Abstract
Since their introduction in the late eighties, Bayesian approaches for neuroimaging have opened the way to new powerful and quantitative analysis of brain data. Here, we apply this statistical framework to evaluate empirically the gain of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction, compared to unimodal (EEG or MEG) one. Combining EEG and MEG information for source reconstruction has been consistently evidenced to enhance localization performances using simulated data. However, given considerable efforts to conduct simultaneous recordings, empirical evaluation becomes necessary to quantify the real information gain. And this is obviously not straightforward due to the ill-posedness of the inverse problem. Here, we consider Bayesian model comparison to quantify the ability of EEG, MEG and fused (EEG/MEG) inversions of individual data to resolve spatial source models. These models consisted in group-level cortical distributions inferred from real EEG, MEG and EEG/MEG brain responses. We applied this comparative evaluation to the timely issue of the generators of auditory mismatch responses evoked by unexpected sounds. These included the well-known Mismatch Negativity (MMN) but also earlier deviance responses. As expected, fused localization was evidenced to outperform unimodal inversions with larger model separability. The present methodology confirms with real data the theoretical interest of simultaneous EEG/MEG recordings and fused inversion to highly inform (spatially and temporally) source modeling. Precisely, a bilateral fronto-temporal network could be identified for both the MMN and early deviance response. Interestingly, multimodal inversions succeeded in revealing spatio-temporal details of the functional organization within the supratemporal plane that have not been reported so far, nor were visible here with unimodal inversions. The present refined auditory network could serve as priors for auditory modeling studies.
