Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Contrasting approaches to genome-wide association studies impact the detection of resistance mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus

View ORCID ProfileNicole E. Wheeler, Sandra Reuter, View ORCID ProfileClaire Chewapreecha, John A. Lees, Beth Blane, Carolyne Horner, David Enoch, Nicholas M. Brown, M. Estée Török, David M. Aanensen, View ORCID ProfileJulian Parkhill, Sharon J. Peacock
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/758144
Nicole E. Wheeler
1Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
2Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicole E. Wheeler
  • For correspondence: nw17@sanger.ac.uk
Sandra Reuter
2Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
3Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Infection Prevention and Hospital Hygiene, Breisacher Strasse 115b, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
4University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine, Box 157 Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire Chewapreecha
5Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
6Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, School of Bioresources and Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claire Chewapreecha
John A. Lees
2Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
7Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Blane
4University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine, Box 157 Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyne Horner
8British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Griffin House, 53 Regent Place Birmingham B1 3NJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Enoch
9Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals, Peterborough, UK
10Public Health England, Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas M. Brown
10Public Health England, Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Estée Török
4University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine, Box 157 Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
10Public Health England, Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Aanensen
1Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian Parkhill
11University of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Julian Parkhill
Sharon J. Peacock
4University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine, Box 157 Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Rapid detection of antibiotic resistance using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) could improve clinical outcomes and limit the spread of resistance. For this to succeed, we need an accurate way of linking genotype to phenotype, that identifies new resistance mechanisms as they appear. To assess how close we are to this goal, we characterized antimicrobial resistance determinants in >4,000 Staphylococcus aureus genomes of isolates associated with bloodstream infection in the United Kingdom and Ireland. We sought to answer three questions: 1) how well did known resistance mechanisms explain phenotypic resistance in our collection, 2) how many previously identified resistance mechanisms appeared in our collection, and 3) how many of these were detectable using four contrasting genome-wide association study (GWAS) methods. Resistance prediction based on the detection of known resistance determinants was 98.8% accurate. We identified challenges in correcting for population structure, clustering orthologous genes, and identifying causal mechanisms in rare or common phenotypes, which reduced the recovery of known mechanisms. Limited sensitivity and specificity of these methods made prediction using GWAS-discovered hits alone less accurate than using literature-derived genetic determinants. However, GWAS methods identified novel mutations associated with resistance, including five mutations in rpsJ, which improved tetracycline resistance prediction for 28 isolates, and a T118I substitution in fusA which resulted in better fusidic acid resistance prediction for 5 isolates. Thus, GWAS approaches in conjunction with phenotypic testing data can support the development of comprehensive databases to enable real-time use of WGS for patient management.

Footnotes

  • https://github.com/nwheeler443/staph_gwas

  • https://microreact.org/project/SaureusGWAS

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 04, 2019.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contrasting approaches to genome-wide association studies impact the detection of resistance mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Contrasting approaches to genome-wide association studies impact the detection of resistance mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus
Nicole E. Wheeler, Sandra Reuter, Claire Chewapreecha, John A. Lees, Beth Blane, Carolyne Horner, David Enoch, Nicholas M. Brown, M. Estée Török, David M. Aanensen, Julian Parkhill, Sharon J. Peacock
bioRxiv 758144; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/758144
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Contrasting approaches to genome-wide association studies impact the detection of resistance mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus
Nicole E. Wheeler, Sandra Reuter, Claire Chewapreecha, John A. Lees, Beth Blane, Carolyne Horner, David Enoch, Nicholas M. Brown, M. Estée Török, David M. Aanensen, Julian Parkhill, Sharon J. Peacock
bioRxiv 758144; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/758144

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4229)
  • Biochemistry (9108)
  • Bioengineering (6752)
  • Bioinformatics (23944)
  • Biophysics (12098)
  • Cancer Biology (9497)
  • Cell Biology (13742)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7616)
  • Ecology (11662)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15479)
  • Genetics (10620)
  • Genomics (14297)
  • Immunology (9465)
  • Microbiology (22793)
  • Molecular Biology (9078)
  • Neuroscience (48890)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1479)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2565)
  • Physiology (3823)
  • Plant Biology (8309)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2290)
  • Systems Biology (6172)
  • Zoology (1297)