ABSTRACT
Background Recognition is growing that many ecological and evolutionary processes in animals are dependent upon microbial symbioses. Although there is much known about the ecology and evolution of spiders, the role of the microbiome in these processes remains mostly unknown. We conducted an exploratory study of the microbiome of a range-expanding spider, comparing between populations, individuals, and tissue types (leg, prosoma, hemolymph, book lungs, ovaries, silk glands, midgut, and fecal pellets). Our study is one of the very first to go beyond targeting known endosymbionts in spiders, and characterizes the total microbiome across different body compartments.
Results The microbiome of the wasp spider Argiope bruennichi is dominated by a novel bacterial symbiont, which is highly abundant in every tissue type in spiders from geographically distinct populations, and also present in offspring. The novel symbiont is affiliated with the Tenericutes, but has low sequence identity (<85%) to all previously named taxa. Furthermore, the microbiome differs significantly between populations and individuals, but not between tissue types.
Conclusions Low sequence identity to other bacteria suggests the novel symbiont represents a new bacterial clade, and its presence in offspring implies that it may be vertically transmitted. Our results shed light on the processes which shape microbiome differentiation in this species, and raise several questions about the implications of the novel dominant bacterial symbiont on the biology of its host.
Background
All multicellular life evolved from and with microbes. Consequently, the interactions between animals and microbes are not rare occurrences but rather fundamentally important aspects of animal biology, from development to systems ecology [1]. The holobiont, defined as a host and all of its symbionts, is considered as a unit of biological organization, upon which selection can act [2, 3]. The nature of the relationships between host and symbionts has been of intense interest in recent years; while some form obligatory, co-evolutionary symbioses [4–8], others are environmentally derived, and/or unstable and temporary [9, 10]. The collective of microbial symbionts and their environment within a certain host or tissue can also be referred to as a microbiome [11]. For example, the intensive research on the human microbiome of the last decade has shed light on many roles of the microbiome of different tissues in health and disease [12]. In addition, correlations have been found between the microbiome and a number of traits, across different levels of biological organization and states (from population-level [13] down to the level of tissue-specific microbiomes [12, 14], as well as across different age and disease states [15]).
A striking feature of the microbiomes of some hosts is the presence of microbial endosymbionts. Endosymbionts, which typically reside within the cells of their hosts, can play a major role in speciation in many organisms, through mechanisms such as assortative mating and reproductive isolation [16]. Wolbachia endosymbiont infections are highly prevalent in invertebrates [17, 18], where they can induce parthenogenesis, cause cytoplasmic incompatibility between uninfected and infected individuals, as well as affect host fecundity, fertility, and longevity [19, 20], and can affect the sex ratio of host species via feminization of males and male killing [21–23]. Non-Wolbachia (endo)symbiotic bacteria can also manipulate host physiology and behavior in diverse ways, from increasing heat tolerance in aphids [24] to determining egg-laying site preference in Drosophila melanogaster [25].
The function of a symbiont within its host is often predictive of its location within tissues. Wolbachia infections are often specifically located in reproductive tissues, but can also be distributed widely throughout somatic cells, depending on the host species [26, 27]. Beyond Wolbachia, many studies on bacterial symbionts have focused on blood- and sap-feeding insects; these specialist feeders require symbionts within their digestive tissues to assist in utilization of their nutrient-poor diets [4, 28–35]. Therefore, endosymbiont, and thus microbiome composition, can vary widely between tissue types and organ systems.
