ABSTRACT
Human brain organoids represent a powerful tool for the study of human neurological diseases particularly those that impact brain growth and structure. However, many neurological diseases lack obvious anatomical abnormalities, yet significantly impact neural network functions, raising the question of whether organoids possess sufficient neural network architecture and complexity to model these conditions. Here, we explore the network level functions of brain organoids using calcium sensor imaging and extracellular recording approaches that together reveal the existence of complex oscillatory network behaviors reminiscent of intact brain preparations. We further demonstrate strikingly abnormal epileptiform network activity in organoids derived from a Rett Syndrome patient despite only modest anatomical differences from isogenically matched controls, and rescue with an unconventional neuromodulatory drug Pifithrin-α. Together, these findings provide an essential foundation for the utilization of human brain organoids to study intact and disordered human brain network formation and illustrate their utility in therapeutic discovery.
INTRODUCTION
Brain organoids derived from human pluripotent stem cells have been shown to recapitulate unique features of human brain development and are increasingly being used as model systems to gain novel insights into a variety of neurological diseases1–3. Organoids represent a significant development in the toolkit available for of our understanding of brain function and disease mechanisms as much of our current knowledge is derived from studies of embryonic and adult animals, particularly rodents. While there is a great deal of conservation in the overall mechanisms of brain development across evolution, it has become increasingly clear that the human brain possesses many distinct features that are not shared with other species4, 5, and it remains unclear how well animal models of neurological disease faithfully recapitulate human pathologies. Moreover, neuromodulatory drugs shown to be effective in ameliorating neurological disease in animals frequently fail when brought to clinical trials6, 7, emphasizing the need for human cell-based systems to help evaluate drug efficacy.
Most brain organoid studies to date have capitalized on the anatomical and cytoarchitectural characteristics of the organoid to model disorders that grossly impact the growth or organization of the human brain such as microcephaly, macrocephaly, and lissencephaly1–3. However, the diverse functions of the human brain depend not only on its stereotyped anatomical structure, but also on the establishment and function of neural microcircuits, and their assembly into neural networks. Indeed, errors in the initial formation of these circuits or damage after their appropriate development are thought to underlie a number of neurological diseases ranging from autism spectrum and neuropsychiatric disorders to epilepsy and Alzheimer’s disease8, 9. Reliably assessing network activity becomes especially critical in those situations in which there is clear clinical disease but no overt structural brain abnormality.
Despite ample evidence of the structural complexity of brain organoids, the presence of sophisticated neural network activities has not been comprehensively demonstrated in live whole-organoid preparations. A key identifying feature of robust neural networks is the presence of distinct frequencies of oscillatory activity. Such activities are thought to depend on precisely tuned inhibitory-excitatory neuronal interactions and can be recorded from intact brain preparations, but are not readily achievable in two-dimensional culture systems10, 11. In addition, specific changes in oscillatory activity, such as the loss of gamma activity or the emergence of polymorphic low frequency activity, can be clear indicators of underlying neurological dysfunction12–14.
In the following study we sought to develop and characterize brain organoid network activity utilizing recent advances in organoid techniques15 to generate cerebral cortex-ganglionic eminence (Cx+GE) “fusion” organoids in which excitatory and inhibitory neurons functionally integrate16–18. We then used a combination of calcium sensor imaging and extracellular recordings of local field potentials to demonstrate the presence of sophisticated network-level activities including oscillatory rhythms. These techniques allowed us to clearly discern pathological network and oscillatory changes in fusion organoids containing a mutation in the Methyl-CpG Binding Protein 2 (MECP2) gene associated with Rett syndrome19. Collectively, these findings provide a framework for how brain organoids can be utilized to investigate the network-level functions of the human brain and illustrate their utility in modeling neurological disorders.
