Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Mixed-stock analyses among migratory, non-native Chinook salmon at-sea and assignment to natal sites in freshwater at their introduced range in South America

View ORCID ProfileSelim S. Musleh, View ORCID ProfileLisa W. Seeb, James E. Seeb, View ORCID ProfileBilly Ernst, Sergio Neira, View ORCID ProfileChris Harrod, View ORCID ProfileDaniel Gomez-Uchida
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/732248
Selim S. Musleh
1Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias con Mención en Manejo de Recursos Acuáticos Renovables (MaReA), Faculty of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, P.O. Box 160-C, Concepción, Chile
2Núcleo Milenio INVASAL, Concepción, Chile
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Selim S. Musleh
Lisa W. Seeb
2Núcleo Milenio INVASAL, Concepción, Chile
3School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, 1122 NE Boat Street, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195-5020, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lisa W. Seeb
James E. Seeb
2Núcleo Milenio INVASAL, Concepción, Chile
3School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, 1122 NE Boat Street, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195-5020, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Billy Ernst
2Núcleo Milenio INVASAL, Concepción, Chile
4Department of Oceanography, Universidad de Concepción, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, P.O. Box 160- C, Concepción, Chile
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Billy Ernst
Sergio Neira
2Núcleo Milenio INVASAL, Concepción, Chile
4Department of Oceanography, Universidad de Concepción, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, P.O. Box 160- C, Concepción, Chile
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Harrod
2Núcleo Milenio INVASAL, Concepción, Chile
5Instituto de Ciencias Naturales Alexander von Humboldt, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile
6Universidad de Antofagasta Stable Isotope Facility, Instituto Antofagasta, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chris Harrod
Daniel Gomez-Uchida
2Núcleo Milenio INVASAL, Concepción, Chile
7Genomics in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Universidad de Concepción, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, P.O. Box 160- C, Concepción, Chile
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel Gomez-Uchida
  • For correspondence: dgomezu@udec.cl
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Invasive species with migratory behavior and complex life cycle represent a challenge for evaluating natal sites among individuals. Private and government-sponsored initiatives resulted in the successful introduction and naturalization of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) throughout northern and southern Patagonia in South America. These migratory fish breed in freshwater, but spend most of their life at sea feeding, forming abundant populations in several watersheds draining into the southeast Pacific Ocean. We used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) combined with genetic structure and mixed-stock analyses to evaluate natal sites of Chinook salmon at-sea caught in one estuary and two coastal locations compared to reference populations from breeding sites in freshwater. Firstly, Bayesian individual-assignment analyses revealed no genetic structure among adults caught off the coast of the Toltén River and migrating (maturing) adults caught in Toltén River estuary, suggesting they likely belong to a single population. Secondly, mixed-stock genetic analyses revealed that most at-sea Chinook salmon caught in one estuary and two coastal locations likely originated from spawners from the nearest river (90-95%), with a small contribution from adjacent watersheds (5-10%). This appears consistent with Chinook salmon populations in their native range in which juveniles migrate short distances (100-200 km) from their river of origin to coastal feeding grounds, some of which became donor of propagules for non-native Chinook salmon populations under study. Mixed-stock genetic analyses provide considerable potential to identify the population of origin of Chinook salmon mixtures caught off the coast. They also seem an appropriate proof of concept to help identify potential immigrants from other watersheds as well as migration patterns and invasion pathways in a non-native species.

Introduction

Population genetics and genomics approaches have been increasingly implemented for studying invasions and their ecological and evolutionary consequences (Barrett 2015; Crommenacker et al. 2015). Primary foci among studies include comparing genetic metrics between native and non-native populations, identifying invasion pathways from donor population sources, and evaluating the role of receiving environments on selection and adaptation among established genotypes (Barrett 2015; Chown et al. 2015). Applications oriented to assign individuals of unknown origin to their natal locations in their non-native, post-establishment range have received lesser attention (but see Darling and Folino-Rorem 2009 for an exception). Knowledge of migration patterns among invasive species with a complex life cycle might benefit from such applications, namely species in which juveniles and adults occupy different environments. Also, and because adults may form population mixtures, quantifying proportions from different populations is a crucial first step to gauge ecological impacts of specific non-native populations, as prey or predators, on native ecosystems, and to recommend potential management actions.

Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) is an anadromous fish native to the Northern Hemisphere and widely distributed in the North Pacific Ocean. Chinook salmon breed in freshwater but feed most of their lives at sea. In their native range, Chinook salmon juveniles migrate to the ocean either in the spring or summer after emerging from the gravel (subyearling) or outmigrate the next spring (yearling), typically followed by 2 to 5 years growing at sea - (Quinn 2005). Patterns of Chinook salmon migration are a highly variable trait among populations; some undertake long migrations, while others remain close to the coast (Healey 1991; Trudel et al. 2009). Chinook salmon are carnivorous fish that prey over a broad range of pelagic species such as euphausiids, decapods, cephalopods and fishes (Brodeur 1990; Daly et al. 2009; Riddell et al. 2018). The species is also an important resource for recreational, tribal, and commercial fisheries and is considered one of the most valuable Pacific salmon species in North America (Quinn 2005).

The clear fishery potential of Chinook salmon triggered government-sponsored and private initiatives to successfully propagate it throughout Pacific Ocean watersheds in South America during 1978-1990 (Correa, Gross 2008), with donor (native) populations spanning multiple geographic regions from North America (Correa, Moran 2017; Gomez-Uchida et al. 2018; Riva Rossi et al. 2012). A recent genetics study has shown that non-native Chinook salmon have invaded new watersheds in South America establishing genetically differentiated population groups originating from both artificial and natural dispersal (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2018). Genetically isolated populations can be useful as reference groups to understand migratory behavior and identifying natal populations among mixed stock salmonids at sea (Bellinger et al. 2015; Bradbury et al. 2016; McKinney et al. 2017). Similar applications could be implemented in their introduced range for understanding key aspects of invasion ecology, namely pathways, sources of propagules, and the relative contribution of specific populations.

Here we employed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and individual assignment methods to characterize genetic structure and population mixtures among non-native Chinook salmon at sea, including one estuary and two coastal locations. We probabilistically assign at-sea individual genotypes to natal sites in freshwater using a set of reference populations. Our study design includes two locations in South America: one study site off Toltén River watershed (39°S) and another at Gulf of Ancud (42°S) in northern Patagonia (Figure 1). These represent two potentially important feeding grounds for non-native, migratory salmonids. Our goal was to help understanding ecology of non-native Chinook salmon, especially in relation to the marine phase and ocean migration patterns, which remain largely unstudied.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Current and historical collection sites of non-native Chinook salmon in South America. a. At-sea sampling sites from Araucanía Region. Grey dots are coastal fishing sites; black dots are fishing sites at the estuary of Toltén River. b. At-sea sampling sites from Los Lagos Region. Grey dots are fishing points at Gulf of Ancud. c. Natal freshwater sites in Pacific Ocean and Atlantic Ocean watersheds.

Materials and Methods

Study sites and sampling

Toltén River supports one of the largest Chinook salmon populations identified to-date in Chile (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2018). The entire watershed comprises four lakes and multiple rivers that run from the Andean mountains to the Pacific Ocean (Figure 1a). River habitats in the western foothills of the Andes (1500 – 2000 masl) provide high-quality habitat for breeding (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2016). The coastal area off Toltén River is highly productive and supports large stocks of common sardine (Strangomera bentincki) and anchovy (Engraulis ringens) (Instituto de Fomento Pesquero 2018), an important prey item for coastal Chinook salmon (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2016). Chinook salmon samples from the estuary (n=121) and off the coast of Toltén River (n=53) were collected by small-scale artisanal fishers under Chile’s Undersecretariat of Fisheries & Aquaculture permit (Res. Ex. 3417/2014) during austral summer 2015 (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Location, date, sample size (n), and genetic statistics (expected heterozygosity, HE; allelic richness, AR) for non-native Chinook salmon

