant Myc expression only seldom involves mutation of the myc gene itself and is usually an indirect consequence of its relentless induction by “upstream” oncogenes – notable examples being Wnt, Notch and Ras itself 27-33. During pancreas organogenesis and early postnatal growth, Myc is highly expressed in a population of multipotent pancreatic progenitor cells and is, like its immediate upstream activators β-catenin 33-35 and Notch 32, required for exocrine pancreas development, maturation and neonatal expansion 31,36-39. While Myc is not appreciably expressed in normal adult, uninjured, non-proliferating pancreas, >40% of PDACs exhibit marked expression of Myc and its canonical target gene signature while overt amplification of the MYC gene at 8q24 is frequent in especially aggressive tumors 19,31,40-42. Furthermore, multiple in vivo mouse studies indicate that deregulated Myc is causally oncogenic in exocrine pancreas (reviewed in 31). Thus, classical transgenic over-expression of Myc targeted to mature acinar cells via an elastase promoter induces widespread acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) 10 while pdx-1 promoter-directed over-expression of Myc in pancreatic progenitor cells through organ development elicits rapid emergence of ductal PanIN 43. Nonetheless, such tumors only rarely progress to PDAC 44, in part because high levels of Myc trigger potent tumor suppressor responses 45. Conversely, pdx-1-CRE-driven excision of endogenous myc concurrently with KRasG12D activation blocks transition of PanINs to PDAC. Studies also indicate a persistent maintenance role for Myc in established PDAC. myc knockdown inhibits proliferation of human PDAC cell lines in vitro 46 and direct 43 or indirect 47 inactivation of Myc triggers macroscopic regression of established PDAC in mouse models in vivo 48, albeit with persistence of dormant tumor cells 43. Taken together, these data suggest a critical role for Myc in both the progression from PanIN to PDAC and in subsequent PDAC maintenance 32. However, the nature of this role remains obscure. For example, Myc has no obvious functional overlap with any of the canonical mutations in CDKN2A, TP53 and SMAD4 that typically cooperate with KRas in PDAC.

Here we use a rapidly and reversibly switchable genetic mouse model whereby Myc may be engaged or disengaged, at will, in indolent KRasG12D-induced PanINs to address key questions concerning the mechanistic role of Myc in PDAC. Does Myc activation drive immediate transition of PanIN to PDAC or, instead, merely raise the eventual likelihood that sporadic progression eventually occurs? What is the phenotype of the pancreas tumors that Myc activation elicits and do they resemble spontaneous PDACs? Finally, we address why Myc is required for the maintenance of PDAC tumors and by what mechanism PDAC tumors regress upon Myc deactivation.

RESULTS

Myc deregulation drives immediate progression of KRasG12D-induced PanINs to adenocarcinoma

Conditional expression of oncogenic KRasG12D in pancreas progenitor cells drives protracted and sporadic outgrowth of indolent PanIN lesions 17. Rarely, these progress to overt adenocarcinoma through aleatory accretion of additional lesions. Since deregulated and/or over-expressed Myc is a frequent feature of advanced PDAC, we first asked whether Myc deregulation is sufficient to drive progression of indolent KRasG12D-driven PanINs to PDAC using the well-characterized pdx1-Cre;LSL-KRasG12D/+ model (Kpdx1) in which Cre recombinase expression, driven by the pdx/IPF1 (Pancreas/duodenum homeobox protein 1) promoter in embryonic pancreatic and duodenal progenitor cells from around E8 18, triggers expression of a single allele of KRasG12D driven from the endogenous KRas2 promoter. Kpdx1 mice with a homozygous Rosa26-LSL-MycERT2 45 background were generated. In the resulting pdx1-Cre;LSL-KRasG12D;Rosa26LSL-MycERT2 (KMpdx1) mice, activation of Cre recombinase in pancreatic progenitor cells induces expression of both KRasG12D, driven from its endogenous promoter, and the conditionally regulatable MycERT2 variant of c-Myc, driven constitutively from the promiscuously active Rosa26 promoter at quasi-physiological levels. Although expressed constitutively in KMpdx1 pancreatic epithelia, MycERT2 is active only in the presence of its ligand, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT).

As previously described 17, by 15 weeks of age Kpdx1 control mice (i.e. KRasG12D alone) each exhibited a small number of early-stage PanIN-1A and PanIN-1B lesions, with the vast majority of pancreatic ducts appearing histologically normal. These PanIN lesions were small, with little or no desmoplastic stroma (Figure 1A). Activation of MycERT2 alone for 3 weeks in the absence of KRasG12D (Mpdx1 mice) had no significant histological impact (Figure 1A) save for a very modest increase in proliferative index (data not shown). By contrast, sustained activation of MycERT2 for 3 weeks in KMpdx1 mice (i.e. KRasG12D and Myc together) induced dramatic progression of existing PanINs to invasive adenocarcinomas that bore all the stereotypical features of spontaneous mouse and human PDAC: highly proliferative nests of epithelial tumor cells embedded in extensive avascular, hypoxic, αSMA (α-smooth muscle actin)-positive desmoplastic stroma densely infiltrated with leukocytes, yet largely devoid of T lymphocytes (Figures 1B, 7, S1 and S8). Tamoxifen alone had no discernible impact on pancreas architecture (Figures 1B and S1). Identical observations were made using the complementary p48-Cre;LSL-KRasG12D; Rosa26LSL-MycERT2 (KMp48) mouse PDAC model, in which Cre expression is driven slightly later and in more pancreas-specific progenitors by the p48/PTF1 promoter (Figure S1) 17,49.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1. Myc drives progression to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (related to Figures S1, S3 and S4)

(A) Representative H&E stained sections of pancreata from 15-week old Kpdx1 (KrasG12D only; left), Mpdx1 (MycERT2 only; middle), and KMpdx1 (MycERT2 and KrasG12D; right) mice treated with either oil control (top row) or tamoxifen (Tam) (bottom row) for 3 weeks. Percentage tumor burden relative to the total pancreas from KMpdx1 mice treated with either oil (control) or tamoxifen is shown right. Results represent mean ± SD, n = 4-6 mice per treatment group. The unpaired Student’s t-test was used to analyze tumor burden. ***p < 0.001. SD = standard deviation. (B) Representative immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for proliferation (Ki67, top row), α-smooth muscle action (α-SMA) (second row), collagen deposition by Gomori’s Trichrome staining (blue-stained collagen, third row) and immunofluorescence staining (IF) of CD45 expressing leukocytes (red, bottom row) in sections of pancreata harvested from 15 week old KMpdx1 mice treated with either oil (Myc OFF, left) or tamoxifen (Myc ON, middle) for 3 weeks and wild type control mice treated with tamoxifen (No Myc, right).

Although expression of MycERT2 is (like KRasG12D) restricted solely to epithelial cells of KMpdx1 and KMp48 tumors, the stereotypical fibroinflammatory and hypovascular stromal changes that Myc induces involve diverse stromal hematopoietic, endothelial and mesenchymal cell types. To address whether the Myc-induced PDAC phenotype is a direct, instructive result of Myc action or, instead, a passive chronic consequence of constraints by the host pancreatic tissue we made use of the inherent rapidity and synchrony of MycERT2 activation by tamoxifen in vivo 50-53. Myc was activated in KMp48 mice by systemic administration of tamoxifen for 0, 1 or 3 days, and pancreata harvested and analyzed. Within 24 hours of Myc activation, we observed a dramatic increase in proliferation of the MycERT2-expressing epithelial tumor compartment of all PanIN lesions and this was accompanied by diverse stromal changes: most notably a marked influx of F4/80+ macrophages, Ly-6B.2+ neutrophils and B220+ B lymphocytes, concurrent loss of CD3+ T cells and induction of αSMA in proximal stellate cells, indicative of myofibroblastic transdifferentiation (Figure 2). Rather later (clearly evident by 72 hours) we observed progressive deposition of dense desmoplasia, loss of patent blood vessels and induction of HIF1-α, a marker of hypoxia (Figure 2), all expected secondary consequences of prior stellate cell activation. Identical Myc-induced phenotypic changes, with identical kinetics, were observed in pancreata of the complementary KMpdx1 switchable Myc model (Figure S2). Hence, all the signature tumor-stromal features of aggressive spontaneous PDAC seen in spontaneous mouse and human PDAC are instructed by activated Myc from the outset.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2. Myc instructs immediate transition to pancreatic adenocarcinoma in KMp48 mice (Related to Figure S2)

Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for proliferation (Ki67), immunofluorescence (IF) staining of macrophages (F4/80, CD206) and neutrophils (Ly-6B), IHC for T cells (CD3), B220+ lymphocytes and α-SMA, Gomori’s Trichrome staining of collagen, and IF for vasculature (CD31) and hypoxia (HIF-1α) in sections of pancreata harvested from 12 week old KMp48 mice treated with oil (left panel) or tamoxifen for 1 or 3 days (Myc ON). Scale bars apply to each row. Quantification (Box-and whisker plots, right) shows upper extreme, upper quartile, median, lower quartile, lower extreme. n = 4-6 for each treatment group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 (ns = non-significant). Data were analyzed using unpaired t-test. FOV = field of view.

