Abstract
Social environments are important determinant of fitness, particularly when same-sex local densities shape both mating success and survival costs.
We studied how mating success varied across a range of naturally occurring local male densities in wild field cricket males, Gryllus campestris, monitored by using fully automated RFID-surveillance system. We predicted that mating success as a function of local density follow a concave pattern predicted by the Allee-effect theory. As increasing density should reduce per capita predation and parasitism risk, we predicted that males generally having high mating success in low (versus high) local density live less long. Finally, we predicted that males on average occurred in local densities where their mating success is highest.
Male mating success followed a density-dependent pattern predicted by the Allee-effect theory. Males also differed in the local density where their mating success was highest. This variation explained longevity and total fitness: males with high mating success in low local density lived longer and had higher total mating success. Finally, we found no evidence of males occupying local densities in which their mating success is highest.
Our study suggest that density-dependent plasticity in mating success is under selection: males having high mating success in low density, but low mating success in high density, lived longer and had higher overall mating success. We thus provide novel insights, with unseen detail, about individual differences in density-dependent mating success and, costs and benefits related to variation in mating success in the wild. Finally, our study also highlights that specific statistical approaches are needed to firmly study the costs and benefits associated with the traits that are repeatedly expressed across range of environments.