Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

An active inference approach to modeling structure learning: concept learning as an example case

Ryan Smith, Philipp Schwartenbeck, Thomas Parr, Karl J. Friston
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/633677
Ryan Smith
1Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rsmith@laureateinstitute.org
Philipp Schwartenbeck
2Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Parr
2Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karl J. Friston
2Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Within computational neuroscience, the algorithmic and neural basis of structure learning remains poorly understood. Concept learning is one primary example, which requires both a type of internal model expansion process (adding novel hidden states that explain new observations), and a model reduction process (merging different states into one underlying cause and thus reducing model complexity via meta-learning). Although various algorithmic models of concept learning have been proposed within machine learning and cognitive science, many are limited to various degrees by an inability to generalize, the need for very large amounts of training data, and/or insufficiently established biological plausibility. Using concept learning as an example case, we introduce a novel approach for modeling structure learning – and specifically state-space expansion and reduction – within the active inference framework and its accompanying neural process theory. Our aim is to demonstrate its potential to facilitate a novel line of active inference research in this area. The approach we lay out is based on the idea that a generative model can be equipped with extra (hidden state or cause) ‘slots’ that can be engaged when an agent learns about novel concepts. This can be combined with a Bayesian model reduction process, in which any concept learning – associated with these slots – can be reset in favor of a simpler model with higher model evidence. We use simulations to illustrate this model’s ability to add new concepts to its state space (with relatively few observations) and increase the granularity of the concepts it currently possesses. We also simulate the predicted neural basis of these processes. We further show that it can accomplish a simple form of ‘one-shot’ generalization to new stimuli. Although deliberately simple, these simulation results highlight ways in which active inference could offer useful resources in developing neurocomputational models of structure learning. They provide a template for how future active inference research could apply this approach to real-world structure learning problems and assess the added utility it may offer.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Added further simulations of Bayesian model reduction and a few other edits as a part of ongoing peer review.

  • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333004441_An_active_inference_approach_to_modeling_structure_learning_concept_learning_as_an_example_case

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 13, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An active inference approach to modeling structure learning: concept learning as an example case
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
An active inference approach to modeling structure learning: concept learning as an example case
Ryan Smith, Philipp Schwartenbeck, Thomas Parr, Karl J. Friston
bioRxiv 633677; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/633677
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
An active inference approach to modeling structure learning: concept learning as an example case
Ryan Smith, Philipp Schwartenbeck, Thomas Parr, Karl J. Friston
bioRxiv 633677; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/633677

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (5134)
  • Biochemistry (11523)
  • Bioengineering (8591)
  • Bioinformatics (28774)
  • Biophysics (14749)
  • Cancer Biology (11889)
  • Cell Biology (17087)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (9282)
  • Ecology (13985)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (18086)
  • Genetics (12123)
  • Genomics (16580)
  • Immunology (11670)
  • Microbiology (27598)
  • Molecular Biology (11348)
  • Neuroscience (59937)
  • Paleontology (447)
  • Pathology (1841)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (3173)
  • Physiology (4863)
  • Plant Biology (10237)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1668)
  • Synthetic Biology (2832)
  • Systems Biology (7275)
  • Zoology (1607)