Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Distentangling the systems contributing to changes in learning during adolescence

Sarah L. Master, Maria K. Eckstein, Neta Gotlieb, Ronald Dahl, Linda Wilbrecht, Anne G.E. Collins
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/622860
Sarah L. Master
1UC Berkeley;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria K. Eckstein
1UC Berkeley;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neta Gotlieb
1UC Berkeley;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Dahl
1UC Berkeley;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Wilbrecht
1UC Berkeley;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne G.E. Collins
2University of California, Berkeley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: annecollins@berkeley.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Multiple neurocognitive systems contribute simultaneously to learning. For example, dopamine and basal ganglia (BG) systems are thought to support reinforcement learning (RL) by incrementally updating the value of choices, while the prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributes different computations, such as actively maintaining precise information in working memory (WM). It is commonly thought that WM and PFC show more protracted development than RL and BG systems, yet their contributions are rarely assessed in tandem. Here, we used a simple learning task to test how RL and WM contribute to changes in learning across adolescence. We tested 187 subjects ages 8 to 17 and 53 adults (25-30). Participants learned stimulus-action associations from feedback; the learning load was varied to be within or exceed WM capacity. Participants age 8-12 learned slower than participants age 13-17, and were more sensitive to load. We used computational modeling to estimate subjects’ use of WM and RL processes. Surprisingly, we found more robust changes in RL than WM during development. RL learning rate increased significantly with age across adolescence and WM parameters showed more subtle changes, many of them early in adolescence. These results underscore the importance of changes in RL processes for the developmental science of learning.

Highlights

  • - Subjects combine reinforcement learning (RL) and working memory (WM) to learn

  • - Computational modeling shows RL learning rates grew with age during adolescence

  • - When load was beyond WM capacity, weaker RL compensated less in younger adolescents

  • - WM parameters showed subtler and more puberty-related changes

  • - WM reliance, maintenance, and capacity had separable developmental trajectories

  • - Underscores importance of RL processes in developmental changes in learning

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 30, 2019.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Distentangling the systems contributing to changes in learning during adolescence
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Distentangling the systems contributing to changes in learning during adolescence
Sarah L. Master, Maria K. Eckstein, Neta Gotlieb, Ronald Dahl, Linda Wilbrecht, Anne G.E. Collins
bioRxiv 622860; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/622860
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Distentangling the systems contributing to changes in learning during adolescence
Sarah L. Master, Maria K. Eckstein, Neta Gotlieb, Ronald Dahl, Linda Wilbrecht, Anne G.E. Collins
bioRxiv 622860; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/622860

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2646)
  • Biochemistry (5269)
  • Bioengineering (3678)
  • Bioinformatics (15796)
  • Biophysics (7257)
  • Cancer Biology (5629)
  • Cell Biology (8099)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4768)
  • Ecology (7518)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10578)
  • Genetics (7733)
  • Genomics (10137)
  • Immunology (5194)
  • Microbiology (13915)
  • Molecular Biology (5387)
  • Neuroscience (30785)
  • Paleontology (215)
  • Pathology (879)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1525)
  • Physiology (2254)
  • Plant Biology (5024)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1041)
  • Synthetic Biology (1388)
  • Systems Biology (4148)
  • Zoology (812)