Unexpectedly, sustained activation of MycERT2 proved rapidly lethal in KMpdx1 mice but not in their KMp48 counterparts. Such lethality corresponded with extensive Myc-induced overgrowth of KMpdx1 duodenal epithelium, severely disrupted crypt-villus architecture and multiple intestinal neoplasms (Figure S3). This is likely due to the known activity of the pdx-1 promoter in primordial duodenum - a promiscuity not shared by the p48 promoter, whose activity is tightly restricted to pancreatic precursor cells 17. However, since the PDAC phenotype induced by Myc was identical in KMpdx1 and KMp48 pancreata, all long-term Myc activation studies were thenceforth conducted in KMp48 mice. Extended activation of MycERT2 eventually also proved lethal in KMp48 animals, however, due to the outgrowth of grossly expanded, highly desmoplastic PDAC (Figure S4): KMp48 mice retained normal intestinal morphology throughout, albeit punctuated by frequent PDAC metastases (data not shown).

Specific signals instruct the Myc-induced PDAC phenotype

MycERT2 is expressed only in the epithelial compartments of both KMpdx1 and KMp48 pancreas tumors. Hence, the immediate stromal changes that Myc elicits must be instructed by signals originating in those MycERT2-expressing tumor epithelial cells. To identify such signals, we activated MycERT2 in KMp48 mice with a single systemic dose of tamoxifen, harvested pancreata 6 hours later, and then interrogated tissue extracts with growth factor/cytokine arrays and isolated mRNA by RT-PCR. Several discrete growth factors and regulators of inflammatory and immune cells were induced (Figure 3), including SHH, previously shown to be critical for PDAC desmoplastic deposition and maintenance 11.

Figure 3:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3: Myc activation immediately induces specific signaling molecules in the pancreata of KMp48 mice

(A) and (B) Representative inflammation antibody arrays of 40 targets (A) and cytokine antibody arrays of 97 targets (B) probed with whole pancreas protein lysates from 12-week old KMp48mice treated for 6 hours with oil (Myc OFF, left) or tamoxifen (Myc ON, right). Fold change quantitation of CXCL5, CCL9, Gas6 and CCL2 signals derived from protein arrays are shown. Each data point represents a single mouse. n = 3 for each cohort. Ratio paired t-test is used to analyze the data. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns = not significant. (C) Quantitative RT-PCR for CXCL5, CCL9, GAS6, CCL2 and SHH mRNA derived from 12-week old KMp48 pancreata treated for 6 hours with oil (blue bars) or tamoxifen (red bars). Tbp was used as an internal amplification control. The unpaired t-test with was used to analyze Taqman expression data. n = 3 for each cohort. The mean ± SD is shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Macrophage influx into PanINs, clearly evident by 24 hr post Myc activation, was presaged by induction at 6 hr of two well-documented macrophage chemoattractants, CCL9 (MIP1γ) and CCL2 (MCP1), the latter widely implicated in human PDAC 55. Myc-induced influx of Ly-6B+ neutrophils was preceded at 6hr by induction of CXCL5 (Figure 3), a well-characterized neutrophil attractant 59,60 and one of several CXCR2 (IL-8RB) receptor ligands. We also observed Myc-dependent upregulation of GAS6 (Figure 3), a ligand for AXL kinase that has previously been implicated in diverse neutrophil dynamics 61-63. Moreover, GAS6 induction correlated with appearance of pAXL immunoreactivity in a portion of PanIN epithelial cells (Figure 4A) while blockade of either GAS6, using low dose Warfarin 64,65 (Figure 4B), or of AXL kinase, using a specific inhibitor TP-0903 66 (Figure 4C), profoundly inhibited Myc-induced neutrophil influx into PanINs, significantly retarded Myc-driven stellate cell activation and proliferation (Figure S5) and impeded tumor growth. Surprisingly, AXL inhibition did not discernibly inhibit Myc induction of CXCL5 (data not shown). Hence, GAS6 and AXL are components of a novel, obligate Myc-driven neutrophil recruitment pathway in PDAC. Unexpectedly, AXL inhibition also profoundly blocked Myc-induced peritumoral influx of B220+ B lymphoid cells but only modestly inhibited Myc-induced macrophage influx (Figure 4C). AXL inhibition also had no discernible impact on the rapid depletion of CD3+ T cell that Myc induces (data not shown). However, we recently showed that Myc-induced depletion of CD3+ T cells from lung adenomas is dependent upon up-regulation of PD-L1 (CD274/B7-H1), a ligand for the PD1 (CD279) receptor whose ligation quells T lymphocyte immune functions. Immunohistological analysis revealed that Myc activation rapidly induced PD-L1 expression on both PanIN epithelial cells in vivo (Figures 5A and S6A) and on isolated KMpdx1 PDAC cells in vitro (Figure S6B). Moreover, ChIP analysis of cultured KMpdx1 PDAC cells located MycERT2 protein on the CD274 (PD-L1) gene (Figure S6C), indicating that Myc-dependent PD-L1 induction in PanIN epithelium is cell autonomous and the B7-H1 gene is most probably a direct Myc target. As in lung, systemic blockade of PD-L1 completely abrogated Myc-induced T cell depletion in pancreas tumors (Figure 5B and 5C). However, as with lung, PD-L1 blockade and consequent persistence of CD3+ T cells had no discernible inhibitory impact on subsequent tumor growth (data not shown). In summary, we identify multiple candidate signaling molecules responsible for the diverse, tightly coordinated transition from indolent PanIN to aggressive PDAC that Myc induces.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4. The GAS6/AXL pathway mediates a subset of Myc-induced stromal changes in KMp48 pancreatic tumors (related to Figure S5)

(A) Immunofluorescence staining of phospho-AXL (pAXL) (green) and its quantification in sections of pancreata of 12-week old KMp48 mice treated with oil (Myc OFF, top left) or tamoxifen for 1 (middle) or 3 days (right) (Myc ON) and of lungs from Adeno-Cre treated kRasG12D/+; MycERT2/T2 mice treated with tamoxifen (Myc ON) for 3 days (extreme right). Representative co-localization of pAXL (green) and pan-keratin (red, epithelial cells) (bottom row). Scale bars apply across each row. (B) Representative immunohistochemical staining for proliferation (Ki67, top panel) and immunofluorescence staining of neutrophils (Ly-6B, middle) and macrophages (F4/80, bottom) in sections of pancreata harvested from 12-week old KMp48 mice either without (left) or with warfarin for 4 days commencing one day prior to tamoxifen administration (Myc ON). Quantitation is shown on the right. n = 4 - 6 per group. *p<0.05, **p < 0.01 (C) Representative immunohistochemical or immunofluorescence staining of proliferation (Ki67), neutrophils (Ly-6B), macrophages (F4/80, CD206), B220 lymphocytes and α-SMA of pancreata harvested from 12-week old KMp48 mice untreated (left) or treated (right) with pAXL inhibitor TP-0903 concurrent with tamoxifen administration (Myc ON) for 5 days. Scale bars apply across each row. Quantitation is shown on the right. n = 4 - 6 per group. *p<0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. FOV = field of view.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 5. Blockade of PD-L1 abrogates Myc-induced T cell exclusion in KMp48 mice (related to Figure S6)

(A) Immunofluorescence staining of PD-L1 in sections of pancreata harvested from 12-week old KMp48 mice treated with oil (Myc OFF, left) or tamoxifen (Myc ON) for 1 (middle) or 3 days (right). Upper boxed region shown at higher magnification. Proportion of cells expressing PD-L1 is shown on the right. n = 4–6 per treatment group. FOV = field of view. (B) Schematic representation of PD-L1 blocking experiment: starting 24 hours prior to tamoxifen administration (Myc ON), 12-week old KMp48 mice were injected intraperitoneally every two days for two weeks with neutralizing antibodies for PD-L1 or IgG control. (C) Representative immunohistochemical staining of T cells (CD3) in pancreatic sections from mice described in (B). Boxed regions are shown at higher magnification below. Red arrows indicate CD3-positive cells. Quantitation of CD3-positive cells shown right. n = 4–6 per treatment group. FOV = field of view. The unpaired student t-test was used to analyze data. n = 4 - 6 per group. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.

