New Results

Zinc-independent activation of Toll-like receptor 4 by S100A9

Andrea N. Loes, Ran Shi, Michael J. Harms
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/796219

ABSTRACT

The homodimer formed by the protein S100A9 induces inflammation through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), playing critical roles in both healthy and pathological innate immune responses. The molecular mechanism by which S100A9 activates TLR4 remains unknown. Previously, the interaction between purified S100A9 and TLR4 was shown to depend on Zn2+; however, the Zn2+ binding site(s) on S100A9 were not identified. Here, we investigated the role of Zn2+ binding in the pro-inflammatory activity of S100A9. We found that the S100A9 homodimer was prone to reversible, Zn2+-dependent aggregation in vitro. Using a combination of site-directed mutagenesis and Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC), we identified multiple residues that contribute to Zn2+ binding in S100A9. We then used mutagenesis to construct a version of S100A9 with no detectable Zn2+ binding by either ITC or Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. This protein did not exhibit aggregation upon addition of saturating Zn2+. Further, despite the lack of Zn2+-binding, this protein was capable of activating TLR4 in a cell-based functional assay. We then modified the functional assay so the Zn2+ concentration was exceedingly low relative to the concentration of S100A9 added. Again, S100A9 was able to activate TLR4. This reveals that, despite the ability of S100A9 to bind Zn2+, S100A9 does not require Zn2+ to activate TLR4. Our work represents an important step in clarifying the nature of the interaction between S100A9 and TLR4.

INTRODUCTION

The protein S100A9 potently activates inflammation through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) [1]. S100A9 is found at high levels in the extracellular space in inflamed tissues, both as a homodimer and as a heterodimer with the protein S100A8 [2,3]. When properly regulated, S100A9 recruits neutrophils and promotes physiological processes such as angiogenesis [4,5]. Excessive S100A9 can, however, lead to pathological inflammation [1,6]. S100A9 is overexpressed in a variety of inflammatory diseases, where it increases the severity of the inflammatory response [1,7–10]. In extreme cases, it can form a powerful feedback loop with other proinflammatory stimuli, leading to septic shock [6,11]. S100A9, and its close evolutionary relatives S100A8 and S100A12, have therefore been identified as potential therapeutic targets for treating inflammatory disorders [8].

Despite the biological importance of the S100A9/TLR4 interaction, its molecular basis remains poorly understood. Some have proposed that activation occurs via a direct, stoichiometric binding interaction between S100A9 and the TLR4 signaling complex [8]. Others have proposed that higher order oligomers of S100s may activate TLR4[12,13] and that aggregation of S100A9 may play a role in regulation of TLR4 activation[14,15]. Individual mutations to S100A9 have been used to argue in favor of a direct interaction via the canonical target binding interface of S100s[16], but the evidence remains far from conclusive.

One observation informing these models was that, in vitro, the interaction between S100A9 and the TLR4/MD-2 complex required both Ca2+ and Zn2+ ions [8]. S100A9, like other members of the S100 family, has two Ca2+ binding sites per monomer. It has multiple residues that may act as ligands for Zn2+, but the site of binding is unknown. Transition-metal binding by the heterodimer has been well characterized[17,18], as the heterodimer’s antimicrobial activity is metal-dependent. Several of S100A9 residues do interact with transition metals in the heterodimer formed with S100A8, hinting that they may play a similar role in the homodimer. However, despite a potential role for Zn2+ binding in regulation of TLR4 activation by S100A9, little work has been done to identify how homodimeric S100A9 binds to Zn2+, nor how Zn2+ binding regulates its biological functions.

To gain insight into the mode of interaction between S100A9, TLR4, and Zn2+, we set out to identify the sites of Zn2+ binding on human S100A9. We identified several sites on the S100A9 homodimer that participate in Zn2+ binding. Mutagenesis experiments that remove these key residues completely ablate Zn2+ binding and metal-dependent aggregation. Surprisingly, a mutant of S100A9 with no detectable Zn2+ binding activates TLR4 in a cell-based assay. This suggests that Zn2+ binding is not necessary for the interaction of S100A9 with TLR4.

RESULTS

The S100A9 homodimer binds to Zn2+ under conditions in which it activates TLR4

We first set out to determine whether S100A9 indeed binds Zn2+ under conditions in which it activates TLR4, as the previous observation was limited to an in vitro TLR4/MD-2 binding assay [8]. We measured activation by transfecting HEK293T cells with plasmids encoding TLR4 and its cofactors MD-2 and CD14. HEK cells do not natively express TLR4, so activation is strictly dependent on the transfected TLR4/MD-2/CD14 gene products [19]. We also transfected a plasmid encoding a luciferase gene downstream of an NF-kB response element. The total luciferase output of the cells thus corresponds to the degree of TLR4-induced NF-kB activation[19,20].

As a positive control, we added lipopolysaccharide—the canonical ligand of TLR4—and observed a potent activation of NF-kB signaling (Fig 1A). This response could be ameliorated with the addition of polymyxin B (PB), which binds LPS and prevents its binding to the TLR4/MD-2 complex (Fig 1A). We then added recombinantly expressed and purified human S100A9 in the presence of PB. As has been observed previously[1,6,8,21–23], recombinant S100A9 potently activated the NF-kB response, even in the presence of excess polymyxin B (Fig 1A).

