Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Contradictory Results

Contextualising UK moorland burning studies: geographical versus potential sponsorship-bias effects on research conclusions

View ORCID ProfileLee E. Brown, View ORCID ProfileJoseph Holden
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/731117
Lee E. Brown
water@leeds, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lee E. Brown
Joseph Holden
water@leeds, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joseph Holden
  • For correspondence: j.holden@leeds.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

  1. It has recently been claimed that geographical variability resulted in false conclusions from some studies examining the impacts of prescribed moorland burning, including the Effects of Moorland Burning on the Ecohydrology of River basins (EMBER) project. We provide multiple lines of evidence to contradict these claims and show that the EMBER results are reliable.

  2. A systematic review of the literature also confirms that EMBER conclusions were not out of line with the majority of other published UK studies on responses to prescribed burning of Sphagnum growth/abundance, soil properties, hydrological change, or peat exposure and erosion.

  3. We suggest that sponsorship-bias is associated with some recent research conclusions related to moorland burning. Thus, it is of grave concern when sponsorship or other potential conflicts of interest are not declared on publications related to moorland burning.

  4. We show that sponsorship and other conflicts of interest were not declared on a recent publication that criticised the EMBER project, thereby entirely undermining that critical assessment.

  5. Policy implications: The EMBER findings are robust. Our study suggests that publications on moorland burning that have been funded by pro-burning groups should be treated with extreme caution by the policy community. Publications that have been shown to have failed to declare conflicts of interest from the outset, when first submitted to a journal, should be disregarded by the policy community because peer reviewers and editors may have been unable to evaluate those pieces of work properly.

Footnotes

  • https://doi.org/10.5518/623

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 15, 2019.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contextualising UK moorland burning studies: geographical versus potential sponsorship-bias effects on research conclusions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Contextualising UK moorland burning studies: geographical versus potential sponsorship-bias effects on research conclusions
Lee E. Brown, Joseph Holden
bioRxiv 731117; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/731117
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Contextualising UK moorland burning studies: geographical versus potential sponsorship-bias effects on research conclusions
Lee E. Brown, Joseph Holden
bioRxiv 731117; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/731117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2430)
  • Biochemistry (4791)
  • Bioengineering (3332)
  • Bioinformatics (14677)
  • Biophysics (6638)
  • Cancer Biology (5168)
  • Cell Biology (7426)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4365)
  • Ecology (6873)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9918)
  • Genetics (7346)
  • Genomics (9527)
  • Immunology (4554)
  • Microbiology (12684)
  • Molecular Biology (4945)
  • Neuroscience (28327)
  • Paleontology (199)
  • Pathology (808)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1391)
  • Physiology (2024)
  • Plant Biology (4497)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (977)
  • Synthetic Biology (1299)
  • Systems Biology (3914)
  • Zoology (726)