Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Cortical Sensitivity to Natural Scene Structure

View ORCID ProfileDaniel Kaiser, Greta Häberle, Radoslaw M. Cichy
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/613885
Daniel Kaiser
1Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel Kaiser
  • For correspondence: danielkaiser.net@gmail.com
Greta Häberle
1Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Radoslaw M. Cichy
1Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Berlin, Germany
3Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
4Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Natural scenes are inherently structured, with meaningful objects appearing in predictable locations. Human vision is tuned to this structure: When scene structure is purposefully jumbled, perception is strongly impaired. Here, we tested how such perceptual effects are reflected in neural sensitivity to scene structure. During separate fMRI and EEG experiments, participants passively viewed scenes whose spatial structure (i.e., the position of scene parts) and categorical structure (i.e., the content of scene parts) could be intact or jumbled. Using multivariate decoding, we show that spatial (but not categorical) scene structure profoundly impacts on cortical processing: Scene-selective responses in occipital and parahippocampal cortices (fMRI) and after 255ms (EEG) accurately differentiated between spatially intact and jumbled scenes. Importantly, this differentiation was more pronounced for upright than for inverted scenes, indicating genuine sensitivity to spatial structure rather than sensitivity to low-level attributes. This sensitivity to spatial structure may support efficient natural scene understanding.

Footnotes

  • We thank Sina Schwarze for help in EEG data collection and manuscript preparation.

  • D.K. and R.M.C. are supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grants (KA4683/2-1, CI241/1-1, CI241/3-1). R.M.C. is supported by a European Research Council Starting Grant (ERC-2018-StG 803370).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 12, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cortical Sensitivity to Natural Scene Structure
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cortical Sensitivity to Natural Scene Structure
Daniel Kaiser, Greta Häberle, Radoslaw M. Cichy
bioRxiv 613885; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/613885
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Cortical Sensitivity to Natural Scene Structure
Daniel Kaiser, Greta Häberle, Radoslaw M. Cichy
bioRxiv 613885; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/613885

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4369)
  • Biochemistry (9543)
  • Bioengineering (7068)
  • Bioinformatics (24765)
  • Biophysics (12559)
  • Cancer Biology (9923)
  • Cell Biology (14296)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7929)
  • Ecology (12073)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15952)
  • Genetics (10901)
  • Genomics (14704)
  • Immunology (9841)
  • Microbiology (23580)
  • Molecular Biology (9453)
  • Neuroscience (50691)
  • Paleontology (369)
  • Pathology (1535)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2674)
  • Physiology (3996)
  • Plant Biology (8638)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1505)
  • Synthetic Biology (2388)
  • Systems Biology (6413)
  • Zoology (1344)