Fig 1.
Fig 1. The S100A9 homodimer binds to Zn2+ under conditions in which it activates TLR4.

A. Activation of TLR4 by S100A9 occurs in the presence and absence of polymixin B. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is used as a positive control for expression and activation of the complex. Polymyxin B is included to control for endotoxin-mediated activation of the complex. Points are the technical triplicates from three biological replicates. Horizontal lines are the mean of the biological replicates. Error bars are SEM of the biological replicates. B. S100A9 depletes zinc from cell culture media. The concentration of zinc in cell culture media in S100A9-treated and untreated DMEM + FBS as measured by ICP-MS. Error bars show standard deviation between duplicate samples. Statistically significant differences (single-tailed Student’s t-test) are noted on each panel (* p < 0.05) C. S100A9 binds to zinc. Plot shows integrated heats from isothermal calorimetry experiment. Inset shows protein aggregation occurred during zinc titration. Arrows indicate two phases of zinc binding. D. Zn2+ induces reversible aggregation in S100A9. Addition of Zn2+ (orange) leads to aggregation of S100A9 and loss of signal for α-helical secondary structure as measured by far UV circular dichroism. Addition of EDTA, restores helical signal (teal).

We next asked whether S100A9 bound to Zn2+ under these assay conditions. We added S100A9 to the media that we used to grow HEK cells. We then ran the treated media through a 3K filter—which should remove protein, but not free metal—and measured the zinc content of the eluate using Inductively-Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). We found that the S100A9-treated sample depleted the zinc concentration by 50% relative to a control that underwent mock treatment without S100A9 (Fig 1B). This suggests that S100A9 does, indeed, bind to Zn2+ under these conditions.

Zn2+ binds S100A9 in vitro and induces reversible aggregation

We next set out to study Zn2+ binding under more tightly controlled in vitro conditions. We followed the binding of Zn2+ to S100A9 using Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) under conditions approximating the extracellular environment (pH 7.4, 100 mM ionic strength, and 200 uM Ca2+). The reaction was exothermic and exhibited a shallow change in heat with increasing Zn2+ concentration (Fig 1C). The curve exhibits two, visually distinct, phases. The first is a high magnitude exothermic process, followed by a second, lower-magnitude exothermic process (indicated by arrows in Fig 1C). This contrasts sharply with the published ITC results for the interaction between Zn2+ and the heterodimer of S100A8/A9, which exhibits an extremely sharp, 2:1 binding transition corresponding to two individual sites with nanomolar binding affinity [18]. These ITC results are difficult to interpret with a thermodynamic binding model, as binding was also accompanied by massive aggregation (Fig 1C, inset). The aggregation behavior of S100A9 in response to Zn2+ was extremely robust. We altered buffer conditions, Zn2+ counter ions, protein concentration, as well Ca2+ concentration. Aggregation occurred within seconds for all conditions at or above equimolar concentrations of Zn2+ to S100A9.

Strikingly, however, the Zn2+-dependent aggregation of S100A9 was reversible: upon addition of EDTA, the aggregated protein rapidly returned to its soluble form. We can observe the reversibility of this process by eye for the highest concentrations we investigated (1 mM ZnCl2, Supp Video). We can also quantify the recovery by far-UV circular dichroism (CD). Protein aggregation is associated with a loss of helical signal upon the addition of Zn2+ (Fig. 1D). Upon addition of EDTA, the solution clears and the helical signal returns (Fig 1D). This indicates we are observing near complete recovery of protein secondary structure upon addition of the chelator.

Disruption of Zn2+ binding

These observations are consistent with the previous proposal that the interaction between S100A9 and TLR4 is Zn2+-dependent—possibly through an aggregated state. We therefore set out to test the hypothesis that Zn2+ binding is necessary for the activation of TLR4 by S100A9. To do so, we set out to identify and disrupt the site(s) of Zn2+ binding in S100A9. Using the structures of other S100 proteins, evolutionary conservation, and chemical reasoning, we identified three possible sets of Zn2+ ligands that could form (possibly overlapping) binding sites on the S100A9 homodimer (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
Fig 2. Zn2+-binding by heterodimer of S100A8/S100A9 provides hypotheses for metal binding residues in S100A9 homodimer.

A. Cartoon representations of crystal structure for S100A8(yellow)/S100A9(purple) heterodimer (PDB:4ggf)[17] in the presence of calcium and manganese. The C-terminal tail (grey) of S100A9 is disordered in the absence of transition metals but becomes structured when histidines in the tail coordinate metal ions. Two distinct interdimer metal binding sites are present in the heterodimer as shown. B. Multiple sequence alignment of S100 proteins reveals conserved residues that may bind Zn2+ (blue).

