Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Contradictory Results

Inverted encoding models estimate sensible channel responses for sensible models

Thomas C. Sprague, Geoffrey M. Boynton, John T. Serences
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/642710
Thomas C. Sprague
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tsprague@ucsb.edu jserences@ucsd.edu
Geoffrey M. Boynton
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John T. Serences
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109Kavli Foundation for the Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tsprague@ucsb.edu jserences@ucsd.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In a commentary published in eNeuro, Gardner & Liu (2019) discuss the role of model specification in interpreting the output of complex models of neural data. As a case study, they suggest that one variant of such analyses, the inverted encoding model (IEM) analysis framework, should not be used to assay properties of “stimulus representations” because the ability to apply linear transformations at various stages of the analysis procedure renders results ‘arbitrary’. As we discuss, the specification of all models is arbitrary to the extent that an experimenter makes choices based on current knowledge of the model system. However, the results derived from any given model, such as the reconstructed channel response profiles obtained from an IEM analysis, are uniquely defined and are arbitrary only in the sense that changes in the model can predictably change results. Moreover, with knowledge of the model used for IEM analyses, the results remain informative as comparisons between reconstructed channel response profiles across task conditions using a fixed encoding model – the most common use of the IEM technique – can generally capture changes in population-level representation magnitude across linear transformations. Thus, changes in the magnitude of the response profiles across conditions are preserved, even across unprincipled linear transforms. IEM-based channel response profiles should therefore not be considered arbitrary when the model is clearly specified and guided by our best understanding of neural population representations in the brain regions being analyzed. Intuitions derived from this case study are important to consider when interpreting results from all model-based analyses, which are similarly contingent upon the specification of the models used.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 21, 2019.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inverted encoding models estimate sensible channel responses for sensible models
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
Share
Inverted encoding models estimate sensible channel responses for sensible models
Thomas C. Sprague, Geoffrey M. Boynton, John T. Serences
bioRxiv 642710; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/642710
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Inverted encoding models estimate sensible channel responses for sensible models
Thomas C. Sprague, Geoffrey M. Boynton, John T. Serences
bioRxiv 642710; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/642710

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (1647)
  • Biochemistry (2739)
  • Bioengineering (1907)
  • Bioinformatics (10243)
  • Biophysics (4183)
  • Cancer Biology (3218)
  • Cell Biology (4539)
  • Clinical Trials (135)
  • Developmental Biology (2840)
  • Ecology (4461)
  • Epidemiology (2041)
  • Evolutionary Biology (7231)
  • Genetics (5477)
  • Genomics (6813)
  • Immunology (2390)
  • Microbiology (7485)
  • Molecular Biology (2993)
  • Neuroscience (18584)
  • Paleontology (136)
  • Pathology (472)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (780)
  • Physiology (1150)
  • Plant Biology (2706)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (680)
  • Synthetic Biology (888)
  • Systems Biology (2846)
  • Zoology (468)