The Gulf of Ancud is located within the commonly referred to Inner Sea of Chiloé (FIGURES Figure 1b) in Chile’s northern Patagonia (Los Lagos Region). This marine area consists of four micro-basins interconnected through narrow passes between islands. Gulf of Ancud has been described as a breeding and nursery area for several native fishes (Bustos et al. 2008) and is therefore a potential feeding ground for juvenile and adult Chinook salmon. Samples (n=42) originated from bycatch of the southern hake (Merluccius australis) long-line fishery taken during 2014 austral summer (Table 1).

SNP genotyping and selection; genetic statistics

Genomic DNA was isolated from each Chinook salmon axillary process (i.e., a small pointed protrusion located above the pelvic fin) using a Macherey-Neigel Nucleospin Tissue kit following manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was carried out using Fluidigm® 96.96 dynamic array chips following established pre-amplification and amplification protocols (Seeb et al. 2009; Smith et al. 2011). We screened DNA samples through a suite of 170 SNPs (Table S1). These loci were selected based on information content among non-native populations, fit to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) proportions, and non-significant linkage disequilibrium (LD) among loci (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2018). We calculated genetic statistics, expected heterozygosities and allelic richness, for all three groups of samples using GENEPOP (Rousset 2008).

Individual-based inference of genetic structure among Chinook salmon at Totten River

We assessed genetic population structure among estuarine and coastal Chinook salmon at Toltén River using Bayesian clustering based on minimization of HWE-LD departures implemented in STRUCTURE (Pritchard et al. 2000). This was based on demographic differences between these zones; previous surveys (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2016) indicated that coastal adults, especially females, were younger (ages 2+ and 3+) than estuary adults (ages 3+ and 4+). We therefore evaluated the likelihood that adults from estuary and coastal fisheries belong to one, two, or three different demes (number of demes = K values). For each K value, 10 independent iterations were run, using the admixture model with 20,000 iterations burn-in period of and 250,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo steps after the burn-in. We arrived to “consensus” coefficients of individual membership (Q-values) within K values using CLUMMP to avoid label switching artifacts and multimodality among independent runs (Jakobsson, Rosenberg 2007).

Mixed stock analyses of estuarine and coastal Chinook salmon and their assignment to reference populations in freshwater

We built a set of reference populations from Chinook salmon genotypes (n=504) including six Pacific Ocean and two Atlantic Ocean watershed sites in South America (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2018; Figure 1c). Multilocus genotypes at 170 SNPs (Table S1) originated from collections of juvenile and spawners taken from natal sites in freshwater. First, we performed a discriminant analysis of principal components (Jombart et al. 2010) to define the most probable number of reference populations. Second, we performed leave-one-out simulations to estimate the probability of assignment of genotypes from their natal sites to reference populations (i.e., self-assignment) using ONCOR (Kalinowski et al. 2008). Genotypes were bootstrapped by resampling alleles following Anderson et al. (2008) in 200 mixtures per natal site containing 100 individuals each. Highly admixed genotypes (possibly hybrids; Gomez-Uchida et al. 2018) were removed from the database, because in simulations they assigned to two or more reference populations. Third, we used Bayesian assignment (Rannala, Mountain 1997) to estimate membership probabilities of one estuary and two coastal Chinook salmon mixtures to reference populations using ONCOR.

Results

SNP genotyping and selection; genetic statistics

Expected heterozygosities among Chinook salmon from one estuary and two coastal locations varied between 0.272 and 0.293, while allelic richness varied between 1.785 and 1.932 (Table 1).

