Abstract
Recently proposed tumor fitness measures, based on profiling neoepitopes for reactive viral epitope similarity, have been proposed to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma and small-cell lung cancer. Here we apply these checkpoint based fitness measures measures to the matched checkpoint treatment naive TCGA samples where cytolytic activity imparts a known survival benefit. We observed no significant survival predictive power beyond that of overall patient tumor mutation burden, and furthermore, found no association between checkpoint based fitness and tumor T-cell infiltration, cytolytic activity (CYT), and abundance (TIL burden). In addition, we investigated the key assumption of viral epitope similarity driving immune response in the hepatitis B virally infected liver cancer TCGA cohort, and uncover suggestive evidence that tumor neoepitopes actually dominate viral epitopes in putative immunogenicity and plausibly drive immune response and recruitment.
Footnotes
Updates to text for additional clarity, as well as additional statistical analysis section; Streamlined references; Major updates to figures and additional supplementary figures.