The Myc-driven transition from PanIN to adenocarcinoma is immediately and fully reversible

We next addressed whether persistent Myc activity is required to maintain PDAC. MycERT2 was activated for 3 weeks in 12-week-old KMpdx1 or KMp48 animals, inducing widespread multifocal aggressive PDAC in all mice. Subsequent MycERT2 de-activation triggered complete regression of all adenocarcinomas (Figure 6A and data not shown), culminating in pancreata largely indistinguishable from those in which Myc had never been activated. Even grossly sized pancreatic tumors, generated after 4-6 weeks MycERT2 sustained activation, regressed with identical histology and kinetics following Myc de-activation (Figures S7A and S7B), although these often exhibited abnormalities in gross organ architecture with evidence of extensive scarring and numerous cyst-like structures (Figure S7C). To confirm that such Myc dependency is not a property peculiar to pancreatic adenocarcinomas induced by direct Myc activation, we also blocked endogenous Myc activity in spontaneously evolving KRasG12D-driven PDAC using the Omomyc dominant negative Myc dimerization mutant (Figure 6B). To do this, we used pdx1-Cre;LSL-KRasG12D; p53ERTAM KI;TRE-Omomyc;CMVrtTA (KPO) mice in which pdx1-Cre-driven activation of oncogenic KRasG12D is combined with a background in which the endogenous p53 of KPO mice is replaced with the conditional p53ERTAM allele 67. Since p53ERTAM is functionally inactive in the absence of tamoxifen, KPO animals without tamoxifen are effectively p53null. This greatly accelerates spontaneous transition of KRasG12D-driven PanIN to PDAC 17,18. In addition, KPO animals harbor a doxycycline-inducible transgene encoding the dominant negative Myc dimerization mutant Omomyc that, upon induction, efficiently blocks endogenous Myc function 68. 10-week-old KPO mice harboring extensive, highly desmoplastic spontaneous PDAC were treated with doxycycline for 4 weeks to inhibit endogenous Myc. As with de-activation of MycERT2 in KMpdx1 and KMp48 mice, inhibition of endogenous Myc by Omomyc triggered quantitative regression of all spontaneous PDAC tumors together with their extensive attendant fibroinflammatory stroma (Figure 6B).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 6. Sustained Myc activation is required for PDAC maintenance (related to Figure S7)

(A) Representative H&E (top) and immunohistochemical staining for proliferation (Ki67, second row), Gomori’s Trichrome staining for collagen (third row) and α-SMA (bottom row) in sections of pancreata from 12 week old KMpdx1 mice in which Myc was never activated (treated with oil for 3 weeks and then left untreated for a further 3 weeks), or activated for 3 weeks (treated with tamoxifen for 3 weeks (middle), or activated for 3 weeks and then switched off (treated with tamoxifen for 3 weeks and then untreated for a further 3 weeks) (right). (B) Representative H&E (top) or Gomori’s Trichome stained (bottom) sections of pancreata from 10-week old Kpdx1; p53ERTAM KI (KPO) mice without (left) or with Omomyc expression for 4 weeks (right).

To define the detailed kinetics of PDAC regression following Myc de-activation, MycERT2 was activated for 3 weeks in 12-week-old KMpdx1 mice to generate aggressive pancreatic adenocarcinomas and then acutely de-activated by tamoxifen withdrawal for 1 and 3 days (Figure 7). Myc de-activation triggered immediate tumor cell arrest and progressive reversal of the PDAC signature stromal changes that Myc activity initially induced - specifically, rapid efflux of macrophages and neutrophils, rapid re-infiltration of CD3+ T cells, de-activation of stellate cells, dissolution of desmoplasia, re-emergence of patent vasculature and reversion from hypoxia back to normoxia (Figure 7). All of the above stromal reversion occurred with comparable rapidity to their initial Myc-driven formation and were accompanied by apoptosis of tumor cells and regression of tumors. Furthermore, regression with identical histology and kinetics was observed following Myc de-activation in PDAC-bearing KMp48 animals (Figure S8). In addition to the above straightforward reversals of various Myc-induced changes, however, PDAC regression also featured unique processes absent from either normal pancreas or PDAC. Most obviously, Myc de-activation triggered not only the proliferative arrest of proliferating tumor cells but also their apoptosis. Since analogous Myc deactivation in cultured KMpdx1 tumor cells hitherto maintained in the presence of 4-OHT triggered no such cell death (data not shown), it is evident that Myc deprivation is not inherently toxic to PDAC cells but rather a vulnerability manifest in tumor cells in vivo. PDAC regression was also marked by rapid and meticulous disassembly of the extensive juxta-PDAC desmoplasia and by the rapid migration of B220+ cells from the PDAC tumor periphery into the regressing tumor mass itself. To address whether PDAC regression was mediated by the influx of CD3+ T cells we systemically ablated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. However, this had no impact on either rate or extent of PDAC regression (Figure 8). Hence, as recently shown in lung adenocarcinoma, CD4+/8+ T cells play no measurable role in PDAC regression.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 7. Myc de-activation triggers immediate reversal of KMpdx1 tumor stroma (related to Figure S8)

Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for proliferation (of Ki67), immunofluorescence (IF) staining of cell death (TUNEL), macrophages (F4/80) and neutrophils (Ly-6B), IHC of T cells (CD3), IF of PD-L1, IHC of α-SMA, and IF for endothelial cells (CD31) and hypoxia (HIF-1α) in sections of pancreata harvested from 12 week old KMpdx1 mice treated with tamoxifen (Myc ON) for 3 weeks (0 day, left) followed by tamoxifen withdrawal (Myc OFF) for 1 (middle) and 3 days (right). Scale bars apply across each row. Quantification is shown on the right. Data were analyzed using unpaired t-test. n = 4-6 for each treatment group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 (ns = non-significant). FOV = field of view.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 8. Depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells does not retard Myc de-activation-induced regression of PDAC in KMp48 mice

(A) Schematic representation of CD4 and CD8 blocking experiment: 12-week old KMp48 mice were administered tamoxifen diet (Myc ON) for 3 weeks. Starting four days before cessation of tamoxifen diet (day 0, Myc OFF), mice were injected four times every other day (−4, −2, 0, +2 day time points) with neutralizing antibodies against CD8 (or IgG control) and injected twice four days apart (−4 and 0 day time points) with neutralizing antibodies against CD4 (or IgG control). Mice were euthanized three days post turning Myc off (+ 3 day). (B) Immunohistochemistry staining and quantification of CD3+T cells in pancreatic tumors isolated from KMp48 mice described in (a). (C) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of cell death by TUNEL in in pancreatic tumors isolated from KMp48 mice described in (a). n = 4 per group. ****p < 0.0001 (ns = non-significant). Data were analyzed using unpaired t-test. FOV = field of view.

