Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Detection of EGFR deletion using unique RepSeq technology

Thuraiayah Vinayagamoorthy, View ORCID ProfileDahui Qin, Fei Ye, Minghao Zhong
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/584045
Thuraiayah Vinayagamoorthy
1MultiGEN Diagnostics Inc.1100, Revolution Mills Drive, Greensboro, NC 27405
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dahui Qin
2Molecular Diagnostic Lab, Moffitt Cancer Center, 10902 N. McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL 33612
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dahui Qin
Fei Ye
3Department of Pathology, Westchester Medical Center, Macy Pavilion, Room# 1435 100 Woods, Rd. Valhalla, NY 10595
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minghao Zhong
3Department of Pathology, Westchester Medical Center, Macy Pavilion, Room# 1435 100 Woods, Rd. Valhalla, NY 10595
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

We are reporting a novel sequencing technology, RepSeq (Repetitive Sequence), that has high sensitivity, specificity and quick turn-around time. This new sequencing technology is developed by modifying traditional Sanger sequencing technology in several aspects. The first, a homopolymer tail is added to the PCR primer(s), which makes interpreting electropherograms a lot easier than that in traditional Sanger sequencing. The second, an indicator nucleotide is added at the 5’end of the homopolymer tail. In the presence of a deletion, the position of the indicator nucleotide in relation to the wild type confirms the deletion. At the same time, the indicator of the wild type serves as the internal control. Furthermore, the specific design of the PCR and/or sequencing primers will specifically enrich/select mutant alleles, which increases sensitivity and specificity significantly. Based on serial dilution studies, the analytical lower limit of detection was 1.47 copies. A total of 89 samples were tested for EGFR exon 19 deletion, of which 21 were normal blood samples and 68 were samples previously tested by either pyrosequencing or TruSeq Next Generation Sequencing Cancer Panel. There was 100 % concordance among all the samples tested. RepSeq technology has overcome the shortcomings of Sanger sequencing and offers an easy-to-use novel sequencing method for personalized precision medicine.

Footnotes

  • Sources of support: The study was supported by Select MultiGEN Diagnostics Thuraiayah Vinayagamoorthy is an employee of Select MultiGEN Diagnostics Inc.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 20, 2019.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detection of EGFR deletion using unique RepSeq technology
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Detection of EGFR deletion using unique RepSeq technology
Thuraiayah Vinayagamoorthy, Dahui Qin, Fei Ye, Minghao Zhong
bioRxiv 584045; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/584045
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Detection of EGFR deletion using unique RepSeq technology
Thuraiayah Vinayagamoorthy, Dahui Qin, Fei Ye, Minghao Zhong
bioRxiv 584045; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/584045

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3502)
  • Biochemistry (7343)
  • Bioengineering (5319)
  • Bioinformatics (20258)
  • Biophysics (10008)
  • Cancer Biology (7735)
  • Cell Biology (11293)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6434)
  • Ecology (9947)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13315)
  • Genetics (9359)
  • Genomics (12579)
  • Immunology (7696)
  • Microbiology (19008)
  • Molecular Biology (7437)
  • Neuroscience (41011)
  • Paleontology (300)
  • Pathology (1228)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2134)
  • Physiology (3155)
  • Plant Biology (6858)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1272)
  • Synthetic Biology (1895)
  • Systems Biology (5311)
  • Zoology (1087)