The first potential ligand was the single Cys residue in the protein (Cys3). This Cys is conserved across many S100 proteins. It is part of a short, disordered region of the N-terminus and could plausibly form an interdimer metal Zn2+ site, thereby inducing aggregation. Further, this specific Cys is important for metal-dependent aggregation in other S100 proteins [24,25]. We substituted Ser for Cys at this position and remeasured binding by ITC. The C3S protein, however, remained aggregation-prone and was essentially indistinguishable from wildtype human S100A9 (Fig 3A).

Fig 3.
Fig 3. Mutagenesis of S100A9 disrupts Zn2+ binding and Zn2+-dependent aggregation.

A) Points show heats observed as Zn2+ was titrated onto S100A9 metal binding mutants: S100A9(C3S) (diamonds), S100A9(Δ99) (triangles) and S100A9(ΔZn) (squares), and S100A9(ΔN-Zn) (crosses). B. Zn2+ dependent aggregation of S100A9 is disrupted by mutagenesis of metal binding residues. Photograph shows protein solution post Zn2+ titration in ITC. Aggregation did not occur for S100A9(ΔN-Zn) and S100A9(ΔZn). C. A single-site binding model fit to the ΔN-Zn data. Lines show results sampled from 10,000 Monte Carlo samples of possible fits using pytc [26]. Values are lower- and upper-bounds for 95% credibility interval. D. Addition of Zn2+ to S100A9(ΔZn) does not result in changes to α-helical secondary structure as measured by far UV circular dichroism.

Another potential collection of Zn2+-binding ligands are part of a C-terminal extension unique to S100A9. This “tail” is disordered in crystal structures of the S100A9 homodimer but is ordered in structures of the S100A8/S100A9 heterodimer bound to transition metals. The tail has three histidines that could conceivably participate in transition metal binding by the S100A9 homodimer (Fig. 2B)[17,18,27]. To test for the importance of these residues for Zn2+-binding, we truncated the C-terminal tail of the protein between residues 99 and 100 in the C3S background S100A9(Δ99). This removes three histidine residues, two of which participate in coordination of metals in the S100A8/A9 heterodimer. This mutation did alter the Zn2+ binding isotherm measured by ITC (Fig 3A). The titration lost its second phase and, superficially at least, resembles single-site binding. As with the wildtype protein, however, this protein aggregated significantly (Fig 3B).

The final site we attempted to disrupt consisted of residues that form the canonical tetrahedral transition metal site observed in many S100 protein family members. If the S100A9 site is similar to other S100 proteins, it would consist of residues from the N-terminus of one monomer (H20 and D30), and the C-terminus of the other monomer (H91 and H95). To disrupt this putative site, we introduced two mutations into the C3S background: H20N/D30S. We then tested metal binding for this “ΔN-Zn” mutant. Like the truncation mutant, these mutations disrupted of one of the processes involved in Zn2+-binding by S100A9 (Fig. 3A). This suggests that the two processes for Zn2+ binding observed in the wild-type protein might be occurring separately: one via the predicted tetrahedral Zn2+-binding site and the other via the C-terminal extension. Interestingly, we did not observe aggregation of the ΔN-Zn mutant in the sample cell (Fig. 3B). This suggests that the Zn2+-dependent aggregation of S100A9 is mediated by Zn2+ binding to the canonical Zn2+ binding site of S100 proteins. Because of the lack of aggregation, we were able to extract thermodynamic parameters for this experiment (Fig. 3C). The data fit a single-site binding model, suggesting that S100A9 ΔN-Zn binds with a 1 Zn2+:1 monomer stoichiometry. The 95% credibility interval for the KD was 1.3-3.8 μM, while the buffer-dependent enthalpy was estimated to be between −7.4 and −3.9 kcal/mol (Fig 3C).

As evidenced by the altered ITC results, both the C-terminal tail and H20/D30 contribute to binding, but removal of either is insufficient to completely disrupt binding. Because our goal is to completely disrupt Zn2+ binding to test for its necessity in TLR4 activation, we thus constructed an eight-way mutant protein in which we disrupted all of the residues that may ligate transition metals in S100A9: C3S/H20N/D30S/H91N/H95N/H103N/H104N/H105N. We measured Zn2+ binding to this eight-way mutant by ITC but found no evidence of binding (Fig 3A). Additionally, S100A9(ΔZn) does not aggregate in the sample cell (Fig. 3B). To verify that adding eight mutations did not disrupt the overall fold of the protein, we examined the far-UV CD signal for this protein and found that it is indistinguishable from that of S100A9, indicating similar secondary structures are present in both proteins (Fig 3D).

Protein activates without Zn2+ binding

Having constructed S100A9 variants with compromised Zn2+ binding, we could now test the hypothesis that Zn2+-binding was necessary for TLR4 activation by S100A9. We first tested our truncation mutant of S100A9, which lacks the histidine-rich C-terminal tail and appears to exhibit a single-site binding (Fig 3B). We found that S100A9Δ99 activated similarly to wildtype (Fig 4A). Next, we applied our mutant with fully disrupted Zn2+ binding to our HEK assay. S100A9(ΔZn) activated TLR4, even without being unable to bind to Zn2+ (Fig 4A). To verify that the protein did not bind Zn2+ in the experimental conditions, we repeated out attempt to pull Zn2+ out of our assay media using S100A9. Unlike the wildtype protein and S100A9Δ99, S100A9(ΔZn) did not pull Zn2+ out of the media (Fig 4B).