RESULTS
Fusion of cortex and ganglionic eminence organoids permits the assembly of abundant excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connections
As cortical circuits in vivo contain a mixture of both excitatory and inhibitory connections, we sought to replicate this process using an organoid “fusion” technique to combine separately generated cortical and subcortical organoids and create an integrated structure (Fig. 1 and Extended Data Fig. 1). Organoids were directed towards cortex (Cx) or ganglionic eminence (GE) identities through the absence or presence of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) pathway agonists in the organoid differentiation scheme (Fig. 1a)15. In the absence of Shh signaling, organoids predominantly exhibited cortical character including expression of the apical and basal radial glial progenitor marker PAX6, the intermediate progenitor marker TBR2 (EOMES), deep cortical plate markers including TBR1, CTIP2 (BCL11B), and BHLHB5 (BHLHE22), and superficial layer markers such as SATB2, and BRN2 (POU3F2) (Fig. 1b and Fig. 3a). Shh pathway-stimulated organoids by contrast expressed canonical GE progenitor and migratory interneuron markers such as NKX2.1, DLX1, DLX2, and OLIG2. Over time in culture, many neurons within the GE organoids expressed the general GABAergic inhibitory neuron marker GAD65 along with a variety of interneuron subtype markers including somatostatin (SST), calretinin, and calbindin (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig. 1c; see also15).
In the developing forebrain in vivo, GE-derived interneurons migrate tangentially into the adjacent cortex and functionally integrate into cortical neural networks, a process that can be recapitulated in vitro16–18. Using adeno-associated virus (AAV)-TdTomato labeling of the GE organoid before Cx+GE fusion, we observed widespread migration of TdTomato+ cells originating from the GE and dispersion within the adjacent Cx two weeks after fusion (Fig. 1a, c). Minimal TdTomato+ cell migration was seen in control Cx+Cx or Cx+GE fusions where Cx was pre-labeled with AAV-TdTomato (Fig. 1c). Immunohistochemical analyses of the cortical aspect of Cx+GE fusions revealed intermingling of Cx-derived excitatory neurons, exemplified by SATB2 which is not expressed within GE organoids, and inhibitory interneurons identified by GAD65 and DLX5 costaining (Fig. 1d). By contrast, Cx+Cx fusions only expressed the neuronal marker SATB2 with few if any GAD65+ DLX5+ cells (Fig. 1d). The integration of excitatory and inhibitory interneurons within the Cx+GE organoids was further confirmed by the prominence of both excitatory synapses, distinguished by VGLUT1 and PSD95 colocalization, and inhibitory synapses visualized by VGAT and gephyrin costaining (Fig. 1e). Cx+Cx organoids, in comparison, predominantly contained only excitatory synapses (Fig. 1e) showing that most inhibitory synapses in the Cx+GE organoids are GE-derived.
Cortex-ganglionic eminence fusion organoids exhibit complex neural network activities including interneuron-dependent multi-frequency oscillations
To determine the range of physiological activity in the fusion organoids, we utilized both live two-photon based calcium imaging of intact organoids and extracellular recordings of local field potentials (LFPs) (Fig. 2a). We applied constrained non-negative matrix factorization extended (CNMF-E) methods for calcium signal processing to extract spiking dynamics from records20, 21, which enabled us to perform unbiased categorization of single cell calcium dynamics into functional microcircuit clusters (Extended Data Figs. 2, 3 and Supplementary Videos 1-3). In combination with LFP data, this approach allowed us to characterize brain organoid physiological activity at single cell, microcircuit, and network levels. After infection with AAV-GCaMP6f virus, we measured spontaneous calcium activity as changes in GCaMP6f fluorescence (ΔF/F, Fig. 2b). Both Cx+Cx and Cx+GE fusions showed comparable spontaneous neural activities (Fig. 2c and Extended Data Fig. 3). However, when we assessed the role of inhibition by adding either the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline methiodide (BMI) or Gabazine, only Cx+GE fusions showed functional GABAergic interneuron-glutamatergic cell connectivity. Both drugs elicited repetitive waves of nearly complete synchronization of calcium transients in Cx+GE fusions (Fig. 2c, d), with no such effect in Cx+Cx fusions (Fig. 2c-e and Supplementary Videos 4-7). Hierarchical clustering revealed large groups of neurons with highly correlated activity in Cx+GE organoids following BMI treatment, while only small groups were observed in the Cx+Cx organoids (Fig. 2d).
