Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder-decoder framework

View ORCID ProfileJoseph G. Makin, View ORCID ProfileDavid A. Moses, Edward F. Chang
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/708206
Joseph G. Makin
1Center for Integrative Neuroscience/Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joseph G. Makin
  • For correspondence: makin@phy.ucsf.edu edward.chang@ucsf.edu
David A. Moses
1Center for Integrative Neuroscience/Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David A. Moses
Edward F. Chang
1Center for Integrative Neuroscience/Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: makin@phy.ucsf.edu edward.chang@ucsf.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

A decade after the first successful attempt to decode speech directly from human brain signals, accuracy and speed remain far below that of natural speech or typing. Here we show how to achieve high accuracy from the electrocorticogram at natural-speech rates, even with few data (on the order of half an hour of spoken speech). Taking a cue from recent advances in machine translation and automatic speech recognition, we train a recurrent neural network to map neural signals directly to word sequences (sentences). In particular, the network first encodes a sentence-length sequence of neural activity into an abstract representation, and then decodes this representation, word by word, into an English sentence. For each participant, training data consist of several spoken repeats of a set of some 30-50 sentences, along with the corresponding neural signals at each of about 250 electrodes distributed over peri-Sylvian speech cortices. Average word error rates across a validation (held-out) sentence set are as low as 7% for some participants, as compared to the previous state of the art of greater than 60%. Finally, we show how to use transfer learning to overcome limitations on data availability: Training certain components of the network under multiple participants’ data, while keeping other components (e.g., the first hidden layer) “proprietary,” can improve decoding performance—despite very different electrode coverage across participants.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 22, 2019.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder-decoder framework
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder-decoder framework
Joseph G. Makin, David A. Moses, Edward F. Chang
bioRxiv 708206; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/708206
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder-decoder framework
Joseph G. Makin, David A. Moses, Edward F. Chang
bioRxiv 708206; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/708206

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3506)
  • Biochemistry (7348)
  • Bioengineering (5324)
  • Bioinformatics (20266)
  • Biophysics (10020)
  • Cancer Biology (7744)
  • Cell Biology (11306)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6437)
  • Ecology (9954)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13325)
  • Genetics (9361)
  • Genomics (12587)
  • Immunology (7702)
  • Microbiology (19027)
  • Molecular Biology (7444)
  • Neuroscience (41049)
  • Paleontology (300)
  • Pathology (1230)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2138)
  • Physiology (3161)
  • Plant Biology (6861)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1273)
  • Synthetic Biology (1897)
  • Systems Biology (5313)
  • Zoology (1089)