Fig 4.
Fig 4. Activation of TLR4 by S100A9 occurs in the absence of Zn2+ binding.

A. Metal binding mutants of S100A9 activate TLR4. Points are the technical triplicates from three biological replicates. Horizontal lines are the mean of the biological replicates. Error bars are SEM of the biological replicates. B. S100A9(ΔZn) does not deplete Zn2+ from cell culture media. The concentration of zinc in cell culture media treated with wild-type S100A9, S100A9(Δ99), and S100A9(ΔZn) as measured by ICP-MS. C. Activation of TLR4 by S100A9 occurs both in high and low Zn2+ conditions. Activation by different concentrations of S100A9 in the presence and absence of 10% FBS which contributes Zn2+ to the media. Points are technical triplicates from three biological replicates. Error bars show a standard error on the mean. Mean is shown as a horizontal line. Statistically significant differences (single-tailed Student’s t-test) are noted on each panel. * p < 0.05

These results suggest that Zn2+ is not necessary for activation. To verify that this holds for the wildtype protein, we re-tested wildtype human S100A9 activity in our TLR4 functional assay without adding Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). FBS is a typical additive in these assays that brings in several micromolar Zn2+ [28,29]. The defined medium without FBS, however, has low concentrations of Zn2+ (5 nM)[30]. If Zn2+ is not necessary for activation, S100A9 may still activate TLR4 even in the absence of FBS. As predicted, we observed that S100A9 activated to an equivalent level in low-Zn2+ FBS(-) media relative to the high-Zn2+ FBS(+) media (Fig 4). Indeed, at the highest protein concentrations, S100A9 activated TLR4 slightly more effectively in the FBS(-) vs. FBS(+) sample (p = 0.018).

DISCUSSION

Here we show that Zn2+-binding by the S100A9 homodimer is distinctly different from that of the S100A8/A9 heterodimer and other S100 homodimers. Zn2+-binding involves many residues in S100A9, and likely occurs at two sites. One site appears to involve the C-terminal tail and the other the tetrahedral binding site. Zn2+-binding also induces reversible-aggregation in S100A9. Intriguingly, we find that Zn2+-dependent aggregation of S100A9 is driven by Zn2+ binding to the canonical interdimer site on S100A9, not by the disordered C-terminal extension, unique to S100A9.

Retention of activation of TLR4 by the full metal binding site deletion mutant was surprising given previous data suggests that Zn2+ is required for S100A9 to interact with the TLR4/MD-2 as purified proteins [8]. However, our results here demonstrate that S100A9 can activate TLR4 independent of Zn2+ binding, either as a protein that cannot bind Zn2+ (Fig 4A) or in media that does not contain appreciable quantities of Zn2+.

The ability to disrupt Zn2+ binding without disrupting pro-inflammatory activity may prove extremely useful for dissecting the biology of S100A9. The protein plays to distinct, but related, roles in innate immunity. As a homodimer, it activates inflammation via TLR4[8]. As a heterocomplex with the protein S100A8, it uses high-affinity metal chelation to achieve potent antimicrobial activity [17,18,27,31]. The individual contributions of each function can, however, be difficult to disentangle. For example, to what extent does S100A9 control bacterial growth directly (by nutrient sequestration as a heterocomplex) or indirectly (by activating inflammation and recruiting neutrophils as homodimer)? Until now, such a question would be difficult to answer. Our S100A9(ΔZn) construct could, however, be a powerful reagent to perform such a study, as it remains pro-inflammatory, but also contains multiple mutations known to compromise antimicrobial activity in the heterocomplex[17].

We also show that the C-terminal tail of S100A9 is not required for the interaction with TLR4. Many biological functions both within cells and outside cells have been attributed to the flexible C-terminal tail of S100A9[32–35], the lack of involvement of the C-terminal in the direct interaction with TLR4 suggests that these functions, like antimicrobial activity, may be functionally separable from TLR4-activation by S100A9.

Our results also suggest that the Zn2+-dependent aggregation is not required for activation by S100A9. Concentrations of Zn2+ in the extracellular space are sufficient to induce aggregation of S100A9 in vitro, and S100A9 aggregates have observed in hosts [14,15]. One possibility is that the solution form of S100A9 is active, while the aggregated form is not. If so, aggregation could act as a feedback loop to decrease the pro-inflammatory activity of S100A9. Further work is needed to address whether the Zn2+-induced aggregation results in a loss in pro-inflammatory activity.

Finally, Zn2+-dependent aggregation of S100A9 has posed a technical challenge to in vitro analyses of target binding interactions by S100A9. The observation that activation of TLR4 by S100A9 can occur in the absence of Zn2+-binding facilitates further, previously impossible, in vitro studies of this.