Individual-based inference of genetic structure among Totten River Chinook salmon

Bayesian clustering analysis showed no evidence of genetic structure among migrating Chinook salmon adults caught at the estuary of Toltén River and adults caught off the coast. Individual membership coefficients were symmetric assuming K= 2 and K= 3 number of demes (Figure 2), consistent with the hypothesis that estuarine and coastal Chinook salmon belong to a single population off Tolten River.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Individual ancestry coefficients (Q-values) among Chinook salmon genotypes sampled at the estuary (a and c) and off the coast of Tolten River (b and d). Clustering was performed assuming K=2 (a and b: upper panels) or K=3 demes (c and d: lower panels).

Mixed stock analyses of estuarine and coastal Chinook salmon and their assignment to reference populations in freshwater

Discriminant analysis of principal components conducted on the dataset defined four genetically differentiated clusters, three among Pacific Ocean watersheds and one among Atlantic Ocean watersheds: (1) Araucanía, (2) Los Lagos, (3) Aysén, and (4) Santa Cruz (Figure 3a). We considered these clusters our reference populations, which were used for subsequent analyses. Leave-one-out simulations provided self-assignment values of 100% for most natal sites among Pacific Ocean watersheds; exceptions were simulations among Atlantic Ocean sites that self-assigned between 82% and 93% (Table 2).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3.

Reference populations in South America and assignment of Chinook salmon from two coastal and one estuary locations, a) Dots represent individual genotypes and dashed lines delimit reference populations. Colors represent natal sites (Table 2); squares are reference populations composed of two or more natal sites. b) Individual assignment probability of estuarine and coastal Chinook salmon off Toltén River to reference populations. c) Individual assignment probability of Chinook salmo from Gulf of Ancud to reference populations. Each bar represents an individual and colors represent probabilities to be assigned to one of four reference populations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Set of reference populations of Chinook salmon from South America based on Gomez-Uchida et al. (2018a). Colored dots represent the natal sites in freshwater; these are nested within four colored squares depicting genetically distinct reference populations. Self-assignment depicts the probability of an individual genotype from a specific natal site to be assigned to its reference population in simulations.

The greatest proportion of Chinook salmon mixtures at-sea, from one estuary and two coastal locations, was assigned to the nearest reference population or rivers. Most estuarine and coastal individuals (>95%) caught off Tolten River were assigned to Araucanía population; five individuals caught at the estuary could be reliably assigned to Los Lagos population, whereas one individual caught off the coast could be assigned to Aysén population (Figure 3b). We obtained a similar result for Chinook salmon captured at Gulf of Ancud, with most genotypes (>90%) assigned to Los Lagos population and few individuals with genetic background from Aysén population (Figure 3c).

Discussion

Using a combination of statistical methods to analyze population mixtures and genetic information provided by SNPs, we probabilistically assigned non-native Chinook salmon caught at sea to some of their natal sites in freshwater in South America. Mixed-stock analyses of samples from one estuary and two coastal locations suggested that most adults originated from the nearest river (90-95%), with limited contribution from adjacent watersheds (5-10%). Contributions from adjacent river sites likely represent immigrants. Below we discuss implications of our findings to illuminate ocean ecology and migration patterns among non-native Chinook salmon. Identifying such patterns has the potential to clarify invasion pathways as well as assist management of invasive species as we argue in the next paragraphs.

Individual-based inference of genetic structure among Tolten River Chinook salmon

We used clustering methods to examine putative genetic structure among Chinook salmon captured in the estuarine and coastal zones off Toltén River, but no genetic structure was apparent amid demographic differences between these zones. This suggests that coastal and estuarine adults are composed of different age classes and likely belong to one single, self-sustaining population. We speculate that Tolten River Chinook salmon has been established for four to five generations since migrating adults showed in high numbers during 2000-2005, assuming a generation length of four years (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2016). Time since establishment may thus be insufficient to evolve neutral genetic structure for a single, large watershed. Suk et al. (2012) reported evolution of genetic structure within 10 generations among non-native Chinook salmon that invaded Lake Huron’s watershed in North America, while Kinnison et al. (2002) found genetic differentiation within 30 generations among introduced Chinook salmon to New Zealand, which originated from a single donor region. Yet, and albeit beyond to the scope of this study, Tolten River Chinook salmon may continue to experience selection at adaptive loci in response to environmental selection imposed by a novel environment. Adaptation following invasion may be linked to changes in phenotypic traits as demonstrated in other invasive taxa, including fishes (Monzon-Arguello et al. 2014), mammals (White et al. 2013) and plants (Vandepitte et al. 2014).

