Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Efference copy is necessary for the attenuation of self-generated touch

View ORCID ProfileKonstantina Kilteni, Patrick Engeler, H. Henrik Ehrsson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/823575
Konstantina Kilteni
1Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Konstantina Kilteni
  • For correspondence: konstantina.kilteni@ki.se
Patrick Engeler
1Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Henrik Ehrsson
1Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

A self-generated touch feels less intense than an external touch of the exact same intensity. According to a prevalent computational theory of motor control, this attenuation occurs because the brain uses internal forward models to predict the somatosensory consequences of our movements using a copy of the motor command, i.e., the efference copy. These tactile predictions are then used to suppress the perceived intensity of the actual tactile feedback. Despite being highly influential, the core assumption of theory has never been tested; that is, whether the efference copy is necessary for somatosensory attenuation. A possible alternative hypothesis is that a predictable contact of two of one’s own body parts is sufficient. Using a psychophysical task, we quantified the attenuation of touch applied on the participants’ left index finger when the touch was triggered by the active or passive movement of the participants’ right index finger and when it was externally generated in the absence of any movement. We observed somatosensory attenuation only when the touch was triggered by the voluntary movement of the participants’ finger. In contrast, during the passive movement, the intensity of the touch was perceived to be as strong as when the touch was externally triggered. In both active and passive movement conditions, the participants showed the same discrimination capacity. Electromyographic recordings confirmed minimal activity of the right hand during the passive movement. Together, our results suggest that the efference copy is necessary for computing the somatosensory predictions that produce the attenuation of self-generated touch.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 30, 2019.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efference copy is necessary for the attenuation of self-generated touch
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Efference copy is necessary for the attenuation of self-generated touch
Konstantina Kilteni, Patrick Engeler, H. Henrik Ehrsson
bioRxiv 823575; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/823575
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Efference copy is necessary for the attenuation of self-generated touch
Konstantina Kilteni, Patrick Engeler, H. Henrik Ehrsson
bioRxiv 823575; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/823575

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2518)
  • Biochemistry (4968)
  • Bioengineering (3473)
  • Bioinformatics (15185)
  • Biophysics (6886)
  • Cancer Biology (5380)
  • Cell Biology (7717)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4521)
  • Ecology (7135)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10210)
  • Genetics (7503)
  • Genomics (9772)
  • Immunology (4825)
  • Microbiology (13185)
  • Molecular Biology (5129)
  • Neuroscience (29368)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (836)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1461)
  • Physiology (2131)
  • Plant Biology (4738)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1008)
  • Synthetic Biology (1337)
  • Systems Biology (4003)
  • Zoology (768)