Among arthropods, insects have been the primary focus of microbiome studies. In comparison, investigations into the microbiome of spiders are scarce but suggest that spiders host diverse assemblages of bacteria, some of which alter their physiology and behavior. In a survey of eight spider species from 6 different families, in which DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) was extracted from the whole body, putative endosymbionts dominated the microbiome of all species [36]. The endosymbionts discovered (assumed by the authors to be endosymbionts of the spiders, not endosymbionts of their insect prey) were largely reproductive parasites, including Wolbachia, Cardinium, Rickettsia, Spiroplasma, and Rickettsiella, which corresponds to the findings on other spider species across families [37–39]. The non-endosymbiont bacterial taxa were typical insect gut microbes, which could be nutritional symbionts of the spiders or represent the microbiome of prey the spiders consumed. As to the effect of endosymbionts on spider hosts, relatively little is known. Wolbachia has been shown to bias the sex ratio in the dwarf spider Oedothorax gibbosus [40], and Rickettsia infection changed the dispersal probability of another dwarf spider species, Erigone atra [41]. The abundance of Rhabdochlamydia was found to vary with population and with sex (higher infection rate in females than males) in Oedothorax gibbosus [39]. The studies mentioned above have focused on endosymbionts alone. It has not yet been investigated whether there are intraspecific differences in the total (endosymbiont and non-endosymbiont) microbial community between different spider populations, the composition of the microbiome in certain tissue types or whether there is vertical transmission of the microbiome in spiders.
Argiope bruennichi (Scopoli, 1772), an orb-weaving spider with a Palearctic distribution [42], is an ideal candidate for a pioneering microbiome study, given the wealth of knowledge that exists on the biology of the species and the genus Argiope [43]. It has been the subject of many studies due to a number of interesting traits, such as sexual dimorphism and sexual cannibalism (i.e. [44–46]), and its recent and rapid range expansion within Europe [42, 47–50]. Since spider dispersal behavior can also be affected by endosymbiont infection [41], and dispersal behavior influences the rate of range expansion, the microbiome might play a role in the rapid range expansion of A. bruennichi. Although some studies on A. bruennichi have used targeted approaches to look for specific reproductive parasites, finding none [38, 51], a holistic approach to investigating the microbiome of A. bruennichi has not been carried out to date. In the present study, we investigate the total bacterial community of A. bruennichi from geographically distant but genetically similar populations in Germany and Estonia, asking the following questions: (1) does A. bruennichi possess a multi-species microbiome? (2) If so, are there population-level differences in the microbiome? (3) Are specific microbes localized in certain tissues? And (4) is the microbiome vertically transmitted?
Results
Illumina amplicon sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S SSU rRNA (small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid) gene of six adult spiders (eight tissue types each) and two spiderling samples from two locations resulted in 5.2 million reads with an arithmetic mean of 90,377 reads per sample (min = 711 max = 981,405). 86.8% of total raw reads passed quality filtering and chimera removal. Chimeras counted for less than 0.5% of all reads. After removing samples with low sequencing depth (less than 4,000 reads), and then sequences with high abundance in negative controls (more than 50 reads in control samples), 1.77 million reads remained, with an average of 41,182 reads per sample (min = 477 max = 629,137). In total, post-filtering, 574 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were detected in the tissues and spider populations.
A bacterial symbiont in Argiope bruennichi
The microbiome of A. bruennichi was dominated by a single ASV, making up 84.56% of all filtered reads (Figure 1). This ASV had less than 85% identity to any sequence in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database. Long read sequencing of two samples generated a near full length 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence corresponding to the dominant ASV which allowed us to further investigate the identity of this dominant symbiont (Table 1). All low-similarity matches originated from environmental samples and uncultured microbes. There was no match to a named taxon, making it difficult to classify the sequence taxonomically. An exploratory gene tree (Figure 2) placed the sequence within the Tenericutes, which are gram negative, cell-associated bacteria, which have lost their cell walls [52]. We refer to this dominant unknown symbiont as DUSA (Dominant Unknown Symbiont of Argiope bruennichi) henceforth.