LFP measurements in untreated fusion organoids uncovered simultaneous, sustained oscillations at multiple frequencies from 1-100 Hz in Cx+GE fusions (Fig. 2f-h), a hallmark of mature neural networks in vivo22, while no discernible oscillatory activities were seen in Cx+Cx structures (Fig. 2, i to k). These findings suggest that the presence of GE-derived inhibitory interneurons stimulates maturation of excitatory cortical networks, as has been shown in the rodent brain23, 24. Moreover, these data indicate that interneurons uniquely entrain the behavior of excitatory cells in Cx+GE fusions, and that the resultant networks are capable of producing complex oscillations resembling those observed by extra- and intracranial recordings of the intact human brain.
Rett syndrome fusion organoids exhibit hypersynchronous neural network activities
We next used this platform to measure pathophysiological changes associated with human neurological disease. Rett syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder typically caused by de novo mutations in one copy of the MECP2 gene on the X chromosome, where affected females exhibit symptoms as early as seven months of age25. Rett female patients exhibit motor delays, cognitive and neuropsychiatric disturbances, autism, and epilepsy25. However, these changes likely present well before clinical symptoms. For example, a recent hiPSC-based study has suggested that Rett may impact prenatal neurogenesis through microRNA-mediated changes in AKT and ERK activity26. Interestingly, while neuroanatomical changes in dendritic arborization and spine density have been reported in multiple Rett models25, 27–30, gross structural abnormalities are less prevalent.
Due to random X-chromosome inactivation, Rett patients are typically mosaic in their MECP2 status, with some cells expressing and others lacking a functional MECP2 allele. This feature permitted the generation of isogenic hiPSC from a single patient as hiPSC reprograming does not revert X-chromosome silencing30. We accordingly generated Cx and GE organoids from isogenic control (iCtrl) and MECP2-mutant (Mut) Rett syndrome patient hiPSC and found no obvious differences in their cytoarchitecture or cell composition (Fig. 3, a and b). The cortex region of both iCtrl and Mut Cx+GE fusions also contained similar percentages of GAD65+ interneurons (mean ∼25%; Fig. 3, c and d), comparable to the percentages reported in most mammalian species31. VGLUT1/PSD95 costaining showed that the abundance of excitatory synapses was nevertheless slightly increased in Mut fusion organoids relative to iCtrl, while VGAT/gephyrin+ inhibitory synapses were not significantly different (Fig. 3, e and f), suggesting that the Mut fusion organoids may be prone to hyperexcitability.
More striking, however, were activity differences revealed though GCaMP6f imaging. Mut Cx+GE fusions exhibited epochs of spontaneously synchronized calcium transients (Fig. 3, g and h, and Supplementary Videos 8-9) reminiscent of the synchronizations observed following administration of GABAA receptor antagonists to control samples (Fig. 2, c to e and Supplementary Videos 4-5) and the epileptiform changes seen in murine models of Rett syndrome32. Previous reports have indicated increased overall activity and diminished size of neural microcircuits in mouse chemoconvulsant epilepsy models33. We similarly observed that the increased synchronization of calcium transients in Mut Cx+GE organoids was accompanied by reductions in both the size of microcircuit clusters and the number of neurons within each cluster (Extended Data Fig. 4a).
