Abstract
Brettanomyces bruxellensis is the main wine spoiler yeast all over the world, yet the structuration of the populations associated with winemaking remains elusive. In this work, we considered 1411 wine isolates from 21 countries that were genotyped using twelve microsatellite markers. We confirmed that B. bruxellensis isolates from wine environments show high genetic diversity, with 58 and 42% of triploid and diploid individuals respectively distributed in 5 main genetic groups. The distribution in the genetic groups varied greatly depending on the country and/or the wine-producing region. However, the two wine triploid groups showing sulfite resistance/tolerance were identified in almost all regions/countries. Genetically identical isolates were also identified. The analysis of these clone groups revealed that a given genotype could be isolated repeatedly in the same winery over decades, demonstrating unsuspected remanence ability. Besides cellar residency, a great geographic dispersal was also evidenced, with some genotypes isolated in wines from different continents. Finally, the study of old isolates and/or isolates from old vintages revealed that only the diploid groups were identified prior 1990 vintages. The triploid groups were identified in subsequent vintages, and their proportion has increased steadily these last decades, suggesting adaptation to winemaking practices such as sulfite use. A possible evolutionary scenario explaining these results is discussed.
Introduction
Brettanomyces bruxellensis is one of the most infamous wine spoiler yeast, able to contaminate up to 25% of red wines [1, 2]. Indeed, B. bruxellensis is known to produce specific compounds like volatile phenols, associated with unpleasant aromas, usually described as “horse sweat” or “leather” [3]. The contaminated wines have tainted organoleptic perception, decreased fruitiness [4, 5] and consequently are rejected by the consumers [6].
An important bibliography is dedicated to the B. bruxellensis species, with 100 to 200 papers published each year of the last decade (source: Google Scholar). Many papers investigate volatile phenol production [7–10], the biotic and abiotic factors impacting B. bruxellensis growth [11–15] and some peculiarities of the species like the ability to survive in the VNC (Viable Non Culturable) state [7, 16, 17] or the specific oxygen needs during fermentation [18]. Moreover, different detection and quantification methods for Brettanomyces, ranging from direct plating methods through molecular detection and flow cytometry analysis, were examined (see Tubia et al., 2018 for review [19]). The genetic diversity of the species has also been largely investigated, and a plethora of markers were developed across the years, including RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA) [20], AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism)[21], REA-PFGE (pulsed field electrophoresis) [22], Sau-PCR [23], PCR-DGGE [24], mtDNA restriction analysis, ISS-PCR (introns 5′ splice site sequence)[25, 26], etc. In the wine industry, most of these genetic analyses revealed high diversity within the species, at the vineyard, in the winery or at sample levels [8, 23, 27–29]. However, in most cases, only a small subset of isolates (a few dozens) were included, and these markers, although discriminant, were not appropriate for population genetic studies. Recently, a great advance was made with the genome sequencing of different B. bruxellensis strains [30–36], revealing the existence of diploid and allotriploid strains. This genetic oddity prompted the development of microsatellite markers, particularly well-adapted for large-scale population studies [37, 38]. Twelve markers were applied to a unique collection of more than 1500 strains of B. bruxellensis from various countries and different fermentation niches (wine, beer, bioethanol, tequila, kombucha, cider) [38, 39]. The strains were clustered in 6 genetic groups, depending on both their ploidy level (diploid versus triploid) and their substrate of isolation [38]. Besides their genetic difference, these populations presented contrasted phenotypes: two different groups of triploid strains, mostly associated with wine substrate, showed tolerance or resistance to sulfur dioxide, the most common preservative used in winemaking [39–41]. A preliminary study on a small subset of 8 strains suggested variability in bioadhesion and colonization properties [42]. Altogether, these results indicate that the genetic diversity of B. bruxellensis is shaped by anthropic activities, including the winemaking process. Though, the precise impact of wine-related activities on B. bruxellensis populations remains to be precisely described. In this work, we focused on the 1411 isolates previously genotyped associated with wine niche (wine, grapes, cellar equipment, etc.). We searched for the geographical and temporal trends underlying wine B. bruxellensis diversity at the species and wine niche levels. Finally, a specific attention on ‘clones’ (i.e. isolates displaying identical genotypes) is proposed.