Our work represents an important step in clarifying the nature of the interaction between S100A9 and TLR4. We have revealed that two structural features of S100A9 appear not to contribute to the S100A9-induced activation of TLR4: Zn2+ binding and the disordered C-terminal terminus. Because removal of Zn2+ binding also removes metal-dependent aggregation, this also causes us to favor a model in which the soluble form of S100A9—rather than the aggregate—is the species that activates TLR4. Overall, our S100A9(ΔZn) construct is a much simpler molecule than the wildtype form, setting up future studies to identify the structural and mechanistic basis for the activation of TLR4 by S100A9.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Plasmids and recombinant protein preparation and characterization

Mammalian expression vectors were obtained from Addgene. The construct containing human TLR4 was made available by Ruslan Medzhitov (Addgene plasmid #13085). Constructs containing human CD14 and ELAM-Luc were obtained from Doug Golenbock (Addgene plasmid #13645 and #13029). Human MD-2 was obtained from the DNASU Repository (HsCD00439889).

A synthetic gene construct for human S100A9 (UniProt #P06702) was designed to be free of common restriction sites and codon optimized and purchased as PUC57 construct from GenScript (New Jersey, USA). S100A9 were cloned into a modified 6xHis MBP LIC TEV vector with NcoI and HindIII to yield a protein constructs with a TEV-cleavable histidine tag. Mutations to S100A9 were made using the QuikChange Lightning Mutagenesis Kit from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA).

To express S100A9 wild-type and mutants, E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS competent cells containing the expression vectors for S100 proteins were grown overnight at 37°C, diluted 1:150 into LB containing ampicillin and chloramphenicol, grown to mid-log phase (OD600 ~ 0.6-1), and induced with 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside overnight at 16° C with aeration. Bacterial pellets were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 rpm at 4° C for 20 min and stored at - 20° C. Pellets (~5 g) were suspended by vortexing and lysed in 25 mL Buffer (25 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 25 mM imidazole, pH 7.4) with 37.5 U DNase I (ThermoFisher Scientific) and 0.75 mg Lysozyme (ThermoFisher Scientific) by shaking at RT for approximately 1 hr. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 15,000 RPM for 50 min. at 4° C. Protein was purified using a 5 mL Ni2+-NTA HisTrap column from (Healthcare GE) using an FPLC (Akta Biosciences) with gradient elution to HisB (25 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, with 500 mM imidazole for human, mouse and chicken proteins, 1 M imidazole for opossum S100A9). Pooled elution peak of purified protein was cleaved with tobacco etch protease (TEV) overnight at RT. Cleaved protein was collected from a gradient elution of a 5 mL Ni-NTA column from HisA to HisB. Protein purity was assessed with SDS-PAGE and pure fractions were pooled and dialyzed into 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, treated with 10g/L chelex. For proteins containing cysteine (wild-type and S100A9Δ99, 0.5 mM TCEP was included in dialysis. Protein was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and fresh aliquots were thawed and exchanged into fresh 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7 (prepared with endotoxin-free water) with 3K Nanosep centrifugal devices prior to functional assays. While results shown here are replicates from a single protein prep, TLR4 activation was tested with two independent preps of each mutant to ensure that the results were not batch specific. Protein concentrations were measured using a Bradford assay.

For metal binding experiments, protein was exchanged into 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 500 uM TCEP, 200 uM CaCl2, pH 7.4 and concentration was measured with a Bradford assay. Titrations were conducted at 25°C with stirring at 1000 rpm. The titrations were performed all on the same day, with the same titrant (500 uM ZnCl2, 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, 500 uM TCEP, 200 uM CaCl2, pH 7.4) in an ITC200 from MicroCal. Injections were 2 uL. Integrations were performed with MicroCal Software. We extracted thermodynamic parameters for Zn2+ binding to ΔN-Zn by fitting a single-site binding model as implemented in pytc[26]. We used the last four points of the titration to account for the heat of dilution. We then generated 900,000 Monte Carlo samples sampling over possible fit values. We reported the 95% credibility interval for the thermodynamic parameters. Note that the “fraction competent” term is a nuisance parameter that captures errors in the concentrations of the titrant or stationary material, as well as the fact that not all protein and/or Zn2+ may have been competent to bind. See Freire et al[36].

For secondary structure measurements, protein samples were prepared at 20 μM in 10 mM Trizma, pH 7. Far-UV circular dichroism data was collected between 200–250 nm using a J-815 CD spectrometer (Jasco) with a 1 mm quartz spectrophotometer cell (Starna Cells, Inc. Catalog No. 1-Q-1). Assays for Zn2+-dependent aggregation were performed by adding 100 μM CaCl2, then 100 μM ZnCl2, and finally 500 μM EDTA. Aggregation was tested in duplicate for each protein. Raw ellipticity was converted into mean molar ellipticity using concentration and the number of residues for each protein.