Rett syndrome fusion organoids display deficits in low-frequency oscillations and frequent appearance of epileptiform high-frequency oscillations
LFP recordings of iCtrl Cx+GE fusions demonstrated infrequent spikes and sustained low frequency and gamma oscillations with few epochs of higher frequency oscillations (> 100 Hz) as was observed with H9 hESC-derived fusion organoids (Fig. 4, a to e, compare to Fig. 2d). By contrast, Mut Cx+GE organoids lacked low frequency and gamma oscillations (Fig. 4, b and c) and instead exhibited recurring epileptiform-appearing spikes and high frequency oscillations (HFOs, ∼200-500 Hz; Fig. 4, a, d, e and Extended Data Fig. 5). These findings concurred with calcium imaging data which showed rare but large high amplitude calcium synchronizations in Mut fusion organoids that could result in spikes or HFOs, as opposed to the numerous small synchronizations seen in iCtrl samples which likely generate sustained lower frequency oscillations without epileptiform events (Fig. 3i and Extended Data Fig. 4b). Hypersynchrony, HFOs, and spikes seen in Mut Cx-GE organoids are all consistent with the electrographic changes observed in human epilepsy34, 35. Indeed, electroencephalographic abnormalities were documented in the Rett patient whose hiPSCs were used in this study30.
Epilepsy is present in 60-80% of Rett patients and is thought to arise primarily from interneuron dysfunction36, 37, though MECP2 loss in other cell types has been implicated in the syndrome19. As our Cx and GE organoids are respectively enriched in excitatory vs. inhibitory interneurons, we generated “mixed” fusions in which either the Cx or GE half of the fused structure was Mut while the other half was iCtrl, as a means of determining the compartment and cell type in which MECP2 deficiency matters most. Mut Cx+iCtrl GE mixed-fusion organoids displayed an LFP profile nearly identical to unmixed iCtrl Cx+GE fusions (Fig. 4, a to e and Extended Data Fig. 5). By contrast, iCtrl Cx+Mut GE organoids demonstrated frequent spikes and HFOs along with deficits in distinct lower frequency activity, similar to unmixed Mut Cx+GE fusions (Fig. 4, a to e and Extended Data Fig. 5), suggesting that MECP2 deficiency in GE-derived interneurons drives the observed changes in network function. Consistent with this conclusion, overall spike frequency was significantly increased in unmixed Mut Cx+GE organoids and iCtrl Cx+Mut GE mixed-fusions compared to iCtrl Cx+GE or Mut Cx+iCtrl GE structures (Fig. 4f).
Both human and murine in vivo studies have shown an inverse relationship between gamma band power and epileptiform discharges12, 13. Gamma oscillations are thought to require complex inhibitory-excitatory network interactions that are highly prone to disruption by epileptic or interictal discharges12. In agreement with this, we routinely observed gamma oscillations in unmixed iCtrl Cx+GE and mixed Mut Cx+iCtrl GE organoids and rarely recorded spiking activity in these samples. In contrast, we observed significant reductions of gamma oscillations in Mut Cx+GE and iCtrl Cx+Mut GE structures (Fig. 4g) coincident with frequent epileptiform spikes and HFOs (Fig. 4d).
Neural oscillation defects seen in Rett syndrome fusion organoids can be partially restored by administration of an unconventional neuromodulatory drug Pifithrin-α
A heralded, but largely unrealized, application of patient-derived hiPSCs is in personalized medicine. We therefore sought to determine the utility of the epileptiform phenotype observed in Rett syndrome organoids for drug testing. First, we used a broad-spectrum anti-seizure medication, sodium valproate (VPA), which is commonly used to treat epilepsy resulting from Rett Syndrome38. We also tested the effect of a putative TP53 target inhibitor, Pifithrin-α, based on previous studies showing that MECP2 deficiency leads to over-activation of the TP53 pathway and premature neuronal senescence30, 39. Consistent with its known spike suppressant properties, exposure to VPA significantly reduced spiking activity in the Mut Cx+GE organoids (Fig. 5, a and c), although it neither decreased HFOs nor restored lower frequency oscillations (Fig. 5, b and d). Pifithrin-α similarly reduced spike frequency but remarkably also suppressed HFOs and resulted in the re-emergence of gamma oscillations (Fig. 5, a to d). These results suggest that unlike VPA, which appeared to merely reduce neuronal hyperexcitability, Pifithrin-α may modulate more upstream excitatory-inhibitory physiologic interactions resulting in a more global restoration of network-level functions. These findings further illustrate the potential value of the fusion organoid modeling approach in personalized drug discovery.