Material & Methods
Yeast strains and microsatellite genotyping
We used 1411 isolates of B. bruxellensis associated with the wine production from 21 countries (S1 Table). Agar-YPD medium containing 10 g.L–1 yeast extract (Difco Laboratories, Detroit M1), 10 g.L–1 bactopeptone (Difco Laboratories, Detroit M1), 20 g.L–1 D-glucose (Sigma-Aldrich) and 20 g.L–1 agar (Sigma-Aldrich) was used for day-to-day growth. All isolates were kept at −80°C in glycerol:YPD (50:50) medium. Twelve microsatellites were used for B. bruxellensis genotyping as previously described, and the microsatellite datasets (encompassing non-wine strains) were published by Avramova et al (2017), Dimopoulou et al (2019) and Lleixa et al (submitted) [37, 38, 43].
Data analysis
The microsatellite dataset was analyzed using R and various packages. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed using ade4 package [44]. Not available (NA) data (around 6% missing data) were replaced by the closest neighbour data (only for PCA analysis). The connection network and minimum spanning tree was built using the chooseCN function from adegenet package [45, 46]. Diversity indexes were calculated using the poppr package [47, 48], and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using 100 bootstrap replicates.
For the geographic distribution, maps were drawn using R maps package and pies using graphics package. Kilometric distances between clones were calculated from longitude and latitude coordinates using the sp package [49].
Results
B. bruxellensis wine isolates show high genetic diversity and distribution varying with the country and the vineyard region
1411 wine isolates from 21 countries were included in our analysis, resulting in 340 genotypes. The isolates’ set is represented as a minimum spanning tree (Fig 1). These isolates belong mostly to the 5 previously described genetic groups (Table 1): 521 isolates belong to the diploid wine group (Wine 2N, CBS 2499-like, darkcyan), 551 to the red triploid wine group (Wine 3N, AWRI1499-like, red), 229 to the triploid beer group (Beer 3N, AWRI1608-like, orange), 69 to the kombucha diploid group (Kombucha 2N, L14165-like, green), 40 to the other triploid wine group (Wine 3N, L0308-like, turquoise) and 1 from the tequila/bioethanol triploid group (blue). Within these groups, contrasting genetic diversity was highlighted, with Shannon’s diversity index ranging from low (0.97) to high (3.73, see Table 1). The lower diversity was estimated for the Wine 2N group, suggesting high clonal expansion within this group, whereas higher diversity was obtained for the Wine/Kombucha 2N group and Wine 3N turquoise and Wine/beer 3N groups. Wine/Kombucha 2N and Wine 3N turquoise group showed an equitability index closed to 1, suggesting a more even distribution of the genotypes among the genetic group compared to Wine 2N group. Simpson’s diversity and Equitability indexes showed the same trend. Overall, the percentage of triploid wine isolates was 58%, indicating that the triploid state, far from being rare, has a large extend.
The genetic distribution of the wine isolates was then assessed per country, or per wine-producing region when sufficient isolates were available (Fig 2). In France, 5 regions were examined (Fig 2A): Bordeaux, Languedoc, Burgundy, Jura and Cotes-du-Rhone. In Bordeaux, 732 isolates were genotyped and were mainly distributed into two genetic groups: the Wine 2N group (darkcyan, sensitive to SO2, encompassing 345/732 of Bordeaux isolates), and the red Wine 3N (tolerant to SO2, 373/732). By contrast, in Burgundy, only a small percentage of the 157 isolates belonged to the Wine 2N group (16/157), while the most represented groups were the Beer 3N (orange, 95/157) and the red Wine 3N (42/157). Cotes-du-Rhone also displayed a high proportion of isolates belonging to the Beer 3N group (orange, 26/36), beside to the Wine 2N (darkcyan, 6/36) and the red Wine 3N (4/36). In Jura, two genetic groups dominated: the red Wine 3N (8/16) and the Beer 3N (orange, 8/16). Finally, isolates from Languedoc mostly fell within the Wine 2N group (darkcyan 63/108), the remaining isolates belonging to the red Wine 3N group (19/108), the turquoise Wine 3N group (15/108) and the Kombucha 2N group (green, 9/108). In Italy, the three regions tested (Calabria, Campania, Puglia) showed various genetic distributions, Puglia being mostly associated with the Wine 2N group, and Calabria/Campania with the red Wine 3N group. Denmark was associated with Wine 2N (darkcyan) and Beer 3N groups (orange), while Portugal showed an almost perfect equitable distribution into the five genetic groups. Isolates from Spain (mostly from Catalonia) showed the dominance of the orange group while Greece was mostly associated with the Kombucha 2N group (green) and then with the red Wine 3N group (Fig 2A). In non-European countries (Fig 2B), the genetic distribution of B. bruxellensis was also contrasted, with the diploid wine group (darkcyan) dominant in USA, Brazil and South Africa, and the red triploid wine group dominant in Australia.