Cell culture and transfection conditions

Human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T/17, ATCC CRL-11268) were maintained up to 30 passages in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37° C with 5% CO2. For each transfection, a confluent 100 mm plate of HEK293T/17 cells was treated at room temperature with 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA in HBSS and resuspended with an addition of DMEM + 10% FBS. This was diluted 4-fold into fresh medium and 135 μL aliquots of resuspended cells were transferred to a 96-well cell culture treated plate. Transfection mixes were made with 10 ng of TLR4, 1 ng of CD14, 0.5 ng of MD-2, 0.1 ng of Renilla, 20 ng of ELAM-Luc, and 68.4 ng pcDNA3.1(+) per well for a total of 100 ng of DNA, diluted in OptiMEM to a volume of 10 μL/well. To the DNA mix, 0.5 μL per well of PLUS reagent was added followed by a brief vortex and RT incubation for 10 min. Lipofectamine was diluted 0.5 μL into 9.5 μL OptiMEM per well. This was added to the DNA + PLUS mix, vortexed briefly and incubated at RT for 15 min. The transfection mix was diluted to 65 μL/well in OptiMEM and aliquoted onto a plate. Cells were incubated with transfection mix overnight (18-22 hrs) and then treated with protein (0-10 μM) or LPS (100 ng/well) mixtures prepared in 25% buffer (20 mM HEPES, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7) and 75% cell culture media (DMEM + 10% FBS). E. coli K-12 LPS (tlrl-eklps, Invivogen) was dissolved at 5 mg/mL in endotoxin free water, aliquots were stored at −20° C. To avoid freeze-thaw cycles, working stocks of LPS were prepared at 10 ug/mL and stored at 4° C. There has been some concern in testing recombinant DAMPs against TLR4 due to the potential presence of contaminating LPS in proteins which have been expressed in bacteria [37,38]. We tested our S100s in the presence of 50 μg/mL polymyxin B, an LPS binding agent to limit signaling from LPS contamination in recombinant protein preparations. This concentration of polymyxin B eliminated signaling by 100 ng/mL of LPS but had a minimal effect on the signaling by S100A9. Cells were incubated with treatments for 4 hr. The Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega) was used to assay Firefly and Renilla luciferase activity of individual wells. Each NF-κB induction value shown represents the Firefly luciferase activity/Renilla luciferase activity.

Metal depletion experiments

Samples were prepared in the same way as HEK cell treatments. First, 150 uL of 8 uM protein was prepared in chelex treated 20 mM HEPES, 100 mM, pH 7.4, then protein was diluted 1:4 into DMEM + 10% FBS. Samples were incubated in cell culture incubator (37 C with 5% CO2) for 1 hr and then filtered with 15 mL 3K microsep columns by centrifuging at 5000 xg for 20 min. Flow-through was collected and sent for analysis by the Elemental Analysis Core at Oregon Health and Sciences University. For each sample 100 μl of the filtered media solution was added to 1 ml of 1 % HNO3 (trace metal grade, Fisher) in a 15 ml acid-rinsed centrifuge tube (VWR). Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP MS) analysis was performed using an Agilent 7700x equipped with an ASX 500 autos ampler. The system was operated at a radio frequency power of 1550 W, an argon plasma gas flow rate of 15 L/min, Ar carrier gas flow rate of 0.9 L/min. Elements were measured in kinetic energy discrimination (KED) mode using He gas (4.3 ml/min). Data were quantified using a 11-point (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 500, 1000 ppb (ng/g) for Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn using a multi-element standard. For each sample, data were acquired in triplicates and averaged. A coefficient of variance (CoV) was determined from frequent measurements of a sample containing ~10 ppb of Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn. An internal standard (Sc, Ge, Bi) continuously introduced with the sample was used to correct for detector fluctuations and to monitor plasma stability. Elemental recovery was evaluated by measuring NIST reference material (water, SRM 1643f) and found to within 90 - 100% for all determined elements.

FUNDING

This research was funded by a grant from the American Heart Association (AHA-15BGIA22830013, MJH, https://heart.org) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH-T32GM007413, ANL, https://nih.gov). ICPMS measurements were in the OHSU Elemental Analysis Core with partial support from NIH core grant S10RR025512. MJH is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences, supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts (https://www.pewtrusts.org/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Project was conceptualized by ANL and MJH. Investigation was performed by ANL and RS. Funding acquisition, project administration, resources and supervision were performed by MJH. Visualization and writing of original draft were performed by ANL and MJH. Reviewing and editing were performed by ANL, RS, MJH.

Supporting information captions

S1 Movie. Addition of ZnSO4 leads to reversible aggregation of S100A9. The solution shown contains 1 mM S100A9 in 10 mM Tris, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4 at room temperature (approximately 25 °C). Five seconds into the movie, 1 mM ZnSO4 is added, leading to massive aggregation. 12 seconds in, 2 mM EDTA is added, dissolving the aggregate.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