DISCUSSION

Exhaustive studies indicate that activation of Myc is, alone, insufficient to drive transformation in vitro or oncogenesis in vivo and requires the cooperative input of other mitogenic mutations – notably activating mutations either in Ras itself or in the greater Ras signaling network 25. Oncogenic Ras, too, is a weak oncogene alone, typically generating indolent adenomatous lesions that only sporadically and rarely progress to adenocarcinoma through chance acquisition of additional oncogenic lesions. Obligate cooperative interdependence between Ras and Myc is recapitulated in pancreas in vivo. Cre recombinase-induced expression of KRasG12D alone in pancreas progenitors drives the protracted and highly inefficient formation of indolent ductal lesions representing each of the three stages of PanIN. Activation of Myc alone in adult mouse pancreata has little discernible impact save for modest focal increases in proliferation. By contrast, activation of Myc in established KRasG12D-driven PanIN drives their uniform and immediate transition to aggressive pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The tumor-stromal phenotype of the pancreatic adenocarcinomas induced by Myc activation exhibits several notable features. First, is the remarkable phenotypic resemblance of the Myc-induced adenocarcinoma phenotype to that of spontaneous PDAC, reproducing essentially all the canonical features of the most aggressive spontaneous human PDACs, including abundant infiltration of macrophages (F4/80+ and CD206+) 69, neutrophils and/or granulocytic MDSCs (Ly-6B+) 59,70-72 and B220+ B cells 73-76, absence of CD3+ T cells 69, activation (αSMA expression) and mitogenesis of stellate cells, extensive deposition of desmoplasia and concomitant blood vessel compression, vascular involution and tumor hypoxia 8,77,78. Second, is the complexity of the Myc-induced PDAC tumor-stromal phenotype, which involves the coordinated choreography of multiple, distinct stromal cell types - inflammatory, lymphoid, endothelial and mesenchymal cells – and commandeers almost all of the classical “hallmarks of cancer” 79,80. A third feature of the Myc induced PDAC phenotype is the immediacy of the stromal changes that Myc induces, most of which are clearly evident within 24 hours of MycERT2 activation. Such immediacy indicates that the PDAC phenotype is actively instructed and not a passive consequence of phenotypic constraints imposed by the surrounding host tissue. Since Myc in KMpdx1 and KMp48 mice is activated only in pancreas epithelial cells, we reasoned that the extensive stromal changes must be driven, and presaged, by instructive signals emanating from the those epithelial PanIN cells. Consistent with this, interrogation of pancreas extracts 6 hours after MycERT2 activation in KMp48 mice showed clear induction of a discrete ensemble of candidate signaling molecules. While our current analysis of signaling molecules is by no means as comprehensive as recent proteome-based studies 81, our kinetic data provide unique causal information as to both the sources and sequence of signals and responses that instigate the complex PDAC tumor-stromal conglomerate. One of the earliest Myc-induced stromal changes we observe is the rapid influx of F4/80 and CD206 macrophages consistent with the cotemporaneous induction of two well-described macrophage chemoattractants – CCL2 and CCL9. Macrophages have diverse origins and functions in normal pancreas 82,83 but in PDAC, where heavy macrophage infiltration is associated with poor prognosis, tumor-associated macrophages are known to promote EMT and tumor cell migration, suppress immunity and promote recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, drive myofibroblastic trans-differentiation of stellate cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) through release of multiple secondary signals including PDGF and TGFβ, and deployment of various proteases that actively remodel stroma 55,83,84. Inhibition of macrophages through blockade of the CCR2 receptor has been shown to enhance anti-tumor immunity, slow PDAC growth and reduce metastases 55,71,85. Myc activation in KMpdx1 and KMp48 PanIN also triggered the rapid influx of Ly6B+ neutrophils. Infiltration by neutrophils (and their G-MDSC kin) in PDAC is associated with the most undifferentiated, aggressive and metastatic forms of the disease with the poorest prognosis 5:Felix, 2016 #349,86,87 and is thought to be a consequence of their secretion of multiple stromal remodeling proteases and diverse secondary signaling molecules including IL-8, GM-CSF, CCL3, CXCL10, IL-2, TNFα and oncostatin-M 59, and through suppression of T cell surveillance 70. Several studies have indicated that a pivotal role is played by CXCL5 and its neutrophil receptor CXCR2 in recruitment of neutrophils in PDAC. Indeed, elevated expression of CXCL5 is associated with the most aggressive disease while blockade of either CXCL5 or CXCR2 impedes neutrophil accumulation in PDAC, slows PDAC growth 70,71,86 and promotes influx of T lymphocytes 70. The induction of CXCL5 (Figure 3) we observe within only 6 hours post Myc activation is entirely consistent with the subsequent neutrophil influx we observe during the Myc-driven transition to PDAC. However, prompted by the previously reported role of GAS6-AXL signaling in neutrophil dynamics 88,89 and the rapid Myc-dependent induction of GAS6 (Figure 3), a member of the Protein S family of vitamin K-dependent plasma glycoproteins, we uncovered an additional signaling pathway necessary for Myc-driven neutrophil influx. GAS6 is a ligand for the TAM receptor tyrosine kinase family (Tyro3, AXL and MER) and its induction by Myc temporally correlated with appearance of phospho-AXL in a proportion of PanIN epithelial cells. Blockade of either GAS6 with low dose Warfarin 64,90 or AXL kinase with the selective AXL kinase inhibitor TP-0903 66,91,92 completely blocked Myc-induced neutrophil influx and markedly suppressed proliferation in both tumor cell and stromal compartments - most especially stellate cells - while exerting only a modest inhibitory impact macrophage infiltration (Figure 4). GAS6-AXL blockade also completely blocked the rapid influx of B220+ B cells to the peritumoral stroma that Myc triggers (Figure 4). A pivotal role for B lymphocytes has lately emerged in PDAC progression and aggression, most notably innate B1b cells, hitherto implicated in physiological processes such as microbial defense and removal of debris after tissue damage 93,94. B cells are attracted to incipient PDAC via CXCL13 and, through their release of IL-35, are thought to suppress T cell immunity 95-97, promote PDAC tumor cell proliferation and invasiveness and inhibit apoptosis 98,99. Diverse studies have demonstrated GAS6-AXL pathway activation in both tumor and stromal compartments of various solid tumors, including PDAC 81 and shown that GAS6-AXL pathway inhibition impedes growth of many cancers including PDAC 100 and promotes responses to chemotherapy 65,91,92,100,101. However, while GAS-AXL signaling is broadly implicated in regulating aspects of immunity 61,88,92,102-104 and tumor-stromal signaling 81, there is no previously described involvement of GAS6-AXL signaling in either neutrophil or B cell dynamics in PDAC. Presently, it remains unclear what the relative contribution of inhibition of each of the individual target cell populations of GAS6-AXL blockade - neutrophils, B lymphocytes or stellate cells – makes to Myc-driven PDAC progression, or whether each of these targets is affected independently or some are contingent upon another. Concomitantly with the influx of macrophage, neutrophils and B cells, Myc activation induced immediate expulsion of CD3+ T lymphocytes from PanINs and this coincided with rapid induction of surface PD-L1 on PanIN epithelial cells in vivo. PD-L1 was also induced by Myc in isolated KMpdx1 tumor cells in vitro, where ChIP analysis located Myc on the CD274 (PD-L1) gene promoter. The immediacy and cell autonomy of Myc-induced PD-L1 induction in PanIN epithelium both intimate that CD274 gene is a direct Myc target in pancreas, as suggested in some other tissues 105. Systemic blockade of PD-L1 with an appropriate antibody completely abrogated Myc-induced T cell efflux, demonstrating PD-L1 to be causally required for T cell efflux. However, the consequent persistence of intra and peritumoral CD3+ T cells exerted no discernible inhibitory impact on either PDAC cell survival or PDAC growth (not shown). These data are in accord with previous studies in both pancreas 106 and lung 54 that indicate that enforced persistence of T cells in tumors is, alone, insufficient to engage significant anti-tumor immune responses. In spontaneous PDAC, activated stellate cells are known to be the principal agents of desmoplastic deposition 8,56,57,81,107. While the role of PDAC desmoplasia in vascular compression and hypoxia is generally accepted 8,9,11,56,58,77,78,108, its influence on disease progression and response to therapy remain contentious 11,109-112. Upon acute activation of Myc, peritumoral KMpdx1 and KMp48 pancreatic stellate cells undergo trans-differentiation into highly proliferative, αSMA+ myofibroblasts. This is accompanied by progressive desmoplasia, vascular compression and onset of hypoxia and demonstrates that desmoplastic deposition is hard-wired into PDAC progression.

The final notable feature of the Myc-driven PDAC phenotype is its remarkable tissue specificity, which is quite distinct from that of adenocarcinomas induced in lung by the exact same combination of KRasG12D and switchable Myc {Kortlever, 2017 #312} (Table 1). In both pancreas and lung, the Myc-induced adenocarcinoma phenotype arises immediately following Myc activation, involves rapid onset of tumor cell proliferation and invasion, influx of macrophages and T cell exclusion, and closely mirrors the phenotypes of spontaneous adenocarcinomas arising each tissue. However, the two phenotypes differ dramatically in other respects, a difference clearly reflected in the signaling molecules deployed in each instance. Thus, rapid influx of macrophages is common to the Myc-induced adenocarcinoma transition in both pancreas and lung, consistent with the pivotal role such cells play in tissue remodeling, and this is reflected in significant commonality in the induction of the monocyte attractant CCL9, augmented in pancreas by co-induction of CCL2. Rapid, Myc-induced CD3+ T cell exclusion is also seen in both tissues and, in both cases, is dependent upon induction of PD-L1. However, the mechanism of PD-L1 deployment is tissue-specific. In pancreas, Myc induces expression of PD-L1 cell autonomously on Myc-expressing PanIN epithelial cells, most likely through direct Myc-dependent transcription. By contrast, PD-L1 is never appreciably induced in Myc-expressing lung adenoma epithelial cells themselves and is, instead, ported into incipient tumors on incoming alveolar macrophages. Another example of tissue-specificity in response to Myc is the dramatic and immediate influx of neutrophils induced by Myc in PanINs, together with activation of its requisite GAS6-AXL pathway. Both neutrophil influx and pAXL are entirely absent from lung (Figure 4 and data not shown), a tissue with already high basal levels of neutrophils. NK and B220+ B cells also exhibit different dynamics following Myc activation in each tissue: peritumoral NK cells are rapidly expelled from lung adenomas but are essentially absent from pancreas tumors while Myc induces B cell expulsion from lung adenomas but rapid influx of B cells to the tumor periphery in PanINs. Perhaps most dramatically, Myc activation in PanIN induces rapid activation and proliferation of local fibroblastic and stellate cell in pancreas, together with abundant deposition of desmoplastic stroma, blood vessel compression and hypoxia. By contrast, Myc activation in lung elicits no appreciable activation of local fibroblastic cells or significant desmoplasia and a dramatic pro-angiogenic switch fueled by macrophage-derived VEGF, which rapidly restores normoxia to the otherwise indolent, hypoxic adenomas 54.

The remarkable tissue-specificity of the complex, multi-cell lineage tumor-stroma phenotypes that the combination of KRasG12D and Myc instruct, together with the remarkable similarity of those phenotypes to those of spontaneous tumors arising in each of the same tissues, strongly supports the idea that adenocarcinoma phenotypes are principally an attribute of their host tissue rather than their peculiar ensemble of driving oncogenes. In this scenario, Ras and Myc serve as common downstream conduits of the multitude of different oncogenic mutations that lie upstream and, rather than specifying the tumor phenotype, KRasG12D and Myc instead unlock a preconfigured tissue-resident program. This notion is entirely consistent with recent studies showing that tumor cell-intrinsic factors dictate aspects of stromal biology, most notably immune dynamics 113. The likely source of this tissue-resident program is suggested by the remarkable phenotypic overlap between PDAC (spontaneous and Myc-driven) and that of regenerating pancreas following injury. Both exhibit marked acinar-ductal metaplasia, epithelial proliferation, rapid infiltration of macrophages and neutrophils, exclusion of T cells, activation of stellate cells and an extreme fibroinflammatory reaction 114-117, attributes so overtly similar as to frequently confound differential diagnosis between pancreatitis and early PDAC. Hence, we conclude that oncogenic Myc “hacks” the endogenous pancreas regenerative program.