After filtering, 573 additional ASVs were detected in the samples, the majority of which were assigned to seven bacterial classes: Actinobacteria (75 ASVs), Alphaproteobacteria (96 ASVs), Bacilli (60 ASVs), Bacteroidea (49 ASVs), Clostridia (84 ASVs), Gammaproteobacteria (115 ASVs), and Mollicutes (3 ASVs). Details of the ASVs in these most abundant classes can be found in Additional File 1. ASVs with the highest abundance (more than 500 reads post-filtering), other than DUSA, were identified as the genera Mesoplasma (Mollicutes: Entomoplasmatales: Entomoplasmataceae), Acinetobacter (Gammaproteobacteria: Pseudomonadales; Moraxellaceae), Micrococcus (Actinobacteria: Micrococcales: Micrococcaceae), Frigoribacterium (Actinobacteria: Micrococcales: Microbacteriaceae), and Alcaligenes (Gammaproteobacteria: Betaproteobacteriales: Burkholderiaceae). Archaea were not detected.
Tissue localization and population differentiation
With DUSA excluded from the analysis, tissue types did not differ significantly in microbiome community composition (PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.180, p = 0.366). However, microbiome community composition varied significantly between populations (PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.045, p < 0.01) and individuals (PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.059, p < 0.001). The interaction between individual and population was also significant (PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.044, p < 0.01) (Figure 3).
With DUSA included in the analysis, the results were similar but p- and R2-values were slightly different: tissue type: PERMANOVA R2 = 0.231, p = 0.131; population: PERMANOVA R2 = 0.039, p < 0.1; individual: PERMANOVA R2 = 0.040, p < 0.1; interaction of individual and population: PERMANOVA R2 = 0.057, p < 0.05.
Vertical transmission
Juvenile spider (spiderling) samples also hosted bacterial sequences; in fact, they were dominated by DUSA (Figure 1). Other bacterial classes made up less than 6% of the filtered reads in spiderlings from Germany, and less than 0.001% of reads in spiderlings from Estonia.
Discussion
An unknown symbiont dominates the Argiope bruennichi microbiome
We have demonstrated that A. bruennichi spiders contain a multi-species microbiome, answering the first of our research questions. However, the A. bruennichi microbiome is dominated by an unknown symbiont sequence (DUSA). DUSA likely represents a novel bacterial clade, due to the low sequence identity to known taxa [53]. A robust evolutionary placement is not possible without further genomic analysis; however, our gene tree suggests that it is likely a close relative or member of the Tenericutes. Due to this placement within the Tenericutes, DUSA may have similar attributes to other arthropod-associated symbionts in the phylum. The Mollicutes, a class within Tenericutes, contain a number of species known to be associated with arthropods. These mollicute species are generally endosymbiotic, and are vertically transmitted [54, 55]. Their effects on hosts are diverse: some are pathogenic [56], while others increase host fitness under parasitism [57], or form nutritional mutualisms via nutrient recycling [55]. In such close symbioses, the endosymbiont genomes usually evolve much faster than free-living species [58–61]. This tendency toward rapid evolution of endosymbionts may explain the low 16S rRNA sequence similarity to other bacteria in the database and would suggest that DUSA forms a close relationship, such as endosymbiosis, with the spider host.
Of the three mollicute ASVs detected in our samples, two were assigned to the genus Spiroplasma, but were detected in very low abundance. The third was assigned to the genus Mesoplasma, and was the second-most abundant ASV in our study. It was only found to be abundant in German spiders, and primarily in midgut and fecal pellet samples from a single individual. If this Mesoplasma ASV would be a facultative nutritional symbiont of the spider (i.e. [54, 55] for Mesoplasma in insects), we would expect it to be present in most investigated members of a species or population. Alternatively, it could be a symbiont of the spider prey, which is more likely since Mesoplasma and its relatives are very common symbionts of insects [37, 54, 55, 62, 63]. Considering that Mesoplasma was found only in the midgut and fecal pellets, it can be assumed that it is prey-derived and its presence within the host is transient.