S1 Movie was kindly shared by Dr. Jeremy Anderson.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Riva M, Källberg E, Björk P, Hancz D, Vogl T, Roth J, et al. Induction of nuclear factor-κB responses by the S100A9 protein is Toll-like receptor-4-dependent. Immunology. 2012;137: 172–182. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2012.03619.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Vogl T, Leukert N, Barczyk K, Strupat K, Roth J. Biophysical characterization of S100A8 and S100A9 in the absence and presence of bivalent cations. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Cell Res. 2006;1763: 1298–1306. doi:10.1016/J.BBAMCR.2006.08.028
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bachmann MP
    Riva M, He Z, Källberg E, Ivars F, Leanderson T. Human S100A9 Protein Is Stabilized by Inflammatory Stimuli via the Formation of Proteolytically-Resistant Homodimers. Bachmann MP, editor. PLoS One. 2013;8: e61832. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061832
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Averill MM, Kerkhoff C, Bornfeldt KE. S100A8 and S100A9 in Cardiovascular Biology and Disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32: 223–229. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.236927
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Ryckman C, Vandal K, Rouleau P, Talbot M, Tessier PA. Proinflammatory Activities of S100: Proteins S100A8, S100A9, and S100A8/A9 Induce Neutrophil Chemotaxis and Adhesion. J Immunol. 2003;170: 3233–3242. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.170.6.3233
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Vogl T, Tenbrock K, Ludwig S, Leukert N, Ehrhardt C, van Zoelen MAD, et al. Mrp8 and Mrp14 are endogenous activators of Toll-like receptor 4, promoting lethal, endotoxin-induced shock. Nat Med. 2007;13: 1042–1049. doi:10.1038/nm1638
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Schiopu A, Cotoi OS. S100A8 and S100A9: DAMPs at the Crossroads between Innate Immunity, Traditional Risk Factors, and Cardiovascular Disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2013/828354
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Akira S
    Björk P, Björk A, Vogl T, Stenström M, Liberg D, Olsson A, et al. Identification of Human S100A9 as a Novel Target for Treatment of Autoimmune Disease via Binding to Quinoline-3-Carboxamides. Akira S, editor. PLoS Biol. 2009;7: e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000097
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.
    1. Tang D
    Chen B, Miller AL, Rebelatto M, Brewah Y, Rowe DC, Clarke L, et al. S100A9 Induced inflammatory responses are mediated by distinct damage associated molecular patterns (DAMP) receptors in vitro and in vivo. Tang D, editor. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0115828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115828
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    Austermann J, Friesenhagen J, Fassl SK, Ortkras T, Burgmann J, Barczyk-Kahlert K, et al. Alarmins MRP8 and MRP14 Induce Stress Tolerance in Phagocytes under Sterile Inflammatory Conditions. Cell Rep. 2014;9: 2112–2124. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.020
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    Dai J, Kumbhare A, Youssef D, McCall CE, Gazzar M El. Intracellular S100A9 Promotes Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells during Late Sepsis. Front Immunol. 2017;8: 1565. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01565
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    Neidhart M, Pajak A, Laskari K, Riksen NP, Joosten LAB, Netea MG, et al. Oligomeric S100A4 Is Associated With Monocyte Innate Immune Memory and Bypass of Tolerance to Subsequent Stimulation With Lipopolysaccharides. Front Immunol. 2019;10: 791. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00791
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Kessel C, Fühner S, Brockmeyer S, Wittkowski H, Föll D. Hexameric S100A12 is required for pro-inflammatory TLR4-signalling. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2015;13: O30. doi:10.1186/1546-0096-13-S1-O30
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    Vogl T, Gharibyan AL, Morozova-Roche LA. Pro-Inflammatory S100A8 and S100A9 Proteins: Self-Assembly into Multifunctional Native and Amyloid Complexes. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13: 2893–2917. doi:10.3390/ijms13032893
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gazit E
    Yanamandra K, Alexeyev O, Zamotin V, Srivastava V, Shchukarev A, Brorsson A-C, et al. Amyloid Formation by the Pro-Inflammatory S100A8/A9 Proteins in the Ageing Prostate. Gazit E, editor. PLoS One. 2009;4: e5562. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005562
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Vogl T, Stratis A, Wixler V, Völler T, Thurainayagam S, Jorch SK, et al. Autoinhibitory regulation of S100A8/S100A9 alarmin activity locally restricts sterile inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2018;128: 1852–1866. doi:10.1172/JCI89867
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    Damo SM, Kehl-Fie TE, Sugitani N, Holt ME, Rathi S, Murphy WJ, et al. Molecular basis for manganese sequestration by calprotectin and roles in the innate immune response to invading bacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110: 3841–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1220341110
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Hayden JA, Brophy MB, Cunden LS, Nolan EM. High-Affinity Manganese Coordination by Human Calprotectin Is Calcium-Dependent and Requires the Histidine-Rich Site Formed at the Dimer Interface. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135: 775–787. doi:10.1021/ja3096416
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Chow JC, Young DW, Golenbock DT, Christ WJ, Gusovsky F. Toll-like receptor-4 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 1999;274: 10689–92. doi:10.1074/JBC.274.16.10689