DISCUSSION
Collectively, these experiments demonstrate the existence of highly sophisticated physiological activities within Cx+GE organoids, congruent with their cytoarchitectural and cellular complexity. These results stand in agreement with findings recently reported by Trujillo et al, who have also observed the emergence of neural oscillations in cortical organoids cultured for prolonged time periods using a different recording approach40. Our studies here further demonstrate that the emergence of higher order network activities such as multi-frequency oscillations requires functional integration of inhibitory interneurons into the excitatory network framework as permitted by the organoid fusion technique, since no oscillations were apparent without them. Critically, this approach also allowed us to identify striking electrophysiological phenotypes in MECP2 mutant Cx+GE organoids despite their cytoarchitectural similarity to iCtrl samples. Nevertheless, we observed a modest increase in excitatory but not inhibitory synaptic puncta in Mut organoids consistent with their overall level of hyperactivity and hypersynchrony. The fusion organoid approach also enabled us to demonstrate that MECP2 mutation restricted to GE derivatives, most notably inhibitory interneurons, was sufficient to drive epileptiform-like LFP changes, suggesting that multifactorial excitatory-inhibitory cell interactions underlie the MECP2-deficient phenotype. Interestingly, we achieved a more complete rescue of the Mut phenotype with a novel drug, Pifithrin-α, than was seen with a traditional anti-seizure medication, VPA, meriting future investigations into its neuromodulatory actions.
In summary, these findings illustrate the potential of brain organoids both as a unique platform for characterizing human neural networks and for personalized drug discovery and research. A remaining challenge is to delineate the precise microcircuit and cell type-specific perturbations that underlie both the oscillatory and pathological epileptiform-like changes revealed in these studies. The fusion organoid system is highly amenable to such detailed cellular and circuit analyses and provides unprecedented opportunities for modeling neural network dysfunction associated with a variety of human neurological disorders.
METHODS
hESC and hiPSC culture and organoid generation
All hPSC experiments were conducted following prior approval from the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee (ESCRO) and Institutional Review Board. Cortex (Cx) and ganglionic eminence (GE) organoids were generated from the H9 hPSC line41 or Rett hiPSCs30 as described previously15 and outlined in schematic form in Fig 1a. Fusion was performed with minor modifications as previously reported17. Cx and GE Organoids were cut at day 56 and two halves (e.g. Cx+GE or Cx+Cx) were combined in a microcentrifuge tube containing 300μl of N2B27 media15 and placed in a hyperoxic incubator containing 5% CO2 and 40% O2 for 72 hours. Fused structures were then carefully transferred to 24-well oxygen permeable dishes (Lumox, Sarstedt) and maintained in a hyperoxic environment with media changes every other day until their use. Neuron migration experiments were conducted by infection of either a Cx or GE organoid with 5 μl of ∼1.98×1013 ml−1 AAV1-TdTomato (pENN.AAV.CAG.tdTomato.WPRE.SV40, a gift of Dr. James M. Wilson, University of Pennsylvania Vector Core AV-1-PV3365) on day 56 and fusion was performed as described 3 days after infection.