The Argiope bruennichi microbiome varies between individuals and populations, but not between tissues
Our analysis of the microbial community composition of tissue types, individuals, and populations shows that there is high variability between all samples. Because the A. bruennichi microbiome is dominated by DUSA, the other ASVs had lower sequencing coverage, which could contribute to the variability. Despite this, we found significant differences between individuals and between populations, thereby answering our second research question. It could be that the microbiome (excluding DUSA) of these spiders is transient and taken up from the environment, and especially from their diet, as is the case in some insects [9]. For instance, across many butterfly species, the larval microbiome largely reflects the microbiome of the food plant’s leaves [10]. To test the hypothesis of a partly prey derived microbiome for A. bruennichi, future studies could sequence both the microbial and prey communities, by combining the methods used in our study with gut content sequencing, as described in [64]. Different prey communities between populations and individuals (at the time of sampling) could lead to the differences observed in our study.
We found no significant differences in the microbial community between tissue types, with or without DUSA included in the analysis, addressing our third research question. Although endosymbiont infections are often localized within reproductive tissues, which could lead to tissue differentiation [26, 27], infection of somatic tissues may facilitate horizontal transfer of a symbiont: through feces, as in the Triatomid bug vectors of Chagas’ disease [65], or to parasites, as in the case of a Nasonia wasp and its fly host [66]. There are also cases of symbionts that live primarily in insect hemolymph and are thus found in all tissues [67, 68]. Tissue differentiation could also arise in the presence of nutritional symbionts in the gut of a host, but no study has explicitly tested this in spiders. Additionally, there are no reported cases of nutritional symbionts in spiders. If there are differences between organ systems in A. bruennichi, they are too subtle be detected with the current sample size.
Evidence of vertical transmission of DUSA?
We analyzed the microbiome of spiderlings to address our fourth research question, whether the microbiome of A. bruennichi is vertically transmitted. Our data suggest that at least DUSA is indeed vertically transmitted. Spiderling samples contained a high abundance of DUSA reads, and few other ASVs. Spiderlings could recruit bacteria from the environment or from their mothers via different avenues. Environmental colonization could possibly occur before or after the closing of the silken egg sac, in the moments between oviposition and encasement in silk, or by passing through the tough outer case (see Methods section for a description of A. bruennichi egg sac components). We consider these environmental avenues to be unlikely, given the extremely short amount of time that the eggs are exposed to the environment before encasement (M.M. Sheffer, G. Uhl, personal observation), and because A. bruennichi egg sac silk is extremely dense and egg sac silk of other spider species has been shown to inhibit growth of bacteria [69]. Vertical transmission of bacteria from mother to offspring could occur while the eggs are in the ovaries, or by deposition during the egg-laying process. We consider vertical transmission to be the most likely avenue for bacterial presence within spiderling tissue, supported by the low diversity of bacteria found in spiderling samples, and the presence of DUSA in female ovaries. Whether transmission occurs before or after egg laying could be tested using fluorescence in situ hybridization to visualize DUSA in or on eggs.
Implications for future studies of Argiope bruennichi and beyond
The presence of an endosymbiont might explain the incongruence between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers found by a study investigating the phylogeographic history of A. bruennichi [42]. The authors offered three possible explanations for this result: male-biased dispersal, selection on mitochondria, or reproductive parasites (e.g. Wolbachia spp.). The authors considered the last explanation the least likely, as no previous study had identified Wolbachia spp. or other reproductive parasites in A. bruennichi [37, 42, 51]. However, these studies targeted a handful of known reproductive parasites using specific primers and PCR (polymerase chain reaction) assays [37, 51], which excluded the possibility of discovering any novel symbionts. Given our discovery of DUSA, the hypothesis that infection with reproductive parasites caused incongruence between molecular markers in A. bruennichi should be revisited. To that end, future efforts should focus on characterizing DUSA, for example by in-depth genomic analysis to determine its phylogenetic placement, as well as by exploring its distribution across the host species’ range and its localization and functions inside the host. Further investigation could illuminate whether the relationship between A. bruennichi and DUSA is pathogenic, commensal, or mutualistic. Importantly, the presence and/or absence of DUSA in other spider or insect species should be explored, perhaps thereby providing clues into the origin of this novel symbiosis.