When summing-up all these regional specific distributions, some trends emerged: the Wine 2N (darkcyan) and the red Wine 3N groups were isolated in almost every region/country. The Beer 3N group (orange) was more dominant around a meridian crossing Denmark, the east of France and Italy (except for Spain), while the Kombucha 2N group (green) was mostly found around Mediterranean countries. Furthermore, isolates tolerant/resistant to sulfites (belonging to the red or turquoise Wine 3N groups), were found in almost all regions/countries.
The temporal distribution of B. bruxellensis wine isolates reveals important evolution over the last century
Most of the studied strains were isolated in the last decade from wines sampled within two years after grapes harvesting (vintage). However, 157 isolates were isolated prior to 2000 and/or were isolated from bottles containing old vintages. For example, three strains were isolated from 1909-wine, five isolates from 1911-wine, etc. Most of the wines with vintages older than 2000 were analyzed several years after bottling (S1 Table).
The genetic distribution of B. bruxellensis strains in wines older than one century, with 20-years intervals, is shown on Fig 3. Without exceptions, isolates from wines produced before-1990 (104 isolates) all belonged to diploid groups, mostly from the Wine 2N group (darkcyan). The Wine 2N group, represented 67% of the isolates from wines produced in 1981-2000, and only 32% of the isolates from wines produced in 2001-2020. For the red Wine 3N group, tolerant/resistant to sulfite, the older wine displaying such isolate dates back to 1990, and was isolated 15 years after wine elaboration. The proportion of “red” isolates increased from 23% for 1981-2000 period and to 43% for the wines produced during 2001-2020. Similarly, the Beer 3N group that was first isolated from a wine of 1995 vintage represented only 4% of the isolates from wines produced between 1981 and 2000, and 18% of the isolates from wines produced between 2001-2020. For the other genetic groups, the older isolates were found in wine as old as 1956 for Kombucha 2N (and represented around 4-5% of the population), 1994 for turquoise Wine 3N (1% and 3% found in wines produced in 1981-2000 and after 2001 respectively), and 2002 for Tequila/Ethanol (less than 1%). Unless the late sampling of the wine (>15 years) biases the analyses, the temporal distribution of B. bruxellensis wine isolates shows a clear shift from domination by the 2N darkcyan genetic group in old vintages to 3N red genetic group prevalence among isolates from wines produced over the last decades.
The same B. bruxellensis genotypes can be identified in wines produced in a given cellar over decades
We then focused on B. bruxellensis clones. In this paper ‘clones’ will be defined as genetically identical isolates for all 12 microsatellite markers tested. Over the 1411 isolates, 138 groups of clones were identified, encompassing 2 to 114 isolates. We searched whether some clones were identified repeatedly in the same winery over different vintages. Forty-two groups of clones contained isolates isolated several times in 11 wineries from France and Italy (Fig 4). For example, in winery A1, 9 clone groups were identified: 7 from the Wine 2N and 2 from the red Wine 3N. Clones from the group n°4 (Wine 2N) were isolated independently in wines of vintages 1909, 1948 and 1970, while clones from the group n°8 were isolated in wines produced in 1990, 2012, 2013 and 2014. Similarly, for winery B1, 15 clone groups were evidenced: clones from the group n°12 (Wine 2N) were isolated repeatedly in wines of vintages 1961, 1985, 1996 and 2014 wines while clones from the group n°22 (Wine 3N) were isolated in wines produced in 2003, 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2014. Thus, in several wineries, genetically identical strains were isolated from wines of different vintages, sometimes from different decades. The longer interval (86 years) was found for winery B1, with clones from the group n°3 isolated in wines produced in 1926 and 2012.
