Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Co-option of the lineage-specific LAVA retrotransposon in the gibbon genome

Mariam Okhovat, Kimberly A. Nevonen, Brett A. Davis, Pryce Michener, Samantha Ward, Mark Milhaven, Lana Harshman, Ajuni Sohota, Jason D. Fernandes, Sofie R. Salama, Rachel J. O’Neill, Nadav Ahituv, Krishna R. Veeramah, Lucia Carbone
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765230
Mariam Okhovat
1Department of Medicine, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: okhovat@ohsu.edu
Kimberly A. Nevonen
1Department of Medicine, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brett A. Davis
1Department of Medicine, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pryce Michener
1Department of Medicine, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha Ward
1Department of Medicine, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Milhaven
2Department of Ecology and Evolution/ Institute for Advance Computational Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lana Harshman
3Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
4Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ajuni Sohota
3Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
4Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason D. Fernandes
5Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
6UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sofie R. Salama
5Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
6UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
7Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 96064, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel J. O’Neill
8Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
9Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadav Ahituv
3Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
4Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krishna R. Veeramah
2Department of Ecology and Evolution/ Institute for Advance Computational Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucia Carbone
1Department of Medicine, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
10Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
11Division of Genetics, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA
12Department of Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Co-option of transposable elements (TEs) to become part of existing or new enhancers is an important mechanism for evolution of gene regulation. However, contributions of lineage-specific TE insertions to recent regulatory adaptations remain poorly understood. Gibbons present a suitable model to study these contributions as they have evolved a lineage-specific TE called LAVA, which is still active in the gibbon genome. The LAVA retrotransposon is thought to have played a role in the emergence of the unusually rearranged structure of the gibbon genome by disrupting transcription of cell cycle genes. In this study, we investigated whether LAVA may have also contributed to the evolution of gene regulation by adopting enhancer function. We characterized fixed and polymorphic LAVA insertions across multiple gibbons and found 96 LAVA elements overlapping enhancer chromatin states. Moreover, LAVA was enriched in multiple transcription factor binding motifs, was bound by an important transcription factor (PU.1), and was associated with higher levels of gene expression in cis. We found gibbon-specific signatures of purifying/positive selection at 27 LAVA insertions. Two of these insertions were fixed in the gibbon lineage and overlapped with enhancer chromatin states, representing putative co-opted LAVA enhancers. These putative enhancers were located within genes encoding SETD2 and RAD9A, two proteins that facilitate accurate repair of DNA double-strand breaks and prevent chromosomal rearrangement mutations. Thus, LAVA’s co-option in these genes may have influenced regulation of processes that preserve genome integrity. Our findings highlight the importance of considering lineage-specific TEs in studying evolution of novel gene regulatory elements.

Footnotes

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 06, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Co-option of the lineage-specific LAVA retrotransposon in the gibbon genome
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Co-option of the lineage-specific LAVA retrotransposon in the gibbon genome
Mariam Okhovat, Kimberly A. Nevonen, Brett A. Davis, Pryce Michener, Samantha Ward, Mark Milhaven, Lana Harshman, Ajuni Sohota, Jason D. Fernandes, Sofie R. Salama, Rachel J. O’Neill, Nadav Ahituv, Krishna R. Veeramah, Lucia Carbone
bioRxiv 765230; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765230
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Co-option of the lineage-specific LAVA retrotransposon in the gibbon genome
Mariam Okhovat, Kimberly A. Nevonen, Brett A. Davis, Pryce Michener, Samantha Ward, Mark Milhaven, Lana Harshman, Ajuni Sohota, Jason D. Fernandes, Sofie R. Salama, Rachel J. O’Neill, Nadav Ahituv, Krishna R. Veeramah, Lucia Carbone
bioRxiv 765230; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765230

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4049)
  • Biochemistry (8682)
  • Bioengineering (6401)
  • Bioinformatics (23122)
  • Biophysics (11642)
  • Cancer Biology (9035)
  • Cell Biology (13134)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7354)
  • Ecology (11275)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (14982)
  • Genetics (10333)
  • Genomics (13918)
  • Immunology (9017)
  • Microbiology (21882)
  • Molecular Biology (8673)
  • Neuroscience (46955)
  • Paleontology (349)
  • Pathology (1403)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2459)
  • Physiology (3679)
  • Plant Biology (7972)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1418)
  • Synthetic Biology (2189)
  • Systems Biology (5970)
  • Zoology (1235)