The rapid regression of advanced, invasive KMpdx1 and KMp48 PDACs upon Myc de-activation, and of spontaneous KRasG12D-induced (and p53-deficient) mouse PDAC upon inhibition of endogenous Myc, indicates that the PDAC phenotype-notwithstanding its complexity, multifarious component cell types and abundant desmoplasia - is inherently reversible. Indeed, sustained blockade of Myc function induces the quantitative regression of even the most extensive tumor masses, restoring normal exocrine pancreas microarchitecture, albeit with a macroscopic organ structure badly disfigured by scars and cysts. There are several features of note in this remarkable PDAC regression. First, the onset of regression is immediate upon MycERT2 deactivation, proceeding with rapid kinetics comparable to those with which Myc initially drove PDAC progression. Such rapidity indicates that, like Myc protein and mRNA, key cell intrinsic and extrinsic pro-tumorigenic effectors downstream of Myc are similarly ephemeral, attenuating rapidly unless continuously re-engaged by Myc activity. Second, since Myc is de-activated only in the PDAC epithelial compartment, all induced stromal alterations associated with regression must be initiated by altered signaling originating in the PDAC epithelium. Moreover, we see no evidence whatsoever that any aspect of the PDAC tumor stroma is independent of Myc and self-sustaining. Third, macroscopic tumor regression, like its Myc-driven progression counterpart, proceeds via a complex choreography across multiple diverse cell types that, in the main, walks back the processes Myc initially induced: tumor cells withdraw from cycle and resume their prior acinar disposition, macrophages and neutrophils rapidly exit, PD-L1 expression falls and CD3+ T cells re-infiltrate, stellate cells de-activate and arrest. After a brief lag, the consequent progressive disassembly of desmoplasia relieves interstitial pressure, restoring patency to blood vessels and tissue reoxygenation. Nonetheless, regression is not a simple reversal of Myc-driven progression since it invokes processes absent from both normal pancreas and PDAC. Most obviously, Myc de-activation triggers not only arrest of proliferating tumor cells but also their death. PDAC regression also requires meticulous disassembly of the extensive PDAC desmoplasia and is accompanied by unexpected migration of B220+ cells from the PDAC tumor periphery into the regressing tumor mass itself. As with Myc-driven PDAC genesis, the rapidity, reproducibility, efficiency and tight choreography of PDAC regression all suggest it is a manifestation of some coordinated physiological process. Clues to the origin of this process come from multiple studies of the post-regenerative resolution phase of pancreas injury by which normal pancreas mass, architecture and function are restored. Such injury resolution involves ductal to acinar transdifferentiation and the involution of fibrosis, and requires both the rapid exclusion of F4/80 macrophages and neutrophils and influx of lymphocytes 114,121,122. It seems plausible that, just as activating Myc hacks into the endogenous pancreas regenerative program, inhibiting Myc (or upstream oncogenic signals) hacks into a physiological injury resolution program that evolved to terminate post-injury regeneration, prune excess cells and reinstate normal tissue architecture. Indeed, it is possible that enforced engagement of this same injury resolution program is the principal mechanism by which targeted inhibition of oncogenic signaling exerts its curative impact in cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Generation and maintenance of genetically engineered mice

LSL-KrasG12D, p48cre/+, Pdx-1-Cre, p53ERTAM, TRE-Omomyc, and Rosa26-lsl-MERT2 mice have all been previously described (Jackson 2001, Kawaguchi 2002, Hingorani 2003, Christophorou 2005, Soucek, 2008; Murphy 2008). CMVrtTA [Tg(rtTAhCMV)4Bjd/J] mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories. Mice were maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle with continuous access to food and water and in compliance with protocols approved by the UK Home Office guidelines under a project license to G.I.E. at the University of Cambridge. Deregulated Myc activity was engaged in pancreatic epithelia of KMpdx1 and KMp48 mice by daily intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich, TS648) dissolved in sunflower oil at a dose of 1 mg/20 g body mass; sunflower oil carrier was administered to control mice. In vivo, tamoxifen is metabolized by the liver into its active ligand 4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT). For long-term treatment, mice were placed on tamoxifen diet (Harlan Laboratories UK, TAM400 diet) as described 118; control mice were maintained on regular diet. Omomyc expression was systemically induced in KPO (pdx1-Cre;LSL-KRasG12D; p53ERTAM KI;TRE-Omomyc;CMVrtTA) mice by addition of doxycycline (2 mg/ml plus 5% sucrose) to their drinking water versus 5% sucrose for control mice.

Tissue preparation and histology

Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation and cardiac perfused with PBS followed by 10% neutral-buffered formalin (Sigma-Aldrich, 501320). Pancreata were removed, fixed overnight in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, stored in 70% ethanol and processed for paraffin embedding. Tissue sections (4 μM) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) using standard reagents and protocols or with Gomori’s Trichrome Stain (Polysciences, 24205), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For frozen sections, pancreata were embedded in OCT (VWR Chemicals, 361603E), frozen on dry ice and stored at –80°C.

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

For immunohistochemical (IHC) or immunofluorescence (IF) analysis, paraffin-embedded sections were de-paraffinized, rehydrated, and either boiled in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or treated with 20ug/ml Proteinase K to retrieve antigens, depending on the primary antibody used. For IF studies, OCT-embedded sections were air-dried and fixed for 30 min in 1% paraformaldehyde. Primary antibodies used were as follows: rabbit monoclonal anti-Ki67 (clone SP6) (Lab Vision, Fisher, 12603707), rat anti-ki67 (Clone SolA15, Fisher, 15237437), rat monoclonal anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, BD Pharmingen, 553076), rat monoclonal anti-neutrophils (Clone 7/4, Cedarlane, CL8993AP), rat monoclonal F4/80 (clone Cl:A3-1, Bio-Rad, MCA497R); goat polyclonal anti-MMR/CD206 (R&D Systems, AF2535); rabbit monoclonal anti-CD3 (clone SP7, ThermoFisher, RM-9107-RQ), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD274/PD-L1 (Abcam, ab58810); rat monoclonal anti-CD45R/B220 (clone RA3-6B2, ThermoFisher, MA1-70098), rabbit polyclonal anti-αSMA (Abcam, ab5694), rabbit polyclonal CD31 (Abcam, 28364), rabbit polyclonal anti-Hif1-α (Abcam, ab82832), rabbit polyclonal anti-pAXL (Y779, AF2228 R&D Systems), mouse monoclonal anti Pan-Keratin (clone C11, NEB, 4545S). Primary antibodies were incubated with sections overnight at 4°C except for anti-CD3, which was applied for 20 minutes at room temperature. For IHC analysis, primary antibodies were detected using Vectastain Elite ABC HRP Kits (Vector Laboratories: Peroxidase Rabbit IgG PK-6101, Peroxidase Rat IgG PK-6104, Peroxidase Goat IgG PK-6105) and DAB substrate (Vector Laboratories, SK-4100); slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, GHS232). For IF analysis, primary antibodies were visualized using species-appropriate cross-adsorbed secondary antibody Alexa fluor 488 or 555 conjugates (ThermoFisher scientific); slides were counterstained with Hoechst (Sigma-Aldrich, B2883) and mounted in Prolong™ Gold Antifade Mountant (ThermoFisher scientific; P36934). TUNEL staining for apoptosis was performed using the Apoptag Fluorescein in situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (Millipore; S7110) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Images were collected with a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope equipped with Axiovision Rel 4.8 software.

Mouse inflammation/Cytokine antibody Arrays and quantitative real time-PCR

Pancreata were collected at appropriate time points and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Whole pancreas protein extracts were isolated and incubated with mouse inflammation/cytokine antibody arrays (40 targets, Abcam, ab133999; 97 targets, Abcam ab169820), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Signal intensity was determined using Image J software. Differential expression of cytokine RNA was assessed by quantitative real time-PCR (RT-PCR). For this, total pancreas RNA was isolated using a Qiagen RNeasy Plus Isolation Kit followed by cDNA synthesis (High Capacity cDNA RT kit, Applied Biosystems, 4374966). RT-PCR was performed using TaqMan Universal Master Mix II (Fisher, 4440038), according to manufacturer’s protocol. Primers used were: Cxcl5 (Fisher, Mm00441260_m1), Gas6 (Fisher Mm00441242_m1), Ccl9 (Fisher, Mm00436451_g1), Ccl2 (Fisher, Mm00490378_m1), Tbp (Fisher, Mm00446973_m1), Shh (Fisher, Mm00436528_m1). Samples were analyzed in triplicate on an Eppendorf Mastercycler Realpex 2 with accompanying software. Tbp was used as an internal amplification control.

Isolation of primary mouse pancreatic cell lines and chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR analysis

Pancreatic tumors were isolated as previously described (Olive 2009), but with modifications. Briefly, 12 week-old KMpdx1 and KMp48 mice were placed on tamoxifen diet for 3 weeks. Pancreatic adenocarcinomas were then harvested, minced, and digested at 37°C in Hank’s balanced salt solution containing 2 mg/ml type V collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, C9263) for 30 min under constant agitation. Digested tumors were centrifuged and the pellet further digested with 1X Trypsin-EDTA (0.05% trypsin, 0.02% EDTA) (Sigma-Aldrich, 59418C) for 5 min. Proteases were inactivated by the addition of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (ThermoFisher Scientific, 41966-029) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (ThermoFisher Scientific, 10270106). Established cell lines were propagated in DMEM containing 10% FBS and maintained with 100nM of (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) (Sigma-Aldrich H7904) and routinely evaluated for mycoplasma contamination. For gene expression analysis, total RNA was isolated, reverse transcribed and amplified by RT-PCR as described above. Primers used were for Cd274/pdl1 (Fisher, Mm00452054_m1), Tbp (Fisher, Mm00446973_m1). Tbp was used as normalization control.

