Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Statistical significance in DTI group analyses: How the choice of the estimator can inflate effect sizes

View ORCID ProfileSzabolcs David, Hamed Y. Mesri, Max A. Viergever, View ORCID ProfileAlexander Leemans
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/755140
Szabolcs David
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Szabolcs David
  • For correspondence: s.david@umcutrecht.nl
Hamed Y. Mesri
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Max A. Viergever
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Leemans
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexander Leemans
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is one of the most prevalent methods to investigate the micro- and macrostructure of the human brain in vivo. Prior to any group analysis, dMRI data are generally processed to alleviate adverse effects of known artefacts such as signal drift, data noise and outliers, subject motion, and geometric distortions. These dMRI data processing steps are often combined in automated pipelines, such as the one of the Human Connectome Project (HCP). While improving the performance of processing tools has clearly shown its benefits at each individual step along the pipeline, it remains unclear whether – and to what degree – choices for specific user-defined parameter settings can affect the final outcome of group analyses. In this work, we demonstrate how making such a choice for a particular processing step of the pipeline drives the final outcome of a group study. More specifically, we performed a dMRI group analysis on gender using HCP data sets and compared the results obtained with two diffusion tensor imaging estimation methods: the widely used ordinary linear least squares (OLLS) and the more reliable iterative weighted linear least squares (IWLLS). Our results show that the effect sizes for group analyses are significantly smaller with IWLLS than with OLLS. While previous literature has demonstrated higher estimation reliability with IWLLS than with OLLS using simulations, this work now also shows how OLLS can produce a larger number of false positives than IWLLS in a typical group study. We therefore highly recommend using the IWLLS method. By raising awareness of how the choice of estimator can artificially inflate effect size and thus alter the final outcome, this work may contribute to improvement of the reliability and validity of dMRI group studies.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 05, 2019.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Statistical significance in DTI group analyses: How the choice of the estimator can inflate effect sizes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Statistical significance in DTI group analyses: How the choice of the estimator can inflate effect sizes
Szabolcs David, Hamed Y. Mesri, Max A. Viergever, Alexander Leemans
bioRxiv 755140; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/755140
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Statistical significance in DTI group analyses: How the choice of the estimator can inflate effect sizes
Szabolcs David, Hamed Y. Mesri, Max A. Viergever, Alexander Leemans
bioRxiv 755140; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/755140

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3698)
  • Biochemistry (7809)
  • Bioengineering (5689)
  • Bioinformatics (21330)
  • Biophysics (10595)
  • Cancer Biology (8199)
  • Cell Biology (11961)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6777)
  • Ecology (10419)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13900)
  • Genetics (9726)
  • Genomics (13094)
  • Immunology (8164)
  • Microbiology (20058)
  • Molecular Biology (7871)
  • Neuroscience (43147)
  • Paleontology (321)
  • Pathology (1280)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2264)
  • Physiology (3362)
  • Plant Biology (7246)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1315)
  • Synthetic Biology (2010)
  • Systems Biology (5547)
  • Zoology (1132)