Mixed stock analyses of estuarine and coastal Chinook salmon and their assignment to reference populations in freshwater

We demonstrated that most Chinook salmon adults sampled from one estuary and two coastal sites originated from the nearest reference population and natal sites in freshwater. Clear differences among four reference populations enable individual assignment of adults captured at sea to their natal sites in freshwater. This resulted from genetic divergence among donor Chinook salmon lineages from North America that is still trackable, combined with contemporary changes driven by founder effects, genetic drift, and gene flow, forming genetically isolated populations (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2018). Although self-assignment was high, it should be noted that our coverage of all potential natal sites in freshwater was incomplete. For example, we had no Chinook salmon genotypes from natal sites at Valdivia and Bueno rivers, two watersheds located south of Tolten River, but north of Petrohué River (Fig. 1c). However, we hypothesize that colonization of Valdivia and Bueno watersheds by Chinook salmon possibly resulted from natural dispersal from Toltén River, Petrohue River, or both. This implies genetic differentiation between sampled and unsampled populations may be weak and likely to belong to the same reference population (e.g., Bradbury et al. 2016).

What is the evidence supporting patterns of coastal ocean migration among Chinook salmon? Large-scale ocean surveys of tagged juveniles in their native range indicate that most will remain within 100-200 km of their natal river in their first year, even though some may travel thousands of km north during their second year, depending on life history variation among populations (Trudel et al. 2009). Tagging studies and mixed-stock genetic analyses among native Chinook salmon adults tell a similar story – a great proportion were recovered or caught within major regions where they were tagged or assigned to, although with notable exceptions (Bellinger et al. 2015; Weitkamp 2010). We thus predict that an important proportion of non-native Chinook salmon adults may remain near their natal watershed feeding on the continental shelf; additionally, other adults may experience long migrations along the Pacific Ocean coast off Chile, and possibly offshore, but return to their natal watersheds before their breeding season. This is consistent with several lines of evidence. First, abundance of suitable prey items such as sardine and anchovies may represent the main factor driving Chinook salmon to remain in coastal habitats close to their river of origin in Chile, especially off Tolten River, where sardine abundance is one of the highest off Chile’s coast (Bustos et al. 2008; Gomez-Uchida et al. 2016; Instituto de Fomento Pesquero 2018). Second, Chinook salmon from Tolten River (reference population: Araucanía) and Petrohue River (reference population: Los Lagos) were likely founded from donor (native) populations that experience short migration routes during juvenile stages after Trudel et al. (2009), namely coastal Oregon and Puget Sound populations, respectively (Gomez-Uchida et al. 2018). Third, Chinook salmon adults have been caught by recreational fishers in both Pacific Ocean and Atlantic Ocean, in some cases thousands of km away from the nearest established population in freshwater, suggesting ‘stray’ salmon may migrate long distances (Liotta 2019; authors’ field observations).

Invasive species frequently experience range expansions and distributional changes, and predicting invasion pathways as well as evaluating the rate of spread are crucial for efficient management of non-native taxa (Sakai et al. 2001). Mixed stock analyses hold clear potential to study migration patterns among non-native Chinook salmon by assigning adults at-sea to their natal sites in freshwater. Such analyses may clarify which non-native populations may be acting as source of propagules, particularly long-distance migrants as part of an ongoing process of invasion by this successful salmonid.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Cristian Canales-Aguirre, Pablo Rivara, Diego Cañas, Mauricio Cañas, and Francisca Valenzuela-Aguayo for their substantial contribution to sample collection. Carita Pascal performed all laboratory procedures, including SNP genotyping, allele scoring, and database management. This research was supported by Núcleo Milenio INVASAL funded by Chile’s government program, Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio from Ministerio de Economia, Fomento y Turismo, and Chile’s government grants, FONDECYT 1130807, 1191256, and FIPA 2014-87. Student support came from CONICYT 21160640 doctoral scholarship to SSM.