ChIP was performed as described in (Carey, 2009), with modifications. Briefly, 107 cells cultured with 100nM 4-OHT or ethanol control for 6 or 24 hours were incubated with 1% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, F8775) at room temperature for 10 min. Fixation was quenched by addition of glycine to a final concentration of 125mM for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed with ice-cold PBS, pelleted and resuspended in lysis buffer (10mM Tris-HCl pH8.0, 85mM KCl, 0.5% NP40, 1mM DTT) with protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, 11836153001). Cross-linked lysates were sonicated to shear DNA to an average fragment size of 100 to 500bp. The following antibodies were then used for immunoprecipitation: rabbit polyclonal anti-c-Myc (CST, 9402), rabbit polyclonal anti ERα (clone HC20) (Santa Cruz, sc-543), normal rabbit IgG as a background control (CST, 2729). Chromatin regions enriched by ChIP were then identified by qPCR in triplicate using SYBR Green Reaction Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, 4385616) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Pdl1 primers used for amplification were 5’-GTTTCACAGACAGCGGAGGT-3’ (forward) and 5’-CTTTAAAGTGCCCTGCAAGC-3’ (reverse) with NCBI reference sequence NM_021893.3 and described in (Noman, JEM 2014). Calculations of average cycle threshold (Ct) and standard deviation for triplicate reactions were performed and each DNA fraction normalized to its input to account for chromatin sample preparation differences.

Blocking antibodies, drug preparation, and drug study treatment groups

For PD-L1 blocking studies, KMp48 mice were injected i.p. with 160 µg of LEAF-purified anti-mouse CD274/PD-L1 (clone 10F.9G2, Biolegend, 124309) or Rat IgG2b isotype control (Clone RTK4530, Biolegend, 400644) every 2 days for 2 weeks, starting one day prior to Myc activation. Mice were euthanized after 2 weeks and pancreata harvested for histology. For CD4/CD8 blocking studies, KMp48 mice were administered tamoxifen diet for 3 weeks. Commencing four days prior to returning the mice to normal (tamoxifen-free) diet they were injected twice i.p. with 200ug of rat anti-mouse CD4 (Clone GK1.5, Bio X Cell, BE003-1) four days apart, and four times with 200ug rat anti-mouse CD8 (Clone 2.43, Bio X Cell, BE0061) every other day. Control mice were injected with an equivalent amount of rat IgG2b isotype control (Clone LTF-2, Bio X Cell, BE0090). Mice were euthanized 3 days post Myc inactivation and pancreata harvested for histological analysis.

For Warfarin blockade of Gas6, KMp48 mice were randomized to receive either normal drinking water or water supplemented with 1 mg/L warfarin (Sigma-Aldrich, A2250) starting one day prior to Myc activation. Warfarin-containing water was replenished every 2 days. Mice were euthanized 3 days following Myc activation and pancreata harvested for histology. For AXL receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition, the specific inhibitor TP-0903.tartrate (Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) was dissolved in its formulation 5% (w/v) Vitamin E TPGS + 1% (v/v) Tween 80 in water and 55 mg/kg administered by oral gavage to KMp48 mice every 2 days, starting 2 hours before initial Myc activation. Mice were euthanized 5 days later and pancreata harvested for histological analysis.

In vivo ultrasound imaging

KMp48 mice were anaesthetized by continuous infusion of 3% isofluorane using a veterinary anesthesia system (VetEquip, California). The ventral, lateral and dorsal abdominal surfaces were shaved and mice then injected i.p. with 2 ml of sterile saline. Tumors were imaged using a Vevo 2100 imaging system (Visual Sonics, Toronto, Canada). Serial images were collected at 0.2 mm intervals throughout the entire tumor. Vevo2100 v1.6.0 software was used to assess tumor size at each time point from 3D scans, identifying in the Z plane and calculating maximal width and length.

Quantification and Statistical Analysis of tumor burden

For quantification of tumor burden, H&E sections were scanned with an Aperio AT2 microscope (Leica Biosystems) at 20X magnification (resolution 0.5 microns per pixel) and analyzed with Aperio Software. Statistical significance was assessed by Mann-Whitney U test, with the mean values and the standard error of mean (SEM) calculated for each group using Prism GraphPad software. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated using the survival time for each mouse from each group, with the log-rank test used to calculate significant differences between the groups using Prism GraphPad software. Student’s t-test was employed in statistical analyses of ChIP and RT-PCR. IHC and IF staining were quantified using Fiji open source software; statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test using Prism GraphPad software; data were represented as Box-and whisker plots, which show upper extreme, upper quartile, median, lower quartile, lower extreme. p values (ns = non-significant; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001) for each group (the number of animals in each cohort varied between 4-6 for each category).

Author contributions

N.M.S and G.I.E. conceived the project. N.M.S, R.M.K., L.B.S., L.S., T.D.L., and G.I.E. designed experiments. N.M.S performed all experiments. R.M.K., V.J.A.B., L.P., T.C. and S.K. assisted with some experiments. M.J.A. did the histological analysis. N.M.S, T.D.L., and G.I.E. wrote the manuscript. G.I.E. supervised the study. All authors discussed results and revised the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Evan laboratory, Drs Daniel Van Hoff (TGEN), Ronald Evans and Michael Downes (Salk Institute), Aarthi Gopinathan and Christine Feig (Cambridge Cancer Institute), Daniel Masso (Vall d’Hebron Institute), and Fernanda Kyle Cezar (King’s College London) for invaluable discussion and advice. We thank Alessandra Perfetto and Daniel Masso for assistance with animals, Stephanie Whike for assistance with histology and the Pre-clinical Genome Editing core at the Cambridge Cancer Research Institute (CI). We thank Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for their generous gift of TP-0903. The study was supported by program grants to G.I.E. (Cancer Research UK C4750/A12077 and C4750/A19013A, European Research Council (294851), and the SU2C/CRUK/Lustgarten Foundation Transatlantic Pancreatic Cancer Dream Team C4750/A22585).

