Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Cerebellar patients have intact feedback control that can be leveraged to improve reaching

View ORCID ProfileAmanda M. Zimmet, View ORCID ProfileAmy J. Bastian, View ORCID ProfileNoah J. Cowan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/827113
Amanda M. Zimmet
aJohns Hopkins University Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue / Ross 720, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
bKennedy Krieger Institute, 707 N. Broadway St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amanda M. Zimmet
Amy J. Bastian
bKennedy Krieger Institute, 707 N. Broadway St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
cJohns Hopkins University Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, 1003 Wood Basic Science Building, 725 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amy J. Bastian
  • For correspondence: ncowan@jhu.edu
Noah J. Cowan
dJohns Hopkins University Department of Mechanical Engineering, 223 Latrobe Hall, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Noah J. Cowan
  • For correspondence: ncowan@jhu.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

It is thought that the brain does not simply react to sensory feedback, but rather uses an internal model of the body to predict the consequences of motor commands before sensory feedback arrives. Time-delayed sensory feedback can then be used to correct for the unexpected—perturbations, motor noise, or a moving target. The cerebellum has been implicated in this predictive control process, as cerebellar damage leads to deficits in movement control (e.g. poor targeting, oscillation) that are reminiscent of a poorly tuned control system. Here we show that the feedback gain in patients with cerebellar ataxia matches that of healthy subjects, but that patients exhibit substantially more phase lag. This difference is captured by a computational model incorporating a Smith predictor in healthy subjects that is missing in patients, supporting the predictive role of the cerebellum in feedback control. Lastly, we improve cerebellar patients’ movement control by altering (phase advancing) the visual feedback they receive from their own self movement in a simplified virtual reality setup.

Footnotes

  • * these authors jointly supervised this work

  • amandazimmet{at}gmail.com, bastian{at}kennedykrieger.org, ncowan{at}jhu.edu

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 01, 2019.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cerebellar patients have intact feedback control that can be leveraged to improve reaching
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cerebellar patients have intact feedback control that can be leveraged to improve reaching
Amanda M. Zimmet, Amy J. Bastian, Noah J. Cowan
bioRxiv 827113; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/827113
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Cerebellar patients have intact feedback control that can be leveraged to improve reaching
Amanda M. Zimmet, Amy J. Bastian, Noah J. Cowan
bioRxiv 827113; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/827113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2518)
  • Biochemistry (4968)
  • Bioengineering (3473)
  • Bioinformatics (15185)
  • Biophysics (6886)
  • Cancer Biology (5380)
  • Cell Biology (7718)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4521)
  • Ecology (7135)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10211)
  • Genetics (7504)
  • Genomics (9774)
  • Immunology (4826)
  • Microbiology (13186)
  • Molecular Biology (5130)
  • Neuroscience (29368)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (836)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1461)
  • Physiology (2131)
  • Plant Biology (4738)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1008)
  • Synthetic Biology (1337)
  • Systems Biology (4003)
  • Zoology (768)