Fig 4 also illustrates that, within a given sample, different B. bruxellensis can be isolated. In fact, if we considered the strains isolated from the same samples, our collection contained 57 wine samples for which at least 5 isolates were analysed (mostly from France or Italy). In 45 out of 57 samples, we found isolates from two different genetic groups, highlighting the high diversity of B. bruxellensis at sample level.
Wines from different countries and/or continents can be spoiled by the same B. bruxellensis clone
Since some clones were able to persist over several years in the cellar, we searched whether wine-producing regions were associated with specific clones. No ‘signature’ was identified, meaning that no specific genotypes were associated with the studied regions. Instead, we found that some clone groups were highly disseminated. For example, the clone group n°16 (Wine 2N, darkcyan) encompassed 96 isolates from Denmark, France, Portugal and USA (Fig 5A). Another example is clone group n°67 (6 isolates), isolated in wines from Italy, Portugal and South Africa. In the other genetic groups also, several examples of dissemination were found (Fig 5B): the clone group n°24 (red Wine 3N) encompassed 29 isolates from France, Italy and USA, while clone group n°35 were found in France, Italy and South Africa.
In order to quantify the level of clonal dissemination, we computed the kilometric distance separating the different isolates belonging to a given clone group (Fig 6). 88% of clone pairs were localized in the same region, with kilometric distance inferior to 100km (‘local clone pairs’), of which 34% had distance inferior to 1km. 4% were separated by ~100-750km, usually associated with inter-country distances, less than 1% were distant of ~750-1000km (intra-continental distances), and 6% were separated by more than 1000km (inter-continental distances). It has to be noted that all isolates were considered here, including clonal isolates from the same wine samples that may drift the distribution toward zero kilometric distance. Thus, B. bruxellensis clones appear to mainly disseminate in short distances while a significant proportion of them showed high geographic dispersal with distances incompatible with natural dispersion.
Discussion
In this work, we studied the genetic diversity and structuration of a large collection (>1400) of wine isolates of B. bruxellensis, from 21 countries across 5 continents. Most of these wine isolates belong to five of the six genetic groups previously described at the species level [38], and confirmed the high genetic diversity of this yeast species [23, 27]. Interestingly, we showed that the distribution of B. bruxellensis wine isolates varied greatly from one country/region to another. For some regions, hundreds of isolates were studied (e.g. Bordeaux region, >700 isolates), while smaller subsets were considered for others (16 isolates for Portugal or Australia, for example). Thus, it will be necessary to further those results with a larger number of isolates for all regions. At a large scale, our results confirm that the two wine triploid groups showing sulfite resistance/tolerance are identified in 14 regions/countries out of 16 and are widespread worldwide.
Our results reveal the unequal distribution of the different genetic groups at both the geographical and time level, suggesting that some environmental factors (climate, temperature, grape varieties etc.) leading to specific wine composition (pH, ethanol and polyphenols contents, etc.), and/or oenological practices (sulfur dioxide management, barrel ageing) could be shaping the diversity of these wine isolates. It will be interesting in a near future to identify those environmental/anthropic factors, and to examine the associated phenotypic characteristics.
B. bruxellensis wine isolates show high spatiotemporal dispersion
The analysis of clones (genetically identical isolates for all 12 microsatellites) revealed unexpected patterns: first, it was observed a cellar remanence of clones over decades despite modern hygienic practices, improved cleaning/disinfection protocols and a large choice of products and treatments [50–52]. This long-term remanence of B. bruxellensis wine isolates in a given cellar is remarkable. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the persistence of cellar-resident populations was shown, but on smaller period of time (over 20 years maximum) [53]. This exceptional temporal durability remains to be explored, but could be related to the specific survival ability of the species, even in a VNC form and to its bioadhesion/biofilm forming capacity in the winery environment [42, 54]. Secondly, besides its cellar residency, some B. bruxellensis clones showed high geographical dispersal and were independently isolated from wines originated from different producing regions, countries and sometimes even from different continents. At a regional scale, the clonal dispersal could be promoted through yeast vectors like insects and birds for a distance inferior to 100km [55–57]. However, for a significant number of clone groups, the calculated kilometric distance is incompatible with the natural dispersion, indicating the involvement of human activities. Indeed, the exchange of contaminated equipment (barrels, bottling equipment, pumps, etc.), the international wine trade and human transport of goods (fruits, etc.) could probably explain such situation [58]. The possibility to isolate clones in wines from old vintages is another example of the specific ability of the species to survive in wines after bottle aging and possibly explain world dissemination of clones through wine exports. In addition, exchanges may also happen between different industrial processes, allowing also niches dispersal of the species. However, it was previously shown that the dispersal was higher for wine isolates than other processes, suggesting different dispersal patterns for the different fermentation processes. Altogether, these results are consistent with the exchange of contaminated wine-related material, followed by adaptation to local winemaking practices, as suggested before [38]. These results draw an atypical picture of B. bruxellensis opportunistic lifestyle, mostly sedentary with nomad propensities.