Generation of Rett hiPSCs
Rett iPSCs were derived from fibroblast line GM07982 obtained from Coriell Repositories and generated by lentiviral transduction of the cells with the Yamanaka factors (Oct4, Klf4, Sox2, and cMyc) as previously described30. GM07982 cells were isolated from a 25-year-old female noted to have EEG abnormalities, and found to contain a truncating frameshift mutation, 705delG, in the MECP2 gene. As Rett females are typically heterozygous for the MECP2 mutation, the collected fibroblasts are mosaic in their MECP2 status with approximately half of the cells expressing the non-mutant allele. Unlike murine cells, the inactive X chromosome remains inactive after reprograming to pluripotency42, allowing the generation MECP2 mutant (Mut) and isogenic control (iCtrl) hiPSCs from the same patient fibroblasts.
Immunohistochemistry
Organoids were immersion fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose, frozen in Tissue-Tek Optimal Cutting Temperature (O.C.T., Sakura) media, and cryosectioned. Immunostaining was performed using previously published laboratory protocols15, 43. Primary antibodies used include the following: goat anti-BRN2 (POU3F2; Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-6029), 1:4000; mouse anti-CALBINDIN (Clone CB-955, Sigma-Aldrich C9848), 1:5000; rabbit anti-CALRETININ (EMD Millipore AB5054), 1:2000; rat anti-CTIP2 (BCL11B; Abcam ab18465), 1:1000; rabbit anti-DLX144 (generous gift of Drs. Soo Kyung Lee and Jae Lee), 1:3000; guinea pig anti-DLX245 (generous gift of Drs. Kazuaki Yoshikawa and Hideo Shinagawa), 1:3000; guinea pig anti-DLX545 (generous gift of Drs. Kazuaki Yoshikawa and Hideo Shinagawa), 1:3000; rabbit anti-FOXG1 (Abcam ab18259), 1:1000; rabbit anti-GABA (Sigma-Aldrich A2052), 1:10000; mouse anti-GAD65 (BD Biosciences 559931), 1:200; mouse anti-GEPHYRIN (Synaptic Systems 147021), 1:500; goat anti-LHX2 (C-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-19344), 1:1000; rabbit anti-MECP2 (Diagenode C15410052), 1:1000; mouse anti-N-CADHERIN (CDH2, BD Biosciences 610920), 1:1000; mouse anti-NKX2.1 (Novocastra NCL-L-TTR-1), 1:500; mouse anti-PAX6 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), 1:100; rabbit anti-PAX6 (MBL International PD022), 1:1000; mouse anti-PSD95 (Millipore MAB1598), 1:1000; mouse anti-SATB2 (Abcam ab51502), 1:100; goat anti-SOX2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-17320, 1:100; rat ant-SOMATOSTATIN (SST, EMD Millipore MAB354), 1:100; rabbit anti-TBR1 (Abcam ab31940), 1:2000; chicken anti-TBR2 (EOMES; EMD Millipore AB15894), 1:1000; guinea pig anti-VGAT (Synaptic Systems 131004), 1:1000; guinea pig anti-VGLUT1 (SLC17A7; EMD Millipore AB5905), 1:1000. Secondary antibody staining was conducted using Dylight 405-, FITC-, Alexa 488-, Cy3-, Alexa 594-, Cy5-, Alexa 647, Dylight 647-conjugated donkey anti-species-specific IgG or IgM antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch or Invitrogen/Molecular Probes). Nuclei were often counterstained using Hoechst 33258 added to the secondary antibody mix at a final concentration of 1 μg ml−1. Images were primarily obtained on a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope except for synaptic puncta, which were imaged using a 63X objective on a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope equipped with Airyscan technology. All images that were directly compared were obtained with identical laser power settings. Image adjustments were limited to brightness, contrast, and level and were applied equally to all images in a set being compared.
Cell and synaptic puncta quantification
All cell quantifications were obtained using at least 9 images per sample consisting of 3 non-contiguous regions per image and at least 3 images obtained from independent experiments. For GAD65 quantification, tiled images of fusion or un-fused organoids were visualized in Photoshop (Adobe), a box of equal size was used to demarcate regions of interest on the outer edges of organoids, and total numbers of GAD65+ cells and Hoechst+ nuclei within the boxed region were manually tabulated. Synaptic puncta were identified and colocalized using Imaris image processing software (Bitplane) using the “spots” identifier, set to detect identically sized objects and thresholded against Hoechst staining to exclude any nuclear overlap. The native “colocalization” function on Imaris was used to identify overlapping puncta.