References

  1. ↵
    Anderson EC, Waples RS, Kalinowski ST (2008) An improved method for predicting the accuracy of genetic stock identification. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:1475–1486
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Barrett SCH (2015) Foundations of invasion genetics: the Baker and Stebbins legacy. Molecular Ecology 24:1927–1941
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    Bellinger MR, Banks MA, Bates SJ, et al. (2015) Geo-Referenced, Abundance Calibrated Ocean Distribution of Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Stocks across the West Coast of North America. PLoS ONE 10:e0131276
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Bradbury IR, Hamilton LC, Chaput G, et al. (2016) Genetic mixed stock analysis of an interceptory Atlantic salmon fishery in the Northwest Atlantic. Fisheries Research 174:234–244
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    Brodeur RD (1990) A synthesis of the food habits and feeding ecology of salmonids in marine waters of the North Pacific Fisheries Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle (INPFC Doc.) FRI-UW- 9016.: 1–38.,
  6. ↵
    Bustos CA, Landaeta MF, Balbontín F (2008) Efectos ambientales sobre la variabilidad espacial del ictioplancton de Chile austral durante noviembre de 2005. Revista chilena de historia natural 81:205–219
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Chown SL, Hodgins KA, Griffin PC, et al. (2015) Biological invasions, climate change and genomics. Evolutionary Applications 8:23–46
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Correa C, Gross MR (2008) Chinook salmon invade southern South America. Biological Invasions 10:615–639
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Correa C, Moran P (2017) Polyphyletic ancestry of expanding Patagonian Chinook salmon populations. Scientific Reports 7:14338
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Crommenacker J, Bourgeois YXC, Warren BH, et al. (2015) Using molecular tools to guide management of invasive alien species: assessing the genetic impact of a recently introduced island bird population. Diversity and Distributions 21:1414–1427
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Daly EA, Brodeur RD, Weitkamp LA (2009) Ontogenetic Shifts in Diets of Juvenile and Subadult Coho and Chinook Salmon in Coastal Marine Waters: Important for Marine Survival? Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:1420–1438
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    Darling JA, Folino-Rorem NC (2009) Genetic analysis across different spatial scales reveals multiple dispersal mechanisms for the invasive hydrozoan Cordylophora in the Great Lakes. Molecular Ecology 18:4827–4840
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Gomez-Uchida D, Cañas-Rojas D, Riva-Rossi CM, et al. (2018) Genetic signals of artificial and natural dispersal linked to colonization of South America by non-native Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Ecology and Evolution 8:6192–6209
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Gomez-Uchida D, Ernst B, Aedo G, et al. (2016) Informe Final FIP 2014-87: Estudio biológico pesquero y sanitario de la población de Salmón Chinook en la cuenca del Rio Toltén. Subsecretaría de Pesca y Acuicultura; Fondo de Investigación Pesquera y Acuicultura, http://www.subpesca.cl/fipa/613/articles-89445_informe_final.pdf, pp. 420
  15. ↵
    1. Groot C and
    2. Margolis L
    Healey M (1991) Life history of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In: Groot C and Margolis L (eds) Pacific salmon life histories. UBC press, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 311–394
  16. ↵
    Instituto de Fomento Pesquero (2018) Evaluación hidroacústica de la biomasa de anchoveta y sardina común entre la V y X Regiones en el verano y otoño de 2018. Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, IFOP, pp. 249.
  17. ↵
    Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. Bmc Genetics 11
  19. ↵
    Kalinowski S, Manlove KR, Taper ML (2008) ONCOR: a computer program for genetic stock identification. Updated 24 Apr 2008 edn., Department of Ecology, Montana State University,
  20. ↵
    Kinnison MT, Bentzen P, Unwin MJ, et al. (2002) Reconstructing recent divergence: Evaluating nonequilibrium population structure in New Zealand chinook salmon. Molecular Ecology 11:739–754
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Liotta J (2019) Surprising record of a Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum, 1792) from the Paraná river delta in San Pedro, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ichthyological Contributions of Peces Criollos 63:1–4
