Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Integrative taxonomy confirms the species status of the Himalayan langurs, Semnopithecus schistaceus Hodgson 1840

View ORCID ProfileKunal Arekar, S. Sathyakumar, K. Praveen Karanth
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/602243
Kunal Arekar
aCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
bWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun 248001, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kunal Arekar
  • For correspondence: kunal.cyan@gmail.com
S. Sathyakumar
bWildlife Institute of India, Dehradun 248001, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Praveen Karanth
aCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Taxonomy is replete with groups where the species identity and classification remain unresolved. One such group is the widely distributed Hanuman langur (Colobinae: Semnopithecus). For most part of the last century, Hanuman langur was considered to be a single species with multiple subspecies. Nevertheless, recent studies using an integrative taxonomy approach suggested that this taxon is a complex, with at least three species. However, these studies did not include the Himalayan population of the Hanuman langur whose taxonomic status remains unresolved. The Himalayan population of Hanuman langurs have been classified as a distinct species with multiple subspecies or have been subsumed into other species. These classification schemes are wholly based on morphological characters and which are sometimes insufficient to delimit different species. Here, we have integrated data from multiple sources viz. morphology, DNA, and ecology to resolve the taxonomy of the Himalayan langur and to understand its distribution limit. Our results with three lines of evidence corresponding to three different species concepts show that Himalayan langur is a distinct species from S. entellus of the plains. Additionally, these results did not show any support for splitting of the Himalayan langur into multiple subspecies. Our study supports the classification proposed by Hill (1939) and we recommend Semnopithecus schistaceus, Hodgson 1840 as species name for the Himalayan langur and subsume all the known subspecies into it.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 12, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Integrative taxonomy confirms the species status of the Himalayan langurs, Semnopithecus schistaceus Hodgson 1840
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Integrative taxonomy confirms the species status of the Himalayan langurs, Semnopithecus schistaceus Hodgson 1840
Kunal Arekar, S. Sathyakumar, K. Praveen Karanth
bioRxiv 602243; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/602243
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Integrative taxonomy confirms the species status of the Himalayan langurs, Semnopithecus schistaceus Hodgson 1840
Kunal Arekar, S. Sathyakumar, K. Praveen Karanth
bioRxiv 602243; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/602243

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4866)
  • Biochemistry (10824)
  • Bioengineering (8069)
  • Bioinformatics (27386)
  • Biophysics (14030)
  • Cancer Biology (11167)
  • Cell Biology (16107)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8809)
  • Ecology (13333)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (17401)
  • Genetics (11706)
  • Genomics (15964)
  • Immunology (11064)
  • Microbiology (26173)
  • Molecular Biology (10686)
  • Neuroscience (56751)
  • Paleontology (422)
  • Pathology (1737)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3012)
  • Physiology (4570)
  • Plant Biology (9671)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1617)
  • Synthetic Biology (2699)
  • Systems Biology (6997)
  • Zoology (1515)