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Rallabhandi P, Bell J, Boukhvalova MS, Medvedev A, Lorenz E, Arditi M, et al. Analysis of TLR4 polymorphic variants: new insights into TLR4/MD-2/CD14 stoichiometry, structure, and signaling. J Immunol. 2006;177: 322–332. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.322
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Ehrchen JM, Sunderkotter C, Foell D, Vogl T, Roth J. The endogenous Toll-like receptor 4 agonist S100A8/S100A9 (calprotectin) as innate amplifier of infection, autoimmunity, and cancer. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86: 557–566. doi:10.1189/jlb.1008647
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.
    1. Lebedeva I V
    Källberg E, Vogl T, Liberg D, Olsson A, Björk P, Wikström P, et al. S100A9 Interaction with TLR4 Promotes Tumor Growth. Lebedeva I V., editor. PLoS One. 2012;7: e34207. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034207
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Loes AN, Bridgham JT, Harms MJ. Coevolution of the toll-like receptor 4 complex with calgranulins and lipopolysaccharide. Front Immunol. 2018;9. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00304
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    Moroz O V., Wilson KS, Bronstein IB. The role of zinc in the S100 proteins: insights from the X-ray structures. Amino Acids. 2011;41: 761–772. doi:10.1007/s00726-010-0540-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Koch M, Bhattacharya S, Kehl T, Gimona M, Vašák M, Chazin W, et al. Implications on zinc binding to S100A2. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Cell Res. 2007;1773: 457–470. doi:10.1016/J.BBAMCR.2006.12.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    Duvvuri H, Wheeler LC, Harms MJ. pytc: Open-Source Python Software for Global Analyses of Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Data. Biochemistry. 2018;57: 2578–2583. doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01264
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    Brunjes Brophy M, Nakashige TG, Gaillard A, Nolan EM. Contributions of the S100A9 C-Terminal Tail to High-Affinity Mn(II) Chelation by the Host-Defense Protein Human Calprotectin. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135: 17804–17817. doi:10.1021/ja407147d
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Cho Y-E, Lomeda R-AR, Ryu S-H, Lee J-H, Beattie JH, Kwun I-S. Cellular Zn depletion by metal ion chelators (TPEN, DTPA and chelex resin) and its application to osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Nutr Res Pract. 2007;1: 29–35. doi:10.4162/nrp.2007.1.1.29
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Richardson CER, Cunden LS, Butty VL, Nolan EM, Lippard SJ, Shoulders MD. A Method for Selective Depletion of Zn(II) Ions from Complex Biological Media and Evaluation of Cellular Consequences of Zn(II) Deficiency. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140: 2413–2416. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b12897
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    Bozym RA, Chimienti F, Giblin LJ, Gross GW, Korichneva I, Li Y, et al. Free zinc ions outside a narrow concentration range are toxic to a variety of cells in vitro. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010;235: 741–50. doi:10.1258/ebm.2010.009258
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Kehl-Fie TE, Chitayat S, Hood MI, Damo S, Restrepo N, Garcia C, et al. Nutrient Metal Sequestration by Calprotectin Inhibits Bacterial Superoxide Defense, Enhancing Neutrophil Killing of Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Host & Microbe. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2011.07.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Pagano RL, Sampaio SC, Juliano L, Juliano MA, Giorgi R. The C-terminus of murine S100A9 inhibits spreading and phagocytic activity of adherent peritoneal cells. Inflamm Res. 2005;54: 204–210. doi:10.1007/s00011-005-1344-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.
    Pagano RL, Moraes NF, De Lorenzo BH, Coccuzzo Sampaio S, Mariano M, Giorgi R. Inhibition of macrophage functions by the C-terminus of murine S100A9 is dependent on B-1 cells. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014: 836491. doi:10.1155/2014/836491
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.
    Hessian PA, Wilkinson L, Hogga N. The S100 family protein MRP-14 (S100A9) has homology with the contact domain of high molecular weight kininogen [Internet]. FEBS 15977 FEBS Letters. 1995. Available: https://ac.els-cdn.com/001457939500905O/1-s2.0-001457939500905O-main.pdf?_tid=e20bc0a0-3632-4d83-8538-58bbb2ec0ae1&acdnat=1539209233_6f0045ba03b298d375408cb40b86e870
  35. 35.↵
    Sopalla C, Leukert N, Sorg C, Kerkhoff C. Evidence for the Involvement of the Unique C-Tail of S100A9 in the Binding of Arachidonic Acid to the Heterocomplex S100A8/A9. Biol Chem. 2002;383: 1895–1905. doi:10.1515/BC.2002.213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Freire E, Schön A, Velazquez-Campoy A. Chapter 5 Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: General Formalism Using Binding Polynomials. Methods Enzymol. 2009;455: 127–155. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(08)04205-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Schaefer L. Complexity of danger: the diverse nature of damage-associated molecular patterns. J Biol Chem. 2014;289: 35237–45. doi:10.1074/jbc.R114.619304
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Tsan M-F, Gao B. Endogenous ligands of Toll-like receptors. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;76: 514–9. doi:10.1189/jlb.0304127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
Back to top
Posted October 07, 2019.
Download PDF
Email
Zinc-independent activation of Toll-like receptor 4 by S100A9
Andrea N. Loes, Ran Shi, Michael J. Harms
bioRxiv 796219; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/796219
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area