Our study adds to a growing body of literature suggesting that bacterial symbionts, especially endosymbionts, play an important role in spider biology. Two other recent studies that surveyed the microbiomes of several spider species found putative endosymbiotic taxa to be both prevalent (70% of surveyed individuals [70]) and dominant within certain hosts (>90% of bacterial reads [36, 71]). We demonstrate in addition that spiders are a source of novel symbiont taxa, which make them interesting targets for discoveries of new types of symbiotic interactions that may impact host biology in yet unimaginable ways. Several unique aspects of spider biology make them particularly exciting for studying symbiosis. For example, their predatory lifestyle offers ample opportunities for symbiont taxa from their prey to enter the spider host, in some cases giving rise to new stable associations. In addition, spiders employ external digestion by secreting digestive fluids into their prey, which sets them apart from the internal digestive systems of most insect hosts that have until now been the subject of (endo)symbiosis research. For now, the implications of these peculiarities for symbiotic interactions between spiders and bacteria is unchartered territory, opening up promising new research avenues on symbiosis.
Conclusion
Our study is the first to look into the localization of microbial symbionts in spider tissues. The principle discovery is that of a novel symbiont, which was found to dominate the microbiome of all individuals and tissue types investigated. Its characteristics, such as low sequence identity to other bacteria and possible vertical transmission, suggest that it may belong to a novel clade of bacterial endosymbionts, with a tight association to its host. Although inference is limited by sample size, our findings highlight the need for more holistic microbiome studies across many organisms, which will increase our knowledge of the diversity of symbiotic relationships.
Methods
Sample collection
For this study, mature female Argiope bruennichi were collected for two purposes: first, for dissection into different tissue types, and second, to produce offspring. The females used for dissection came from two sites: one in Germany (Greifswald: 54.11 N, 13.48 E; n = 3), and one site in Estonia (Pärnu: 58.30 N, 24.60 E; n = 3). The females which produced offspring came from two sites (Plech, Germany: 49.65 N, 11.47 E; n = 1; Pärnu, Estonia: 58.30 N, 24.60 E; n = 1) and were maintained in the lab until they produced an egg sac. It is important to note that A. bruennichi females lay their eggs into a simple egg sac, which is then wrapped in a silk casing consisting of two layers: one “fluffy” silk layer, and one tough outer layer [72]. Eggs hatch within the first weeks, but the juvenile spiders, “spiderlings,” remain in the egg sac for several months over winter [72]. The spiderlings, which hatched from the egg sacs produced in the lab, were preserved in the silk casing in the freezer until the day of DNA extraction for microbiome analysis.
Sample preparation
Three adult specimens each from Greifswald and Pärnu were dissected within two days of collection, and the spiders were not fed between the point of collection and dissection. Before dissection, the spiders were anaesthetized using CO2, after which the prosoma and opisthosoma were separated using sterilized scissors. A 10 μl sample of hemolymph was immediately taken from the aorta at the point of separation with a sterile pipette. Next, the legs were removed and a single leg was taken as a sample and stored separately from the whole prosoma. Sterilized forceps were used for dissection of the opisthosoma. The cuticle was removed dorsally, and a sample of the midgut was taken from the dorsal side and stored. The cuticle was then cut ventrally, between the epigynum and the spinnerets. The two cuticular flaps were pulled to loosen the internal organs, and the digestive tubules were teased apart to reveal the rest of the organs. The major ampullate silk glands, which produce structural and dragline silk and are the largest and easiest to remove of all the silk glands [73–76], were removed and stored. Then, a sample of the ovaries was removed and stored. Removal of the ovaries revealed the cloaca, and existing fecal pellets and the surrounding fluid in the cloaca were sampled using a sterile pipette. Finally, the book lungs were removed and stored. All tissue samples were stored in sterile tubes and frozen until the time of DNA extraction.