Footnotes

  • Lead contact: Gerard I. Evan

References

  1. 1.↵
    Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 64, 9–29 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Hruban, R.H., Goggins, M., Parsons, J. & Kern, S.E. Progression model for pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6, 2969–2972 (2000).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.
    Hruban, R.H. & Klimstra, D.S. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Seminars in diagnostic pathology 31, 443–451 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Maitra, A. & Hruban, R.H. Pancreatic Cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 3, 157–188 (2008).
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Bailey, P., et al. Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nature 531, 47–52 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    Witkiewicz, A.K., et al. Whole-exome sequencing of pancreatic cancer defines genetic diversity and therapeutic targets. Nature Communications 6, 6744 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Feigin, M.E., et al. Recurrent noncoding regulatory mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nature Genetics 49, 825 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Feig, C., et al. The pancreas cancer microenvironment. Clinical Cancer Research 18, 4266–4276 (2012).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Neesse, A., et al. Stromal biology and therapy in pancreatic cancer. Gut 60, 861–868 (2011).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Grippo, P.J. & Tuveson, D.A. Deploying Mouse Models of Pancreatic Cancer for Chemoprevention Studies. Cancer Prevention Research 3, 1382 (2010).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Olive, K.P., et al. Inhibition of Hedgehog Signaling Enhances Delivery of Chemotherapy in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer. Science 324, 1457–1461 (2009).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Collins, M. & Pasca Di Magliano, M. Kras as a key oncogene and therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer. Front Physiol 4, 407 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Jonckheere, N., Vasseur, R. & Van Seuningen, I. The cornerstone K-RAS mutation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: From cell signaling network, target genes, biological processes to therapeutic targeting. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 111, 7–19 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Collins, M.A., et al. Oncogenic Kras is required for both the initiation and maintenance of pancreatic cancer in mice. The Journal of clinical investigation 122, 639–653 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.
    Collins, M.A., et al. Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Is Dependent on Oncogenic Kras in Mice. PLoS ONE 7, e49707–49713 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Pettazzoni, P., et al. Genetic Events That Limit the Efficacy of MEK and RTK Inhibitor Therapies in a Mouse Model of KRAS-Driven Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Research 75, 1091–1101 (2015).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Hingorani, S.R., et al. Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell 4, 437–450 (2003).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Hingorani, S.R., et al. Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Cell 7, 469–483 (2005).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Bardeesy, N., et al. Both p16(Ink4a) and the p19(Arf)-p53 pathway constrain progression of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the mouse. Science 103, 5947–5952 (2006).
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.
    Hruban, R. Pathology of Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Pancreatic Exocrine Cancer: Consensus Report and Recommendations. Cancer Research 66, 95–106 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.
    McAllister, F., et al. Oncogenic Kras Activates a Hematopoietic-to-Epithelial IL-17 Signaling Axis in Preinvasive Pancreatic Neoplasia. Cancer Cell 25, 621–637 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Schönhuber, N., et al. A next-generation dual-recombinase system for time- and host-specific targeting of pancreatic cancer. Nature Medicine 20, 1340–1347 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Pasca di Magliano, M., et al. Hedgehog/Ras interactions regulate early stages of pancreatic cancer. Genes & Development 20, 3161–3173 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Colotta, F., Allavena, P., Sica, A., Garlanda, C. & Mantovani, A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis 30, 1073–1081 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Land, H., Parada, L.F. & Weinberg, R.A. Tumorigenic conversion of primary embryo fibroblasts requires at least two cooperating oncogenes. Nature 304, 596–602 (1983).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Sodir, N.M. & Evan, G.I. Finding cancer’s weakest link. Oncotarget 2, 1307–1313 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Kerkhoff, E., et al. Regulation of c-myc expression by Ras/Raf signalling. Oncogene 16, 211–216 (1998).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.
    Rennoll, S. & Yochum, G. Regulation of MYC gene expression by aberrant Wnt/β-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer. World J Biol Chem 6, 290–300 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.
    Weng, A.P., et al. c-Myc is an important direct target of Notch1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Genes & Development 20, 2096–2109 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.
    Yashiro-Ohtani, Y., et al. Long-range enhancer activity determines Myc sensitivity to Notch inhibitors in T cell leukemia. Science 111, E4946–E4953 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Hessmann, E., Schneider, G., Ellenrieder, V. & Siveke, J.T. MYC in pancreatic cancer: novel mechanistic insights and their translation into therapeutic strategies. 35, 1609–1618 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    Mazur, P.K., et al. Notch2 is required for progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 13438–13443 (2010).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Murtaugh, L.C., Law, A.C., Dor, Y. & Melton, D.A. β-Catenin is essential for pancreatic acinar but not islet development. Development (Cambridge, England) 132, 4663–4674 (2005).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.
    Heiser, P.W., et al. Stabilization of β-Catenin Induces Pancreas Tumor Formation. Gastroenterology 135, 1288–1300 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Wells, J.M., et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is required for development of the exocrine pancreas. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 4 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Bonal, C., et al. Pancreatic inactivation of c-Myc decreases acinar mass and transdifferentiates acinar cells into adipocytes in mice. Gastroenterology 136, 309-319.e309 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.
    Nakhai, H., Siveke, J.T., Mendoza-Torres, L. & Schmid, R.M. Conditional inactivation of Myc impairs development of the exocrine pancreas. Development (Cambridge, England) 135, 3191–3196 (2008).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.
    Skoudy, A., Hernandez-Munoz, I. & Navarro, P. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and transcription factors: role of c-Myc. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer 42, 76–84 (2011).
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    Zhou, Q., et al. A Multipotent Progenitor Domain Guides Pancreatic Organogenesis. Developmental Cell 13, 103–114 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Birnbaum, D.J., et al. Genome profiling of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 50, 456–465 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.
    Schleger, C., Verbeke, C., Hildenbrand, R., Zentgraf, H. & Bleyl, U. c-MYC activation in primary and metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: incidence, mechanisms, and clinical significance. Mod Pathol 15, 462–469 (2002).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    Bian, B., et al. Gene expression profiling of patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts predicts sensitivity to the BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1: implications for individualized medicine efforts. EMBO Molecular Medicine 9, 482–497 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    Lin, W.c., et al. Dormant Cancer Cells Contribute to Residual Disease in a Model of Reversible Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Research 73, 1821–1830 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    Sandgren, E.P., Quaife, C.J., Paulovich, A.G., Palmiter, R.D. & Brinster, R.L. Pancreatic tumor pathogenesis reflects the causative genetic lesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 93–97 (1991).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Murphy, D.J., et al. Distinct Thresholds Govern Myc’s Biological Output In Vivo. Cancer Cell 14, 447–457 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Sahai, V., et al. BET Bromodomain Inhibitors Block Growth of Pancreatic Cancer Cells in Three-Dimensional Collagen. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 13, 1907–1917 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Mazur, P.K., et al. Combined inhibition of BET family proteins and histone deacetylases as a potential epigenetics-based therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nature Medicine, 1–15 (2015).
  48. 48.↵
    Wirth, M., Mahboobi, S., Kramer, O.H. & Schneider, G. Concepts to Target MYC in Pancreatic Cancer. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 15, 1792–1798 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    Herreros-Villanueva, M. Mouse models of pancreatic cancer. World Journal of Gastroenterology 18, 1286 (2012).
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    Lawlor, E.R., et al. Reversible Kinetic Analysis of Myc Targets In vivo Provides Novel Insights into Myc-Mediated Tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 66, 4591–4601 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.
    Pelengaris, S., Khan, M. & Evan, G.I. Suppression of Myc-induced apoptosis in beta cells exposes multiple oncogenic properties of Myc and triggers carcinogenic progression. Cell 109, 321–334. (2002).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.
    Pelengaris, S., Littlewood, T., Khan, M., Elia, G. & Evan, G. Reversible activation of c-Myc in skin: induction of a complex neoplastic phenotype by a single oncogenic lesion. Mol Cell 3, 565–577 (1999).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Shchors, K., et al. The Myc-dependent angiogenic switch in tumors is mediated by interleukin 1beta. Genes & development 20, 2527–2538 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    Kortlever, R.M., et al. Myc Cooperates with Ras by Programming Inflammation and Immune Suppression. Cell 171, 1301-1315.e1314 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    Cui, R., et al. Targeting tumorassociated macrophages to combat pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 7, 50735–50754 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    Chauhan, V.P., et al. Compression of Pancreatic Tumor Blood Vessels by Hyaluronan Is Caused by Solid Stress and Not Interstitial Fluid Pressure. Cancer Cell 26, 14–15 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    DuFort, C.C., DelGiorno, K.E. & Hingorani, S.R. Mounting Pressure in the Microenvironment: Fluids, Solids, and Cells in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. 1-15 (2017).
  58. 58.↵
    Jacobetz, M.A., et al. Hyaluronan impairs vascular function and drug delivery in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Gut 62, 112 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    Felix, K. & Gaida, M.M. Neutrophil-Derived Proteases in the Microenvironment of Pancreatic Cancer-Active Players in Tumor Progression. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 12, 302–313 (2016).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    Zhou, S.-L., et al. Overexpression of CXCL5 mediates neutrophil infiltration and indicates poor prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 56, 2242–2254 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    Bauer, T., et al. Identification of Axl as a downstream effector of TGF-β1 during Langerhans cell differentiation and epidermal homeostasis. J. Exp. Med. 209, 2033–2047 (2012).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.
    Bosurgi, L., et al. Paradoxical role of the proto-oncogene Axl and Mer receptor tyrosine kinases in colon cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 13091–13096 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    Bosurgi, L., et al. Macrophage function in tissue repair and remodeling requires IL-4 or IL-13 with apoptotic cells. Science 356, 1072–1076 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    Kirane, A., et al. Warfarin Blocks Gas6-Mediated Axl Activation Required for Pancreatic Cancer Epithelial Plasticity and Metastasis. Cancer Research 75, 3699–3705 (2015).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    Park, I.-K., et al. The Axl/Gas6 pathway is required for optimal cytokine signaling during human natural killer cell development. Blood 113, 2470–2477 (2009).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    Sinha, S., et al. Targeted Axl Inhibition Primes Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia B Cells to Apoptosis and Shows Synergistic/Additive Effects in Combination with BTK Inhibitors. Clinical Cancer Research 21, 2115–2126 (2015).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    Christophorou, M.A., et al. Temporal dissection of p53 function in vitro and in vivo. Nat Genet 37, 718–726 (2005).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. 68.↵