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    McKinney GJ, Seeb JE, Seeb LW (2017) Managing mixed-stock fisheries: genotyping multi-SNP haplotypes increases power for genetic stock identification. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 74:429–434
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Monzon-Arguello C, de Leaniz CG, Gaĵardo G, et al. (2014) Eco-immunology of fish invasions: the role of MHC variation. Immunogenetics 66:393–402
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Quinn T (2005) The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout, Univ. Press. Seattle, 320 pp.
  26. ↵
    Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997) Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94:9197–9201
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Beamish RJ
    Riddell BR, Brodeur RD, Bugaev AV, et al. (2018) Ocean ecology of Chinook Salmon. In: Beamish RJ (ed) The ocean ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 555–696
  28. ↵
    Riva Rossi CM, Pascual Ma, Aedo Marchant E, et al. (2012) The invasion of Patagonia by Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): Inferences from mitochondrial DNA patterns. Genetica 140:439–453
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP’ 007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, et al. (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:305–332
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Suk HY, Neff BD, Quach K, et al. (2012) Evolution of introduced Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in Lake Huron: emergence of population genetic structure in less than 10 generations (vol 21, pg 235, 2012). Ecol Freshw Fish 21:494–494
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    Trudel M, Fisher J, Orsi JA, et al. (2009) Distribution and Migration of Juvenile Chinook Salmon Derived from Coded Wire Tag Recoveries along the Continental Shelf of Western North America. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:1369–1391
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Vandepitte K, de Meyer T, Helsen K, et al. (2014) Rapid genetic adaptation precedes the spread of an exotic plant species. Molecular Ecology 23:2157–2164
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    Weitkamp LA (2010) Marine Distributions of Chinook Salmon from the West Coast of North America Determined by Coded Wire Tag Recoveries. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:147–170
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    White TA, Perkins SE, Heckel G, et al. (2013) Adaptive evolution during an ongoing range expansion: the invasive bank vole (Myodes glareolus) in Ireland. Molecular Ecology 22:2971–2985
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 11, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mixed-stock analyses among migratory, non-native Chinook salmon at-sea and assignment to natal sites in freshwater at their introduced range in South America
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mixed-stock analyses among migratory, non-native Chinook salmon at-sea and assignment to natal sites in freshwater at their introduced range in South America
Selim S. Musleh, Lisa W. Seeb, James E. Seeb, Billy Ernst, Sergio Neira, Chris Harrod, Daniel Gomez-Uchida
bioRxiv 732248; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/732248
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Mixed-stock analyses among migratory, non-native Chinook salmon at-sea and assignment to natal sites in freshwater at their introduced range in South America
Selim S. Musleh, Lisa W. Seeb, James E. Seeb, Billy Ernst, Sergio Neira, Chris Harrod, Daniel Gomez-Uchida
bioRxiv 732248; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/732248

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4235)
  • Biochemistry (9140)
  • Bioengineering (6784)
  • Bioinformatics (24005)
  • Biophysics (12131)
  • Cancer Biology (9537)
  • Cell Biology (13781)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7638)
  • Ecology (11704)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15513)
  • Genetics (10647)
  • Genomics (14327)
  • Immunology (9484)
  • Microbiology (22849)
  • Molecular Biology (9095)
  • Neuroscience (49003)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1483)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2570)
  • Physiology (3848)
  • Plant Biology (8331)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1471)
  • Synthetic Biology (2296)
  • Systems Biology (6193)
  • Zoology (1301)