For the spiderling samples, one egg sac each from Plech and Pärnu was opened with sterilized forceps, and 5 spiderlings were placed directly into phenol-chloroform for DNA extraction.
DNA Extraction and Illumina Amplicon Sequencing
DNA was extracted from tissue samples using a phenol-chloroform extraction protocol, as described in [77]. Mechanical lysis was performed via bead beating in a FastPrep 24 5G (MP Biomedicals) with FastPrep Lysing Matrix E. A fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified from the extracted DNA with a primer pair recommended by the Earth Microbiome Project, targeting the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene [515f: 50-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-30, 806r: 50-GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT-30 [78]] coupled to custom adaptor-barcode constructs. PCR amplification and Illumina MiSeq library preparation and sequencing (V3 chemistry) was carried out by LGC Genomics in Berlin. Sequences have been submitted to the NCBI short read archive, and can be found under the BioProject number PRJNA577547, accession numbers SAMN13028533- SAMN13028590.
In addition, PacBio long-read SMRT (single molecule real-time) sequencing of almost full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicons was performed for two of the samples (a prosoma extract from a German spider and a spiderling extract from Estonian spiderlings). For this, ~1500 bp amplicons were amplified using the primers Ba27f (AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG), and Ba1492r (CGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT) tailed with PacBio universal sequencing adapters (universal tags) in a first round of PCR with 25 cycles. After PCR product purification, a second round of PCR was done with distinct barcoded universal F/R primers as provided by the manufacturer (PacBio, Menlo Park, CA). SMRTbell Library preparation and SMRT sequencing on a PacBio Sequel System was also done according to manufacturer instructions. Approximately 20 barcoded amplicons were multiplexed per SMRT cell. Initial processing of SMRT reads and exporting of CCS (circular consensus sequencing) data was done with the SMRT Link analysis software as recommended by the manufacturer. Raw reads are available on the NCBI short read archive, and can be found under the BioProject number PRJNA577547, accession number SAMN13046638.
The resulting sequences were clustered and consensus sequences derived using IsoCon [79]. The DUSA sequence was identified by comparing the short V4 amplicon with the SMRT IsoCon consensus sequences and choosing the sequence with the highest match.
Sequence Processing
Sequences clipped from adaptor and primer sequence remains were received from the LGC Genomics sequencing facility, and then processed using the DADA2 (Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm 2) package in R [Version 1.6.0 [80]] [81]. The R script used for sequence processing can be found in Additional File 2. Forward and reverse Illumina reads were simultaneously filtered and truncated to 200 bp. Error rates were estimated using the maximum possible error estimate from the data as a first guess. Sample sequences were de-multiplexed and unique sequences were inferred using the core denoising algorithm in the DADA2 R package. Following sample inference, paired forward and reverse reads were merged. Chimeric sequences accounted for less than 0.5% of the total sequence reads and were removed using the removeBimeraDenovo function. Taxonomic classification was performed using the DADA2 package’s implementation of the RDP’s naïve Bayesian classifier [82], with a minimum bootstrap confidence of 50, drawing from the Silva database [83]. The resulting unique amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) with taxonomic classification were used to build a table containing relative abundances of ASVs across all samples.
Data Analysis and Visualization
To control for possible contamination during the process of extraction and sequencing, given low DNA yield from some tissue types, a control extraction using sterile water was performed alongside each extraction. These negative controls were included in the sequencing run. A series of cutoffs were employed as quality control on the relative abundance table. First, samples with low sequencing depth (less than 4000 reads) were removed. Then, the data was strictly filtered to remove any ASVs found in extraction blanks (with an abundance of 50 reads or more). After the removal of those possible contaminants, another sequencing depth cutoff was enforced, removing samples with less than 400 reads.