Live organoid calcium imaging
The genetically encoded calcium indicator GCaMP6f was introduced into organoids between day 88-95 via infection with 5 μl of 1.98×1013 GC ml−1 pAAV1.Syn.GCaMP6f.WPRE.SV40 virus46, a gift from Dr. Douglas Kim & the GENIE Project (Addgene viral prep # 100837-AAV1 or UPENN Vector core AV-1-PV2822). All imaging was performed 12-14 days after infection using a Scientifica two-photon microscope with a Coherent Chameleon tunable laser. Calcium transients were recorded at an excitation of 920 nm using a 20X 0.8NA water-immersion objective (Nikon) and at a frame rate of 31 Hz with 512 × 512- pixel resolution and 0.5 × 0.5 mm field of view. Recording was performed in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) as described below with additional 10mM HEPES to maintain a pH of 7.3-7.4 in the absence of O2/CO2 perfusion (see Extracellular Recording below for details). Following initial imaging in the absence of drugs, organoids were then subjected to 1-minute incubation with the GABAA receptor antagonist gabazine (25 μM) or bicuculline methiodide (100 μM) and the identical fields were re-imaged after drug exposure.
Microcircuit identification
Raw Ca2+ imaging files in tiff format were processed to identify fluorescence transients (ΔF/F0) and spike estimation in MATLAB (Mathworks Inc.) using the constrained non-negative matrix factorization-extended (CNMF-E) methodology20, 21. Following CNMF-E based data extraction neuronal microcircuit clusters were identified by performing hierarchical clustering on the correlation matrix of neuronal Ca2+ spiking data and analyzed based on Muldoon et al.33. The correlation between all pair-wise combinations of the time course of spikes for all neurons identified by CNMF-E was calculated to generate a correlation matrix. Following generation of the correlation matrix, linkage analysis was performed using the MATLAB linkage function from the statistics toolbox (with ‘complete’/furthest distance). The generated hierarchical clustering was input into the dendrogram function from the MATLAB statistics toolbox with ‘Color Threshold’ fixed at 1.5 for all experimental groups. By then assigning each neuron to a cluster determined by its assigned color in the dendrogram, clusters were created in which there was high correlation between all neurons in the cluster. In order to calculate the number of pairs of neurons that were significantly correlated within each dataset we first generated 1000 shuffled time courses for each neuron using MATLAB’s randperm function. Pairwise correlations for the randomly shuffled time courses were calculated in the same way as the original data, and a pair of neurons were considered correlated if their correlation coefficient in the original data was significantly different to the 1000 shuffled datasets with P < 0.05. To determine the threshold of simultaneous firing, the synchronization of the time shuffled data was calculated, and the threshold was set at the 99th percentile of synchronization in the shuffled data. Synchronization above this threshold was considered “synchronized”. These data were then plotted on a normalized y-axis ranging from 0 (no synchronizations) to 1 (100% synchronization) and time on the x-axis. The total number of synchronizations, average synchronization amplitude, and average synchronization duration were then tabulated.