    Soucek, L., et al. Modelling Myc inhibition as a cancer therapy. Nature 455, 679–683 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 69.↵
    Chang, J.H., Jiang, Y. & Pillarisetty, V.G. Role of immune cells in pancreatic cancer from bench to clinical application. Medicine 95, e5541–5513 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. 70.↵
    Chao, T., Furth, E.E. & Vonderheide, R.H. CXCR2-Dependent Accumulation of Tumor-Associated Neutrophils Regulates T-cell Immunity in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Immunology Research 4, 968–982 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. 71.↵
    Nywening, T.M., et al. Targeting both tumour-associated CXCR2 +neutrophils and CCR2 +macrophages disrupts myeloid recruitment and improves chemotherapeutic responses in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut, gutjnl-2017-313738-313713 (2017).
  72. 72.↵
    Große-Steffen, T., et al. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Pancreatic Tumor Cell Lines: The Role of Neutrophils and Neutrophil-Derived Elastase. Clinical and Developmental Immunology 2012, 1–12 (2012).
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    Koizumi, M., et al. Increased B Cell-Activating Factor Promotes Tumor Invasion and Metastasis in Human Pancreatic Cancer. PLoS ONE 8, e71367–71311 (2013).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. 74.
    Lee, K.E., et al. Hif1a Deletion Reveals Pro-Neoplastic Function of B Cells in Pancreatic Neoplasia. Cancer Discovery 6, 256–269 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. 75.
    Pylayeva-Gupta, Y., et al. IL35-Producing B Cells Promote the Development of Pancreatic Neoplasia. Cancer Discovery 6, 247–255 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. 76.↵
    Roghanian, A., Fraser, C., Kleyman, M. & Chen, J. B Cells Promote Pancreatic Tumorigenesis. Cancer Discovery 6, 230–232 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. 77.↵
    Erkan, M., et al. Cancer-Stellate Cell Interactions Perpetuate the Hypoxia-Fibrosis Cycle in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. NEO 11, 497–508 (2009).
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.↵
    Provenzano, P.P., et al. Enzymatic Targeting of the Stroma Ablates Physical Barriers to Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 21, 418–429 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  79. 79.↵
    Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 (2000).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  80. 80.↵
    Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  81. 81.↵
    Tape, C.J., et al. Oncogenic KRAS Regulates Tumor Cell Signaling via Stromal Reciprocation. Cell, 1–12 (2016).
  82. 82.↵
    Calderon, B., et al. The pancreas anatomy conditions the origin and properties of resident macrophages. Journal of Experimental Medicine 212, 1497–1512 (2015).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. 83.↵
    Zhu, Y., et al. Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Originate from Embryonic Hematopoiesis and Promote Tumor Progression. Immunity 47, 323-338.e326 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  84. 84.↵
    Hu, H., Jiao, F., Han, T. & Wang, L.-W. Functional significance of macrophages in pancreatic cancer biology. Tumor Biol. 36, 9119–9126 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  85. 85.↵
    Sanford, D.E., et al. Inflammatory monocyte mobilization decreases patient survival in pancreatic cancer: a role for targeting the CCL2/CCR2 axis. Clinical Cancer Research 19, 3404–3415 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. 86.↵
    Li, A., et al. Overexpression of CXCL5 Is Associated With Poor Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. The American Journal of Pathology 178, 1340–1349 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  87. 87.
    Reid, M.D., et al. Tumor-infiltrating neutrophils in pancreatic neoplasia. Mod Pathol 24, 1612–1619 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. 88.↵
    Giangola, M.D., et al. Growth Arrest–Specific Protein 6 Attenuates Neutrophil Migration and Acute Lung Injury in Sepsis. Shock 40, 485–491 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  89. 89.↵
    Korshunov, V.A. Axl, A Receptor Tyrosine Kinase, Mediates Flow-Induced Vascular Remodeling. Circulation Research 98, 1446–1452 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. 90.↵
    Korshunov, V.A., Mohan, A.M., Georger, M.A. & Berk, B.C. Axl, a receptor tyrosine kinase, mediates flow-induced vascular remodeling. Circulation Research 98, 1446–1452 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. 91.↵
    Aveic, S., et al. TP-0903 inhibits neuroblastoma cell growth and enhances the sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy. European journal of pharmacology 818, 435–448 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  92. 92.↵
    Park, I.K., et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase Axl is required for resistance of leukemic cells to FLT3-targeted therapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 29, 2382–2389 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.↵
    Cunningham, A.F., et al. B1b cells recognize protective antigens after natural infection and vaccination. Front Immunol 5, 535 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  94. 94.↵
    Rothstein, T.L., Griffin, D.O., Holodick, N.E., Quach, T.D. & Kaku, H. Human B-1 cells take the stage. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1285, 97–114 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    Mirlekar, B., Michaud, D., Searcy, R., Greene, K. & Pylayeva-Gupta, Y. IL-35 hinders endogenous anti-tumor T cell immunity and responsiveness to immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunology Research, canimm.0710.2017-0735 (2018).
  96. 96.
    Turnis, M.E., et al. Interleukin-35 Limits Anti-Tumor Immunity. Immunity, 1–26 (2016).
  97. 97.↵
    Gunderson, A.J., et al. Bruton Tyrosine Kinase-Dependent Immune Cell Cross-talk Drives Pancreas Cancer. Cancer Discovery 6, 270–285 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  98. 98.↵
    Huang, C., et al. Tumour-derived Interleukin 35 promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell extravasation and metastasis by inducing ICAM1 expression. Nature Communications 8, 1–15 (0001).
    OpenUrl
  99. 99.↵
    Nicholl, M.B., et al. IL-35 promotes pancreas cancer growth through enhancement of proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis: Evidence for a role as an autocrine growth factor. Cytokine 70, 126–133 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. 100.↵
    Leconet, W., et al. Preclinical validation of AXL receptor as a target for antibody-based pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. 33, 5405–5414 (2013).
    OpenUrl
  101. 101.↵
    Kariolis, M.S., et al. Inhibition of the GAS6/AXL pathway augments the efficacy of chemotherapies. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 183–198 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  102. 102.↵
    Guo, Z., Li, Y., Zhang, D. & Ma, J. Axl inhibition induces the antitumor immune response which can be further potentiated by PD-1 blockade in the mouse cancer models. Oncotarget 8, 89761–89774 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  103. 103.
    Paccez, J.D., et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase Axl is an essential regulator of prostate cancer proliferation and tumor growth and represents a new therapeutic target. Oncogene 32, 689–698 (2012).
    OpenUrl
  104. 104.↵
    Schmid, E.T., et al. AXL receptor tyrosine kinase is required for T cell priming and antiviral immunity. eLife 5, e12414 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. 105.↵
    Casey, S.C., et al. MYC regulates the antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1. Science 352, 227–231 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  106. 106.↵
    Feig, C., et al. Targeting CXCL12 from FAP-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts synergizes with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 20212–20217 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  107. 107.↵
    Apte, M.V., Wilson, J.S., Lugea, A. & Pandol, S.J. A Starring Role for Stellate Cells in the Pancreatic Cancer Microenvironment. YGAST 144, 1210–1219 (2013).
    OpenUrl
  108. 108.↵
    Wehr, A.Y., Furth, E.E., Sangar, V., Blair, I.A. & Yu, K.H. Analysis of the human pancreatic stellate cell secreted proteome. Pancreas 40, 557–566 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. 109.↵
    Carr, R.M. & Fernandez-Zapico, M.E. Pancreatic cancer microenvironment, to target or not to target? EMBO Molecular Medicine 8, 80–82 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  110. 110.
    Lee, J.J., et al. Stromal response to Hedgehog signaling restrains pancreatic cancer progression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, E3091–E3100 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  111. 111.
    Özdemir, B.C., et al. Depletion of Carcinoma-Associated Fibroblasts and Fibrosis Induces Immunosuppression and Accelerates Pancreas Cancer with Reduced Survival. Cancer Cell 25, 719–734 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  112. 112.↵
    Rhim, A.D., et al. Stromal Elements Act to Restrain, Rather Than Support, Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 25, 735–747 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  113. 113.↵
    Li, J., et al. Tumor Cell-Intrinsic Factors Underlie Heterogeneity of Immune Cell Infiltration and Response to Immunotherapy. Immunity 49, 178-193.e177 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  114. 114.↵
    Folias, A.E., Penaranda, C., Su, A.L., Bluestone, J.A. & Hebrok, M. Aberrant Innate Immune Activation following Tissue Injury Impairs Pancreatic Regeneration. PLoS ONE 9, e102125 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. 115.
    Klöppel, G. & Adsay, N.V. Chronic pancreatitis and the differential diagnosis versus pancreatic cancer. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 133, 382–387 (2009).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  116. 116.
    Sugumar, A. & Chari, S.T. Distinguishing Pancreatic Cancer From Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Comparison of Two Strategies. YJCGH 7, S59–S62 (2009).
    OpenUrl
  117. 117.↵
    1. Grippo, P.J. &
    2. Munshi, H.G.
    Phillips, P. Pancreatic stellate cells and fibrosis. in Pancreatic Cancer and Tumor Microenvironment (eds. Grippo, P.J. & Munshi, H.G.) (Transworld Research Network, Transworld Research Network., Trivandrum (India), 2012).
  118. 118.↵
    Wilson, C.H., et al. The kinetics of ER fusion protein activation in vivo. Oncogene 33, 4877–4880 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. 119.
    Sodir, N.M., et al. Endogenous Myc maintains the tumor microenvironment. Genes & Development 25, 907–916 (2011).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  120. 120.
    Soucek, L., et al. Inhibition of Myc family proteins eradicates KRas-driven lung cancer in mice. Genes & Development 27, 504–513 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  121. 121.↵
    Murtaugh, L.C. & Keefe, M.D. Regeneration and Repair of the Exocrine Pancreas. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 77, 229–249 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. 122.↵
    Westphalen, C.B., Renz, B., Reichert, M., Rustgi, A. & Wang, T.C. Cellular Plasticity and Heterogeneity in Pancreatic Regeneration and Malignancy. Can Cell Microenviron 3, 1–8 (2017).
    OpenUrl
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 21, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Myc instructs and maintains pancreatic adenocarcinoma phenotype
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Myc instructs and maintains pancreatic adenocarcinoma phenotype
Nicole M. Sodir, Roderik M. Kortlever, Valentin J.A. Barthet, Luca Pellegrinet, Tania Campos, Steven Kupczak, Lamorna Brown Swigart, Laura Soucek, Mark J. Arends, Trevor D. Littlewood, Gerard I. Evan
bioRxiv 556399; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/556399
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Myc instructs and maintains pancreatic adenocarcinoma phenotype
Nicole M. Sodir, Roderik M. Kortlever, Valentin J.A. Barthet, Luca Pellegrinet, Tania Campos, Steven Kupczak, Lamorna Brown Swigart, Laura Soucek, Mark J. Arends, Trevor D. Littlewood, Gerard I. Evan
bioRxiv 556399; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/556399

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cancer Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4246)
  • Biochemistry (9176)
  • Bioengineering (6807)
  • Bioinformatics (24066)
  • Biophysics (12160)
  • Cancer Biology (9567)
  • Cell Biology (13847)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7661)
  • Ecology (11739)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15547)
  • Genetics (10673)
  • Genomics (14366)
  • Immunology (9515)
  • Microbiology (22916)
  • Molecular Biology (9135)
  • Neuroscience (49170)
  • Paleontology (358)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2584)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8351)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2301)
  • Systems Biology (6207)
  • Zoology (1304)