ASVs were aggregated by bacterial class to obtain an overview of the microbiome. Low-abundance classes (less than 1000 reads total, meaning less than 0.1% of filtered reads) were aggregated into a category called “Other.” The relative abundance of each class was then visualized in the form of pie charts using the ggplot2 package [84] in R.
To test for and visualize dissimilarity in ASV composition between tissue types, sampling sites and individuals, non-metric multidimensional scaling was performed on Hellinger-transformed sequence variant counts using Bray-Curtis distance, implemented in the vegan package (vegan function ‘metaMDS’) [version 2.5-1 [85]] in R. Explanatory power of tissue type, sampling site, and individual was calculated using a PERMANOVA test (vegan function ‘adonis’). This analysis was done on filtered reads, once with the most dominant ASV (DUSA) excluded due to its overwhelming influence on the data, which might mask the patterns of the rest of the bacterial community, and once with DUSA included. The R script used for filtering, statistical analysis, and data visualization of the 16S amplicon sequences can be found in Additional File 3.
The almost-full length 16S rRNA gene sequence of DUSA generated by SMRT amplicon sequencing was compared to that of well-known endosymbiotic bacterial taxa retrieved from Silva and GenBank, along with two archaeal sequences as an outgroup. The sequences were aligned using ClustalW implemented in MEGA [86, 87], and a consensus tree was calculated using IQ-TREE [88] with 5000 bootstrap iterations. The consensus tree was visualized using FigTree [89]. For clarity of visualization, branches were collapsed by phylum for distant taxa and by genus for Tenericutes; for an un-collapsed tree of the Tenericutes and all accession numbers see Additional Files 4 and 5.
List of abbreviations
- ASV
- Amplicon Sequence Variant
- CCS
- Circular Consensus Sequencing
- DADA2
- Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm 2
- DNA
- Deoxyribonucleic Acid
- DUSA
- Dominant Unknown Symbiont of Argiope bruennichi
- NCBI
- National Center for Biotechnology Information
- PacBio
- Pacific Biosciences
- PCR
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- rRNA
- ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid
- SMRT
- Single Molecule Real-Time
- SSU
- Small Subunit
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
16S SSU rRNA and PacBio SMRT sequencing data are available at the NCBI Short Read Archive, under the BioProject number PRJNA577547 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA577547).
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in online repositories and as Additional Files; raw sequences can be downloaded at https://figshare.com/s/24d2c1ccc68637c5b519 and can be processed using the R script included in this article (Additional File 2). The files generated post-sequence processing, which were used for statistical analysis and data visualization (using the R script in Additional File 3) can be downloaded at https://figshare.com/s/dfc0b9ad60dbabd0e69b.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
Funding for this study was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as part of the Research Training Group 2010 RESPONSE.
Authors’ contributions
GU, MMB, and TU conceived of the study. MMS and GU collected and dissected the samples; MMS performed the laboratory work and drafted the manuscript. MMS and MMB performed the 16S SSU rRNA sequence processing and data analysis. TL and SP assisted MMS with the generation (TL) and analysis (SP) of the PacBio amplicon for the gene tree. All authors read, contributed to, and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We thank Susanne Kublik of the Microbiome Analysis Core Facility of the Helmholtz Zentrum München for her valuable expertise and support in SMRT sequencing, Philip O.M. Steinhoff for early comments on the manuscript, and Sebastian Petters for advice in the lab.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- 42.↵
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.
- 49.
- 50.↵
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.
- 60.
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.↵
- 64.↵
- 65.↵
- 66.↵
- 67.↵
- 68.↵
- 69.↵
- 70.↵
- 71.↵
- 72.↵
- 73.↵
- 74.
- 75.
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵
- 80.↵
- 81.↵
- 82.↵
- 83.↵
- 84.↵
- 85.↵
- 86.↵
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.↵