Extracellular recordings
Organoids were recorded between age day ∼100-107. Live organoids were perfused with 500nM kainic acid in aCSF (containing in mM: NaCl 126, D-glucose 10, MgCl2 1.2, CaCl2 2, KCl 5, NaH2PO4 1.25, Na Pyruvate 1.5, L-Glutamine 1, NaHCO3 26, pH 7.3-7.4 when bubbled with 95% O2, 5% CO2) to initiate oscillatory network activity. LFP activity was recorded using a patch pipette filled with aCSF connected with a head stage to a field amplifier (A-M Systems Inc., model 3000), and band pass filtered between 0.1 and 1000 Hz by to an instrumentation amplifier (Brownlee BP Precision, model 210A). Field potentials were digitized at 4096 Hz with a National Instruments A/D board using EVAN (custom-designed LabView-based software from Thotec) and analyzed with custom procedures (Wavemetrics, Igor Pro 8). Lower frequency activity was visualized for 10-minute epochs using power spectral densities (PSDs), which were calculated using the “dsperiodogram” function of Igor Pro, and spectrograms, which were generated using the Gabor method on Igor Pro. High frequency activity up to 650 Hz was visualized by generating Morlet wavelet plots of 0.5-1.0 second epochs of the raw traces used for low frequency analyses. Inter-spike intervals and spike frequencies were tabulated on Igor Pro using the identical 10-minute epochs used above.
Statistical information
All samples were subject to Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality testing. Non-normal samples were analyzed by a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test or Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Normally distributed data were analyzed by a two-tailed Student’s t-test or ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Violin plots display the full distribution of individual data points with dotted lines to indicate the median and quartile values. Figure legends specify sample numbers and P values for all statistical tests. Each n represents an independent experiment. Table S1 specifies the number of non-contiguous sections imaged prior to selection of representative images. The n for all other representative images is specified in the figure legends.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files.
CODE AVAILABILITY
CNMF/CNMF-E has been previously published. CNMF_E is publicly available on Github at https://github.com/zhoupc/CNMF_E (6).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
R.A.S, O.A.M, A.K., and J.M.P. performed most of the organoid culture experiments and R.A.S. worked with others below on various analytical procedures. M.W., J.E.B., and B.G.N. assisted with the development of the organoid culture methods. B.G.N. assisted with imaging analysis. S.M. assisted R.A.S. in computational analysis of calcium indicator imaging experiments. I.F. and I.M. provided expertise in local field potential recording methods and data analysis. P.G. provided guidance in 2-photon calcium indicator imaging and computational methods. K.P and W.E.L. provided the Rett patient hiPSC used in the experiments. R.A.S., J.M.P., and B.G.N. conceived, designed, and supervised the experiments with helpful input from the other authors. R.A.S. and B.G.N. wrote the manuscript.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank S. Butler, T. Carmichael, and members of the Novitch lab for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript; J. Buth, N. Vishlaghi, and F. Turcios-Hernandez for technical assistance, and J. Lee, S.-K. Lee, H. Shinagawa, and K. Yoshikawa for valuable reagents. We also thank the UCLA Broad Stem Cell Research Center (BSCRC) and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center microscopy cores for access to imaging facilities. This work was supported by research awards from the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and BSCRC Ablon Scholars Program, the Dave Steffy Stem Cell Research Fund, the UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute, and grants from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) (DISC1-08819 to B.G.N.), the National Institute of Health (R01NS089817 and R01NS085227 to B.G.N.; R01NS088571 to J.M.P.; R01NS030549 and R01AG050474 to I.M.), the Paul Allen Family Foundation Frontiers Group to K.P. and W.E.L., and the March of Dimes Foundation to W.E.L. R.A.S. was supported by the UCLA/NINDS Translational Neuroscience Training Grant (R25NS065723), a Research and Training Fellowship from the American Epilepsy Society, and a training award from the UCLA BSCRC. M.W. was supported by postdoctoral training awards provided by the UCLA BSCRC and the Uehara Memorial Foundation, and a grant from the NICHD (K99HD096105). O.A.M. and A.K. were supported in part by the UCLA-California State University Northridge CIRM-Bridges training program (EDUC2-08411). We also acknowledge the support of the IDDRC Cells, Circuits and Systems Analysis, Microscopy and Genetics and Genomics Cores of the Semel Institute of Neuroscience at UCLA, which are supported by the NICHD (U54HD087101).