Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing

Alexey Gorbachev, Nikolay Kulemin, Vladimir Naumov, Vera Belova, Dmitriy Kwon, Denis Rebrikov, View ORCID ProfileDmitriy Korostin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/577080
Alexey Gorbachev
Zenome.io, Ltd., Moscow, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikolay Kulemin
Zenome.io, Ltd., Moscow, RussiaPirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vladimir Naumov
Zenome.io, Ltd., Moscow, RussiaNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I. Kulakov, Moscow, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vera Belova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dmitriy Kwon
Company Helicon, Ltd., Moscow, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denis Rebrikov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, RussiaNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I. Kulakov, Moscow, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dmitriy Korostin
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dmitriy Korostin
  • For correspondence: d.korostin@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background MGISEQ-2000 developed by MGI Tech Co. Ltd. (a subsidiary of the BGI Group) is a new competitor of such next-generation sequencing platforms as NovaSeq and HiSeq (Illumina). Its sequencing principle relies on the DNB and cPAS technologies also used in the previous version of the BGISEQ-500 device, but the reagents for MGISEQ-2000 are refined and the platform utilizes updated software. The cPAS technology has evolved from cPAL previously created by Complete Genomics.

Findings This article compares the results of the whole-genome sequencing of a DNA sample from a Russian female donor performed on MGISEQ-2000 and Illumina HiSeq 2500 (both PE150). Two platforms were compared in terms of sequencing quality, number of errors and performance. Additionally, we did variant calling using four different software packages: Samtools mpileaup, Strelka2, Sentieon, and GATK.

Conclusions The accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection was similar between the data generated by MGISEQ-2000 and HiSeq 2500, which was used as a reference:

For Samtools mpileaup software package: TPR (Sensitivity) 99.30%, FPR = 0,000498%;

For Strelka2 software package: TPR (Sensitivity) 99,51%, FPR = 0,000254%;

For Sentieon software package: TPR (Sensitivity) 99,57%, FPR = 0,000285%.

For GATK software package: TPR (Sensitivity) 98,70%, FPR = 0,000240%.

At the same time, a separate indel analysis of the overall error rate revealed similar FPR values and lower sensitivity:

For Samtools mpileup: TPR (Sensitivity) 93,62%, FPR = 0,000698%;

For Strelka2: TPR (Sensitivity) 98,84%, FPR = 0,000127%;

For Sentieon: TPR (Sensitivity) 98,68%, FPR = 0,000285%.

For GATK: TPR (Sensitivity) - 98,70%, FPR = 0,000240%.

The method of statistical analysis we use does not allow us to conclusively establish which of the two instruments is the most accurate. However, it can be said with confidence that the data generated by the analyzed sequencing systems are characterized by the comparable magnitude of error and that MGISEQ-2000 can be used for a wide range of research tasks on a par with HiSeq 2500.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 04, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
Share
Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing
Alexey Gorbachev, Nikolay Kulemin, Vladimir Naumov, Vera Belova, Dmitriy Kwon, Denis Rebrikov, Dmitriy Korostin
bioRxiv 577080; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/577080
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing
Alexey Gorbachev, Nikolay Kulemin, Vladimir Naumov, Vera Belova, Dmitriy Kwon, Denis Rebrikov, Dmitriy Korostin
bioRxiv 577080; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/577080

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (1526)
  • Biochemistry (2480)
  • Bioengineering (1739)
  • Bioinformatics (9683)
  • Biophysics (3903)
  • Cancer Biology (2972)
  • Cell Biology (4195)
  • Clinical Trials (135)
  • Developmental Biology (2627)
  • Ecology (4102)
  • Epidemiology (2031)
  • Evolutionary Biology (6898)
  • Genetics (5206)
  • Genomics (6501)
  • Immunology (2184)
  • Microbiology (6945)
  • Molecular Biology (2752)
  • Neuroscience (17282)
  • Paleontology (126)
  • Pathology (427)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (706)
  • Physiology (1057)
  • Plant Biology (2489)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (643)
  • Synthetic Biology (831)
  • Systems Biology (2690)
  • Zoology (430)