Allotriploidisation: a recent adaptation to winemaking practices?
One of the most interesting results of this work is the fact that isolates from old vintages mostly belong to a unique group, the so-called “wine diploid” (darkcyan), while, intriguingly, this group represents only ≈31 % of nowadays isolates. The oldest isolates for the triploid genetic groups date back the 1981-2000 interval, which is particularly surprising for the Wine 3N (red) group that encompasses ≈45% of recent isolates and in a less extend for the Wine/Beer 3N (orange) group showing ≈16% of recent isolates. It has to be noted that most of the ‘old’ isolates were actually isolated recently from ‘old’ vintages (eg strain L0626 that was isolated in 2006 from a 1909 vintage). Thus, two main hypotheses can explain this result: either isolates from the Wine 2N group have higher survival or revival rates or the triploid groups emerged more recently, during the 1981-2000 period. It is not possible from our data to favor one or the other scenario. Subsequent strain isolations will help determine whether the different genetic groups display contrasted ability to survive in wines over decades, thus formally testing the first hypothesis. On the opposite, some elements could be consistent with the second hypothesis: first, wines produced these last decades are characterized by higher ethanol content as a consequence of climate change [59, 60]. Cibrario et al recently showed that some strains of the Wine 3N red group were highly tolerant to high ethanol content [61]. It can be hypothesized that the progressive increase in wine alcohol level could have triggered the selection of fitter individuals regarding ethanol content. Second, the two Wine 3N groups (red and turquoise) show an outstanding phenotypic trait related to adaptation to modern winemaking practices, namely sulfite tolerance/resistance. While sulfur dioxide addition is used in winemaking at least since the 18th century, it became the preferred treatment for B. bruxellensis spoilage in the 90’s, when Chatonnet et al. demonstrated formally that the species was the main responsible for ethylphenol production in wine [3]. Subsequently, control strategies encouraging the use of recurrent sulfite treatments at high dosage have emerged [62]. One possible outcome of the adoption of these strategies by the wine industry might have been the selection of tolerant/resistant strains. For example, in Australia where the use of larger quantities of sulfite was promoted [58, 63], 92% of B. bruxellensis wine isolates were SO2-tolerant in 2012 while in Greece the isolates that belong to the tolerant/resistant group were exclusively isolated from sweet red wine where higher doses of SO2 are detected and permitted [64]. Winemaking environments may have supported the existence of specific selective pressure favouring the retaining of fitter allotriploid individuals and their progressive proliferation in the last decades. Indeed, competition experiments between tolerant and sensitive strains showed that the former outcompeted the latter in high SO2 concentrations [41]. Altogether, our results suggest that independent allotriploidisation events in B. bruxellensis may have allowed diversification and subsequent adaptation to winemaking practices.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Details of the 1411 strains of Brettanomyces bruxellensis used in this study.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the different wineries who kindly provided wine samples. This work received financial support from the Conseil Interprofessionel des Vins de Bordeaux (CIVB, Grant number: 2014/2015 40792), from Région Aquitaine (Grant number: 2014:1R20203-00002990), from France Agrimer (Grant number: 7120154146) and by the French National Research Agency (ANR-18-CE20-0003). A.M. and M.C.P. participation was supported by a project from the Spanish Government (AGL2015-73273-JIN). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.